rigine-
De : Lou Berger
Envoyé : mardi 14 mai 2024 15:10
À : NETMOD Group
Cc : NetMod WG Chairs
Objet : [netmod] Re: WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-
extensions-06
Hi,
The WG poll has triggered some good comment.
Authors,
Please address all comments received and publish a new version.
Pleas
Hi,
The WG poll has triggered some good comment.
Authors,
Please address all comments received and publish a new version. Please
also let the WG know how each comment is addressed.
Thank you,
Lou
On 4/29/2024 5:41 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
All,
This starts working group last call on
https
WG,
We'd like to extend this LC for another couple of weeks in the hope that
we get more feedback from the WG on this document.
Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
This is useful and important.
Thank you,
Lou and Kent
All,
This starts working group last call on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-extensions/
The working group last call ends on May 13th.
Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.
Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
and believe it is
Hi
On 3/21/2024 4:15 PM, Jean Quilbeuf wrote:
...
Many thanks for your comments, they make a lot of sense. We will work
on it and propose a new version of the draft.
...
Thanks for the discussion. One thing that would really help me, and
perhaps others, is an example of how full include
Due to the content change between the last poll on -03 and the current rev:
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of the renewed WG Last Call:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
tf.org/meeting/119/floor-plan?room=m2
WG Chairs:
Lou Berger (lberger at labs dot net)
Kent Watsen (kent plus ietf at watsen dot net)
WG Secretary
Jason Sterne (jason dot sterne at nokia dot com)
Available During Session:
MeetEcho: https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/ietf119/?s
WG, Authors,
Based on the low level of comments/discussion, we would like to
(a) Have the authors give a brief summary of this document during 119
(b) Start last called immediately after the meeting.
Thank you
Lou and Kent
On 12/18/2023 5:48 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
WG, Authors,
The last
Jan,
Sorry about the confusion. The time posted at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2024-netmod-01/session/netmod
is the planned meeting time. It shows as 2024-01-23 14:00-16:00 UTC.
For convenience add your time zone here to see local: Time Zone
Converter – Time Difference
as soon as possible. Optimally, the update
would happen by the first week of January so that we can rerun the last
call on the new version.
Thank you,
Lou and Kent
On 12/4/2023 6:00 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
All,
This starts working group last call on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft
All,
This starts working group last call on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-acl-extensions/
The working group last call ends on December 18th (any TZ).
Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.
Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
and
WG,
Draft session minutes are available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-118-netmod
Please review and send comments/corrections to the list.
Our thanks to Jason and everyone who contributed to the session and note
taking!
Kent and Lou
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of WG Last Call:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in
FYI a new version of the agenda has been posted.
Presenters please provide slides by Sunday Nov 5.
Authors of WG drafts - if you are not presenting at 118, please send
status updates to the list ASAP.
Thank you,
Lou
On 10/24/2023 3:08 PM, Jason Sterne (Nokia) wrote:
Hello NETMOD WG,
WG
This document is adopted.
Authors,
Please resubmit with only the name changed to draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8407bis
Thank you!
Lou (and Kent)
On 9/11/2023 6:22 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
Hello,
This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-netmod
WG,
Based on the very good discussion on list and the opinions recorded on
the poll, the Chairs want to state that the WG has agreed to:
"OPTION 1. Publish an RFC based on
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning that updates both YANG 1.0 (RFC
6020) and YANG 1.1 (RFC 7950) to allow YANG
Hello,
This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-netmod-rfc8407bis/
Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the
list by the end of the day (any time zone) Sept 25.
Thank you,
Lou (as Co-chair)
Authors, Contributors, WG,
In preparation for WG Adoption
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been disclosed
Authors,
I may have missed it, but was the point below addressed?
On 7/3/2023 2:23 PM, Andy Bierman wrote:
YANG authors should not need to tag nodes with specific metrics at all.
I am not convinced that standard tags like "counter," or "loss," or
"delay" are useful.
IMO it would be better to
Jurgen,
I/we certainly agree that discussion plays an important role in reaching
consensus. We've reserved an hour for related discussion - which we are looking
to set the stage for further discussions to close on the open points raised
during LC.
Again for your comments to the group on this
A revised agenda has been posted - please review and please let us know
if you see any needed corrections or (more) missed requests.
