[notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch-show-get-header: new function; return alist of parsed header fields.

2009-12-05 Thread David Bremner
This function parses the displayed message to recover header fields. It uses mailheader.el to do the actual header parsing, after preprocessing to remove indentation. It relies on the variables notmuch-show-message-begin-regexp, notmuch-show-header-begin-regexp, and

[notmuch] RFC: output json from notmuch?

2009-12-13 Thread David Bremner
, and the equivalent sexpr as parsed by json.el. -- David Bremner Professor, UNB Computer Science brem...@unb.ca http://www.cs.unb.ca/~bremner Cross Appointment, UNB Mathematics http://www.mitacs.ca/ MITACS

Re: [notmuch] RFC: output json from notmuch?

2009-12-13 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 13 Dec 2009 19:21:02 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: Attachments: json output of a message from carl, and the equivalent sexpr as parsed by json.el. uh, right. Second time lucky. msg.json Description: json encoded message msg.sexpr Description: msg converted

Re: [notmuch] RFC: output json from notmuch?

2009-12-13 Thread David Bremner
discussion), as a counter-weight to the desire to avoid dependencies (which I agree with), I also think we should be careful about how many embedded copies of code there are, from the point of keeping up with security problems. This is probably a bias I picked up from Debian. -- David Bremner

Re: [notmuch] RFC: output json from notmuch?

2009-12-14 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 14 Dec 2009 14:30:45 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: I'm still not sure of the need to depend on a library just to *generate* any particular format. I would expect that job to be so constrained as to be almost trivial. I won't necessarily block a patch based on that, but I

[notmuch] notmuch and imap [musing, no code :)]

2009-12-15 Thread David Bremner
Recent discussions on IRC (I forget with whom, sorry), brought me back to thinking about syncing notmuch with imap. In addition to the flags \Seen, \Answered, \Draft, \Deleted, and \Flagged, imap servers can optionally support user defined keywords (i.e. tags). At least courier and dovecot do.

[notmuch] wish: syncable/immutable threads

2009-12-15 Thread David Bremner
I write links to notmuch threads into my todo list in org-mode. I then try to visit these threads on a different machine, but of course that thread id doesn't exist there, since the database was reindexed and tags reimported. I don't know if it is in any way practical, but it would be nice from

Re: [notmuch] wish: syncable/immutable threads

2009-12-17 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:36:04 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: But yes, if you can make your links depend only on message IDs then you can get reliable results even before we start including thread IDs in the dump output. The result of notmuch show --entire-thread id:foo is quite

[notmuch] wish: more informative citations

2009-12-18 Thread David Bremner
Wouldn't it be nice if citations showed the first line or so of the text being cited? Stealing text from another thread, In case of a citation following immediately new contents. When the citation was collapsed: [1-line citation. Click/Enter to show.] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet,

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch-query.el: new file to support access to the notmuch database.

2009-12-21 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 09:21:40 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: I like that you're doing a new file, separate from our current notmuch.el. That file has already become extremely large and unwieldy and needs to be broken up. But to do that, I really want to get the emacs lisp files

[notmuch] message-templ

2009-12-29 Thread David Bremner
Users of notmuch may be interested in Arisawa-san's port of the wanderlust template mechanism to message mode. This allows for example to emulate gnus posting styles (at least as far as I understand them) and to send form letters. I have made a public git repo containing Arisawa-san's version

Re: [notmuch] libtool-less shared library building

2010-01-20 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:07:26 -0500, Ben Gamari bgamari.f...@gmail.com wrote: Here is a short patch to build libnotmuch.so and link against the notmuch binary against it. I think the notmuch rule in Makefile.local is probably missing a dependency on lib/libnotmuch.so, but I wasn't sure how to

Re: [notmuch] Git commit mails (was: New wiki instance on the notmuchmail.org website)

2010-02-03 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:18:29 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote: PS: speaking of prefixes, how about remving the subject prefix of this list in general? ;) I used to agree, but in notmuch, I actually find it convenient to have threads marked by mailing list. Perhaps this will

