I really can't see how Morgan has any other option. MM must go. He has been
amazingly loyal to him but he just can't cut it. Time for some new ideas, even
if we go down, MM has had more than enough chances.
Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra
-Original Message-
From: Steven Millward
Send
I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone
can say we lack pace.
I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the
night has anything to do with it.
Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing isn't
it? I can't get
Bring in Stuart Pearce Psycho will fix us !
Sent from my iPhone
On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward wrote:
> Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon during
> the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed
> them in the same fi
That's better. Forgive and forget Rog. Let's move on an put this match
behind us.
On 13 February 2012 10:21, Rog & Reet wrote:
> When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said:
> "I always feel I'm the right person to do it.
>
> "I've not got a message for the fan
Paul Crowe really enjoyed the game.
He only watched the 1 minute of injury time in the first half.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 3:09 PM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v
I take it you've not been watching the games recently Steve?
What I'd like to see is progress and its not happening. Mick's still pounding
his 'graft and we'll be OK' approach and selecting teams largely based on
players' ability/willingness to 'put in a shift'. It worked in the Championship
an
Well if Mick was in charge then he'd have had the artillery in front of the
infantry.
Squaddies flying planes, airmen in subs and him and Clippy standing in a
field looking as bemused as ever.
I'd have been all for surrendering even though war hadn't been declared
until after Poland was invaded.
I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to watch
the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means you don't
suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our ineptitude. There were
many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who felt the same
Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon
during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We
thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this
year. So what?
It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom
UNCLASSIFIED
I am becoming frustrated with many things at Wolves, but one thing
plainly obvious to me is that Ebanks Blake is totally out of his depth
in the Premier League, he takes far too long on the ball..again it was
obvious and pointed out by David Pleat last night.
For me the spark has gon
When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said: "I
always feel I'm the right person to do it.
"I've not got a message for the fans. I've apologised. That is all I can
do."
He's said sorry , so that's all right then.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googl
We'll be told how devastated they all are but that they're a great bunch of
lads who will keep working for each other, for him and for the fans. It'll be
the worst performance of his tenure at Wolves (we've had a few of these now,
each one setting a new low - how bad does it have to get before i
UNCLASSIFIED
We have to take the risk and replace him now, no use worrying about who
can get us back up if we go down.
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email
I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now.
Really don't give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn't be any worse.
Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behal
UNCLASSIFIED
A bit late.
Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men
IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence
and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914.
If you have received this email in error, you are requested t
apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest
demanding Mick's head.
On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview.
>
> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:
>
>> Should have been 6
>>
>> From: ns
Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
I wish we could see Mick's pos
47% possession at home
Hennesey faced 29 shots, with 16 of them on target (versus our 5 shots on
target)
we got what we deserved.
what's West Brom's wage bill Steve?
On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> I wish we could see Mick's post match interview.
>
> On 13/02/2012, at 2:22
I wish we could see Mick's post match interview.
On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:
> Should have been 6
>
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Marcus Chantry
> Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM
> To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
> S
It could easily have been 10 or more. lets not forget Hennessy pulled off
about 7 top draw saves.
On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote:
> Should have been 6
>
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
> Of Marcus Chantry
> Sent: Monday, 13 Febru
I think clipboard just shook hands goodbye with Mick.
From: chant...@iinet.net.au
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:20:38 +1100
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
only 8 points gap between us and them now.
On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:so will Mick
Should have been 6
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
sorry, 5 at home.
On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:
only 8 points gap between us and them now.
On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home?
> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>
>> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence
5 now. I hope they make it 6 and send Mick on his way.
This is the result we've deserved all season. It's been on the cards for so
long.
For and against screwed.
From: chant...@iinet.net.au
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:13:06 +1100
To: nswolves@googlegrou
sorry, 5 at home.
On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home?
> On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
>
>> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to
>> midfield, then a ho
so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home?
On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to
> midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly.
> --
> Boo! Thick Mick Out.
--
Boo! Thick M
At least Henry will be back next week to relegate Milijas back to the bench.
I think Mick will be gone after today.
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
From: chant...@iinet.net.au
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:08:12 +1100
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Why the fuck did mick just ask O'Hara w
anyone who reckons that O'Hara is a better player than Milijas only needs to
watch this match to demonstrate how bad O'Hara is.
On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to
> midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up
SEB has mo brains. Offsides and shooting from out there instead of trying to
set it up closer and feedi g others.
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
From: chant...@iinet.net.au
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:06:04 +1100
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
I beg to differ Jeremy the replay showed h
Why the fuck did mick just ask O'Hara whether he's ok? Can't he see from the
touch line that he is dead on his feet and a liability to the team.
Sent from my iPhone
On 13/02/2012, at 2:06 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:
> I beg to differ Jeremy the replay showed he had a clear view all the way fro
I beg to differ Jeremy the replay showed he had a clear view all the way from
the players boot.
Sent from my iPhone
On 13/02/2012, at 2:03 AM, "Jeremy Tonks" wrote:
> He didn’t see it till it hit him L
>
> We’re MUCH better second half but still crap.
>
>
> From: nswolves@googlegroups.c
He didn't see it till it hit him L
We're MUCH better second half but still crap.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:59 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
But how can a keeper who has pulled off some world class saves already in the
match, fail to catch a ball fired straight at his body?
Sent from my iPhone
On 13/02/2012, at 1:54 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I
> seriously look a
We must train this bad too. Joy.
Oh look, Nenad is on.
From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:54:18 +
And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I
seriously look at this g
And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I
seriously look at this guy sometimes and think that he's crap on purpose.
From: to...@hotkey.net.au
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:47:22 +1100
Is anyone s
Is anyone suggesting otherwise Marcus?
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Marcus Chantry
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:43 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
The fact that we scored doesn't change the f
The half time stats said it all. Same crap, just on a Sunday. Even Bassong
seems to have dropped to a lower level.
Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
From: chant...@iinet.net.au
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:43:05 +1100
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
The fact that we scored doesn't change th
The fact that we scored doesn't change the fact we are crap.
Sent from my iPhone
On 13/02/2012, at 1:19 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:
> I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took
> us 45 mins.
>
> At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off.
>
>
Scoring from open play?
Must have been 1000-1 for that on 44 ½ minutes.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Taylor
Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:19 AM
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
I can't believe we
I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took
us 45 mins.
At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off.
From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com
To: nswolves@googlegroups.com
Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:08 +
Anyon
Appalling showing - and then Fletcher. How can we be square? I suppose
Hennessy can take some credit for some excellent early work.
They need to mark a bit closer in the second half.
From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf
Of Paul Taylor
Sent: Monday, 13
Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to
midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly.
--
Boo! Thick Mick Out.
42 matches
Mail list logo