Thank you
On 7/12/2023 6:42 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
All,
The draft agenda has been posted -- please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/117/materials/agenda
All,
The draft agenda has been posted -- please see:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/117/materials/agenda-117-netmod
Please let us know if you see any needed corrections or missed requests.
The main focus of the meeting will be on discussing/getting input on the
WGLC on "semver" and
Hi charles,
We made the choice to not have it on the agenda because the agenda was so tight
and to only mention it in the chair slides. If there's something you'd like to
say about the liaison please feel free to come up to the mic when that side is
shown.
Thanks
Lou
Acknowledgement and Contributor sections before moving forward
on this document. Once we have the new version, we can then judge if
there are any missing IPR statements.
Thank you,
Lou and Kent
On 1/16/2023 5:53 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
Authors, Contributors, WG,
In preparation for WG Last Call
Are you
I believe we are just missing a response from Ebben.
Lou
--
On February 16, 2023 2:07:20 PM Lou Berger wrote:
Authors, contributors,
As far as I tell those on the to line and listed below have not
responded to the IPR poll. Either way, can the following please
respond, even if doing
Thank you,
Lou
On 1/16/2023 5:53 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
Authors, Contributors, WG,
In preparation for WG Last Call
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I
Forwarding - this didn't make it into the archive...
Forwarded Message
Subject:RE: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-08
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 18:12:37 +
From: Balázs Lengyel
To: Lou Berger , benoit.cla...@huawei.com
, lana.w
Forwarding - this didn't make it into the archive...
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-08
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 14:06:36 +
From: Joe Clarke (jclarke)
To: Lou Berger , benoit.cla...@huawei.com
, lana.w
, Lou Berger
CC: NetMod WG Chairs , NETMOD Group
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft.
Regards,
Reshad.
On Monday, January 16, 2023, 05:53:12 PM EST, Lou Berger
wrote:
Authors, Contributors, WG,
In preparation for WG Last Call
Are you aware of any IPR
Forwarding - this didn't make it into the archive...
Forwarded Message
Subject:RE: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-08
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 10:18:03 +
From: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
To: Lou Berger , benoit.cla...@huawei.com
, lana.w
Forwarding - this didn't make it into the archive...
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on
draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-08
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 11:52:17 +
From: Jan Lindblad (jlindbla)
To: Lou Berger
CC: Benoit Claise , Wubo
Forwarding - this didn't make it into the archive...
Forwarded Message
Subject:Re: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-08
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 08:52:27 +0100
From: Benoit Claise
To: Lou Berger , lana.w...@huawei.com,
e...@juniper.net
Forwarding - this didn't make it into the archive...
Forwarded Message
Subject:RE: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-08
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 01:22:26 +
From: Wubo (lana)
To: Lou Berger , Benoit Claise
, e...@juniper.net ,
lind
Forwarding - this didn't make it into the archive...
Forwarded Message
Subject:RE: Regarding IPR on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning-08
Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2023 01:13:43 +
From: Qin Wu
To: Jason Sterne (Nokia) , Lou Berger
, Benoit Claise , Wubo
Authors, Contributors, WG,
In preparation for WG Last Call
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been
Hi,
This poll is closed. Authors please republish the draft with a 'file
name' of draft-ietf-netmod-acl-00 and only this and the date changed.
Please then work to address adoption comments in rev -01.
Thank you,
Lou and Kent
On 12/19/2022 6:00 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
Hello,
This email
Hello,
This email begins a 3-week adoption poll for:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dbb-netmod-acl/
Please voice your support or technical objections to adoption on the
list by the end of the day (any time zone) January 9.
This is an extended call due to the holiday/New Year.