Re: [notmuch] list subject prefixes [was: Git commit mails (was: New wiki instance on the notmuchmail.org website)]

2010-02-03 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 03 Feb 2010 18:37:57 -0500, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: I think I might agree with Martin. The subject prefix doesn't really seem necessary with notmuch, considering that for the following two searches: notmuch search to:notmuch@notmuchmail.org notmuch

Re: [notmuch] hack to retag a directory

2010-02-06 Thread David Bremner
On Fri, 05 Feb 2010 17:41:48 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: [talking about gitmuch, a simple wrapper around notmuch dump git commit] And it's interesting that this script might be just good enough for the synchronization needs of some people. It's not integrated, and might

Re: [notmuch] patchwork test instance

2010-02-10 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 16:25:03 +1300, martin f krafft madd...@madduck.net wrote: Are people actually using it? I know that merging patches is impossible, and that sucks, but otherwise: is this something to keep around, or should I take the site offline again? I'm not sure what merging patches

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] Add an --format=(json|text) command-line option to both notmuch-search and notmuch-show.

2010-02-10 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 11:17:40 -0400, da...@tethera.net wrote: From: Scott Robinson sc...@quadhome.com In the case of notmuch-show, --format=json also implies --entire-thread as the thread structure is implicit in the emitted document tree. Dear Scott and other interested parties; As I

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] notmuch-show: add tags to json output

2010-03-01 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 1 Mar 2010 16:39:06 +0100, Sebastian Spaeth sebast...@sspaeth.de wrote: The previous json patches forgot to add the notmuch tags to the json output. This is inconsistent to the text output so here they are. We just output a 'tags' field that sends a space delimited list of

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 3/3] notmuch-show.c: prototype tabular output format, with output control

2010-03-09 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 11:51:46 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Are you proposing the tabular format for inclusion in notmuch? Or does prototype suggest that you were just showing a demonstration of what could be done here? If you do want this included, what's the motivation for

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH 3/3] notmuch-show.c: prototype tabular output format, with output control

2010-03-10 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:25:22 -0800, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Tue, 09 Mar 2010 16:19:16 -0400, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: --format=tabular --output=message-id Ah, so maybe your notmuch show --format=tabular is basically the same thing I imagined for notmuch

Re: [notmuch] [PATCH] format_part_json: part_content-data is not null terminated

2010-04-01 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 11:49:48 +0100, Gregor Hoffleit gre...@hoffleit.de wrote: In format_part_json, part_content-data is not a null terminated string. I'd like to see this bug fixed, and the patch is pretty small, but... Instead, we have to use part_content-len. + content_data =

Re: [notmuch] pull request

2010-04-01 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 01 Apr 2010 14:09:57 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: More significantly, this level of documentation needs to be put into the notmuch help output (instead of the placeholder that's there in the current patch). It also needs to be added to the man page in notmuch.1. Allow me

Re: [notmuch] Message parsing issue?

2010-04-06 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 3 Apr 2010 18:25:40 +1100, Jason White ja...@jasonjgw.net wrote: The problem is that for certain messages, notmuch show treats the entire message, including, significantly, all of the headers, as the message body. An example is attached, with notmuch show output as the first file and

Re: [PATCH] Try to provide search buffers with titles from notmuch-folders.

2010-04-15 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 08:16:09 -0400, Servilio Afre Puentes servi...@gmail.com wrote: --- emacs/notmuch.el | 11 ++- 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) Thanks very much for the contribution. It would be nice (and Carl will almost certainly ask for this) to have a

[PATCH v2] notmuch.el: add a hook to notmuch-reply

2010-04-21 Thread David Bremner
From: David Bremner brem...@unb.ca This patch introduces a variable notmuch-reply-hook and calls it using run-hooks. This allows people to easily override the header setup and so forth done by notmuch-reply. In particular it allows harmonizing the headers of message-mode and notmuch-reply

Re: bug tracking

2010-04-22 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 11:47:13 -0400, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: I now think it is essential that we put together a bug tracker for notmuch. Things are moving pretty quickly now, which is great, but as the UI is frequently changing, I'm stumbling upon lots of little bugs.

