Hey Guy's,
Getting below message which in turn fails to list proper UID / GID on
NFSv4 mounts from within an unprivileged account. All files show up with
owner and group as nobody / nobody when viewed from the client.
Wondering if anyone saw this and what the solution could be here?
If not t
Hi.
What version of Ganesha is this?
Daniel
On 03/05/2018 10:35 PM, Varghese Devassy via Nfs-ganesha-devel wrote:
Hello,
I am testing our own version of FSAL and I am observing an issue with
directories containing 100,000 files. When I do ls on the directory, it
only lists about 21 files. T
Based on the error messages, you client is not sending t...@nix.my.dom
but is sending t...@my.dom@localdomain. Something is mis-configured on
the client. Have you tried having identical (including case)
idmapd.conf files on both the client and server?
Idmap configuration has historically be
>From Daniel Gryniewicz :
Daniel Gryniewicz has uploaded this change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/402881
Change subject: MDCACHE - Initialize dirent structs in entry early
..
MDCACHE - Initialize dirent structs in
>From Daniel Gryniewicz :
Daniel Gryniewicz has uploaded this change for review. (
https://review.gerrithub.io/402880
Change subject: Add tracepoints for NFS4 session refcounts
..
Add tracepoints for NFS4 session refcounts
Ch
If you see this, then I can send e-mails again.
Frank
--
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot__
Branch next
Tag:V2.7-dev.2
NOTE: This merge includes an ntirpc pullup, please update your submodule
Release Highlights
* Pullup NTIRPC through #106
* ASYNC/vector changes to the FSAL API
* A variety of fixes related to state recovery
* RADOS_KV: fix append of revoked del
t...@my.dom is an ad user. Nix.my.dom is a subdomain managed freeipa.
Tried identical ifmapd.conf files on client and server but rpcidmapd tries to
start the local copy of nfsd on the nfs Ganesha servers but that competes with
nfs-Ganesha and won’t bind on port 2049. So I need to change the p
Hello,
Is there plans to implement multiprotocol (NFS and CIFS accessing same
export/share) in ganesha? I believe current FD cache will need changes to
support that.
Thanks,
Pradeep
--
Check out the vibrant tech community
Ganesha has multi-protocol (NFS3, NFS4, and 9P). There are no plans to
add CIFS, since that is an insanely complicated protocol, and has a
userspace daemon implementation already (in the form of Samba). I
personally wouldn't reject such support if it was offered, but as far as
I know, no one
Basically, this. For the sake of discussion, is Daniel's take on SMB
integration directly in nfs-ganesha what you're thinking of, or were
you ireferring to co-export of Linux filesystems with Samba or some
other Linux-integrated SMB stack?
Matt
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 12:29 PM, Daniel Gryniewicz
> Basically, this. For the sake of discussion, is Daniel's take on SMB
integration
> directly in nfs-ganesha what you're thinking of, or were you ireferring to
co-
> export of Linux filesystems with Samba or some other Linux-integrated SMB
> stack?
IBM had some degree of success with exporting fi
On 03/06/2018 12:20 PM, Pradeep wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is there plans to implement multiprotocol (NFS and CIFS accessing same
> export/share) in ganesha?
CIFS* _in_ ganesha? No.
There is on-going work being done to make leases, delegations, and ACLs
work consistently and reliably between nfs-ganes
Hi Daniel,
What I meant is a use case where some one needs to access the same export
through NFS protocol using Ganesha server and SMB protocol using Samba
server. Both Samba and Ganesha are running on the same server. Obviously,
file can't be open by both ganesha and samba; so we need to close th
So, in fact, both ganesha and samba can have the same file open at the
same time (just as any 2 processes can). This will, of course, cause
issues if both are modifying the same sections of the file. This is why
file locking was invented. NFSv3 (via NLM) and NFSv4 (built in) have
locking mod
> So, in fact, both ganesha and samba can have the same file open at the same
> time (just as any 2 processes can). This will, of course, cause issues if
> both are
> modifying the same sections of the file. This is why file locking was
> invented.
> NFSv3 (via NLM) and NFSv4 (built in) have lo
When using nfsv3 on glusterfs-3.13.1-1.el7.x86_64 and
nfs-ganesha-2.6.0-0.2rc3.el7.centos.x86_64,
I gets strange "Invalid argument" when writing file.
1. With quota disabled;
nfs client mount nfs-ganesha share, and do 'll' in the testing directory.
2. Enable quota;
# getfattr -d -m . -e hex /roo
On 2018/3/7 10:59, Kinglong Mee wrote:
> When using nfsv3 on glusterfs-3.13.1-1.el7.x86_64 and
> nfs-ganesha-2.6.0-0.2rc3.el7.centos.x86_64,
> I gets strange "Invalid argument" when writing file.
>
> 1. With quota disabled;
> nfs client mount nfs-ganesha share, and do 'll' in the testing director
On 3/6/2018 10:45 AM, Tom wrote:> t...@my.dom is an ad user. Nix.my.dom
is a subdomain managed freeipa.
Tried identical ifmapd.conf files on client and server but rpcidmapd tries to
start the local copy of nfsd on the nfs Ganesha servers but that competes with
nfs-Ganesha and won’t bind on p
19 matches
Mail list logo
