[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 130856] Re: Show remaining time till backup is finished in UI
** Changed in: sbackup Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) -- Show remaining time till backup is finished in UI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130856 You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup team, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 618730] Re: Merge sbackup and nssbackup
Done in release 0.11.0 of SBackup. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: sbackup Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) ** Changed in: sbackup Assignee: Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: sbackup Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) -- Merge sbackup and nssbackup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618730 You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 604558] Re: 'abort backup' on exernal drives not possible
Fixed in SBackup 0.11.0 ** Changed in: sbackup Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: Undecided = High ** Visibility changed to: Public ** This bug is no longer flagged as a security vulnerability -- 'abort backup' on exernal drives not possible https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604558 You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup team, which is a direct subscriber. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Announcement] Final version Simple Backup 0.11.0 released
I'm proud to announce the first release 0.11.0 of the 0.11 series of the Simple Backup suite. Thanks to all who contributed to this release with coding, sending patches, testing, reporting bugs and translating! Series 0.11.x finally replaces the old-fashioned Simple Backup 0.10.5 with code that was developed in (Not So) Simple Backup in the meantime. It adds some very interesting features and is ready for daily use. Most notable enhancements are: * fixes many, partly long standing, bugs * implementation of a status application which presents information of running backups such as backup size, progress and estimated remaining time * implementation of a GIO/GVFS backend for access of remote targets (currently supported is FTP, SFTP, SSH, NFS). The backend to use can be controlled by a GConf setting (see https://answers.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+faq/1256) * notification window in case of not found backup destination: you can directly retry to use the specified destination, after mounting an external disk (good for creation of backups stored on external disks that might not be plugged in) See the changelog on the download page for more information. Known issues - There are a few known issues in SBackup 0.11.0: * Logarithmic purge is disabled * specified log directories are not modified when using former nssbackup configurations. This might lead to directories named `.../nssbackup`. * in order to use secure remote targets (SFTP, SSH via GIO) you'll have to add the remote machine to your trusted machines first (see https://answers.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+faq/1255) * due to default security settings it is not possible to create backups at remote destinations which are split into several chunks when running as superuser (root) using the GIO backend * when upgrading snapshots in old Simple Backup format (1.4 and older) it is not recommended to use these as base for successive snapshots. Make a full snapshot instead. * No Help available on Ubuntu 8.04 Hardy (due to use of Mallard) * if you want to install nssbackup from source code after you've had already installed it from PPA, you need to *Purge* the package (i.e. remove package and configuration files, not only remove) to avoid confusion of your packaging software about configuration files in system directories (namely /etc/dbus-1/system.d) Have fun. Changelog: * [Fix] LP #618730: Merge sbackup and nssbackup (see enclosed file nssbackup.ChangeLop for further information) * [Fix] LP #604558: 'abort backup' on exernal drives not possible * [Fix] LP #412934: sbackup/nssbackup fails if exclude-path contains an equal-sign * [Fix] LP #277137: crashed with NoSpaceError: No space left on device * [Fix] LP #328902: Spelling and wording errors * [Fix] LP #130856: Show remaining time till backup is finished in UI * [Fix] LP #267759: Simple Backup should display a progress bar * [Fix] LP #137293: empty dialog when restoring with sbackup * [Fix] LP #176838: Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring * [Fix] LP #254464: Password for SSH Do Not URI Encode * [Fix] LP #489107: sbackup crahses: stop_if_no_target is not an option in general * [Fix] LP #504990: Mb used instead of MB in the application dialogs * [Fix] LP #507175: libgnomevfs2-extra required for FTP backups * [Fix] LP #310306: Error: no space left * [Fix] LP #383383: restore crashes when the destination path or file is non existent * [Fix] LP #331551: Wrong original English text in sbackup po-file * [Fix] LP #585769: default backup directory doesn't exist in ubuntu * translations updated signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 550261] Re: Backups cannot be started through the GUI
** Changed in: sbackup Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: Critical = Medium -- Backups cannot be started through the GUI https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550261 You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup team, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 620526] Re: No way to determine when a restore completes
Thank you for reporting this bug. This bug is fixed in version 0.11 of SBackup. It is very unlikely that it will be fixed in Lucid though. As a workaround you can install the latest version from PPA (https://edge.launchpad.net/~nssbackup- team/+archive/ppa ) -- No way to determine when a restore completes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620526 You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup team, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #120900]: error reported running sudo nssbackupd
Question #120900 on nssbackup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+question/120900 Status: Open = Solved Jean-Peer Lorenz changed the question status: Change status as this seemed solved now. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of NSsbackup team, which is an answer contact for nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 152905] Re: The max size isn't respected.
Fixed in 0.11 series ** Also affects: sbackup/0.10 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup/0.10 Status: New = Fix Committed ** Changed in: sbackup/0.10 Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: High = Medium ** Changed in: sbackup Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- The max size isn't respected. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152905 You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 42142] Re: sbackup doesn't check for/prevent full disk
** Also affects: sbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/0.10 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup/0.10 Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: sbackup/0.10 Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: New = Fix Released -- sbackup doesn't check for/prevent full disk https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/42142 You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup team, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 622095] Re: backup over ftp doesn't work with sbackup 0.11.0
Thanks for reporting this issue and helping to make SBackup better. In order to track down the problem, could you please post a listing of the content of your backup destination under `/home/ufoofeuropa`? The output of `ls -lah` of this directory. Thank you. Does the backup work if you create an empty folder in `/home/ufoofeuropa` (e.g. my-backups) and specify this one as destination? -- backup over ftp doesn't work with sbackup 0.11.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622095 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 622496] Re: problem occurs if nssbackup is run with the destination drive not present. It looses the config info.
Thank you for using nssbackup and reporting this issue. I cannot confirm your described behavior. nssbackup works as follows: start the configuration, plug in your external harddrive and specify a directory on the external drive as backup destination. Save your configuration. When running a backup (scheduled or manual), it is checked for the presence of your custom backup destination and used. If the external disk (or whatever is specified) is not found, a message box appears which states: Destination not found. Please make sure the path exists (e.g. by mounting external disk). You can retry or cancel You can now plug in your external disk and proceed or the backup is canceled after 300 sec if you do nothing. I think this is what you expect, isn't it? Slightly different when opening the configuration. If you open the configuration again, without the external drive being present, another error message is showed: Destination path not found. It is set to the default value. Check the value before you save your configuration. That is, the destination value is not saved to disk/modified on disk unless you save your configuration again. Closing the configuration without saving will result in no modification of your previous configuration/specified destination. Purpose of this behavior is not to support a non-existing destination path when modifying the configuration. The user is forced to set the destination to an existing path when he/she sets up a backup. Does it work for you in this way? What I see here, is maybe a feature request. The error message (or choices) that are shown when opening the configuration while the destination is unavailable could be improved. A problem might arise when starting the configuration gui just for running a backup and not for modifying settings. P.S: As you might recognized, nssbackup and SBackup are finally re- merged. SBackup 0.11.x is identical with nssbackup 0.3.x. Development will take place in SBackup (to stop confusion) from now. So, you're invited to use SBackup from now. Thanks. -- problem occurs if nssbackup is run with the destination drive not present. It looses the config info. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622496 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 622512] Re: Cannot backup to smb location
@Gotit: Thank you for using nssbackup and reporting this issue. Currently there are no updated packages prepared for Ubuntu 9.04. I'll fix this and provide packages ASAP. As you might recognized, nssbackup and SBackup are finally re-merged. SBackup 0.11.x is identical with nssbackup 0.3.x. Development will take place in SBackup (to stop confusion) from now. So, you're invited to use SBackup from now. Thanks. ** Summary changed: - Cannot backup to smb location + No updated packages available for Ubuntu pre-Lucid ** Changed in: nssbackup Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: nssbackup Importance: Undecided = Low ** Description changed: Cannot use an smb location for backup destination as stated on the NSsbackup homepage: Some will do the backup on your hard drive while others will do on a remote location ( on a SSH, FTP, SMB server ... ) . NSsbackup is one of those software. I specified an smb location (smb://homenet/usb_storage/) but when I press the Test button I get a pop-up that states: - No plugin could deal with that schema 'smb://homenet/usb_storage/' + No plugin could deal with that schema 'smb://homenet/usb_storage/' Running: NSsbackup v0.2.1 Ubuntu 9.04 Installed the PPA from https://edge.launchpad.net/~nssbackup- team/+archive/ppa + + + - This is fixed in nssbackup 0.3.x. However, no updated packages are available for Ubuntu 8.04, 9.04, 9.10 -- No updated packages available for Ubuntu pre-Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622512 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Fwd: Re: Logarithmic purge disabled]
Weitergeleitete Nachricht Von: Jean-Peer Lorenz peer@gmx.net An: Anton Feenstra feens...@few.vu.nl Betreff: Re: Logarithmic purge disabled Datum: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 10:54:16 +0200 Good morning Anton, Thank you for looking into SBackup and your bug tracking. Another maintainer able to fix minor flaws would be great. Software maintenance is really time consuming. I'm sorry to tell you, that I've already fixed the purge issue. I'll prepare an updated release within the next days. I've re-implemented it similar to the simple purge: only freestanding snapshots are removed and the removal process is repeated until no freestanding snapshot or at least 1 snapshot remain (within a certain period). The more I think about rebasing of snapshots, the more I dislike the whole idea. It is always dangerous to modify backuped data, even more if it stored in 'foreign' formats (here tar). Moreover, the current implementation of writing TAR snapshot files (snar files) contains errors and updating tarballs in only possible for uncompressed tars. So, I consider to cut rebasing completely. But that's another story... I don't get why it becomes so expensive? Because of the current implementation. Each path that is processed is compared to every stored path in sequential manner. Regards, Jean-Peer Am Montag, den 23.08.2010, 09:37 +0200 schrieb Anton Feenstra: Hi Jean-Peer, I'm considering what how to implement. It seems the rebase operations, although a nice idea, quickly become too costly. As an alternative, I'm considering changing the purge logic to purge incremental snapshots only when their base (full) snapshot is scheduled to purge as well. This is the easy part. More tricky is that we do not want to purge a full (base) snapshot when any of its incremental (child) snapshots should be retained (though I'm not sure when exactly this condition could apply). I'm thinking now on how to implement this (will come back on that). I think it would be best to add a config option for this, like: - purge incremental snapshots individually by re-basing (may be slow) *or* - purge incremental shapshots together with their base (full) snapshot As a sidenote, I think I understand the basic logic of the rebasing, however I don't get why it becomes so expensive? signature.asc Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 587911] Re: Logarithmic purge disabled/does not work
** Summary changed: - Logarithmic purge disabled in final release 0.2 + Logarithmic purge disabled/does not work ** Also affects: nssbackup/0.2 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nssbackup/0.3 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: nssbackup/devel Importance: High Assignee: Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: nssbackup/devel Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: nssbackup/0.2 Status: New = Won't Fix ** Changed in: nssbackup/0.3 Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: nssbackup/devel Importance: High = Low ** Changed in: nssbackup/0.3 Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: nssbackup/0.3 Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) ** Also affects: sbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- Logarithmic purge disabled/does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587911 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 106155] Re: Sbackup should report when a backup fails
** Also affects: sbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/0.10 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: sbackup/0.10 Importance: Undecided = High ** Changed in: sbackup/0.10 Status: New = Won't Fix -- Sbackup should report when a backup fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/106155 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 620384] Re: New upstream release 0.11.0
Please review! In the meantime I've fixed two more bugs upstream and revamped the whole packaging. Should be in better shape now: * use 0.11.1 instead of 0.11.0 as base; it fixes two more important bugs * standards version set to latest 3.9.1 * drop dependecies on python 3.0 and setuptools * clean up of Makefile and rules file * proper use of distutils and dh_pysupport * installation of private python package instead of public one * drop distribution detection (no longer required) * don't byte compile python modules manually * don't call update icon cache for hicolor * don't touch user's home directories from Makefile nor maintainer scripts * simplifications of install files (more wildcards) * removed maintainer scripts that are no longer required. -- New upstream release 0.11.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 620384] Re: New upstream release 0.11.0
** Attachment added: Build log https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/620384/+attachment/1523297/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-i386.sbackup_0.11.1ubuntu1_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz -- New upstream release 0.11.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 620384] Re: New upstream release 0.11.0
** Attachment added: Upstream changelog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/620384/+attachment/1523296/+files/sbackup-upchange.log -- New upstream release 0.11.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 620384] Re: New upstream release 0.11.0
** Attachment added: sbackup_0.11.1ubuntu1.dsc https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/620384/+attachment/1523306/+files/sbackup_0.11.1ubuntu1.dsc -- New upstream release 0.11.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 620384] Re: New upstream release 0.11.0
** Attachment added: sbackup_0.11.1ubuntu1.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/620384/+attachment/1523307/+files/sbackup_0.11.1ubuntu1.tar.gz ** Summary changed: - New upstream release 0.11.0 + New upstream release 0.11.1 -- New upstream release 0.11.1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 617473] Re: GIO mount fails on amd64 due to missing package dependency to gvfs-fuse
** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- GIO mount fails on amd64 due to missing package dependency to gvfs-fuse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617473 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 587911] Re: Logarithmic purge disabled/does not work
** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Logarithmic purge disabled/does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587911 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 149865] Re: [Wishlist] Option not to gzip
** Also affects: sbackup Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/0.10 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup/0.10 Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: sbackup/0.10 Status: New = Won't Fix ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: New = Fix Released -- [Wishlist] Option not to gzip https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149865 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 587911] Re: Logarithmic purge disabled/does not work
Fixed in latest release of Simple Backup 0.11.1: logarithmic purge is re-enabled. Please take a look at sbackup's project site at https://launchpad.net/sbackup -- Logarithmic purge disabled/does not work https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587911 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 335450] Re: GConf error when run as cronjob
Thank you for your comment. Could you please describe how this bug/issue affects you when using sbackup? Do backups actually work or don't they? It's not entirely clear to me what the exact reported problem is. Moreover, could you please provide steps how to reproduce the issue on your system? Does this happen all the time, periodically...? Please add your log output or terminal output. Thanks for your help. P.S.: Please avoid further statements such as Great... is there will be any fix somewhere around 2020?. This is a community driven project and its future depends solely on valuable contributions and fixes from volunteers. So, please contribute with helpful bug reports etc. At least, please respect the work of others. Thanks. -- GConf error when run as cronjob https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 632605] Re: Incremental backups fail but not full backups
Of course, you'll have to install the package 'sbackup-plugins-fuse' then. -- Incremental backups fail but not full backups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 335450] Re: GConf error when run as cronjob
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- GConf error when run as cronjob https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/335450 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 632605] Re: Error while closing snapshot file over FTP (was: Incremental backups fail but not full backups)
** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Assignee: (unassigned) = Martin Schaaf (mascha) ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Assignee: Martin Schaaf (mascha) = (unassigned) ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: In Progress = Confirmed -- Error while closing snapshot file over FTP (was: Incremental backups fail but not full backups) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 630016] Re: always makes full backup
Thank you for using Simple Backup and reporting this issue. What brings you to the conclusion the created snapshot are full snapshots? What is the size of the archive files (files.tar.*)? ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Incomplete -- always makes full backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 634031] [NEW] Default behaviour when target is not accessable should be `Retry` instead of `Cancel`
Public bug reported: In the case of a non-existing target the indicator application displays a message window offering two choices: 1) Try to use it again 2) Cancel. After a certain period of time the default choice `Cancel` is selected. The default choice should be `Retry` so in case of a user not interacting with the computer a permanent error message is displayed stating that the backup was not successful. Valid for Simple Backup 0.11.0 and 0.11.1 ** Affects: sbackup Importance: Low Status: Confirmed ** Affects: sbackup/0.10 Importance: Undecided Status: Invalid ** Affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Low Assignee: Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) Status: Confirmed ** Affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Low Status: Confirmed ** Description changed: - In the case of a non-existing target the indicator application displays - a message window offering two choices: 1) Try to use it again 2) Cancel. - After a certain period of time the default choice `Cancel` is selected. + In the case of a non-existing target the indicator application displays a message window offering two choices: + 1) Try to use it again + 2) Cancel. After a certain period of time the default choice `Cancel` is selected. The default choice should be `Retry` so in case of a user not interacting with the computer a permanent error message is displayed stating that the backup was not successful. Valid for Simple Backup 0.11.0 and 0.11.1 ** Also affects: sbackup/0.10 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup/0.10 Status: New = Invalid ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Milestone: None = 0.11.2 ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) -- Default behaviour when target is not accessable should be `Retry` instead of `Cancel` https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 622095] Re: backup over ftp doesn't work with sbackup 0.11.0
I've added more useful debug output to version 0.11.1 Could you please re-run the setup described above and post the log. That would be really helpful. Thanks a lot. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Incomplete -- backup over ftp doesn't work with sbackup 0.11.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622095 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 632605] Re: Error while closing snapshot file over FTP (was: Incremental backups fail but not full backups)
Did this happen every time you've tried to make an incremental backup? What kind of FTP server are you running (is it NAS with FTP access, an old machine running a FTP server,...)? Are you able to reproduce the error? If so, I guess there is another thing that actually causes the FTP server to close the connection. -- Error while closing snapshot file over FTP (was: Incremental backups fail but not full backups) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 638188] [NEW] Inconsistent behavior (error message or choices) when opening config gui while destination is unavailable
Public bug reported: What I see here, is maybe a feature request. The error message (or choices) that are shown when opening the configuration while the destination is unavailable could be improved. A problem might arise when starting the configuration gui just for running a backup and not for modifying settings. When running a backup (scheduled or manual), it is checked for the presence of your custom backup destination and used. If the external disk (or whatever is specified) is not found, a message box appears which states: Destination not found. Please make sure the path exists (e.g. by mounting external disk). You can retry or cancel You can now plug in your external disk and proceed or the backup is canceled after 300 sec if you do nothing. I think this is what you expect, isn't it? Slightly different when opening the configuration. If you open the configuration again, without the external drive being present, another error message is showed: Destination path not found. It is set to the default value. Check the value before you save your configuration. That is, the destination value is not saved to disk/modified on disk unless you save your configuration again. Closing the configuration without saving will result in no modification of your previous configuration/specified destination. Purpose of this behavior is not to support a non-existing destination path when modifying the configuration. The user is forced to set the destination to an existing path when he/she sets up a backup. ** Affects: sbackup Importance: Wishlist Status: Confirmed ** Description changed: + What I see here, is maybe a feature request. The error message (or + choices) that are shown when opening the configuration while the + destination is unavailable could be improved. A problem might arise when + starting the configuration gui just for running a backup and not for + modifying settings. + When running a backup (scheduled or manual), it is checked for the presence of your custom backup destination and used. If the external disk (or whatever is specified) is not found, a message box appears which states: Destination not found. Please make sure the path exists (e.g. by mounting external disk). You can retry or cancel You can now plug in your external disk and proceed or the backup is canceled after 300 sec if you do nothing. I think this is what you expect, isn't it? Slightly different when opening the configuration. If you open the configuration again, without the external drive being present, another error message is showed: Destination path not found. It is set to the default value. Check the value before you save your configuration. That is, the destination value is not saved to disk/modified on disk unless you save your configuration again. Closing the configuration without saving will result in no modification of your previous configuration/specified destination. Purpose of this behavior is not to support a non-existing destination path when modifying the configuration. The user is forced to set the destination to an existing path when he/she sets up a backup. - - Does it work for you in this way? - - What I see here, is maybe a feature request. The error message (or - choices) that are shown when opening the configuration while the - destination is unavailable could be improved. A problem might arise when - starting the configuration gui just for running a backup and not for - modifying settings. ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: Undecided = Wishlist ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Confirmed -- Inconsistent behavior (error message or choices) when opening config gui while destination is unavailable https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638188 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 71698] Re: Old backups are not deleted (log purge)
(ns)sbackup does not purge incremental backups (in the latest version) is not totally right: logarithmic purge works in SBackup 0.11+, however the fix is not yet ported to nssbackup 0.3 (and I'm not sure it ever will). See bug https://bugs.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+bug/587911 to track progress made on this. The rest said by Anton is basically right: snapshots get only purged (logarithmic plan or simple cut-off) in the case they are _standalone_ (i.e. other snapshots do not depend on them). Purpose is to keep incremental and full snapshots consistent. Rebasing of incremental snapshots as in nssbackup before 0.2.0 is completely dropped since it is a severe risk to the backuped data. Version SBackup 0.11 introduced a slight modification of the logarithmic purge plan: * keep all from yesterday * keep one per day from last week * keep one per week from last month * keep one per month from last year * keep one per quarter from 2nd last year * keep one per year further into past Read 'keep one' as 'keep at least one'. @dik23: making a full backup every 30 days means purging of snapshots will be possible not before 30 days after the first snapshot because every snapshot in your archive relies on the other (except the latest but this one is also kept because it's the latest ;-) until you create another full snapshot. HTH. -- Old backups are not deleted (log purge) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/71698 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 455377] Re: sbackup crashes at backup --Zombie
If you hit this issue with nssbackup please open a new bug at https://bugs.launchpad.net/nssbackup Please, don't forget to include the following: * version and installed from where * your OS * a brief description of your setup and backup configuration * run as superuser/regular user? * your configuration file in question * log files with debug output enabled * list steps to reproduce the issue * output when started from command line The same information are required to track down the problem in SBackup! Thanks a lot. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Incomplete -- sbackup crashes at backup --Zombie https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/455377 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 634356] Re: Exception on reading snapshots in restore ui.
** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) -- Exception on reading snapshots in restore ui. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 638072] Re: Exclude rules not working on some dirs
** Changed in: sbackup Status: Incomplete = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) ** Also affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Low Assignee: Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Milestone: None = 0.11.2 -- Exclude rules not working on some dirs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 630016] Re: always makes full backup
Do your backups finish successful? What is logged? What filesystem type is your backup destination? -- always makes full backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 622095] Re: backup over ftp doesn't work with sbackup 0.11.0
** Also affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided Status: Incomplete ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: New = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: Incomplete = Fix Released ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) -- backup over ftp doesn't work with sbackup 0.11.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/622095 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 507177] Re: Russian translation missing in Lucid
** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Confirmed -- Russian translation missing in Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507177 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 630016] Re: always makes full backup
Your logs reveal following full snapshot: size required is '4662 MiB 145 KiB 903'. incremental : size required is '4521 MiB 957 KiB 11'. So, SBackup is basically working as it should. However, too much files are considered as fresh/updated. Let's find out why! * What type of filesystem/harddisk is /media/shared? P.S.: Yes, I've changed the command from sbackupd to sbackup because it's not a system daemon. You can find information about available commands and options at FAQ 'What commands and options do exist?' https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+faq/1294 -- always makes full backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 630016] Re: always makes full backup
Ok, so I'll set it to invalid. Thanks for your help and for using Simple Backup. P.S.: 'chmod -R uog+rw /media/shared/*' sounds for me like a 'brute force' way of doing :-o Maybe you can set owner/group of the disk when mounting it (in fstab), I do similar with my NTFS multimedia drive. P.S.S.: if you have mostly pictures on your shared drive, you should really try to save uncompressed snapshots. Recent file formats are quiete effective and it could speed up your backup significantly. (If I store my full machine directory (60 GB) compression saves max. 10 GB at all, so I don't use it) ** Changed in: sbackup Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- always makes full backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/630016 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 642087] [NEW] Logarithmic purge not working under certain circumstances
Public bug reported: Simple Backup 0.11.1 Logarithmic purge not working under certain circumstances: e.g. select full backups every 3 days - oldest snapshots gets removed before 2 weeks are elapsed ** Affects: sbackup Importance: Medium Assignee: Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) Status: Confirmed ** Affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Medium Assignee: Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) Status: Confirmed ** Affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Medium Assignee: Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = In Progress ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: sbackup Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) ** Changed in: sbackup Milestone: None = 0.11.2 ** Also affects: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: sbackup/trunk Importance: Medium Assignee: Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) Status: In Progress ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Milestone: 0.11.2 = None ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: In Progress = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Importance: Undecided = Medium ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) ** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Milestone: None = 0.11.2 -- Logarithmic purge not working under certain circumstances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 642087] Re: Logarithmic purge not working under certain circumstances
** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- Logarithmic purge not working under certain circumstances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 212015] Re: Automatic time-set sbackup on smb share is not working while manual backup is working
Please re-test with our latest release which can be found at https://edge.launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team/+archive/ppa and post log output etc. if the error is still alive. Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Incomplete -- Automatic time-set sbackup on smb share is not working while manual backup is working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/212015 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 471385] Re: simple backup restore error in 9.10
Please re-test with our latest release which can be found at https://edge.launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team/+archive/ppa and post log output etc. if the error is still alive. Thanks. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Incomplete -- simple backup restore error in 9.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471385 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 620384] Re: New upstream release 0.11.1
Please sponsor. Here are updated uploads: * upstream changelog * build log (please ignore that the log refers to version ..ubuntu2) * dsc file * and tarball I've modified maintainer scripts etc. according to your review. Moreover, I've fixed some bugs upstream and bumped the version numbering to 0.11.2 in the meantime. -- New upstream release 0.11.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 620384] Re: New upstream release 0.11.1
** Attachment added: Build log (0.11.2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/620384/+attachment/1609438/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-maverick-i386.sbackup_0.11.2ubuntu2_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz -- New upstream release 0.11.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 620384] Re: New upstream release 0.11.1
** Attachment added: Upstream changelog (0.11.2) https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/620384/+attachment/1609439/+files/sbackup-upchange.log -- New upstream release 0.11.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 620384] Re: New upstream release 0.11.1
** Attachment added: sbackup_0.11.2ubuntu1.dsc https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/620384/+attachment/1609441/+files/sbackup_0.11.2ubuntu1.dsc -- New upstream release 0.11.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 620384] Re: New upstream release 0.11.1
** Attachment added: sbackup_0.11.2ubuntu1.tar.gz https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/620384/+attachment/1609442/+files/sbackup_0.11.2ubuntu1.tar.gz ** Summary changed: - New upstream release 0.11.1 + New upstream release 0.11.2 -- New upstream release 0.11.2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/620384 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 638072] Re: Exclude rules not working on some dirs
** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Exclude rules not working on some dirs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 634031] Re: Default behaviour when target is not accessable should be `Retry` instead of `Cancel`
** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Default behaviour when target is not accessable should be `Retry` instead of `Cancel` https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 634356] Re: Exception on reading snapshots in restore ui.
** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Exception on reading snapshots in restore ui. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 632605] Re: Error while closing snapshot file over FTP (was: Incremental backups fail but not full backups)
** Changed in: sbackup/0.11 Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Error while closing snapshot file over FTP (was: Incremental backups fail but not full backups) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 645543] Re: Cannot concatenate str and error object error in 0.11.2 leads do no incremental backup
Thanks for reporting this issue and providing a fix for it. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup Milestone: None = 0.11.3 -- Cannot concatenate str and error object error in 0.11.2 leads do no incremental backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 645543] Re: Cannot concatenate str and error object error in 0.11.2 leads do no incremental backup
** Changed in: sbackup Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- Cannot concatenate str and error object error in 0.11.2 leads do no incremental backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #124884]: Not So Simple Backup to LTO tape?
Question #124884 on nssbackup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+question/124884 Status: Expired = Needs information Jean-Peer Lorenz changed the question status: Hi Brian, I've got no experience with tape drives. Can you mount the drive to a specific mount point (/media/...) and use this? -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #122507]: re-merged ?
Question #122507 on nssbackup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+question/122507 Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer: Hello Robert, please follow these steps: 1. translate your error message into english 'ans an error message: Erreur critique: Aucun fichier de configuration trouvé pour le profile par défaut.' and post it 2. open Synaptic package manager and search for 'nssbackup' and *purge* (i.e. remove it including configuration) all related packages 3. repeat step 2 for 'sbackup': *purge* all sbackup related packages 4. Open menu item 'Preferences - Repositories' in Synaptic and remove all entries related to nssbackup PPA 5. if you've manually modified your sources.list, undo all of your changes related to nssbackup/sbackup. There is no need to mess around with configuration files in Ubuntu 10.04 in order to add a PPA. You can do it using the GUI (and you should use the GUI unless you really know what you're doing ;-) 6. Close the repositories dialog and reload your packages list within Synaptic. At this time, neither nssbackup nor sbackup should be installed on your machine. Plus, you should only find sbackup 0.10.5 (this is the version included in Ubuntu Lucid's universe) when looking for it. 7. You can now add our PPA https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup- team/+archive/ppa to your repositories: open the repositories dialog again. Select tab 'Other software' and just add the following line 'ppa :nssbackup-team/ppa', press ok and then reload your packages list within Synaptic. 8. You should now find sbackup 0.11.x in Synaptic. 9. Install it (sbackup and sbackup-gtk) and check/set configurations according to your need in sbackup gui. 10. In the case you are paranoid and/or don't trust the Simple Backup Maintainers you can disable the source in the repositories dialog. Though you'll not receive automatic updates from this source then. HTH, Jean-Peer -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #122507]: re-merged ?
Question #122507 on nssbackup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+question/122507 Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer: Hi, what should I do to add the source? You don't need it. If you want the source code of simple backup just go to https://launchpad.net/sbackup/+download There, you can download tarballs containing the source that you can extract into a directory of your choice and inspect the code. my translation is: No configuration file found for default profile This mean no backup can be created because there is no configuration file present. The purge step removed it (however, purge is always preferable over remove when reinstalling software because it really removes everything of the old package). You'll have to set up a configuration before you can make a backup. installed, but there I find no menu entry for sbackup Well, this'd be really weird. SBackup installs menu entries under: * Applications - Accessories (start it from here a normal user without root privileges, does not support scheduled backups) * Applications - System tools (start it from here a root user, enables scheduled backups). In case there is no menu entry 'Applications-System tools' it could be required to enable this submenu under 'System - Settings - Main menu'. Does invokation from the command line using 'sbackup-config-gtk' resp. 'gksu sbackup-config-gtk' work? Jean-Peer -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 648754] Re: Can't mount ftp location
Thank you for using SBackup and reporting this issue. In order to track down the cause of the problem some more information are required. Please answer the following questions: * what distribution do you use? * what version of sbackup is installed; from where was it installed (PPA, from source)? * Is the bug reproducible; does it happen every time? * do you run sbackup as superuser (root) or as regular user? * are you able to open your backup destination using Nautilus? * do you have these packages installed: gvfs, gvfs-fuse, gvfs-backends? Thanks for your help. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: Confirmed = Incomplete -- Can't mount ftp location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 647929] Re: Included files dirs not working
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug. In order to track down the cause of the problem some more information are required. Please answer the following questions: * Is the bug reproducible; does it happen every time? * is your backup destination on a local drive or remote? * do you run sbackup as superuser (root) or as regular user? * Do backups work in general for you? * Do manual backups (started from Configuration GUI) work as expected? * How do you invoke the backup process? Thanks for your help. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Incomplete -- Included files dirs not working https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647929 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 642087] Re: Logarithmic purge not working under certain circumstances
** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed ** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released -- Logarithmic purge not working under certain circumstances https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642087 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 634356] Re: Exception on reading snapshots in restore ui.
** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Exception on reading snapshots in restore ui. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634356 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 634031] Re: Default behaviour when target is not accessable should be `Retry` instead of `Cancel`
** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Default behaviour when target is not accessable should be `Retry` instead of `Cancel` https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/634031 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 638072] Re: Exclude rules not working on some dirs
** Changed in: sbackup/trunk Status: Confirmed = Fix Released -- Exclude rules not working on some dirs https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/638072 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 248652] Re: RegExp (to exclude files) seems incomplete
I'm closing this bug since there is no activity since 2 years now. Feel free to reopen it if the issue is still valid for you. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: Incomplete = Invalid -- RegExp (to exclude files) seems incomplete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248652 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 648754] Re: Can't mount ftp location
Hum, it works for me most of the time. Occasionally it fails but it's gio/gvfs related then (I experience quite a lot of crashes of gvfs- daemon and Nautilus when using FTP paths in Maverick, mounting in general is not possible etc.). So far, sbackup works as expected. Could you please have a look at LP Bug #617473 and perform the tests that are proposed there? -- Can't mount ftp location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 648754] Re: Can't mount ftp location
As a workaround you could use the 'legacy' Fuse plugins: https://answers.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+faq/1256 -- Can't mount ftp location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 632605] Re: Error while closing snapshot file over FTP (was: Incremental backups fail but not full backups)
I've seen this error a few times on Maverick now. However, it did not happened every time. What distribution are you using? -- Error while closing snapshot file over FTP (was: Incremental backups fail but not full backups) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/632605 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to nssbackup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 248652] Re: RegExp (to exclude files) seems incomplete
Thanks for your response. In order to track down the cause of the problem some more information are required. Please answer the following questions: * what distribution do you use? * what version of sbackup is installed; from where was it installed (PPA, from source)? * Is the bug reproducible; does it happen every time? * is your backup destination on a local drive or remote? * do you run sbackup as superuser (root) or as regular user? * Do backups work in general for you? * Do manual backups (started from Configuration GUI) work as expected? * How do you invoke the backup process? Thanks for your help. -- RegExp (to exclude files) seems incomplete https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/248652 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 648754] Re: Can't mount ftp location
** Changed in: sbackup Status: Incomplete = In Progress -- Can't mount ftp location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 653577] [NEW] Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected
Public bug reported: Simple Backup 0.11.2 An exception is thrown when clicking on Restore, Restore as, Revert or Revert as with no file selected: ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter'. Traceback (most recent call last): File /home/peer/programming/python/sbackup/branches/series-0.11/0.11/src/sbackup/ui/restoregui.py, line 639, in on_restoreas_clicked src = self.path_to_dir(tstore.get_path(iter)) TypeError: iter should be a GtkTreeIter ** Affects: sbackup Importance: Low Assignee: Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Confirmed ** Changed in: sbackup Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) ** Changed in: sbackup Milestone: None = 0.11.3 -- Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 653749] Re: sbackup is not able to mount remote directory via SSH (testing works fine)
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug. In order to track down the cause of the problem some more information are required. Please answer the following questions: * what distribution do you use? * from where was it installed (PPA, from source)? * Is the bug reproducible; does it happen every time? * do you run sbackup as superuser (root) or as regular user? * are you able to open your backup destination using Nautilus/command line? At first glance, your specific error looks like an underlying problem with GIO/GVFS to me not directly caused by SBackup. Thanks for your help. -- sbackup is not able to mount remote directory via SSH (testing works fine) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653749 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 648754] Re: Can't mount ftp location
Workaround for this issue pushed to 0.11 repository. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: In Progress = Fix Committed ** Changed in: sbackup Importance: Undecided = Low ** Changed in: sbackup Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz) ** Changed in: sbackup Milestone: None = 0.11.3 -- Can't mount ftp location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 646297] Re: Snapshot version is not considered when making backup after upgrade
Problem was not caused by outdated snapshot versions. Base snapshot was simply broken. Settings status to invalid. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- Snapshot version is not considered when making backup after upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/646297 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 653577] Re: Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected
** Changed in: sbackup Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed -- Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 653577] Re: Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected
** Also affects: sbackup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 653577] Re: Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected
This bug is fixed in upstream series 0.11 Attached are the upstream changelog for latest bugfix release (fixes only bugs) and debdiff. sbackup (0.11.3) * [Fix] LP: #645543 Cannot concatenate str and error object error prevents incremental backups * [Fix] LP: #648754 Can't mount ftp location: don't fail when gvfs-fuse is not available; use it only if really required * [Fix] LP: #653577 Error 'iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected * refer to dependend package 'gvfs-fuse' in install and readme file * translations updated * translations added: da,el,fa,is,ja,kk,ko,kw,ro,sr,sw Is version numbering ok for a bugfix only release or should it introduce a 4th digit (i.e. 0.11.2.1)? -- Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 653577] Re: Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected
** Attachment added: ChangeLog https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/653577/+attachment/1669644/+files/ChangeLog -- Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 653577] Re: Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected
** Patch added: sbackup_0.11.3ubuntu1.debdiff https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/653577/+attachment/1669645/+files/sbackup_0.11.3ubuntu1.debdiff -- Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 645543] Re: Cannot concatenate str and error object error in 0.11.2 leads do no incremental backup
debdiff which fixes this is attached to LP Bug #653577 ** Also affects: sbackup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Cannot concatenate str and error object error in 0.11.2 leads do no incremental backup https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 653577] Re: Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected
Please sponsor pre-release update. -- Error ' iter should be a GtkTreeIter' when clicking on Restore with no file selected https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653577 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 648754] Re: Can't mount ftp location
debdiff which fixes this is attached to LP Bug #653577 ** Also affects: sbackup (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New = Confirmed -- Can't mount ftp location https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/648754 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #127941]: No dbus service on RHEL-5
Question #127941 on Simple Backup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/127941 Status: Open = Answered Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer: Hi Pete, no, there is not a single Ubuntu-ism in SBackup. You need to install a recent version of package 'python-gobject'. It is a part of Glib, the core library used to build GTK+ and GNOME. This package contains the Python bindings for GObject. Have a look at the Install file for further information about dependencies. HTH, Jean-Peer. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #129095]: Running backup from the command line
Question #129095 on Simple Backup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/129095 Status: Open = Answered Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer: Thanks for using SBackup. Beginning with sbackup 0.11.x the naming scheme was changed. It is now more consistent and intuitive. sbackupd was renamed since it's actually not a system deamon: 'sbackup' - the backup programm (was 'sbackupd') 'sbackup-config-gtk' - configuration gui written in GTK+ 'sbackup-restore-gtk' - restoration and snapshot handling (delete, upgrade) written in GTK+ HTH, Jean-Peer. P.S.: You can define/set up a cron job using the configuration gui (when running as root). Supported are simple schedules (e.g. daily, hourly) as well as custom cron expressions (e.g. 10 * * * *). -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Question #129095]: Running SBackup applications from the command line
Question #129095 on Simple Backup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/129095 Summary changed to: Running SBackup applications from the command line -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #129095]: Running backup from the command line
Question #129095 on Simple Backup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/129095 Related FAQ set to: Running SBackup applications from the command line https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+faq/1323 Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer: Jean-Peer Lorenz suggests this article as an answer to your question: FAQ #1323: “Running SBackup applications from the command line”. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 659020] Re: Cannot install upgrade or remove sbackup-gtk after upgrading to maverick
@Michael: something is wrong with your icon caches or theme folders. Could you please manually run from command line ~$ sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -v /usr/share/icons/ubuntu-mono-light ~$ sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -v /usr/share/icons/ubuntu-mono-dark and ~$ sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -f -t /usr/share/icons/ubuntu-mono-light ~$ sudo gtk-update-icon-cache -f -t /usr/share/icons/ubuntu-mono-dark Thanks for your help. ** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu) Status: New = Incomplete -- Cannot install upgrade or remove sbackup-gtk after upgrading to maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659020 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 655654] Re: Unable to mount host message in sbackup in ssh connection
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug. In order to track down the cause of the problem some more information are required. Please answer the following questions: * what distribution do you use? * what version of sbackup is installed; from where was it installed (PPA, from source)? * Is the bug reproducible; does it happen every time? * do you run sbackup as superuser (root) or as regular user? * Do backups work in general for you? * Do manual backups (started from Configuration GUI) work as expected? * are you able to open your backup destination using Nautilus/command line? * How do you invoke the backup process? Thanks for your help. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Incomplete -- Unable to mount host message in sbackup in ssh connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 653749] Re: sbackup is not able to mount remote directory via SSH (testing works fine)
I hope I can try it with another machine soon to check if it is a local problem on the used laptop or not. Any progress on this? ** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Incomplete -- sbackup is not able to mount remote directory via SSH (testing works fine) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/653749 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 659020] Re: Cannot install upgrade or remove sbackup-gtk after upgrading to maverick
There are usually two reasons for this error: * the cached directory is empty - caused by icons pack uninstall removing files but leaving directory in place *directory is not empty but the icons are not in subfolders named WIDTHxHEIGHT (icon dimensions). Please check the theme folder /usr/share/icons/ubuntu-mono-dark. Did you installed any icons manually? Does re-installing the ubuntu-mono-dark theme help? -- Cannot install upgrade or remove sbackup-gtk after upgrading to maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/659020 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 655654] Re: Unable to mount host message in sbackup in ssh connection
Sounds like this: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+faq/1324 Have a look at this FAQ and post your outcomings. Thanks. -- Unable to mount host message in sbackup in ssh connection https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655654 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #138942]: How can I use sBackup with 7-zip?
Question #138942 on Simple Backup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/138942 Status: Open = Answered Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer: Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time asking this question. No, you can't use 7zip with SBackup. The only supported compression formats are: gzip, bzip. It is not planned to support 7zip in the foreseeable future. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 655362] Re: wrong categories in .desktop-files (sbackup-gtk)
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug. The described behaviour is intentional: SBackup is not related to any System settings. Therefore System - Administration is not the right place for it. Since 0.11 SBackup launchers are located under Applications - Utilities for regular users and Applications - System tools when running it with root privileges according with Gnome recommendations. ** Changed in: sbackup Status: Confirmed = Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/655362 Title: wrong categories in .desktop-files (sbackup-gtk) ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 670671] Re: Tar teminated with errors
Thank you for using SBackup and for taking the time reporting this bug. is this project abandoned? No, the project is active (though there was little activity in the last few weeks) Basically, your problem is not directly related to SBackup. TAR is not able to finish sucessfully and this issue is reported by SBackup. In order to track down the cause of the problem some more information are required. Please answer the following questions: * Is the bug reproducible; does it happen every time? * is your backup destination on a local drive or remote? * do you run sbackup as superuser (root) or as regular user? * Do backups work in general for you? * Do manual backups (started from Configuration GUI) work as expected? * How do you invoke the backup process? Thanks for your help. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/670671 Title: Tar teminated with errors ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Question #139526]: unable to choose hidden dirs in /home to exclude
New question #139526 on Simple Backup: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/139526 In this i want NOT to save my data from the directory .VirtualBox cause i do not need those virtual machines saved. Normally i choose the complete home-directory to save and pick those dirs that i don't need (downloads, dropbox, ..) But in the dialog 'not to save' i can only select normal files or directorys - no hidden directorys; so my backup goes real big with some virtual machines in it. Next problem ist, with some snapshot from those virtual machines and a bit of working with it, the incremental updates also goes real BIG... Ubuntu 10.04.1 sbackup 0.11.3ppa1-lucid1 -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #139526]: unable to choose hidden dirs in /home to exclude
Question #139526 on Simple Backup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/139526 Status: Open = Answered Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer: In order to select hidden files/directories within the file chooser dialog just enable 'Show hidden files' in the dialog's context menu. You can reach this menu by right-clicking into the file chooser dialog's files list. The select 'Show hidden files'. This is a feature of the Gnome file chooser dialog and available throughout Gnome applications. Thank you for using SBackup. -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Nssbackup-team] [Bug 692337] Re: unable to choose hidden dirs in /home to exclude
** Changed in: sbackup Status: New = Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/139526 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is subscribed to Simple Backup. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692337 Title: unable to choose hidden dirs in /home to exclude ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
Re: [Nssbackup-team] [Question #139011]: How to restore a complete file system?
Question #139011 on Simple Backup changed: https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+question/139011 Status: Open = Answered Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer: You should be able to restore files and directories from your backup (if you've stored them). It is not possible to restore a file system at once. You'll have to create a fresh file system and then to restore your data. Please also read https://answers.launchpad.net/sbackup/+faq/1325 -- You received this question notification because you are a member of Simple Backup Maintainers, which is an answer contact for Simple Backup. ___ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team Post to : nssbackup-team@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~nssbackup-team More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