Re: [PATCH] notmuch.pod: pod version of documentation, converted by rman, massaged by hand.

2010-04-24 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 31 Dec 2009 13:39:29 -0400, da...@tethera.net wrote: The idea here is to be able to generate the online help and the man page from one source. To generate a man page: pod2man notmuch.pod notmuch.1 To generate help for a specific notmuch subcommand podselect

Re: [PATCH] notmuch.pod: pod version of documentation, converted by rman, massaged by hand.

2010-04-26 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 26 Apr 2010 16:33:27 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: I tried to look at it a couple of times, but it was already stale then so I didn't look hard enough. The couple of questions I have are: * How close does the generated output match what we have today? Pretty

Re: syncing mail by simply syncing the filesystem

2010-06-12 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 09:13:07 +0200, Christoph Groth c...@falma.de wrote: The ideal setup would be one which would allow to use any of my computers independently (for example when I'm away with my laptop). When necessary, the local mail stores would be synchronized by simply syncing the home

Re: syncing mail by simply syncing the filesystem

2010-06-12 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 15:23:45 +0200, Arvid Picciani a...@exys.org wrote: syncing maildir works. notmuch's db resides inside your maildir, but its probably not safe to do while its running. And you can only have one place receive your mail, otherwise you loose tags. Well, only one place where

Re: social gathering during DebConf

2010-07-26 Thread David Bremner
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:56:51 -0400, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Hey, folks. For those of you that don't already know, David Bremner will be hosting a birds-of-a-feather session on notmuch during DebConf 10 in NYC [0] on Thursday, August 5 [1]. I also made a wiki page

Re: notmuch synchronization

2010-10-05 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:48:36 -0400, Ethan Glasser-Camp gla...@cs.rpi.edu wrote: - the message at http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2010/002957.html starts a thread about exactly this subject. This seems like the most promising approach (using unison to sync mail across all machines,

Re: notmuch-next branch

2010-10-12 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:19:35 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:45:47 +0300, Felipe Contreras felipe.contre...@gmail.com wrote: I'm proposing to have notmuch-next branch, either on github or gitorious (please vote). I'd be glad to host something on

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Maildir synchronization v2

2010-10-13 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 10:50:36 -0400, Servilio Afre Puentes servi...@gmail.com wrote: Wouldn't it be more efficient to query notmuch for the filename using the message ID we store in the DB? When network usage is implemented, tramp can give us transparent remote file access in emacs. We can

Re: notmuch setup: segfault in prompt macro

2010-10-13 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:43:40 -0400, Mike Kelly pi...@pioto.org wrote: Hi, While testing Michal Sojka's latest patches, I tried running notmuch setup, only to find that it segfaults. It does this on a vanilla branch, too, though: #0 0x286e3ba5 in memcpy () from /lib/libc.so.7 No

Re: [PATCH 3/4] Add rules to build notmuch.1 and notmuch-help.h from the pod file.

2010-11-03 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 3 Nov 2010 14:18:55 -0300, da...@tethera.net wrote: +notmuch_help_files= \ + notmuch-setup-help.h\ + notmuch-new-help.h \ + notmuch-show-help.h \ + notmuch-search-help.h \ + notmuch-count-help.h\ + notmuch-reply-help.h\ +

Re: Second draft of logging patches

2010-11-09 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 24 Oct 2010 18:01:02 -0300, da...@tethera.net wrote: Here is my second try at logging, taking into account the feedback I got from Rob and Michal. There is definitely some tidying to do; in particular I know the protoypes in public headers need documentation. Also, I should add a

Re: Second draft of logging patches

2010-11-13 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 13 Nov 2010 06:25:57 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, David Bremner wrote: I had a thought of a possibly interesting application of the (yet to be written) log playback code. It could be use to implement a simple queuing system where commands

