dlink all of the Maildir emails into an MH folder (directory), and
allow manipulation of the files through the hardlinks for NMH while
allowing Maildir access to other clients.
I haven't tried to mix Maildir and MH in procmail, but you might want to
give something like this a try:
:0
* Subject
hat I'll ever give up nmh. ;-) Alternatively,
I could have used inc to simply split the messages and done a bash for loop to
push each file through procmail, but I hadn't thought of that at the time. ;-)
Regardless, nmh was still a lifesaver.
--
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
k over IMAP. The
IMAP daemon's themselves must understand the MH format. I believe UW
has mh support as a "legacy", but I haven't spent enough time to get
my own use of it working. Any feedback on IMAP daemons that work with
the MH format.
--
Chad Walstrom <[E
It seems that nmh forward progress might have stalled again. What's
the status of hosting the project on Savannah?
chad
so that someone can help you find what's going wrong for you. Be
sure to tell them what client you're using (command-line tools, xmh,
exmh, mh-e, etc.).
chad
need."
"I'm glad you like the new FEATURE. Understand, though, that
you cannot rightly complain about it not working as expected. You
can, however, help us debug the code..."
$0.02,
--
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | a.k.a. ^ch
I agree with the ``save 2.0 for the next round of new features''
sentiment. I suggest putting out a release with as many of the bugfixes
as we can get in, then start working on a 2.0 beta with major new
features/interface changes/what-have-you.
chad
BRANCH_1_0_BUGFIX_67728
* The key to using CVS with branching really lies in consistent and
discriptive use of tags, both the branching and standard types.
--
Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | a.k.a. ^chewie
http://www.wookimus.net/
at most of the time I've seen people try to use separate
branches for radically different versions of softare the results were at
best `confusing'. That said, I'm all for trying it again.. :-)
chad
t random net-projects, barring Savanah.
chad
Let's see what we
can do.
To directly address Peter's question: yes, I believe that the proposed
changes could be nice for mh-e support, but they don't seem very close
to `deployed' to me right now. I'm including Jon Stienhart's message
below.
chad
--- Forward
27;t get a response in a reasonable time, a new SourceForge project may
be in order. I'd suggest ``1 January 2002'' as a reasonable cut-off,
personally.
chad
ble. Otherwise, I'd forget
about mail clients at all and just use one of the many webmail
interfaces.
chad
13 matches
Mail list logo
