On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
> > The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive
> > for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region
> > without thinking
On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
> > The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive
> > for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region
> > without thinking
Hi,
On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
> > The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive
> > for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region
> > without thin
Jameson Graef Rollins
writes:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
>> The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive
>> for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region
>> without thinking about it, that this approach would ma
Jameson Graef Rollins
writes:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
>> The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive
>> for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region
>> without thinking about it, that this approach would ma
On Sun, 15 May 2011 18:16:31 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
wrote:
> It's possible, and works the way you'd think it would -- just select a
> bunch of threads in the search list, and then tag them. It will apply
> the tag to the messages in the region. (In fact, tagging a single thread
> is just a specia
Hi,
On Mon, 16 May 2011 09:29:19 -0700, Jameson Graef Rollins
wrote:
> On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
> wrote:
> > The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive
> > for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region
> > without thi
Hi,
On Mon, 16 May 2011 17:15:17 +0200, Daniel Schoepe wrote:
> I think this is only a subset of the requested functionality, since one
> can only tag consecutive threads at once.
It seems like for non-consecutive messages to be tagged, there'd have to
be some sort of mutt-style message-marking
On Sat, 14 May 2011 22:23:16 -0700, mueen at nawaz.org wrote:
> 2. Using the Python bindings, I want to do a query, get the messages,
> and examine the headers of the messages. The problem is that if a
> message is multi-part, then, I can't find any way to see the main
> headers. I can only see the
On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive
> for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region
> without thinking about it, that this approach would make sense for the
> emacs interface. In o
On Mon, 16 May 2011 11:27:52 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal
wrote:
> The decision, if I remember correctly, was that regions are so intuitive
> for emacs users, and many people reported trying to tag by region
> without thinking about it, that this approach would make sense for the
> emacs interface. In
Hi,
On Mon, 16 May 2011 17:15:17 +0200, Daniel Schoepe
wrote:
> I think this is only a subset of the requested functionality, since one
> can only tag consecutive threads at once.
It seems like for non-consecutive messages to be tagged, there'd have to
be some sort of mutt-style message-markin
On Sun, 15 May 2011 18:16:31 -0400, Jesse Rosenthal wrote:
> It's possible, and works the way you'd think it would -- just select a
> bunch of threads in the search list, and then tag them. It will apply
> the tag to the messages in the region. (In fact, tagging a single thread
> is just a special
On Sat, 14 May 2011 22:23:16 -0700, mu...@nawaz.org wrote:
> 2. Using the Python bindings, I want to do a query, get the messages,
> and examine the headers of the messages. The problem is that if a
> message is multi-part, then, I can't find any way to see the main
> headers. I can only see the "h
Hi
On Sat, 14 May 2011 22:23:16 -0700, mueen at nawaz.org wrote:
> 3. Can I mark a bunch of messages for tagging in the Emacs interface? I
> know I can tag all messages in a query, but sometimes I'd just like to
> select a few manually and tag them (or apply some other command to
> them).
I do n
On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:56:11 +0200, Xavier Maillard
wrote:
> On Sat, 14 May 2011 22:23:16 -0700, mueen at nawaz.org wrote:
>
> > 3. Can I mark a bunch of messages for tagging in the Emacs interface? I
> > know I can tag all messages in a query, but sometimes I'd just like to
> > select a few man
On Sun, 15 May 2011 23:56:11 +0200, Xavier Maillard wrote:
> On Sat, 14 May 2011 22:23:16 -0700, mu...@nawaz.org wrote:
>
> > 3. Can I mark a bunch of messages for tagging in the Emacs interface? I
> > know I can tag all messages in a query, but sometimes I'd just like to
> > select a few manuall
Hi
On Sat, 14 May 2011 22:23:16 -0700, mu...@nawaz.org wrote:
> 3. Can I mark a bunch of messages for tagging in the Emacs interface? I
> know I can tag all messages in a query, but sometimes I'd just like to
> select a few manually and tag them (or apply some other command to
> them).
I do not
On 05/15/2011 01:23 AM, mueen at nawaz.org wrote:
> 1. How do I see *all* the headers using the emacs interface? It shows me
> only 4 headers.
shift-v from within a "notmuch-show" buffer will show the entire source
of the message, including all headers.
i don't know the answers to your other ques
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
writes:
> On 05/15/2011 01:23 AM, mu...@nawaz.org wrote:
>> 1. How do I see *all* the headers using the emacs interface? It shows me
>> only 4 headers.
>
> shift-v from within a "notmuch-show" buffer will show the entire source
> of the message, including all headers.
That di
Daniel Kahn Gillmor
writes:
> On 05/15/2011 01:23 AM, mueen at nawaz.org wrote:
>> 1. How do I see *all* the headers using the emacs interface? It shows me
>> only 4 headers.
>
> shift-v from within a "notmuch-show" buffer will show the entire source
> of the message, including all headers.
That
On 05/15/2011 01:23 AM, mu...@nawaz.org wrote:
> 1. How do I see *all* the headers using the emacs interface? It shows me
> only 4 headers.
shift-v from within a "notmuch-show" buffer will show the entire source
of the message, including all headers.
i don't know the answers to your other questio
Hi,
1. How do I see *all* the headers using the emacs interface? It shows me
only 4 headers.
2. Using the Python bindings, I want to do a query, get the messages,
and examine the headers of the messages. The problem is that if a
message is multi-part, then, I can't find any way to see the main
he
Hi,
1. How do I see *all* the headers using the emacs interface? It shows me
only 4 headers.
2. Using the Python bindings, I want to do a query, get the messages,
and examine the headers of the messages. The problem is that if a
message is multi-part, then, I can't find any way to see the main
he
24 matches
Mail list logo