Re: splittng threads [was: Re: Combining threads]

2010-11-14 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 23:24:09 +0100, Michal Sojka sojk...@fel.cvut.cz wrote: On Sat, 13 Nov 2010, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: my current understanding is that a not-uncommon use case is to have two separate notmuch instances, synchronized by syncing maildirs and tagsets. Would such a

Re: PGP/MIME signature verification

2010-12-13 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:35:03 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: hey folks-- the signature-verification branch on my git repo [0] contains functional PGP/MIME signature verification if you supply the --verify argument to notmuch show --format=json It relies on gpg

Re: PGP/MIME signature verification

2010-12-13 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 14:35:03 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: The JSON this change produces is similar (but not identical) to my earlier proposal on this list. I forgot to mention, I also had a look at the produced json, and it looks sensible enough. One thing I'm

fix for Debian build failures

2010-12-13 Thread David Bremner
a060745745d82dc9531ed456428420f26ad2833b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner brem...@unb.ca Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:00:47 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] tests: Add optional use of timeout utility, if present. Add to emacs tests. The goal here is to treat a hung test as a failure. The emacs test for sending mail is known

better timeout patch.

2011-01-11 Thread David Bremner
Here is a timeout patch that actually seems to work. Also attached are the diffs to debian/changelog to update to 0.5+nmu2. From f8e8ea0058ca2e57fececc3f01cc05ece0c3c3c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Bremner brem...@unb.ca Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:48:59 -0400 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] tests

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called crypto to my notmuch repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. It has been applied

Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-04 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Please test and provide feedback. I would really like to see this series merged into the mainline for the next release, if at all possible. I reported some pretty weird experiences yesterday on IRC with

[Review] Re: new crypto branch providing full PGP/MIME support

2011-02-26 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 02 Feb 2011 17:18:45 -0800, Jameson Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Hi, all. I have pushed a new branch called crypto to my notmuch repository [0]. This branch provides full support for PGP/MIME signed and encrypted messages, including emacs UI support. It has been applied

Re: [PATCH] python/thread: always return a string in get_subject/authors

2011-05-09 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 9 May 2011 09:06:34 +0200, Anton Khirnov an...@khirnov.net wrote: Now None is returned when those don't exist, which is inconvenient to deal with. I'm not using the python bindings, but from a philosophical point of view, this change makes me a bit uncomfortable since it apparently

proposed debian upload 0.5.5

2011-05-28 Thread David Bremner
I'd like to upload current master to debian experimental. I think this might help with a few integration issues (libgmime in particular, and maybe gpg-agent). My branch is at http://pivot.cs.unb.ca/git/?p=notmuch.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/proposed-0.5.5 On top of current master, this

Re: proposed debian upload 0.5.5

2011-05-28 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 28 May 2011 09:37:59 -0300, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: I'd like to upload current master to debian experimental. I think this might help with a few integration issues (libgmime in particular, and maybe gpg-agent). My branch is at http://pivot.cs.unb.ca/git/?p

Re: Decryption fails

2011-05-30 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 30 May 2011 21:30:03 +0200, Felix Geller fgel...@gmail.com wrote: starts eating all my CPU and doesn't return. Doing it on the command line using gpg directly or going through Emacs' epa works fine. Most of the test cases in crypto fail as well, but I'm not sure which ones are

Re: When will we have our next release?

2011-06-04 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 04 Jun 2011 16:27:33 +0200, Xavier Maillard xav...@maillard.im wrote: I know it is a bit off topic here but just a question: how will you deal with dependencies ? I mean, when we need GMime vX.Y.Z and Debian has already vX.V.W ? The same as every other Debian package? Try to persuade

Debian packaging changes

2011-06-21 Thread David Bremner
As of the latest snapshot for debian experimental, I create seperate binary packages for python bindings and for the emacs-interface. Since the plan is to merge these changes back to master fairly soon, I'd appreciate any feedback on these or any other patches in the series.

