On 12 Jun 2009 Grahame Parish wrote:
> On this subject, is there any reason why a new NetSurf window inherits
> the history of the parent?
Because it's bloody useful. You can open a new path of navigation
through a site and then close either window without having to remember
which was the origi
On 27 Jun, Tony Moore wrote in message
<0cdbf67150.old_coas...@old_coaster.yahoo.co.uk>:
> On 27 Jun 2009, Steve Fryatt wrote:
> > On 27 Jun, Jim Nagel wrote in message
> > :
> >
> > > is there a keyboard shortcut to close such a window? if not, is that
> > > a useful feature suggestion?
>
On 27 Jun, Jim Nagel wrote in message
:
> Tony Moore wrote on 12 Jun:
> > Using NetSurf, you can close the blank window, as soon
> > as the download dialogue box appears. The download
> > continues unaffected.
> is there a keyboard shortcut to close such a window? if
> not, is that a usefu
On 27 Jun 2009, Steve Fryatt wrote:
> On 27 Jun, Jim Nagel wrote in message
> :
> > Tony Moore wrote on 12 Jun:
> >
> > > Using NetSurf, you can close the blank window, as soon as the
> > > download dialogue box appears. The download continues unaffected.
> >
> > is there a keyboard shortcut t
On 27 Jun, Jim Nagel wrote in message
:
> Tony Moore wrote on 12 Jun:
> > Using NetSurf, you can close the blank window, as soon as the download
> > dialogue box appears. The download continues unaffected.
>
> is there a keyboard shortcut to close such a window? if not, is that a
> useful feat
Tony Moore wrote on 12 Jun:
> Using NetSurf, you can close the blank window, as soon as the download
> dialogue box appears. The download continues unaffected.
is there a keyboard shortcut to close such a window?
if not, is that a useful feature suggestion?
i'd suggest Sh-Ctrl-Z, which is used b
In article <1d1e386a50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>, Richard Porter
wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2009 Rob Kendrick wrote:
> > On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:41:04 +0100 Richard Porter
> > wrote:
> >> I can't see why you'd need to open a new window unless you are going
> >> to put something in it.
> > I can't see
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:00:30 +0100
Grahame Parish wrote:
> To take up rjek's point earlier, will the RISC OS version ever have a
> tabbed interface? I've got so used to it with FF and now IE that it
> is one thing I really miss. I understand it is supported on some OSs.
The big stumbling blo
In message <506a3fbf40t...@netsurf-browser.org>
Michael Drake wrote:
> In article ,
>Grahame Parish wrote:
>> In RISC OS the new window fully overlays the parent in most cases, so
>> you can end up with a stack of redundant windows hiding behind the
>> current one. I can see it b
On 12 Jun 2009 Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <0275346a50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
>Richard Porter wrote:
>> What I'd like is the ability NOT to open a new window when downloading
>> a file, regardless of the target attribute.
> Choices... Content, untick "Allow links to open in new
In article <506a3fbf40t...@netsurf-browser.org>, Michael
Drake wrote:
> In article ,
>Grahame Parish wrote:
> > In RISC OS the new window fully overlays the parent in
> > most cases, so you can end up with a stack of redundant
> > windows hiding behind the current one. I can see it
> > bei
In article ,
Grahame Parish wrote:
> In RISC OS the new window fully overlays the parent in most cases, so
> you can end up with a stack of redundant windows hiding behind the
> current one. I can see it being useful if you closed the parent to
> open the child, but then there would be no
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:24:59 +0100
Grahame Parish wrote:
> In RISC OS the new window fully overlays the parent in most cases, so
> you can end up with a stack of redundant windows hiding behind the
> current one. I can see it being useful if you closed the parent to
> open the child, but then
In message <20090612132044.3f429...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:16:40 +0100
> Grahame Parish wrote:
>> On this subject, is there any reason why a new NetSurf window
>> inherits the history of the parent? If you forget that a new window
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 13:16:40 +0100
Grahame Parish wrote:
> On this subject, is there any reason why a new NetSurf window
> inherits the history of the parent? If you forget that a new window
> has opened (because it fully overlays the parent) you can click
> 'Back' far enough to get into the par
In message <506a3a3549t...@netsurf-browser.org>
Michael Drake wrote:
> In article <0275346a50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
>Richard Porter wrote:
>> What I'd like is the ability NOT to open a new window when downloading
>> a file, regardless of the target attribute.
> Choices...
In article <0275346a50.r...@user.minijem.plus.com>,
Richard Porter wrote:
> What I'd like is the ability NOT to open a new window when downloading
> a file, regardless of the target attribute.
Choices... Content, untick "Allow links to open in new windows".
That means that the target attrib
On 12 Jun 2009 Tony Moore wrote:
> On 12 Jun 2009, Richard Porter wrote:
>> It is very annoying when you click on a link to a pdf file and a blank
>> window pops up obscuring the directory you were going to put it in.
> Using NetSurf, you can close the blank window, as soon as the download
> di
On 12 Jun 2009, Richard Porter wrote:
> It is very annoying when you click on a link to a pdf file and a blank
> window pops up obscuring the directory you were going to put it in.
Using NetSurf, you can close the blank window, as soon as the download
dialogue box appears. The download continues
On 12 Jun 2009 Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:41:04 +0100
> Richard Porter wrote:
>> I can't see why you'd need to open a new
>> window unless you are going to put something in it.
> I can't see why web masters seem to think I'm not able to do it myself
> if I wish, personally.
>
On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 11:41:04 +0100
Richard Porter wrote:
> I can't see why you'd need to open a new
> window unless you are going to put something in it.
I can't see why web masters seem to think I'm not able to do it myself
if I wish, personally.
It's not really NetSurf's fault if a web site
On 12 Jun 2009 Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> My understanding is that NetSurf is aiming for HTML5 compliance
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#valid-browsing-context-name
> -or-keyword
> suggests that _new_window as a target in an tag would be processed
> as follows:
> - The first ti
On Thu, 2009-06-11 at 16:12 +0100, Harriet Bazley wrote:
> On 9 Jun 2009 as I do recall,
> Richard Porter wrote:
>
> > On 8 Jun 2009 John-Mark Bell wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 10:46 +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
> >
> > >> I mean that you have decided not to implement target="
On 9 Jun 2009 as I do recall,
Richard Porter wrote:
> On 8 Jun 2009 John-Mark Bell wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 10:46 +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
>
> >> I mean that you have decided not to implement target="_new" because
> >> you believe that it isn't valid html and therefore sho
On 8 Jun 2009 John-Mark Bell wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 10:46 +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
>> I mean that you have decided not to implement target="_new" because
>> you believe that it isn't valid html and therefore shouldn't be
>> supported.
> Er, no. There was a bug. It is now fixed.
Aha,
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 10:46 +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
> On 8 Jun 2009 John-Mark Bell wrote:
>
> >> but for idealogical reasons,
>
> > I have no idea what you mean by this.
>
> I mean that you have decided not to implement target="_new" because
> you believe that it isn't valid html and there
On 8 Jun 2009 John-Mark Bell wrote:
>> but for idealogical reasons,
> I have no idea what you mean by this.
I mean that you have decided not to implement target="_new" because
you believe that it isn't valid html and therefore shouldn't be
supported. The pragmatic view would be to implement it
On Mon, 2009-06-08 at 09:50 +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
>
> The attribute target="_new" works with most browsers (and is valid
> html)
No it isn't, but as we've said time and again, that's irrelevant from a
browser manufacturer's perspective.
> but for idealogical reasons,
I have no idea wha
On 8 Jun 2009 Harriet Bazley wrote:
> I recently fell foul of a link which used the HTML code href="/local/page" target="_new_window"> and totally failed to open in a
> new window as advertised in the body text of the parent page - is this
> valid HTML? The
I recently fell foul of a link which used the HTML code and totally failed to open in a
new window as advertised in the body text of the parent page - is this
valid HTML? The only reference material I've got suggests that
target="_blank" is the way to do this, but "new_window" seems to work in
N
30 matches
Mail list logo
