On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:01:07 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> here is my report of git's test-lib relicensing. The following is the
> last list sent to me by Junio. I guess you have this information
> somewhere in your mailbox as well.
Hi Michal,
Thanks for following up with this.
> There are three
On Tue, 06 Apr 2010 19:01:07 +0200, Michal Sojka wrote:
> here is my report of git's test-lib relicensing. The following is the
> last list sent to me by Junio. I guess you have this information
> somewhere in your mailbox as well.
Hi Michal,
Thanks for following up with this.
> There are three
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
> has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
> as with the rest of the git code base.
>
> The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
> partic
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
> has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
> as with the rest of the git code base.
>
> The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
> partic
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was not
> meant to be an exhaustive list. ?"blame -C -C -C" may tell you more.
Without substantial analysis, "blame" alone is not sufficient - it
does not show which wo
Junio C Hamano writes:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/1389/focus=140156
[...]
>> Meanwhile, a message ID lives forever and can be used in multiple
>> contexts.
>
> Oh, I never said "do not use message ID". I said "message ID alone is not
> good enough for most people".
F
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:42:30 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Please drop the above the next time.
Oops. Yes, I missed that.
> FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was not
> meant to be an exhaustive list. "blame -C -C -C" may tell you more.
Fair enough.
> You are t
On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 19:42:30 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Please drop the above the next time.
Oops. Yes, I missed that.
> FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was not
> meant to be an exhaustive list. "blame -C -C -C" may tell you more.
Fair enough.
> You are t
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Tay Ray Chuan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano
> wrote:
> > FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was
> > not meant to be an exhaustive list. ?"blame -C -C -C" may tell you
> > more.
>
> Without substantial analysi
Junio C Hamano writes:
>> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.mail.notmuch.general/1389/focus=140156
[...]
>> Meanwhile, a message ID lives forever and can be used in multiple
>> contexts.
>
> Oh, I never said "do not use message ID". I said "message ID alone is not
> good enough for most people".
F
Hi,
On Tue, 23 Feb 2010, Tay Ray Chuan wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano
> wrote:
> > FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was
> > not meant to be an exhaustive list. "blame -C -C -C" may tell you
> > more.
>
> Without substantial analysi
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> FWIW, I only said "_at least_ you need consent from them", and it was not
> meant to be an exhaustive list. "blame -C -C -C" may tell you more.
Without substantial analysis, "blame" alone is not sufficient - it
does not show which wo
Carl Worth writes:
> From 8693995fde71e8b028318e1e83bdbb6ae759335a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Carl Worth
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:41:24 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from
> GPLv2 to GPLv2+.
Please drop the above the ne
Carl Worth writes:
> From 8693995fde71e8b028318e1e83bdbb6ae759335a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Carl Worth
> Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:41:24 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from
> GPLv2 to GPLv2+.
Please drop the above the ne
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Carl Worth wrote:
> The request for relicensing was presented to the git community in:
>
> Message-ID: <871vgmki4f@steelpick.localdomain>
>
> and explicitly agreed to by Junio C Hamano, Sverre Rabbelier, Johannes
> Schindelin, Pierre Habouzit, and J
From 8693995fde71e8b028318e1e83bdbb6ae759335a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Carl Worth
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 11:41:24 -0800
Subject: [PATCH] test-lib.sh: Add explicit license detail, with change from
GPLv2 to GPLv2+.
This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
has
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 3:55 AM, Carl Worth wrote:
> The request for relicensing was presented to the git community in:
>
> ? ? ? ?Message-ID: <871vgmki4f.fsf at steelpick.localdomain>
>
> and explicitly agreed to by Junio C Hamano, Sverre Rabbelier, Johannes
> Schindelin, Pierre Habouzit, an
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
> has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
> as with the rest of the git code base.
>
> The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
>
Hi,
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010, Carl Worth wrote:
> This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
> has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
> as with the rest of the git code base.
>
> The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
>
Carl Worth writes:
> This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
> has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
> as with the rest of the git code base.
>
> The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
> particular, the notmuch p
Carl Worth writes:
> This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
> has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
> as with the rest of the git code base.
>
> The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
> particular, the notmuch p
This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
as with the rest of the git code base.
The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
particular, the notmuch project: http://notmuchmail.org)
This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
as with the rest of the git code base.
The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
particular, the notmuch project: http://notmuchmail.org)
This file has had no explicit license information noted in it, but
has clearly been created and modified according to the terms of GPLv2
as with the rest of the git code base.
The purpose of relicensing is to allow other GPLv3+ projects (in
particular, the notmuch project: http://notmuchmail.org)
25 matches
Mail list logo
