Brief update: I've made a quick check and for me it works: I've executed
sbackupd from terminal and started another sbackupd process after a
short period of time. The second process was aborted with the (expected)
error 'nssbackup already running'.
Conclusion: not easy to reproduce for me - I
I meant nssbackupd rather than sbackupd. I'm a bit confused about the
naming currently.
--
nssbackup does not prevent itself from running in parallel.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573733
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to
A fix for this problem is already committed to the 0.2 series branch and
will be included in the next release (the final 0.2.0 release) in short
time.
The error is triggered if not enough free disk space is available for
the current backup. In such cases an error message is printed, and this
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
nssbackup does not prevent itself from running in parallel.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573733
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
It seems that the lock file bug prevents nssbackup from finishing
regularly and this one is invalid.
Yes, you are right. The removal of the lock file during the second
attempt of execution by cron leads to a failure when the first backup is
finished. This is fixed in branch
If the lock file can't be removed it shouldn't crash.
This is what I've changed in order to fix bug #573733. Marking this one
as invalid.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
nssbackup crashes with: IOError: Given copy source '/tmp/nssbackup/files.snar'
does not
= Medium
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz)
** Changed in: nssbackup
Milestone: None = release0.2
--
Excluding files by type excludes more than expected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258542
You received this bug notification because you
This behavior of TAR causes some more problems:
* when merging snar files in order to remove snapshots, excluded files are not
found in earlier snapshots because they are marked as 'Not included' (this
means 'unchanged'). In fact, they were *never* included.
--
Excluded files are not included
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 550261 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550261
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 550261
After upgrade to Lucid backups cannot be started through the GUI
--
Creation of manual backup doesn't work in Lucid
** Also affects: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
** Summary changed:
- sbackup fails if exclude-path contains an equal-sign
+ sbackup/nssbackup fails if
Thank you for taking the time reporting this bug.
Could you please try the following: disable the removal of snapshots by
unchecking the according checkbox in the GUI.
This should solve the problem temporarily. However, backups are then no
longer removed by nssbackup. If you are required to free
** Summary changed:
- nssbackup causes python process to run on 100% CPU in a loop
+ Merge of incremental snapshot metadata is much too slow (Python process runs
100% CPU)
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
--
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
nssbackup does not prevent itself from running in parallel.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573733
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Crash, with %d format: a number is required, not str
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/577296
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Excluding files by type excludes more than expected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/258542
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
A warning is logged stating that logarithmic purging is disabled and
that you should set an appropriate cutoff value in your configuration.
Existing backups are not removed until you change to cutoff purge. That
is, you can manually save your old backups and then enable cutoff purge.
Question #112940 on NSsbackup changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/nssbackup/+question/112940
Status: Open = Answered
Jean-Peer Lorenz proposed the following answer:
Hi Paolo,
you're right - at the moment a proper commandline interface providing
some features/configuration tricks
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz)
--
Backup unsuccessful
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588878
You received this bug notification
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed = In Progress
--
Backup unsuccessful
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588878
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
___
Mailing
I've just released nssbackup 0.2.1 which includes a fix for this. It'd
be nice if you could drop a line here whether the issue is solved or
not.
Thanks and have fun.
Jean-Peer
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Backup unsuccessful
Note from the Not So Simple Backup-Team (maintainers of the successor of
sbackup and somehow in charge for sbackup):
Our resources are very limited and we concentrate on Nssbackup rather
the old-fashioned Sbackup. Unfortunately, it's quite difficult to get a
fix for this bug into Lucid or to push
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 550261 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550261
Note from the Not So Simple Backup-Team (maintainers of the successor of
sbackup and somehow in charge for sbackup):
Our resources are very limited and we concentrate on Nssbackup rather
the old-fashioned
Thank you for taking the time reporting this bug.
In order to track down the problem please answer following questions:
* is `agamemnon` the root of your ftp server?