Thank
-
From: Oscar González de Dios
Sent: Tuesday, December 6, 2022 7:16 PM
To: mohamed.boucad...@orange.com; Lou Berger ; Samier
Barguil Giraldo (Nokia)
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs ; NETMOD Group
Subject: RE: Regarding IPR on draft-dbb-netmod-acl-03
Dear NETMOD WG chairs, all,
No, I'm not aware of any
5, 2022, at 2:41 PM, IETF Secretariat
mailto:ietf-secretariat-re...@ietf.org>> wrote:
The NETMOD WG has placed draft-dbb-netmod-acl in state
Candidate for WG Adoption (entered by Lou Berger)
The document is available at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-dbb-netm
Authors, Contributors, WG,
In preparation for WG Adoption
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been disclosed
WG,
The *draft* agenda for IETF115 has been posted -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/115/agenda
The NetMod session information is scheduled to be held:
Tuesday, November 8, 2022
09:30-11:30 Tuesday Session I
Richmond 4
Adrian,
Thanks for this -- as far as I can tell, Jurgen's comments were not
addressed in the on-list discussion in August. Do think that they
were? We were at least expecting some document update based on the
discussion.
Authors/Contributors,
Where do you think we stand in resolving
Presenters, please check that your slides are properly uploaded. If not
- please send/upload ASAP.
Thank you,
Lou
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
WG,
The *draft* agenda for IETF114 has been posted -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/114/agenda
The NetMod session information is:
Wednesday, July 27, 2022
15:00-17:00 Wednesday Session III
Independence A/B
iCalendar:
Yes. See https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc8340#section-2.5
Lou
--
On April 11, 2022 6:52:27 AM tom petch wrote:
Can a YANG tree diagram contain comment lines?
draft-ietf-teas-yang-te has a tree diagram of 40 pages and since the IETF has
abolished the page number, then any
on the specific changes.
Thank you!
Lou (Co-Chair & doc Shepherd)
On 2/21/2022 12:20 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
All,
This starts working group last call on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver/
The working group last call ends on March 7 th.
Please send your comm
on the specific changes.
Thank you!
Lou (Co-Chair & doc Shepherd)
On 2/21/2022 12:20 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
All,
This starts working group last call on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/
The working group last call ends on March 7 th.
Please send
CET, 09:00-11:00 UTC)
WG Chairs:
Lou Berger(lberger at labs dot net)
Kent Watsen (kent plus ietf at watsen dot net)
Joel Jaeggli (joelja at bogus dot com)
Available During Session:
ICS: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/sessions/netmod.ics
MeetEcho: https
WG,
The *draft* agenda for IETF111 has been posted -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/agenda
Tuesday, March 22, Tuesday, March 22, 2022 09:00-11:00 UTC
iCalendar: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/113/sessions/netmod.ics
This will be a hybrid meeting. Our plan to cover updates,
All,
This starts working group last call on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-module-versioning/
The working group last call ends on March 7 th.
Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.
Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
and
All,
This starts working group last call on
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-yang-semver/
The working group last call ends on March 7 th.
Please send your comments to the working group mailing list.
Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
and believe it is ready
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of WG Last Call:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of WG Last Call:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been disclosed in
All,
A draft agenda for our virtual 112 meeting has been posted.
Please take a look and let us know if any changes are needed.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/112/materials/agenda-112-netmod
Presenters:
Please provide your slides to the chairs no later than the Tuesday
before our meeting.
Tom,
okay, you made me look...
The full text is
leaf received-metric {
type uint16;
description
"The metric with which this route was advertised by the
neighbor, or maximum value (infinity) to indicate the
route was
WG,
The *draft* agenda for IETF111 has been posted -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/agenda
TUESDAY, July 27, 2021 -- 1430-1530 Session II (UTC)
iCalendar: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/111/sessions/nemod.ics
This will be fully remote meeting. Our plan to cover
All,
A draft agenda for our virtual 110 meeting has been posted.
Please take a look and let us know if any changes are needed.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/materials/agenda-110-netmod
Presenters:
Please provide your slides to the chairs no later than the Tuesday
before our
WG,
The *final* agenda for IETF110 has been posted -
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/agenda
Friday, 12 March 2021, Session III 16:00-18:00 (UTC)
iCalendar: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/110/sessions/nemod.ics
This will be fully remote meeting. Our plan to cover updates,
Fyi here is the link to the meeting materials:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2021-netmod-01/session/netmod
On January 30, 2021 12:10:21 PM Kent Watsen wrote:
NETMOD is hosting a virtual interim this coming Monday (in ~45 hours).
ICS file
-policy-00. The -01 version should address issues
/ comments raised during adoption. Note that publication of the -00
version is gated by the completion of the IPR poll.
Thank you!
