On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 04:35:26PM -0800, Dan Harkless wrote:
> I know with sendmail this is undesirable, because the "plussed user" email
> addresses definitely correspond to a single mailbox. I'm still a little
> fuzzy on qmail's "user-extensions", though. Do they (always? usually?)
> corresp
> From: Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 17:12:40 -0800
>
>
> "Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > If so, I should probably reimplement $USERNAME_EXTENSION to only get ta
> cked
> > > onto the account name in the "From:" line that post generates.
> > >
>
> > FYI...Postfix calls that variable "recipient_delimiter" in its
> > configuration file and it defaults to '+'. So, what happens if
> > USERNAME_EXTENSION isn't set, but "masquerade:" includes
> > "username_extension"?
>
> I think you misunderstood my comments above. $USERNAME_EXTENSION is th
"Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > If so, I should probably reimplement $USERNAME_EXTENSION to only get tacked
> > onto the account name in the "From:" line that post generates.
> >
> > qmail users, please let me know what you think.
>
> Could it be conditional?
Yes, I could cer
> From: "Dan Harkless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 16:35:26 -0800
>
> BTW, while testing $USERNAME_EXTENSION just now I had an unexpected
> failure. I tried to 'inc' my mail but it wasn't working because it was
> looking for /var/spool/mail/dan$USERNAME_EXTENSION.
>
> Did yo
Scott Blachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Here's my ChangeLog entry:
>> * Changed the new "plussed_user" option to mts.conf's
>> "masquerade:" to "username_extension" after getting feedback from
>> qmail users, who use '-' as a separat
"Dan Harkless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Okay, I ended up going with an environment variable called
>> $USERNAME_EXTENSION. I didn't like $USER_EXTENSION because it sounds like
>> it describes the generic concept of an extension (to a software packa
Scott Blachowicz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Here's my ChangeLog entry:
> >
> > * Changed the new "plussed_user" option to mts.conf's
> > "masquerade:" to "username_extension" after getting feedback from
> > qmail users, who use '-' as a
Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's my ChangeLog entry:
>
> * Changed the new "plussed_user" option to mts.conf's
> "masquerade:" to "username_extension" after getting feedback from
> qmail users, who use '-' as a separator rather than '+'. Removed
> checkin
Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Okay, I ended up going with an environment variable called
> $USERNAME_EXTENSION. I didn't like $USER_EXTENSION because it sounds like
> it describes the generic concept of an extension (to a software package) by
> a user. With $USERNAME_EXTENSION, it'
Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Okay, I ended up going with an environment variable called
>$USERNAME_EXTENSION. I didn't like $USER_EXTENSION because it sounds like
>it describes the generic concept of an extension (to a software package) by
>a user. With $USERNAME_EXTENSION, it's muc
Okay, I ended up going with an environment variable called
$USERNAME_EXTENSION. I didn't like $USER_EXTENSION because it sounds like
it describes the generic concept of an extension (to a software package) by
a user. With $USERNAME_EXTENSION, it's much more obvious what it's for.
Here's my Cha
Neil W Rickert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >"Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> So clearly it provides for overriding the name, but not for simply adding
> >> an extension. I think adding this functionality to nmh would be useful.
>
> >
Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So clearly it provides for overriding the name, but not for simply adding
>> an extension. I think adding this functionality to nmh would be useful.
>> I would then also be able to repackage my spam-proof
Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So clearly it provides for overriding the name, but not for simply adding
>> an extension. I think adding this functionality to nmh would be useful.
>> I would then also be able to repackage my spam-proof
"Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> So clearly it provides for overriding the name, but not for simply adding
> an extension. I think adding this functionality to nmh would be useful.
>
> I would then also be able to repackage my spam-proof addresses in a way
> that I wouldn't be e
16 matches
Mail list logo