* do you've tried to create a folder with appropriate permissions there (before
configuring the backup) using a ftp application?
*
Thank you for taking the time reporting this bug.
Confirmed - this is evil and shouldn't happen.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided = Low
--
Link to launchpad start root firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599865
You
Thanks for the log. You are hitting a really weird bug here. The error
is different every time:
1) 'IOError: [Errno 5] Input/output error' in checkTarget
2) '[Errno 2] No such file or directory:
'/home/eric/.local/share/nssbackup/mountdir/ftp_bac...@192.168.1.250/calliope/test''
in checkTarget
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Incomplete = In Progress
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz)
--
Wont backup to d-link nas, mount problem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599870
You
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Triaged = Fix Released
--
No desktop notifications when running NSsbackup as superuser
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/330646
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz)
--
Changes to the Do a full backup text box are not noticed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601574
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
Remote SFTP destination doesn't work
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375816
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Changed in: nssbackup/0.2
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
deletes incremental backups left by sbackup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337269
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team,
** Summary changed:
- nssbackup does not work when backing up root
+ nssbackup does not work when backing up root directory (/*)
--
nssbackup does not work when backing up root directory (/*)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578982
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
** Changed in: nssbackup/0.2
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
NSS Backup 0.2 RC7 deleted all old ful backups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392409
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team,
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
Restoration GUI is cluttered and user-unfriendly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
I've disabled the link when running as root. Fix committed to trunk. Bug
is still valid for series 0.2.
** Also affects: nssbackup/0.2
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: nssbackup/0.2
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: nssbackup/0.2
Importance: Undecided =
@Stefano Rivera: Thanks for your valueable comment and your review. I'll
prepare a debdiff taking your review in account ASAP. Related to
Maverick: I'm preparing just in the moment a new release of the whole
sbackup package containing many bugfixes and feature implementations we
did in nssbackup.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz)
--
command line control on full - incremental backup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613746
You
I've implemented a commandline option `--full` that can be used to force
a full backup (of all profiles that are executed). This is now in
development line and will be released soo.
A commandline option to force an incremental backup is not implemented
and I'm not quite sure it ever will.
I edit
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
Command line control on full backup is missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613746
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
** Changed in: nssbackup/0.3
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: nssbackup/0.3
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz)
** Changed in: nssbackup/0.3
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
** Changed in: nssbackup/0.3
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
Make a full backup now button
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146619
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is
** Summary changed:
- ( wishlist )sbackup time to completion??
+ Show remaining time till backup is finished in UI
--
Show remaining time till backup is finished in UI
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/130856
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is
** Summary changed:
- Changes to the Do a full backup text box are not noticed
+ Modifications to the Do a full backup every ? days text box are not
recognized
--
Modifications to the Do a full backup every ? days text box are not recognized
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601574
You received
Fix committed.
Note: you have to confirm your changes by pressing enter.
Thanks for reporting this bug.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
Modifications to the Do a full backup every ? days text box are not recognized
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601574
@MikeR: Are you talking about sbackup or nssbackup? The (not so) simple
backup suite is ready for daily use and not in alpha or beta state,
current stable version is 0.2.1. Just have a look at
https://launchpad.net/nssbackup
To answer your questions:
Is there any chance of plugging the holes in
I'm proud to announce that the first stable release for the 0.3 series
of NSsbackup is out. Thanks to all who contributed to this release with
coding, sending patches, testing, reporting bugs and translating!
This stable release with version 0.3.0 adds some very interesting
features and is ready
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Command line control on full backup is missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/613746
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Modifications to the Do a full backup every ? days text box are not recognized
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/601574
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Restoration GUI is cluttered and user-unfriendly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/584294
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Link to launchpad start root firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/599865
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
sbackup/nssbackup fails if exclude-path contains an equal-sign
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/412934
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
Is this still an issue?
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: In Progress = Incomplete
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Medium = Undecided
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: Oumar Aziz OUATTARA (wattazoum) = (unassigned)
** Changed in: nssbackup
Milestone: 0.2 = None
--
Do you see the issues with version nssbackup 0.3.0?
Note: default setting is to use the GIO backend. If you want to use the
Fuse plugins instead: install the according packages (nssbackup-plugin-
ftp...) and modifiy a Gconf setting. Open Configuration
editior-Applications-sbackup-global
** Summary changed:
- [feature request] Script hooks for pre- and post- backup
+ [Feature request] Script hooks for pre- and post-backup
--
[Feature request] Script hooks for pre- and post-backup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/174173
You received this bug notification because you are a member
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
** Changed in: nssbackup/0.3
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Make a full backup now button
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146619
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team,
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed = Opinion
** Summary changed:
- Filters on NSsbackup retore
+ [Feature request] Filters for selection of files in restoration gui
** Changed in: nssbackup
Milestone: release0.3 = None
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: Oumar Aziz
** Summary changed:
- user scheduling
+ [Feature request] Scheduled backups for regular users
--
[Feature request] Scheduled backups for regular users
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345379
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to
** Summary changed:
- Support for compression AND splitting
+ [Feature request] Support for splitting of compressed snapshots
--
[Feature request] Support for splitting of compressed snapshots
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345272
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Changed in: nssbackup
Milestone: release0.3 = None
** Description changed:
- I installed a good friend after her Notebook died a Ubuntu at a used Thinkpad
(was not expensive).
- She writes only texts and is surfing a little bit. But her texts a very
important for her, so I gave her the
Done: revamped dialog for connecting to remote sites.
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed = Fix Released
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Wishlist = Low
--
Mandatory slash should be added automatically
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375817
You received this bug
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: New = Incomplete
--
Backup ssh take long time .
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/368190
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to NSsbackup.
___
Thanks for using nssbackup and for reporting this bug.
I'm really sorry: this is 'the-one-bug-that-made-it-into-final' despite
intense testing. A fix is already cooked and will be available through
PPA today.
--
[Errno 17] File exists
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616667
You received this bug
** Summary changed:
- [Errno 17] File exists
+ Unable to save configuration as superuser: OSError-File exists
--
Unable to save configuration as superuser: OSError-File exists
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616667
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team,
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided = High
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz)
--
Unable to save configuration as superuser: OSError-File exists
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
** Summary changed:
- nssbackup is not cleaning up old, corrupt backups
+ Misleading option label: nssbackup is not cleaning up incomplete/corrupt
backups
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided = Low
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
Misleading option label: nssbackup is not cleaning up incomplete/corrupt backups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616497
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
nssbackup-upgrade-backups and nssbackupd crashes when starting
nssbackup-restoration-gui
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576030
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Misleading option label: nssbackup is not cleaning up incomplete/corrupt backups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616497
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
Unable to save configuration as superuser: OSError-File exists
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/616667
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to nssbackup.
Thanks for reporting this issue.
The things do work as expected on i386?
The cause of the problem is here:
2010-08-13 18:20:51,444 - INFO in _gio_utils._mount_done_cb(355): Path is
already mounted.
2010-08-13 18:20:51,445 - DEBUG in pathparse.query_mount_uri(247):
get_mount_uri:
So, the package `gvfs-fuse` is not installed on your amd64 machine?
Could you please install `gvfs-fuse` (it's an official package and even
supported by Canonical) and then repeat the tests (i.e. list directory
.gvfs and test whether it works in nssbackup)?
--
amd64 ftp gio mount error
Here is a brief summary before closing this bug report:
curlftpfs 0.9.2 is buggy, with curlftpfs 0.9.1 the backup runs fast and well -
won't fix.
A workaround is available since nssbackup 0.3.0: use GIO/GVFS backend rather
Fuse plugins.
I set the status of this bug to `Fix released`.
**
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: New = Confirmed
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: Undecided = High
--
amd64 ftp gio mount error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617473
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to nssbackup.