Re: hiding xapian symbols

2011-06-21 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:05:15 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: However, i'm concerned that the act of hiding these symbols will make it so that any program that tries to link both libnotmuch and libxapian will be unable to use these symbols. This makes me think that a

Notmuch 0.6: Let's do it.

2011-06-22 Thread David Bremner
No, it's not a code name, unless you really want it to be. After some discussion with Carl and Jamie on IRC, I have declared myself release tyrant, with Jamie as my assistant [1]. The release plan is as follows. 1) Create a release branch (called release) at b0ba84f9e71b0. You can get this

Re: [PATCH] emacs: Show all multipart/alternative parts by default.

2011-06-22 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 18:14:12 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: One way to get around this is to set the notmuch-show-all-multipart/alternative-parts customization variable to True ('t'), which will cause all parts to always be displayed. Pushed.

Re: [PATCH] tests: add a test for symbol hiding side effects

2011-06-23 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 22 Jun 2011 09:02:36 -0300, da...@tethera.net wrote: From: David Bremner brem...@debian.org The worry here is that a binary linking with libnotmuch might lose access to Xapian::Error symbols because libnotmuch hides them. After some helpful feedback from jrollins and amdragon on IRC

Re: libnotmuch: add linker script to declare only notmuch_* symbols as global.

2011-06-23 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:35:58 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 03:20:05 -0700 (PDT), (David Bremner) wrote: Presumably you'll be updating the debian/libnotmuch1.symbols files as necessary next. (I assume the packaging scripts will guide you to do that anyway.) Yes

Re: debian: Override RPATH_LDFLAGS

2011-06-23 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 14:38:42 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: So, you'll want to test it, of course, but I think you can (and should) drop this override of RPATH_LDFLAGS from the Debian packaging now. As you say, it seems to work without this patch. Revert pushed to master. d

Re: [PATCH] test: remove useless test_emacs call from an emacs FCC test

2011-06-23 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011 17:12:04 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: Thanks for the catch. That was left over from some debugging I was doing while writing the patch originally. I cherry-picked all three of these into the release branch. I'm going to skip the typo fixes for 0.6, unless

Re: [PATCH] libnotmuch: build symbols list without relying on gcc -aux-info.

2011-06-28 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:04:39 -0700, Carl Worth cwo...@cworth.org wrote: I assume by better you mean that this one is less fragile to issues like the precise formatting of our notmuch.h header file. Yes, that's what I meant. Meanwhile, though, our API *is* declared in the header file, (that's

Re: Notmuch 0.6: Let's do it.

2011-07-01 Thread David Bremner
The release plan is as follows. 4) Release July 1. We are getting close. I have tagged 0.6rc1 in git://git.notmuchmail.org/git/notmuch and uploaded 0.6~rc1 to Debian unstable. Barring fubars, the only changes from here should be documentation [1] Your friendly release tyrant, David [1]

notmuch release 0.6 now available

2011-07-01 Thread David Bremner
/notmuch-0.6.tar.gz.sha1.asc (signed by David Bremner) What's new in notmuch 0.6 = New, general features - Folder-based searching Notmuch queries can now include a search term to match the directories in which mail files are stored (within the mail

branchs and tags and merges oh my!

2011-07-01 Thread David Bremner
Much to everyone's relief, 0.6 is finally released. From a git perspective, the release process went like this. 0) I branched release from master on June 22 1) I cherry-picked some subset of post June 22 commits from master to release 1a) actually I cheated and cherry-picked the last few

Re: branchs and tags and merges oh my!

2011-07-02 Thread David Bremner
On Fri, 01 Jul 2011 18:37:27 -0300, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: So now we have to decide what to do. FWIW, there are about 20 commits on release past d6f05fd. There are two obvious strategies going forward. A third strategy is git checkout master git merge -s ours 0.6

Re: branchs and tags and merges oh my!

