Re: [netmod] [Gen-art] Genart telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-06

Francis, thanks for your review. I have entered a No Objection ballot. Alissa > On Jan 23, 2018, at 5:55 PM, Francis Dupont wrote: > > Reviewer: Francis Dupont > Review result: Ready > > I am the assigned Gen-ART reviewer for this draft. The General Area > Review

Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-syslog-model-19.txt

Kent My request for a reference for Posix hs been fixed in -19. Tom Petch - Original Message - From: "Kent Watsen" To: Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 4:59 PM > Clyde, > > This draft still isn't passing idnits. I provided the link to idnits

[netmod] Last Call: (YANG Tree Diagrams) to Best Current Practice

The IESG has received a request from the Network Modeling WG (netmod) to consider the following document: - 'YANG Tree Diagrams' as Best Current Practice The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to

[netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-09: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

On 01/23/2018 03:26 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:05:54PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: >> >> Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on >> Nov 6th. >> >> Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments are address >>

Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

One additional point below. n 01/24/2018 09:35 AM, joel jaeggli wrote: > > > On 1/24/18 8:07 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Kent Watsen writes: >> >>> Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on >>> Nov 6th. >>> >>> Per normal

Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

On Wed, 2018-01-24 at 09:35 -0500, joel jaeggli wrote: > > On 1/24/18 8:07 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Kent Watsen writes: > > > > > Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on > > > Nov 6th. > > > > > > Per normal process,

Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

On Wed, Jan 24, 2018 at 09:35:49AM -0500, joel jaeggli wrote: > > Once the document is adopted by the working group it's the working > group's document. > > The consensus call was made back here: > > https://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/netmod/current/msg19433.html So then go ahead and

Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

On 1/24/18 8:07 AM, Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > Kent Watsen writes: > >> Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on >> Nov 6th. >> >> Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments are >> address unless significant

Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

Hi, Kent Watsen writes: > Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on > Nov 6th. > > Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments are > address unless significant faults are found. Post LC comments have > been made, which

Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

Great news. Thanks, Chris. Kent Watsen writes: Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on Nov 6th. Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments are address unless significant faults are found. Post LC comments have

Re: [netmod] moving forward with schema mount

Juergen Schoenwaelder writes: > On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 08:05:54PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: >> >> Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on >> Nov 6th. >> >> Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments