Hi,
On Sat, 20 Feb 2016, Hitoshi Mitake wrote:
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> At Sat, 06 Feb 2016 10:05:51 +0100,
> Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >
> > David Miller writes:
> >
> > > From: Robert Jarzmik
> > > Date: Fri, 05 Feb 2016 22:44:56 +0100
> > >
> > >>
anyone have debugging ideas? Is there a description somewhere how an
incoming packet traverses the networking stack in such a setup?
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D
-
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH
Pascalstr. 28
D-52076 Aachen
Germany
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH
Pascalstr. 28
D-52076 Aachen
Germany
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo
also
fixing ATM - the one in the state machine. So, unrelated.
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 03:24:05PM +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
in irttp_dup() (remember spinlock_init()?:-)), otherwise it oopses.
good catch, again...Yes, I do remember the irttp_dup bug ;-)
I've put a tsap_init
;
- }
+ schedule_work(self-irnet_flow_work);
/* Reset lock */
self-tx_queue_lock = 0;
-
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH
Pascalstr. 28
D-52076 Aachen
Germany
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
.
Thanks
Guennadi
-
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH
Pascalstr. 28
D-52076 Aachen
Germany
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http
-
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
DSA Daten- und Systemtechnik GmbH
Pascalstr. 28
D-52076 Aachen
Germany
ftp D [c3c9e460] C01E5838 0 18445 1 20756 14588
(L-TLB)
[c01e5420] (__schedule+0x0/0x7e8) from [c01e5cfc] (schedule+0x54/0x124)
[c01e5ca8] (schedule+0x0/0x124) from
Ok, a simple analysis reveals the recursive spinlock:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
[bf12b220] (ppp_channel_push+0x0/0xc8 [ppp_generic]) from [bf12bf98]
(ppp_output_wakeup+0x18/0x1c [ppp_generic])
===
r7 = C38F42BC r6 = C38F4200 r5 = C38F4200
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Ok, a simple analysis reveals the recursive spinlock:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2007, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
[bf12b220] (ppp_channel_push+0x0/0xc8 [ppp_generic]) from [bf12bf98]
(ppp_output_wakeup+0x18/0x1c [ppp_generic
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Jeff, might be worth getting the sk_buff leak fix in ppp from
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg27706.html in 2.6.21 too?
Don't know how important it is for stable. It was present in 2.6.18 too.
Can you resend
On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2007 at 01:14:43PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Below is a patch that fixes ONE
sk_buff leak (maintainer added to cc: hi, Paul:-)). Still investigating if
there are more there.
Are you still seeing the skb cache growing
Jeff, might be worth getting the sk_buff leak fix in ppp from
http://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg27706.html in 2.6.21 too?
Don't know how important it is for stable. It was present in 2.6.18 too.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
I'm quite sure the leak is in the IrDA code rather than in the ppp or
ipv4 one, hence the need for full irda debug...
Well, looks like you were wrong, Samuel. Below is a patch that fixes ONE
sk_buff
(Short recap for newly added to cc: netdev: I'm seeing an skb leak in
2.6.20 during an IrDA IrNET+ppp UDP test with periodic connection
disruptions)
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
Ok, looks like all leaked skbuffs come
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
On 3/21/2007, Guennadi Liakhovetski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[c0182380] (__kfree_skb+0x0/0x170) from [c0182514] (kfree_skb+0x24/0x50)
r5 = C332BC00 r4 = C332BC00
[c01824f0] (kfree_skb+0x0/0x50) from [bf0fac58]
(irlap_update_nr_received+0x94/0xc8
.
Not subscribed, please cc.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe netdev in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sun, 28 May 2006, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
ieee80211: eth1: Unknown management packet: 112
a small addendum: below is the function from the original driver, where
they process management packets. Although they don't have special
processing for 0x70, they seem to be doing lots of stuff
18 matches
Mail list logo