Lou (for co-chairs)
On 12/7/2020 5:27 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
This email begins a 2-week adoption poll
have done this accidentally. If not, I will leave this to my coauthors.
-Qin
*发件人:*Lou Berger [mailto:lber...@labn.net]
*发送时间:*2020年12月8日6:20
*收件人:*Qin Wu ; Igor Bryskin ;
Henk Birkholz ; Xufeng Liu
; Benoit Claise
*抄送:*NetMod WG Chairs ; NetMod WG
*主题:*Fwd: Regarding IPR on draft-wwx
Just a reminder that we have an upcoming interim. Please join in via
webex and codimd:
Date December 14, 2020
Start Time 14:30 UTC
Duration up to 90 minutes
Time Zone Converter:
I should have mentioned that this is the 2nd adoption call on this
document. for full context on discussion on this draft, see
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/?q=draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang
On 12/7/2020 5:27 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
This email begins a 2-week adoption poll
This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang-10
Please voice your support or technical objections on list before the end
of December 21, any time zone.
Thank you!
Netmod Chairs
PS Note the IPR poll is running concurrently as the
From: Lou Berger
To: Qin Wu , Igor Bryskin ,
Henk Birkholz , Xufeng Liu
, Benoit Claise
CC: NetMod WG Chairs
Authors,
Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption call
on this draft. In preparation for that, we’ve determined both that the
draft has changed
Hi,
Here are the usual (hopefully) useful session links:
Meetecho:
https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/ietf109/?group=netmod==1
Materials: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/109/session/netmod
Note taking: https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-109-netmod?both
Audio stream:
On August 30, 2020 5:01:28 AM Qin Wu wrote:
Thanks Lou for valuable comments, please see reply inline below.
*发件人:*Lou Berger [mailto:lber...@labn.net]
*发送时间:*2020年8月30日2:40
*收件人:*Kent Watsen ; netmod@ietf.org;
draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-t...@ietf.org
*主题:*Re: [netmod
Hi,
A couple of comments:
- As a co-author or YANG Module Tags, I'm thrilled to see it being
used/augmented by this document, but I'm not clear on how the metric and
operation type tags are to be used. To me these seem to be best defined
by the modules themselves, e.g., does a value
Sorry about the flurry of invites. The right time is, weekly starting
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/converter.html?iso=20200901T13=1440
Lou
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
Hi,
Here are some (hopefully) useful links for today's sessions:
Joint note taking: https://codimd.ietf.org/notes-ietf-108-netmod?both
Session material: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/session/netmod
Join session: https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/ietf108/?group=netmod
See you
/agenda-108-netmod
Session:
Thursday July 28th
UTC: 14:10-15:50
WG Chairs:
Kent Watsen (kent plus ietf at watsen dot net)
Lou Berger (lberger at labs dot net)
Joel Jaeggli (joelja at bogus dot com)
Available During Session:
ICS:https://datatracker.ietf.org
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been
--
--- Forwarded message ---
From: NomCom Chair 2020 nomcom-chair-2...@ietf.org
Date: June 10, 2020 2:57:10 PM
Subject: Nomcom 2020-2021 Second Call For Volunteers
To: IETF Announcement List ietf-annou...@ietf.org
CC: i...@ietf.org
This is the second sending of the call for volunteers
Hi,
The authors/contributors have a requested an informal meeting to discuss
draft-wwx-netmod-event-yang. The WebEx details follow
Lou
--
--- Forwarded message ---
From: NETMOD Working Group messen...@webex.com
Date: June 3, 2020 11:06:40 PM
Subject: Webex meeting invitation:
in case you missed it...
Forwarded Message
Subject:Reminder: Survey on planning for possible online IETF meetings
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 00:03:35 -0700
From: IETF Executive Director
Reply-To: ietf108plann...@ietf.org
To: IETF Announcement List
This
Hi,
At our interim, we mentioned that we were going to do a virtual hum
on draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-01 - we will be conducting this hum
via etherpad. (Yes, this is a total experiment!)
To express your support or disinterest, please visit
Just a reminder that reviews are being solicited on these documents -
particularly if you care anout encoding and transport...
Forwarded Message
Subject: [netmod] WG Last Call of CORECONF drafts:
draft-ietf-core-yang-cbor-12, -sid-11, -comi-09, -yang-library-01
Date:
West Coast
based folks, perhaps there are not many of them involved in Netmod.
