Re: [NetBehaviour] furtherfield on wikipedia

2008-12-14 Thread marc garrett
Hi Helen Eduardo, Thanks Eduardo for the link, I forgot about this one... It has been rather infuriating, yet an obvious obstacle in respect of the circumstances of certain people putting their energy in following the more traditional paths laid out already there, rather than forging

Re: [NetBehaviour] furtherfield on wikipedia

2008-12-13 Thread Eduardo Navas
Hello everyone, I must admit that I don't completely understand why the page would have been proposed for deletion in the first place. I know of page stubs that are fillers and stay on until someone decides to add content to it. The citations are valid enough, as far as I can tell, to show the

Re: [NetBehaviour] furtherfield on wikipedia

2008-12-13 Thread helen varley jamieson
thanks, eduardo, i've now added that reference, have boldly reinstated it as an article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furtherfield the original reason for deletion was given as: I just went through 20 pages of Google and couldn't find a single non-trivial article on the subject. It's written

Re: [NetBehaviour] Furtherfield on wikipedia

2008-11-26 Thread Rob Myers
Here is the discussion page for the original deletion - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Furtherfield Here are the notability criteria for web sites - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WEB We need to assemble examples of mentions of Furtherfield in web, media

Re: [NetBehaviour] Furtherfield on wikipedia

2008-11-26 Thread Alessandro Ludovico
hi everyone, some time ago i created a page on wikipedia for furtherfield. this was deleted, i don't know why, so i've recreated it tried to be more thorough with references etc. the new page is now here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furtherfield i'm sure there's a lot more that can be added to

Re: [NetBehaviour] Furtherfield on wikipedia

2008-11-26 Thread Rob Myers
The major thing that is needed is national (UK) and international news and book coverage of Furtherfield. So the Neural articles are great. BBC bio ref: http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/shootinglive/2003/completelyfurther/biog.shtml http://www.bbc.co.uk/arts/shootinglive/2003/completelyfurther/ Mute

Re: [NetBehaviour] Furtherfield on wikipedia

2008-11-26 Thread helen varley jamieson
bloody hell - it was deleted it again yesterday immediately after i reposted it! (luckily i saved it offline ...). they've also deleted the UpStage page which i had redone (even tho it is my own project - but it was recommended in the cyberformance deletion discussion then no-one seemed to be

Re: [NetBehaviour] Furtherfield on wikipedia

2008-11-26 Thread marc garrett
3 more gr's... marc bloody hell - it was deleted it again yesterday immediately after i reposted it! (luckily i saved it offline ...). they've also deleted the UpStage page which i had redone (even tho it is my own project - but it was recommended in the cyberformance deletion

Re: [NetBehaviour] Furtherfield on wikipedia

2008-11-25 Thread Patrick Lichty
what is it with those people, first the one, then this... H I'm sure it;s just net.oddness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi everyone, some time ago i created a page on wikipedia for furtherfield. this was deleted, i don't know why, so i've recreated it tried to be more thorough

Re: [NetBehaviour] Furtherfield on wikipedia

2008-11-25 Thread marc garrett
so will you help us out Patrick? marc what is it with those people, first the one, then this... H I'm sure it;s just net.oddness [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi everyone, some time ago i created a page on wikipedia for furtherfield. this was deleted, i don't know why, so