, James
James G Wright PhD
Scientist
Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: 44 (0) 772 5636914
www.wright-dose.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Stephen Duffull
Sent: 25 October 2007 23:53
To: 'Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions'
Cc: 'nmusers'
Subject: RE
be correct.
Did any adverse events occur in the 4 excluded subjects in the novel
treatment arm? This is all I wish to know.
Best regards, James
James G Wright PhD
Scientist
Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: 44 (0) 772 5636914
www.wright-dose.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto
as to be practically irrelevant
But that is a long way from:
Weight is always important, in that it should alter dose selection
Best regards, James
James G Wright PhD
Scientist
Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: 44 (0) 772 5636914
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf
. Best regards,
James G Wright PhD
Scientist
Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: 44 (0) 772 5636914
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Mark Sale - Next Level Solutions
Sent: 19 July 2008 21:13
Cc: nmusers@globomaxnm.com
Subject: [NMusers] algorithm
for the metabolite, but the importance of this
depends on how the parameter will actually be used.
James G Wright PhD
Scientist
Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: 44 (0) 772 5636914
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Nick Holford
Sent: 09 December 2008 20:52
To: nmusers
no end of stress over the years, and
next time I may have to contend with the (almost irrefutable) argument
but Nick Holford said it was true.
Best regards, James
James G Wright wrote:
Hi Nick,
I hope all is well with you - good to see you are keeping the nmusers
in
line :-).
I am not sure I
that becomes metabolite is unknown - we are estimating CL/F,
V/F etc. for the metabolite. Any assumption about F, V etc. is again
optional.
Do you agree?
Best regards, James
James G Wright PhD
Scientist
Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: 44 (0) 772 5636914
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
on which assumptions are necessary and which are optional.
I am pleased we are in agreement that assumptions about F= are entirely
optional.
Best regards, James
James G Wright PhD
Scientist
Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: 44 (0) 772 5636914
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
. It is
likely that study procedures, precision of recorded sampling times etc.
vary between the two studiess.
Best regards, James
James G Wright PhD
Scientist
Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: 44 (0) 772 5636914
-Original Message-
From: owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com [mailto:owner-nmus...@globomaxnm.com
Hi Nick,
I hope you are well. I think what you have written below is very nice
summary of a sensible and realistic approach to extrapolation, and I just
wanted to add a comment from my personal experience.
On a couple of occasions, I have seen data which unexpectedly switches from
linear to
,
The pharmacometrics group at the University of Cape Town
--
James G Wright PhD,
Scientist, Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: UK (0)772 5636914
it
separately for pure CL and F...
Maybe I can put in the table all the NONMEM pure values and show
CL/F explicitly in the text? In the end the values of V/F, Q/F, etc
are not as important as CL/F.
Thanks again!
Paolo
On 2013/01/07 16:39, James G Wright wrote:
Dear Paolo,
If I have
immediately notify
the sender and thereafter delete this email and any attachments.
--
James G Wright PhD,
Scientist, Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: UK (0)772 5636914
:
Alpenstrasse 3
8152 Glattpark-Opfikon (Zürich)
Switzerland
Phone: (+41) 44 / 55 51 404
Mobile: (+41) 79 / 654 33 99
mailto: nele.kaess...@takeda.com
http://www.takeda.com
-Original Message-
From: James G Wright [mailto:ja...@wright-dose.com]
Sent: Freitag, 18. Januar 2013 5:10
To: Kaessner
not have
a closed form (i.e. only expressed in differential equation), how can
I do that?
Your help will be much appreciated!
Yaming Hang
--
James G Wright PhD,
Scientist, Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: UK (0)772 5636914
-dose.com, indicating if we may
retain a copy in the event we are unable to offer you one of our current
positions. Please also include your notice period. All applications will
be treated with the utmost confidentiality.
--
James G Wright PhD,
Scientist, Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: UK (0)772 5636914
flect "inter dose event variability" either. I was wondering if there
is any good solution to this problem? Any comments are very much
appreciated!
Warm regards,
Tingjie Guo
--
James G Wright PhD,
Scientist, Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: UK (0)772 5636914
between the two approaches is
different. This is the statistical reason why it matters to plot
predictions on the xaxis.
Joga Gobburu
University of Maryland
--
James G Wright PhD,
Scientist, Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: UK (0)772 5636914
Hi Nick,
I hope you are well! I think censoring is still a problem for VPCs
unless you are including am explicit model component for the mechanism
of censoring…?
I agree that the VPC is the most important method of assessing your
model, and diagnostic plots are mainly to help you work out
University means that we will process your
personal data. For more information on how this is performed,
please read here: http://www.uu.se/en/about-uu/data-protection-policy
--
James G Wright PhD,
Scientist, Wright Dose Ltd
Tel: UK (0)772 5636914
20 matches
Mail list logo