It doesn't seem like nmh development has really progressed lately; I am
having a hard time finding commits later than March 17th of this year.
I'm wondering if Dan the gang are still doing work on nmh; if not, then
would they be interested in having someone else run the show for a while?
I'd be
chad wrote:
I would say that if you are interested and
don't get a response in a reasonable time, a new SourceForge project may
be in order. I'd suggest ``1 January 2002'' as a reasonable cut-off,
Hi all --
How's SourceForge doing these days? VA Software isn't in the best shape
now, I
On Thu, 2001-12-06 at 17:47, chad wrote:
In looking over back mail recently, I noticed that no one responded to
Jon Steinhart's interesting patches regarding mime attachments. If
memory serves, he prodded the list more than once; at least once with no
response in early July. I would say
How's SourceForge doing these days? VA Software isn't in the best shape
now, I hear. I've been trying to find a big chunk of time to move the
online MH book to SourceForge, but now I'm wondering if I might move it
there and the server would go away. Comments, anyone?
Make a backup.
--Ken
No, I agree there hasn't been much work. I think the major sticking
issue for a 1.0.5 was that Dan was not happy with the new date parsing
code. The new code was a bit faster and actually compiled. The old
parser was some crufty code that was being munged with sed in order to
compile.
I would suggest Sourceforge not be used for a variety of reasons;
First being the fact that it is a sinking ship. If people feel a
Sourceforge-like site is really needed it would make more sense
to me to use savannah.gnu.org which is now open to non-GNU
projects.
What is wrong with mhost.com
Ken Hornstein wrote:
I don't see anything wrong with mhost, per se ... other than Dan (the
guy who was really driving nmh development) and Doug (the guy who hosts
the site) seem to be busy now. That makes it difficult to manage the
Hi, sorry to be late getting in on this, but you guys started
