[Nfs-ganesha-devel] new statx() like interface for libcephfs

2016-06-28 Thread Jeff Layton
any issues with the above pull request? -- Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com> -- Attend Shape: An AT Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT Park in San Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries pres

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] new statx() like interface for libcephfs

2016-06-28 Thread Jeff Layton
> Thanks for pointing this out. Ganesha would definitely be able to make use of > it. Beyond btime, are there any other fields it adds access to that struct > stat did not have? Not so far, but the interface is extensible so we could easily add stuff later

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] NFSv4 delegation in Ganesha

2017-08-03 Thread Jeff Layton
USTER (hopefully in 2.6 release). WRT XFS, I am not sure if > anyone is actively looking at it. > > Thanks, > Soumya > Hi Soumya, I just started looking at delegation support in ganesha (mostly with an eye toward plumb

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] [PATCH] ZFS: don't hand out delegations

2017-08-03 Thread Jeff Layton
From: Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com> There are two calls to do_delegation in the current code, but only one is still "live". The other is commented out. The live one will only be called if support_ex returns false. That will result in the ->lock_op being called to request

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] CEA-HPC test upgrade

2017-09-20 Thread Jeff Layton
FS still needs to be converted to use the new interface (not too hard to do, but I'd rather it be done by someone who is able to test the result). I have a patch for FSAL_CEPH more or less ready to go, but I'm having to rework some of the underlying ceph support. Once that's done and merged, the FSAL_CE

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] NFSv4 delegation in Ganesha

2017-08-29 Thread Jeff Layton
branch above is wrong, I think, so I'm looking more closely today at the up_ops stuff (spoiler -- it's quite complicated with the layered FSAL approach). -- Jeff Layton <jlay...@redhat.com> -- Check out the vibran

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] [nfs-ganesha]{PATCH] FSAL_CEPH: do an inode lookup vs. MDS when the Inode is not in cache

2017-11-10 Thread Jeff Layton
On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 14:19 +, Sage Weil wrote: > On Fri, 10 Nov 2017, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Fri, 2017-11-10 at 21:39 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2017 at 7:24 PM, Jeff Layton <jlay...@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2017-11

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] clustered ceph/ganesha talk at ceph developer monthly

2018-06-06 Thread Jeff Layton
This recovery backend is the basis for allowing ganesha to work in an active/active configuration over CephFS. I plan to cover the theory and design, and give a brief demo of it. Cheers, -- Jeff Layton -- Check out

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: MainNFSD: invert _NO_PORTMAPPER option

2018-02-21 Thread Jeff Layton
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 18:24 -0500, William Allen Simpson wrote: > On 2/21/18 4:51 PM, Jeff Layton wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 13:40 -0800, Frank Filz wrote: > > > We could take this opportunity to change the option to RPCBIND... > > > > > >

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Announce Push of V2.7-dev.1

2018-02-24 Thread Jeff Layton
; But success for CI CentOS cthon04 and CEA 9P and pynfs! > > So who is able to update the trigger-fsal_gluster CI? > > Do we need a separate trigger-fsal_ceph CI? > Bah, that was my breakage. We can back out that specfile patc

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Change in ffilz/nfs-ganesha[next]: MainNFSD: invert _NO_PORTMAPPER option

2018-02-21 Thread Jeff Layton
On Wed, 2018-02-21 at 13:40 -0800, Frank Filz wrote: > > On 2/21/18 1:59 PM, GerritHub wrote: > > > Jeff Layton has uploaded this change for *review*. > > > > > > View Change <https://review.gerrithub.io/400871> > > > > > > Mai

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Ganesh 2.3 : NFSv4 client gets error NFS4ERR_OLD_STATEID

2018-04-10 Thread Jeff Layton
ould be ideal, if only to narrow down whether the server sent the wrong seqid here or the client ignored it for some reason. Testing more recent ganesha code might also be helpful if that's an option. Good luck! -- Jeff Layton <jlay...@poochiereds.net> -

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Announce Push of V2.7-dev.4

2018-03-17 Thread Jeff Layton
e world's most > engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot > ___ > Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list > Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel See: ht

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] Deploying an Active/Active NFS Cluster over CephFS

2018-12-12 Thread Jeff Layton
s cluster be a non-starter? > > > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018, 12:16 Jeff Layton > (Sorry for the duplicate email to ganesha lists, but I wanted to widen > > it to include the ceph lists) > > > > In response to some cries for help over IRC, I wrote up this blog po

[Nfs-ganesha-devel] Deploying an Active/Active NFS Cluster over CephFS

2018-12-12 Thread Jeff Layton
! -- Jeff Layton ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] NFS-Ganesha CEPH_FSAL ceph.quota.max_bytes not enforced

2019-03-04 Thread Jeff Layton
gt; [1] http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/16526 > [2] https://github.com/nfs-ganesha/nfs-ganesha/issues/100 > > Thanks > David > It looks like you're having ganesha do the mount as "client.admin", and I suspect that that may allow you to bypass quotas? You may want to tr

Re: [Nfs-ganesha-devel] [ceph-users] NFS-Ganesha CEPH_FSAL | potential locking issue

2019-04-16 Thread Jeff Layton
rom there you can start looking at statistics in the NFS client to see what's going on there. Are certain RPCs taking longer than they should? Which ones? Once you know what's going on with the client, you can better tell what's going on with the server. -- Jeff Layton ___ Nfs-ganesha-devel mailing list Nfs-ganesha-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs-ganesha-devel