yep this is a tedious process that some of us on this list had to go
thru a few years ago, with entries for furtherfield, cyberformance
UpStage. it was pretty frustrating the process for getting things
undeleted working out the wikipedia rules processes was pretty
circular. but in the end
wikipedia gets gazillions of hits but it's free for all. yet is clearly not
a free-for-all concerning its internal processes. an interesting
'architecture'. re simon and 'social media'.
one wonders what has kept it being free for all. because in some ways it's
worth millions of dollars.
the
Most students use Wikipedia, avoid telling profs about it.
By Jacqui Cheng.
Surprise! Most students use Wikipedia at some point during their
research on a paper or project, and they usually do so early on in the
process. Online peer-reviewed journal First Monday recently published
the
distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: [NetBehaviour] Most students use Wikipedia, avoid telling profs
about it.
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:29:45 +
Most students use Wikipedia, avoid telling profs about it.
By Jacqui Cheng.
Surprise! Most students use Wikipedia at some point
...@netbehaviour.org%3e
*Subject*: [NetBehaviour] Most students use Wikipedia, avoid telling
profs about it.
*Date*: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:29:45 +
Most students use Wikipedia, avoid telling profs about it.
By Jacqui Cheng.
Surprise! Most students use Wikipedia at some point during their
research
: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:56:44 +
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Most students use Wikipedia, avoid telling profs
about it.
if this is really true the profs need to wise-up.
Wikipedia is a great first stop for research
creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Most students use Wikipedia, avoid telling profs
about it.
I think most Profs are fully aware that students use Wikipedia. I would
hazard a guess (in fact I wouldn't I know for a fact) that lot of the
material
On 19/03/10 07:52, Simon Biggs wrote:
It is no big deal for the student to find a useful reference. Most
Wikipedia
entries cite sources. Many of these sources are accessible on line,
through
Google books, Project Gutenberg or Amazon. If not then there are these
places called libraries...
and point you at the original
sources of material.
t.
--- On Fri, 19/3/10, Simon Biggs s.bi...@eca.ac.uk wrote:
From: Simon Biggs s.bi...@eca.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Most students use Wikipedia, avoid telling profs
about it.
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 15:27:23 + (GMT)
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Most students use Wikipedia, avoid telling profs
about it.
I agree with Simon, for academic purposes you of course
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Most students use Wikipedia, avoid
telling profs about it.
I think most Profs are fully aware that students use Wikipedia.
I would hazard a guess (in fact I wouldn't I know for a fact
i recently attempted to put an article about an important contemporary
artist on wikipedia. it was repeatedly deleted by 'bearcat'. he said the
artist wasn't notable enough to merit inclusion in wikipedia. i cited
articles about him in the guardian and nytimes, and books in which his work
is
On Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:14:45 -0700, Jim Andrews j...@vispo.com wrote:
i recently attempted to put an article about an important contemporary
artist on wikipedia. it was repeatedly deleted by 'bearcat'. he said the
artist wasn't notable enough to merit inclusion in wikipedia. i cited
Subject: Re: [NetBehaviour] Most students use Wikipedia, avoid telling profs
about it.
To: NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity
netbehaviour@netbehaviour.org
Date: Friday, 19 March, 2010, 15:39
From my experience, I'd suggest that nowadays most professors also use
Wikipedia - they're
keep at em..:)
On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Jim Andrews j...@vispo.com wrote:
Bearcat is clearly a deletionist. They are a real problem, and not just
for well-referenced notable articles about art. They are convinced (and
convince each other) that they are making Wikipedia better
15 matches
Mail list logo