2011-07-02 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 11:59:04 -0400, servilio servi...@gmail.com wrote: What about having Carl do the merging of features into a develop branch[1], then the release manager prepares a release in a release branch, merging back and tagging into master when release is ready? A similar workflow

Re: [PATCH] Use POSIX sed invocation

2011-07-03 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 10:18:17 +0100, Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org wrote: Fixes broken build on DragonFly BSD - sed -n 's/^\s*\(notmuch_[a-z_]*\)\s*(.*/\t\1;/p' $ notmuch.sym + sed -n 's/^[[:space:]]*\(notmuch_[a-z_]*\)[[:space:]]*(.*/'`printf \t`'\1;/p' $ notmuch.sym Fix (for

Re: branchs and tags and merges oh my!

2011-07-03 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 15:23:02 -0500, Jed Brown j...@59a2.org wrote: Remind me of why bugfix patches can't (usually) be applied to the release branch first, then merged into master? Yes, that might work out for a release consisting of one or two critical patches, and happening more or less

Re: branchs and tags and merges oh my!

2011-07-03 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 03:14:03 -0400, servilio servi...@gmail.com wrote: I think there is no need for tags on master, make dist should only be run on the release branch, right? It isn't just about make dist (which I anyway thinks makes sense to run on master to make snapshots). Every

Re: notmuch 0.6: notmuch new dies with std::terminate

2011-07-04 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 11:58:24 +0100, Robin Green gree...@greenrd.org wrote: Some time after upgrading to notmuch 0.6, notmuch new suddenly started failing, with this backtrace: (this is on DragonFly BSD) Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. [...] #3 0x00080150c9c1 in

Re: priorities for 0.7

2011-07-07 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 07 Jul 2011 20:34:21 +0200, Daniel Schoepe daniel.scho...@googlemail.com wrote: My patch about user-defined sections mainly needs better documentation and there's discussion reducing its flexibility a little, so it should definitely be ready before the feature freeze, if that's still

Re: [PATCH] debian: strictly depend on the same version of libnotmuch

2011-07-10 Thread David Bremner
On Sat, 9 Jul 2011 21:17:09 +0200, Uwe Kleine-K├Ânig uklei...@strlen.de wrote: To prevent the same problem in the future let notmuch depend on the same version of libnotmuch1. I added the additional comment , | The underlying issue is that the libnotmuch interface is not | entirely

Re: Proposed patches for notmuch-vim

2011-07-10 Thread David Bremner
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 07:32:20 -0300, David Bremner da...@tethera.net wrote: Can someone who uses the vim interface (Felipe?) have a look at the patches in Also http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=633115 d pgp5RdtebeWBE.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: priorities for 0.7

2011-07-10 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 06 Jul 2011 09:55:00 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Hey, folks. Now that 0.6 is *finally* out the door, it's time to start working on 0.7. As Interim Distinguished co-Chief Vice Tyrant I have been tasked with starting the discussion on 0.7 release

notmuch-vim: set foldmethod=marker

2011-07-10 Thread David Bremner
Joey Hess reports http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=616692 that adding set foldmethod=marker to .vimrc pretty much breaks the vim interface, and I can confirm this is still present in 0.6. Any comments from vimmers? d pgpKGxYSF9yaO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: Notmuch scripts

2011-07-10 Thread David Bremner
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:28:21 +0200, c...@te2000.cz wrote: As some of you know I have written several scripts that aid using notmuch, including an alternative to the notmuch-mutt perl script. Since Carl Worth consented to include them into official distribution I am now cleaning them up,

Re: hello from a new vim front-end user/hacker

2011-07-10 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 12:43:30 -0400, Jason Woofenden ja...@jasonwoof.com wrote: For my future patches, I'm planning on pushing them to a public repo, and mailing the patches to this list with git-send-email. Is that a good system for you all? That is perfect, and welcome aboard! Maybe the vim

