On Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:15:39 -0500, Brett Viren
wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Mike Hommey
> wrote:
> But, here is one that looks I/O bound:
>
> notmuch tag -unread tag:inbox
>
> I have my home directory on an encfs volume and I see it and notmuch
> competing for CPU when viewing
On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 3:36 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
> A good test, if you have enough memory, would be to put your mailbox in
> a tmpfs, and see how fast that imports.
(Oops, forgot to reply to the list.)
I don't see any function calls related to I/O on the call graph.
But, here is one that lo
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 05:36:18PM -0500, Brett Viren wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
>
> > Though, frankly, I think we need to fix "notmuch new" to do much better
> > than 40 files/sec.
>
> Just a "me too".
>
> Processed 130871 total files in 38m 7s (57 files/sec.)
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:18 -0500, Brett Viren
wrote:
> Processed 130871 total files in 38m 7s (57 files/sec.).
> Added 102723 new messages to the database (not much, really).
Just be glad that you have so little mail. ;-)
> This was ~2GB of mail on a 2.5GHz CPU. That seems pretty reasonable
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:18 -0500, Brett Viren
wrote:
> How can I purge the index? I can't locate it.
I believe you can just remove /path/to/maildir/.notmuch
Jed
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 20:36:06 +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Yup, I had the repo on my disk a week before Keith blogged about it. Just nice
> that it was going crazy that fast and people start using it and contributing
> to
> it.
Yes, it's quite fun.
> > Though, frankly, I think we need to fix "
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 18:07, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:51:11 +0100, Stefan Schmidt datenfreihafen.org> wrote:
> > Disclaimer: I'm using vim, in combination with mutt for email, for years,
> > but
> > never dealt with emacs. Please have this in mind and spot any emacs user
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 18:26, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:36:55 +0100, Stefan Schmidt datenfreihafen.org> wrote:
>
> > In my case only 80 messages were printed before the gap. All of them had a
> > wrong
> > year in the timestamp. 1900 and 1970. Maybe notmuch just comes int
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 18:16, Carl Worth wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:12:52 -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> > I haven't figured out how to quickly tag everything as already read or
> > archived or whatever .. can someone who knows more about what's going on
> > confirm my hypothesis and if
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:36:55 +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> I executed "/usr/local/bin/notmuch search --sort=oldest-first tag:inbox" by
> hand
> and from the 21 minutes it took it stayed around 20 in a state where no new
> message where printed and then sudenly all the rest comes up.
That's actu
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:12:52 -0700, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> I haven't figured out how to quickly tag everything as already read or
> archived or whatever .. can someone who knows more about what's going on
> confirm my hypothesis and if so, suggest the best approach to getting to
> a happier state?
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 15:51:11 +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Disclaimer: I'm using vim, in combination with mutt for email, for years, but
> never dealt with emacs. Please have this in mind and spot any emacs user
> errors
> in this report. :)
Hi Stefan, welcome to Notmuch! And don't worry, we do
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 17:36:18 -0500, Brett Viren
> wrote:
>> How can I purge the index? ?I can't locate it.
>
> I believe you can just remove /path/to/maildir/.notmuch
Doh! Thanks. I have a dovecot controlled Maildir so this
dot-directory got
On Sat, Nov 21, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Carl Worth wrote:
> Though, frankly, I think we need to fix "notmuch new" to do much better
> than 40 files/sec.
Just a "me too".
Processed 130871 total files in 38m 7s (57 files/sec.).
Added 102723 new messages to the database (not much, really).
This was ~2G
Hello.
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 08:12, Bdale Garbee wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>
> > Sadly that takes around 25 minutes here on an Intel Core2Duo notbeook
> > (Thinkpad
> > X200s). I tried this several times now. CPU load was low (~10%) during this
> > time
>
Hello.
Disclaimer: I'm using vim, in combination with mutt for email, for years, but
never dealt with emacs. Please have this in mind and spot any emacs user errors
in this report. :)
I have first seen notmuch several weeks ago as it seems a silent project. Being
more then happy now that it envol
On Sat, 2009-11-21 at 15:51 +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Sadly that takes around 25 minutes here on an Intel Core2Duo notbeook
> (Thinkpad
> X200s). I tried this several times now. CPU load was low (~10%) during this
> time
> so it is mostly IO bound.
I see the same behavior on my notebook.
17 matches
Mail list logo
