[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:02:08 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > One distinction is that I have all of my "notmuch tag" commands operate > globally rather than just on new messages. One of the things that really > annoyed be about sup was that the support for automatic tagging worked > as a hook on

[notmuch] vim client

2010-02-25 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from Arian Kuschki's message of Thu Feb 25 12:03:30 -0500 2010: > On Sat 20, 12:34 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > > > The real problem is all notmuch calls are synchronous. Vim unfortunately > > lacks the excellent asynchronous subprocess interface that emacs has. > > Therefore, I'm afraid

[notmuch] vim client

2010-02-25 Thread Arian Kuschki
On Sat 20, 12:34 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: > The real problem is all notmuch calls are synchronous. Vim unfortunately > lacks the excellent asynchronous subprocess interface that emacs has. > Therefore, I'm afraid the vim client is going to be just as unuable > until someone has implemented

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread Carl Worth
ot;) ("pdx" . "tag:inbox AND tag:pdx") ("todo" . "tag:todo and not tag:cairo and not tag:notmuch and not tag:intel") ("inteltodo" . "(tag:todo and tag:intel) or tag:todo-intel") ("notmuchtodo" . "(tag:todo and tag:notmuch) or tag:todo-notmuch") ("cairotodo" . "(tag:todo and tag:cairo) or tag:todo-cairo") )) -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100225/c9ddffa6/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH] Support for deletion (patch included)

2010-02-25 Thread ra...@free.fr
Carl: The patch in the mail has problems; apparently I have to manually add scissorlines to the mail for it to be processed by git-am. I thought this was automatically added. (I hate the git UI -- nothing is consistent, concepts have different names, the definition of scissor lines is as precise

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
I'm slowly groping my way to using the notmuch emacs client as my routine MUA. As I coerce it into tagging and displaying the way I want, the next big question was automatically tagging things and getting them in to notmuch. I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard. My solution

[notmuch] envelope-to

2010-02-25 Thread Tim Stoakes
James Vasile(james at hackervisions.org)@240210-14:59: > Can notmuch search for envelope-to:? Or for that matter, can it > search for arbitrary headers? > > I get a lot of BCC mail. The envelope-to is a good way for me to know > which of my various addresses was BCC'd. I'm very new here, but I

[notmuch] [PATCH] Support for deletion (patch included)

2010-02-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
I cannot comment on this patch, I just want to state that this functionality can also be achieved with (id:87sk90ragj.fsf at jhu.edu) "add functionality in notmuch search mode to add or remove tags by region" and (id:1266408746-28549-1-git-send-email-Sebastian at SSpaeth.de) "bind 'd' to new

[notmuch] [PATCH] Simplify "unread" tag handling in emacs UI.

2010-02-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:20:27 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:26:47 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > > > It then checks the unread status in order to decide whether to proceed > > > to the next again. So with your patch notmuch-show-next-unread-message > > > will skip through

[notmuch] Introducing notmuchsync

2010-02-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:49:44 -0500, Jameson Rollins wrote: > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:19:06 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > > I think that's the open question still. How much of this kind of > > functionality do we integrate into notmuch itself. I don't know the > > answer to that question yet, but I'm

[notmuch] Introducing notmuchsync

2010-02-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:19:06 -0800, Carl Worth wrote: > On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:12:28 +0100, "Sebastian Spaeth" SSpaeth.de> wrote: > > > > - Synchronizes the "S" flag with the "unread" tag (1-way). The > > synchronization direction is decided by using either --sync (change > >

[notmuch] [PATCH] add notmuch-show-delete keybinding 'd'

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
At Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:53:14 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: > > On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins finestructure.net> wrote: > > > 2. It removes the "inbox" and "unread" tags while adding the tag to > > >indicate deletion. > > > > Hey, Carl. Why is this last point

[notmuch] patchwork test instance

2010-02-25 Thread martin f krafft
rubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 198 bytes Desc: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/) URL: <http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/attachments/20100225/d1283b69/attachment.pgp>

[notmuch] [PATCH] Support for deletion (patch included)

2010-02-25 Thread ra...@free.fr
Hi Carl, > Could you also write a commit message describing what the patch does? > The easiest way for me to apply that would be if you would create a git > commit, then run "git format-patch origin/master" and mail the resulting > files, (the "git send-email" command can be used here, or you can

Re: [notmuch] Introducing notmuchsync

2010-02-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:19:06 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Mon, 18 Jan 2010 16:12:28 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: - Synchronizes the S flag with the unread tag (1-way). The synchronization direction is decided by using either

Re: [notmuch] Introducing notmuchsync

2010-02-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:49:44 -0500, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:19:06 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: I think that's the open question still. How much of this kind of functionality do we integrate into notmuch itself. I don't know the

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Simplify unread tag handling in emacs UI.

2010-02-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:20:27 -0500, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:26:47 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: It then checks the unread status in order to decide whether to proceed to the next again. So with your patch

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] add notmuch-show-delete keybinding 'd'

2010-02-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: 2. It removes the inbox and unread tags while adding the tag to indicate deletion. Hey, Carl. Why is this last point important? [...]Why should it modify any other tags? A message/thread should be

Re: [notmuch] envelope-to

2010-02-25 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 12:00:37 +1030, Tim Stoakes notm...@stoakes.net wrote: I get a lot of BCC mail. The envelope-to is a good way for me to know which of my various addresses was BCC'd. I'm very new here, but I think the answer is 'no' - notmuch only seems to index a few headers. Which is

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] add notmuch-show-delete keybinding 'd'

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
At Thu, 25 Feb 2010 11:53:14 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth wrote: On Wed, 24 Feb 2010 14:01:18 -0500, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: 2. It removes the inbox and unread tags while adding the tag to indicate deletion. Hey, Carl. Why is this last point important?

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Support for deletion (patch included)

2010-02-25 Thread racin
Carl: The patch in the mail has problems; apparently I have to manually add scissorlines to the mail for it to be processed by git-am. I thought this was automatically added. (I hate the git UI -- nothing is consistent, concepts have different names, the definition of scissor lines is as precise

[notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
I'm slowly groping my way to using the notmuch emacs client as my routine MUA. As I coerce it into tagging and displaying the way I want, the next big question was automatically tagging things and getting them in to notmuch. I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard. My solution

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread Carl Worth
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:25:16 -0500, James Vasile ja...@hackervisions.org wrote: I'm curious as to what people are doing in this regard. I'm currently using a script that does tagging not entirely unlike yours, (though my script isn't clever to retry a call to notmuch---believe it or not I'm

Re: [notmuch] vim client

2010-02-25 Thread Ben Gamari
Excerpts from Arian Kuschki's message of Thu Feb 25 12:03:30 -0500 2010: On Sat 20, 12:34 -0500, Ben Gamari wrote: The real problem is all notmuch calls are synchronous. Vim unfortunately lacks the excellent asynchronous subprocess interface that emacs has. Therefore, I'm afraid the vim

Re: [notmuch] Initial tagging

2010-02-25 Thread James Vasile
On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:02:08 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: One distinction is that I have all of my notmuch tag commands operate globally rather than just on new messages. One of the things that really annoyed be about sup was that the support for automatic tagging worked as a