Re: [PATCH] debian: strictly depend on the same version of libnotmuch

2011-07-10 Thread David Bremner
On Sun, 10 Jul 2011 17:12:19 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor d...@fifthhorseman.net wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed Non-text part: multipart/signed On 07/10/2011 08:53 AM, David Bremner wrote: | The underlying issue is that the libnotmuch interface is not | entirely captured by the set

problems with symbol hiding on Debian Squeeze i386

2011-07-11 Thread David Bremner
Julien Valroth reported on IRC that he had problems with the initial call of 'notmuch new' crashing with terminate called after throwing an instance of 'Xapian::InvalidArgumentError' I confirmed that the following quick and dirty patch seems to fix the problem. --- a/lib/Makefile.local +++

Impending release 0.6.1, Debian versioning scheme.

2011-07-17 Thread David Bremner
I'm about ready to roll a bug fix release 0.6.1. You can take a look at git://pivot.cs.unb.ca/notmuch.git branch: release This fixes two annoying bugs: The debian packages now depend strictly on the same version libnotmuch (thanks ukleink). This makes upgrades slightly more

Re: Missing inlined message/rfc822 bodies?

2011-07-18 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 01:06:05 -0700, Keith Packard kei...@keithp.com wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed Non-text part: multipart/signed I wasn't seeing anything for an inlined message/rfc822 part (as with a forwarded email message) and discovered that for some reason, the message structure

Re: [PATCH] Emacs: Add variable to toggle message indentation in a thread

2011-07-18 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 18 Jul 2011 21:04:17 +0200, Felix Geller fgel...@gmail.com wrote: Used git send-email this time, did that turn out correctly? :) It looks good, except you need some commit messages. Have a look at the existing commits to get an idea of what the standards are. Particularly look at

Re: [PATCH] libnotmuch: only build symbols list after the modules are built

2011-07-20 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 20 Jul 2011 14:38:18 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote: If the notmuch.sym target does not explicitly depend on $(libnotmuch_modules), gen-version-script.sh may be run before all the .o files are created. This can be observed when doing a parallel build on a machine with

Re: [PATCH] libnotmuch: only build symbols list after the modules are built

2011-07-20 Thread David Bremner
On Thu, 21 Jul 2011 01:31:37 +0200, Thomas Jost schno...@schnouki.net wrote: Here's an updated version of the patch with a shorter commit message. For the record, the build log I sent earlier was obtained on my work PC, which has two 8-core CPUs. No problem on my laptop with its dual-core

notmuch release 0.7 now available

2011-08-01 Thread David Bremner
/notmuch-0.7.tar.gz.sha1.asc (signed by David Bremner) What's new in notmuch 0.7 = Vim interface improvements -- Jason Woofenden provided a number of bug fixes for the Vim interface * fix citation/signature fold lengths * fix cig/cit parsing

[Jonathan Nieder] Bug#636707: notmuch-vim: using a saved search is very slow

2011-08-05 Thread David Bremner
---BeginMessage--- Package: notmuch-vim Version: 0.7-1 Severity: wishlist Hi, I'm getting started using notmuch-vim for the first time. Following the advice from README.Debian, I run: vim-addons install notmuch Then, following the advice from README: vim -c ':NotMuch' I am

[Jonathan Nieder] Bug#636709: notmuch-vim: :help notmuch does not show help

2011-08-05 Thread David Bremner
---BeginMessage--- Package: notmuch-vim Version: 0.7-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: upstream Hi, Vim's help system is one of its strengths. It would be nice if :help :NotMuch and similar commands worked for getting an overview of how the vim plugin works when it is in use. (I should probably move

Re: [PATCH] fix checking whether header is member of message-hidden-headers

2011-08-25 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011 14:59:02 +0300, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@iki.fi wrote: Emacs lisp function 'member' takes element and list as an argument. I.e. the second argument is list, not symbol referencing the list. On emacs 23.x the member call always returned nil (thus buggy), on emacs 22.x the

Re: Fix for emacs 24

2011-08-26 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 01 Aug 2011 11:12:36 -0600, richardmu...@gmail.com wrote: Emacs added another parameter to the send mail functions. This caused emacs to error out. (defun notmuch-mua-mail (optional to subject other-headers continue -switch-function yank-action

