[netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-entity-07: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-entity-07: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14

Hi Einar, I can work on updating the draft as soon as we agree on the changes. Should take only a couple of days to turn around and publish the draft. > On Jan 9, 2018, at 11:35 PM, Eliot Lear wrote: > > Hi Mahesh, > > Thanks for this work. I think this is okay. In the case

Re: [netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-entity-07: (with COMMENT)

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:55:46PM -0800, Adam Roach wrote: > -- > COMMENT: > -- > > I have one correction and one question about the ietf-hardware YANG module.

Re: [netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with DISCUSS)

Hi Juergen, Thanks for your quick response. Inline. On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:21:13AM -0800, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: >> >>

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14

> On Jan 10, 2018, at 12:58 AM, Einar Nilsen-Nygaard (einarnn) > wrote: > > Mahesh, > > Two things: > > First, I see that you have still left in the “icmp-off” action. This was > something both Kristian and I recommended removing, and I also discussed this > with Sonal

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 08:16:13PM -0800, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote: > > > > On Jan 10, 2018, at 12:58 AM, Einar Nilsen-Nygaard (einarnn) > > wrote: > > > > Mahesh, > > > > Two things: > > > > First, I see that you have still left in the “icmp-off” action. This was > >

[netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-02: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-02: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with COMMENT)

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:15 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 05:05:09AM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > -- > > COMMENT: > >

[netmod] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with DISCUSS)

Kathleen, further thoughts inline... On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:12:02PM -0500, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > Hi Juergen, > > Thanks for your quick response. Inline. > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 2:45 PM, Juergen Schoenwaelder > wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018

Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-acl-model-14

Mahesh, Two things: First, I see that you have still left in the “icmp-off” action. This was something both Kristian and I recommended removing, and I also discussed this with Sonal at the end of last year and she agreed that it should probably be removed since it seems at this point (absent

Re: [netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with DISCUSS)

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 11:21:13AM -0800, Kathleen Moriarty wrote: > > -- > DISCUSS: > -- > > Hello, > > Thanks for your work on this draft. I'm a little

[netmod] Kathleen Moriarty's Discuss on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with DISCUSS)

Kathleen Moriarty has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-entity-06

Hi, On 10/01/2018 13:12, Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp) wrote: Hi, --- snip --- state.”, so the above sentence only applies for the second case below. Ok. 2. The second case is that something is detected but it can’t be read. We do not see a reason to use the value configured for the

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with COMMENT)

On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 05:05:09AM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > -- > COMMENT: > -- > > > protocol interactions with other systems and that is neither

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-entity-06

Hi, "Bogaert, Bart (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)" wrote: > Hi, > > --- snip --- > > > state.”, so the above sentence only applies for the second case below. > > Ok. > > > 2. The second case is that something is detected but it can’t be read. > > We do not see a reason to use

Re: [netmod] AD review of draft-ietf-netmod-entity-06

Hi, --- snip --- > state.”, so the above sentence only applies for the second case below. Ok. > 2. The second case is that something is detected but it can’t be read. > We do not see a reason to use the value configured for the leafs > ‘serial-num’, ‘mfg-name’ and ‘model-name’ of a matching

Re: [netmod] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with COMMENT)

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:10:23PM -0800, Alvaro Retana wrote: > Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: No Objection > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and

Re: [netmod] Alexey Melnikov's Yes on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with COMMENT)

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 02:50:09AM -0800, Alexey Melnikov wrote: > Alexey Melnikov has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: Yes > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addresses included in the To and CC

[netmod] Reminder: WGLC - draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams

Just a reminder given the date that this was posted. This last call is expected to complete Monday 1/15/18. Thanks joel On 1/1/18 2:01 PM, joel jaeggli wrote: > Greetings, > > We hope the new year is a time to make great progess on outstanding > documents before preparation for the London

Re: [netmod] Last Call: (Network Management Datastore Architecture) to Proposed Standard two

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:08:24PM +0100, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > Hi Tom, > > "tom p." wrote: > > Much of this I-D is about the idea that network management data objects > > can often take two different values. The I-D always refers to this as > > being two values but

Re: [netmod] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with COMMENT)

On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 07:00:18AM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote: > On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 5:15 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder < > j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 05:05:09AM -0800, Eric Rescorla wrote: > > > > > >

Re: [netmod] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-revised-datastores-09: (with COMMENT)

Juergen: Hi! WFM. Thanks! Alvaro. On January 10, 2018 at 11:07:04 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder ( j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de) wrote: > On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 07:10:23PM -0800, Alvaro Retana wrote: > > Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for >