Re: [netmod] New Version draft-shytyi-netmod-vysm-02.txt as Working Group document.

Hi Dmytro, First of all, I find the discussion within the netmod WG as just the wrong place to have this discussion. You will be hard pressed to find too many people who can give you critical feedback on the model in this WG. See inline with [mj] > On Sep 5, 2019, at 2:03 PM, Dmytro Shytyi wr

Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Suresh, Please see https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-10 for updates. It's now Informational. Kent // as co-author > On Sep 5, 2019, at 1:08 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: > > Hi Suresh, > > Thank

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Adam, Thank you for your review. Comments below. Update @ https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-10 Kent // as co-author > On Sep 3, 2019, at 8:34 PM, Adam Roach via Datatracker > wrote: > > Adam

Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Ben, Thank you for your review. Comments below. Update @ https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-10 Kent // as co-author > On Sep 5, 2019, at 2:07 AM, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker > wrote: > > Be

[netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-10.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF. Title : Handling Long Lines in Inclusions in Internet-Drafts and RFCs Authors : Kent Watsen

Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 10:08 AM Kent Watsen wrote: > Hi Suresh, > > Thank you for your review. Comments below. > > Kent // as co-author > > > On Sep 5, 2019, at 10:41 AM, Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker < > nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > > Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position fo

Re: [netmod] New Version draft-shytyi-netmod-vysm-02.txt as Working Group document.

[Dmytro] Hello Mahesh Jethanandani, Thank you for your comment. Please find answers inline. >I find the representation of a service model in this draft for a uCPE as too >simple. In reality, on a uCPE, you could be running a Network Service (NS), >which is composed of multiple VNFs interconne

Re: [netmod] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 17:17 +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Kent Watsen wrote: > > > > > > >> There has been discussion about how embedding YANG models in RFCs seems > like a > > >> poor fit for a number of reasons. By standardizing line-folding > mechanisms and > > >> claiming them as a best p

Re: [netmod] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

On Thu, 2019-09-05 at 15:08 +, Kent Watsen wrote: > > > > > There has been discussion about how embedding YANG models in RFCs seems > > > like a > > > poor fit for a number of reasons. By standardizing line-folding mechanisms > > > and > > > claiming them as a best practice, this document rei

Re: [netmod] New Version draft-shytyi-netmod-vysm-02.txt as Working Group document.

I find the representation of a service model in this draft for a uCPE as too simple. In reality, on a uCPE, you could be running a Network Service (NS), which is composed of multiple VNFs interconnected together. This service model does not address such a configuration. Besides, how is the confi

Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Suresh, Thank you for your review. Comments below. Kent // as co-author > On Sep 5, 2019, at 10:41 AM, Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker > wrote: > > Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: Discuss > > When responding, please k

Re: [netmod] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alissa, Thank you for your review. Comments below. Kent // as co-author > On Sep 4, 2019, at 2:56 PM, Alissa Cooper via Datatracker > wrote: > > Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: Abstain > > When responding, please keep t

Re: [netmod] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

Hi Martin, On Thu, Sep 05, 2019 at 05:17:30PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Kent Watsen wrote: > > > > >> There has been discussion about how embedding YANG models in RFCs seems > > >> like a > > >> poor fit for a number of reasons. By standardizing line-folding > > >> mechanisms and > > >>

Re: [netmod] New Version draft-shytyi-netmod-vysm-02.txt as Working Group document.

Dear All, Please find the updated version of the VYSM Internet Draft(v0.2). The new version of draft introduces an extension of the yang model defined in previous version. From now the VYSM supports (0day configuration)/(bootstrap) of the VNFs hosted in the uCPE. With 0day configuration in t

Re: [netmod] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

Kent Watsen wrote: > > > >> There has been discussion about how embedding YANG models in RFCs seems > >> like a > >> poor fit for a number of reasons. By standardizing line-folding mechanisms > >> and > >> claiming them as a best practice, this document reinforces the root of that > >> problem

Re: [netmod] Alissa Cooper's Abstain on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with COMMENT)

>> There has been discussion about how embedding YANG models in RFCs seems like >> a >> poor fit for a number of reasons. By standardizing line-folding mechanisms >> and >> claiming them as a best practice, this document reinforces the root of that >> problem rather than trying to fix it. > >

[netmod] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer

Re: [netmod] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Benjamin, On Wed, Sep 04, 2019 at 11:07:46PM -0700, Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker wrote: > Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-09: Discuss > [...] > -- > COMMENT: >