Thanks,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Lou Berger
Sent: 26 March 2020 19:06
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton)
Cc: netmod-cha...@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: netmod - New Interim Meeting Request
delete the one
meeting request has just been submitted by Lou Berger.
This request requires approval by the Area Director of the Operations and
Management Area
The meeting can be approved here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim/request/interim-2020-netmod-
01
Just an FYI - in trying to move this document out of the WG approval
list to Dead WG document, this version got published. I have moved it
now to Dead WG Document state. There may have been a better way to do
this datatracker, but I clearly missed it. My apologies if this causes
any
. The file names should all be in the form
draft-ietf-netmod-.
Thank you,
Lou (and Kent and Joel)
On 3/2/2020 5:29 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
Hi,
We'd like to start a two week adoption call for the set of documents described
below by Rob. To be specific, this includes
1) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-solutions
Hi,
We'd like to start a two week adoption call for the set of documents described
below by Rob. To be specific, this includes
1) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-solutions-03
2) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-module-versioning-01
3) draft-verdt-netmod-yang-semver-01
4) draft-rwilton-netmod-yang-packages-03
5)
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been
Authors, Contributors, WG,
As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
Please state either:
"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
If so, has this IPR been
tooling, unchanged from the version presented at 106.
Thanks,
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Lou Berger
Sent: 19 February 2020 16:37
To: Rob Wilton (rwilton) ; netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] FW: New Version Notification for draft-rwilton-
netmod-yang-packages-03.txt
Thanks Rob/Team
Thanks Rob/Team!
All,
We're planning to run the adoption poll on the versioning document
set once the next update of the selection draft is published -- so
please feel free to get started reading/commenting on this document now.
Lou
On 2/19/2020 11:31 AM, Rob Wilton (rwilton) wrote:
Qin,
if you want to be agnostic of protocol, the document will need to
be updated from its current netconf specific form.
Thanks,
Lou
On 11/19/2019 2:45 AM, Qin Wu wrote:
Talking with our coauthors, we believe should not limit usage of this
model only to netconf. Other protocols could
Hi,
Authors, is there a reason tat the body of the text is only focused
on netconf? Why would you limit this work to any specific protocol?
Thanks,
Lou
___
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
FYI
Tuesday, November 19, 2019 (+08)
Session 1 "10:00-12:00 Tuesday Morning session I"
Session 2 "15:20-16:50 Tuesday Afternoon session II"
Slides: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/106/session/netmod
Etherpad: https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/notes-ietf-106-netmod
All,
A draft agenda for our 106 meeting in Singapore has been posted.
Please take a look and let us know if any changes are needed.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-106-netmod
Presenters:
Please provide your slides to the chairs no later than the Friday
before our
Qin,
Thanks for the update.
To answer your question as well as respond to the related thread, as
chair, I generally think it best to adopt once there is consensus in the
WG on a direction to take with respect to the topic covered by a draft.
That is not to say that a fully formed or
WG,
Just a reminder that it is time to send in your agenda requests.
Please do so by the end of Monday Nov 4th (any TZ).
Thank you!
Lou (Kent and Joel)
As reminder -- requests should go to netmod-cha...@ietf.org and include
- name of the drafts
- name of presentation (usually the
Michael/Authors/WG,
Thank you for this work. One of the questions in looking at this draft is the
relationship to this draft to other individual work that has been discussed in
the WG,
notablyhttps://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bryskin-netconf-automation-yang . In
looking at both drafts, I
All,
Draft minutes for the Montreal meeting are available at:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/105/materials/minutes-105-netmod
and/or
https://etherpad.ietf.org/p/notes-ietf-105-netmod
Please take a look and send any comments/correction to the list. Please
feel free to make proposed
Joel,
The only needed edit is the addition of the -state appendix,
right? Or is something else needed?
Thanks,
Lou
(as co-author)
On 7/27/2019 5:54 PM, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
Folks Ignas,
draft-ietf-netmod-module-tags, currently in IESG review is in need of a
a fairly significant edit,
Lou Berger has requested publication of draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-07 as
Best Current Practice on behalf of the NETMOD working group.
Please verify the document's state at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding
1 - 100 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