** Changed in: sbackup (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete = Fix Committed
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
Backups cannot be started through the GUI
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550261
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Hello Aigars,
sorry for the late reply. Always a lot of work - I'm sure you know what
I mean. Thanks for your commitment related to the bugfix for Lucid.
During the last months I've squashed as much open bugs as possible from
nssbackup in order to prepare a final merge of sbackup and nssbackup
Another interesting output would be: `ps aux | grep -i gvfs-fuse-
daemon`. This checks if the gvfs-fuse-daemon is running and should give:
~$ ps aux | grep -i gvfs-fuse-daemon
peer 2204 0.0 0.0 1860 596 pts/2S+ 15:44 0:00 grep
--color=auto -i gvfs-fuse-daemon
peer 2535
Sounds great.
I'll change the bug summary and title to reflect the real issue.
Thanks again for your help and patience.
** Summary changed:
- amd64 ftp gio mount error
+ GIO mount fails on amd64 due to missing package dependency to gvfs-fuse
** Changed in: nssbackup
Importance: High = Low
** Changed in: nssbackup
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
** Changed in: nssbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz)
--
GIO mount fails on amd64 due to missing package dependency to gvfs-fuse
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617473
You received this bug
Public bug reported:
Improvements and bug fixes implemented in nssbackup should go into
sbackup. Please re-merge both projects and replace the aged sbackup by
nssbackup.
** Affects: sbackup
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Merge sbackup and nssbackup
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
Merge sbackup and nssbackup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/618730
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
___
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
'abort backup' on exernal drives not possible
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/604558
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is a direct subscriber.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
Spelling and wording errors
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328902
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to nssbackup.
___
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
sbackupd.py crashed with NoSpaceError: No space left on device
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277137
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to sbackup in ubuntu.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: Incomplete = Won't Fix
--
New config request: option to have backup fail if target directory does not
exist
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/133021
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: Confirmed = Fix Committed
--
emty dialog when restoring with sbackup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/137293
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to nssbackup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
Gnome VFS not available in Gutsy Tribe 5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/134829
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
Simple Backup should display a progress bar
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/267759
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
Password for SSH Do Not URI Encode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/254464
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
Incremental backups should not appear incremental when restoring
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/176838
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to nssbackup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
Mb used instead of MB in the application dialogs.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/504990
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
libgnomevfs2-extra required for FTP backups
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/507175
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
sbackup crahses: stop_if_no_target is not an option in general
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/489107
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
restore crashes when the destination path or file is non existent
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383383
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: Incomplete = Invalid
--
Custom directory on external hard disk causes sbackup to fail
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64532
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Incomplete
--
sbackup works for hours if I continue working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/602037
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
default backup directory doesn't exist in ubuntu
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585769
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Fix Committed
--
Wrong original English text in sbackup po-file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/331551
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: New = Won't Fix
--
Simplle backup should work with RW CD/DVDs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105668
You received this bug notification because you are a member of NSsbackup
team, which is subscribed to Simple Backup.
Sorry for being late. Finally, new stable release SBackup 0.11 is
available.
@Bilal: Could you provide some hints for the required procedure to get
the release into Maverick? FFe?
Attached is a source package for maverick. The source code is located
here (without debian files):
** Attachment added: SBackup 0.11.0 source package for Maverick
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sbackup/+bug/550261/+attachment/1499701/+files/source_package-sbackup0.11.0ubuntu1%7Emaverick1.tar.gz
--
Backups cannot be started through the GUI
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550261
Fixed in SBackup 0.11.0
** Changed in: sbackup
Importance: Undecided = Medium
** Changed in: sbackup
Assignee: (unassigned) = Jean-Peer Lorenz (peer.loz)
** Changed in: sbackup
Status: Fix Committed = Fix Released
--
emty dialog when restoring with sbackup
https
101 - 200 of 666 matches
Mail list logo