Re: Patch formatting: (was: remove GNU specific nm option from version script)

2011-08-30 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011 14:04:03 +0300, Tomi Ollila tomi.oll...@nixu.com wrote: Maybe you should check how to properly format patches for the list. For example. see: http://notmuchmail.org/pipermail/notmuch/2011/005412.html PS: Maybe we should have just one page anyone can refer in reply

Re: [PATCH] adds getline and getdelim to notmuch.sym if not provided by OS

2011-09-05 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 09:43:37 +0200, matthias.guedem...@googlemail.com wrote: Can you let me know if my version of the patches is OK on OpenBSD? yes it works well on OpenBSD5.0-current, thanks a lot, OK, I pushed a slightly modified version to master, hopefully I didn't break it when tidying

Re: Fix for emacs 24

2011-09-05 Thread David Bremner
On Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:47:44 -0600, richardmu...@gmail.com wrote: ** `compose-mail' now accepts an optional 8th arg, RETURN-ACTION, and passes it to the mail user agent function. This argument specifies an action for returning to the caller after finishing with the mail. This is currently

Re: gmail syncing sort of working

2011-09-05 Thread David Bremner
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 19:31:36 -0700, Alex Botero-Lowry alex.boterolo...@gmail.com wrote: p.s. I also ran into an issue with the notmuch python bindings where I had to wrap every c_void_p in POINTER() or it would segfault for any method that tried to use a pointer. Also the sed command that

Re: [PATCH] test: overhaul multipart test to test for improved message/rfc822 handling

2011-09-05 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:01:46 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: The main goal of this overhaul is to define how message/rfc822 parts should be handled. message/rfc822 parts should be output in a similar fashion to the outer message, including some subset of the

Re: [PATCH] Add NEWS item output improvements to rfc822 part handling.

2011-09-06 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:17:30 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: --- NEWS | 11 +++ 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) Pushed, with thanks! d ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org

test case for message display

2011-09-06 Thread David Bremner
I haven't had a chance to investigate it, but here is a message that show a bug in message display, I think in citation/top-posting hiding. Hiding the whole message would be ok, but there is no un-hide button. ---BeginMessage--- --- Original message --- From: Ross Vandegrift

Re: [PATCH] Do not attept to output part raw if part is not GMimePart.

2011-09-07 Thread David Bremner
On Tue, 06 Sep 2011 15:51:42 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins jroll...@finestructure.net wrote: Everyone that I know of who has tried to reproduce this bug has been able to. I vote that we include this patch in 0.8, so that we can get it out of the way. I have pushed this to master. Sorry, I

notmuch release 0.8 now available

2011-09-10 Thread David Bremner
/notmuch-0.8.tar.gz.sha1.asc (signed by David Bremner) What's new in notmuch 0.8 = Improved handling of message/rfc822 parts Both in the CLI and the emacs interface. Output of rfc822 parts now includes the primary headers, as well as the body and all subparts. Output

Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] improved broken tests support and test for a bug

2011-09-10 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 08:07:18 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: This version implements suggestions by Austin. Regards, Dmitry I have pushed this series. ___ notmuch mailing list notmuch@notmuchmail.org

Re: [PATCH] Add missing call to g_type_init()

2011-09-10 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:38:58 -0400, Aaron Ecay aarone...@gmail.com wrote: The Glib docs state Prior to any use of the type system, g_type_init() has to be called.[1] To not do so can lead to segfaults. The g_type system is currently used by various filters that operate on uuencoded text,

Re: [PATCH] test: reset known_broken status in test_expect_equal and test_expect_equal_file

2011-09-11 Thread David Bremner
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 03:30:54 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin dmitry.kuroch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi David. IMHO this is not a good idea, because: 1. It introduces multiple places where the flag is reset. If new test_expect_* functions are added in the future, there would be more of these. So

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >