[netmod] WG Last Call resolutions incorporated in draft-ietf-tictoc-1588v2-yang-06

Dear all, Based on all the comments we received during the WG Last Call process, we've updated the document to version 6. We believe all the LC comments are resolved and the consensus is reflected in this new revision. Many thanks to Martin, Tal, Opher, Alex, John and many others who had

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-02.txt size

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 07:03:11PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: > >As tree diagrams are intended to provide a simplified view of a >module, diagrams longer than a page should generally be avoided. If >the complete tree diagram for a module becomes too long, the diagram >can be split

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-02.txt size

On 10/26/2017 6:17 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 01:32:45PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: > >>> But what practical advice can we give them? >> we added section 3.2 covering Long Diagrams in general, and due to this >> draft we added: >> >>When long diagrams are

Re: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-ding-netmod-arp-yang-model-00.txt

Resending as I previously sent this to i-d-announces by mistake and it appears the whole message was rejected (i.e. it didn't get sent to netmod either) Hi Xiaojian, * The published module ietf-ip (RFC 7277) overlaps the data being provided in this module. Especially

Re: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-ding-netmod-arp-yang-model-00.txt

Hi Xiaojian, * The published module ietf-ip (RFC 7277) overlaps the data being provided in this module. Especially your /arp/arp-tables and /arp/arp-static-tables seem to correspond to /interfaces-state/interface/ipv4/neighbor and /interfaces/interface/ipv4/neighbor from ietf-ip. I think

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-02.txt size

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 01:32:45PM -0400, Lou Berger wrote: > > But what practical advice can we give them? > > we added section 3.2 covering Long Diagrams in general, and due to this > draft we added: > >When long diagrams are included in a document, authors >should consider whether

Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements [was Re: augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK?]

Hi - On 10/26/2017 11:42 AM, Andy Bierman wrote: On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Randy Presuhn > wrote: Hi - On 10/26/2017 10:44 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: Hi , Separating out the issue

Re: [netmod] rfc7223bis (interfaces) enabled leaf vs SNMP admin-state

Hi Martin, I'm OK with that direction ('enabled' affects ifAdminStatus). I'm questioning the other direction. I think a change in ifAdminStatus should be reflected in 'enabled'. Rgds, Jason > -Original Message- > From: Martin Bjorklund [mailto:m...@tail-f.com] > Sent: Thursday,

Re: [netmod] rfc7223bis (interfaces) enabled leaf vs SNMP admin-state

"Sterne, Jason (Nokia - CA/Ottawa)" wrote: > Hi all, > > The issue I'm raising isn't new to the 'bis' version of RFC7223, but > I'm questioning whether we should consider changing something about it > while we're in there. > > The 'enabled' leaf has this in the

Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements [was Re: augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK?]

On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 11:22 AM, Randy Presuhn < randy_pres...@alumni.stanford.edu> wrote: > Hi - > > On 10/26/2017 10:44 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: > >> Hi , >> >> Separating out the issue regarding which datastore action and RPC apply >> to, we propose the following NEW text to the datastores

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-02.txt

Indeed. There is a lot of grouping expansion occurring in some of your drafts. K. // contributor I would find an option to show "uses" very useful, instead of always having to expand groupings. Depending on the groupings and the amount of groupings reuse it can cut down complexity of

Re: [netmod] Action and RPC statements [was Re: augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK?]

Hi - On 10/26/2017 10:44 AM, Robert Wilton wrote: Hi , Separating out the issue regarding which datastore action and RPC apply to, we propose the following NEW text to the datastores draft: 6.2 Invocation of Actions and RPC Operations This section updates section 7.15. of RFC 7950.

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-02.txt size

Hi Tom, On 10/26/2017 12:50 PM, t.petch wrote: > Lou > > I like the advice that diagrams should be one page long but wonder how > to apply that to those I see in routing WGs. I have just been looking > at > > draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-12 > > where the diagram is 36 pages long - which may

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5157)

On Thu, 2017-10-26 at 09:02 -0700, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Vladimir Vassilev > wrote: > > On 10/24/2017 03:42 AM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > Although the instance-identifier is problematic, it is rarely used at

Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK?

Hi, A refined version of the proposed text is below (because "schema" isn't defined): On 26/10/2017 11:10, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Andy Bierman wrote: On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: Andy Bierman wrote:

[netmod] Action and RPC statements [was Re: augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK?]

Hi , Separating out the issue regarding which datastore action and RPC apply to, we propose the following NEW text to the datastores draft: 6.2 Invocation of Actions and RPC Operations This section updates section 7.15. of RFC 7950. In YANG data models, the "action" statement may appear

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-02.txt size

> On Oct 26, 2017, at 9:50 AM, t.petch wrote: > > Lou > > I like the advice that diagrams should be one page long but wonder how > to apply that to those I see in routing WGs. I have just been looking > at > > draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-12 > > where the diagram is 36

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-02.txt size

On 26/10/2017 17:50, t.petch wrote: Lou I like the advice that diagrams should be one page long but wonder how to apply that to those I see in routing WGs. I have just been looking at draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-12 where the diagram is 36 pages long - which may be one of the larger ones

[netmod] rfc7223bis (interfaces) enabled leaf vs SNMP admin-state

Hi all, The issue I'm raising isn't new to the 'bis' version of RFC7223, but I'm questioning whether we should consider changing something about it while we're in there. The 'enabled' leaf has this in the description: Changes in this leaf in the intended configuration are

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams-02.txt size

Lou I like the advice that diagrams should be one page long but wonder how to apply that to those I see in routing WGs. I have just been looking at draft-ietf-teas-yang-te-topo-12 where the diagram is 36 pages long - which may be one of the larger ones but by no means exceptional - and I

Re: [netmod] XPath node type tests

Andy Bierman writes: >I think text() and node() are just filter tests. > > /foo/*[text()] would return all the child nodes of /foo that are leaf or >leaf-list > >text() returns a boolean (0 or 1). Do not use it for value testing: > > /foo/*[text() =3D 'fred'] // wrong! > > /foo/*[. =3D

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5157)

On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 5:27 AM, Vladimir Vassilev wrote: > On 10/24/2017 03:42 AM, Andy Bierman wrote: > > >> >> Although the instance-identifier is problematic, it is rarely used at all, >> let alone using it as a list key. >> > It is used as a key in

Re: [netmod] augment YANG 1.0 with YANG 1.1 OK?

Andy Bierman wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 12:49 PM, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > > Andy Bierman wrote: > > > I think NMDA is creating much more complexity and disruption than is > > > required. > > > The original issue was the

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14

"Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: > Hi Mahesh, > > On 10/25/17, 9:22 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani" > wrote: > > >Acee, > > > >Thanks for reviewing the draft. > > > >> On Oct 25, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: > >> > >> Hi Kent,

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14

Hi Mahesh, On 10/25/17, 9:22 PM, "Mahesh Jethanandani" wrote: >Acee, > >Thanks for reviewing the draft. > >> On Oct 25, 2017, at 6:21 AM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote: >> >> Hi Kent, Mahesh, et al, >> >> I have read the draft and support publication. I

Re: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-ding-netmod-arp-yang-model-00.txt

Hi all, The ARP YANG module defined in this document has common properties that need to be configured. It provides freedom for service providers to adapt this data model to different product implementations. Please have a look and provide comments on the list. Thanks, Xiaojian A new