[NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took us 45 mins. At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off. From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:08 + Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Is anyone suggesting otherwise Marcus? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:43 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies The fact that we scored doesn't change the fact we are crap. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:19 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote: I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took us 45 mins. At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off. _ From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:08 + Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I seriously look at this guy sometimes and think that he's crap on purpose. From: to...@hotkey.net.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:47:22 +1100 Is anyone suggesting otherwise Marcus? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:43 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies The fact that we scored doesn't change the fact we are crap. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:19 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote:I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took us 45 mins. At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off. From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:08 +Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
We must train this bad too. Joy. Oh look, Nenad is on. From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:54:18 + And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I seriously look at this guy sometimes and think that he's crap on purpose. From: to...@hotkey.net.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:47:22 +1100 Is anyone suggesting otherwise Marcus? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:43 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies The fact that we scored doesn't change the fact we are crap. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:19 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote:I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took us 45 mins. At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off. From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:08 +Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
He didn't see it till it hit him L We're MUCH better second half but still crap. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:59 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies But how can a keeper who has pulled off some world class saves already in the match, fail to catch a ball fired straight at his body? Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:54 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote: And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I seriously look at this guy sometimes and think that he's crap on purpose. _ From: to...@hotkey.net.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:47:22 +1100 Is anyone suggesting otherwise Marcus? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:43 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies The fact that we scored doesn't change the fact we are crap. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:19 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote: I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took us 45 mins. At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off. _ From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:08 + Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
I beg to differ Jeremy the replay showed he had a clear view all the way from the players boot. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 2:03 AM, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: He didn’t see it till it hit him L We’re MUCH better second half but still crap. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:59 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies But how can a keeper who has pulled off some world class saves already in the match, fail to catch a ball fired straight at his body? Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:54 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote: And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I seriously look at this guy sometimes and think that he's crap on purpose. From: to...@hotkey.net.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:47:22 +1100 Is anyone suggesting otherwise Marcus? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:43 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies The fact that we scored doesn't change the fact we are crap. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:19 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote: I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took us 45 mins. At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off. From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:08 + Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Why the fuck did mick just ask O'Hara whether he's ok? Can't he see from the touch line that he is dead on his feet and a liability to the team. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 2:06 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: I beg to differ Jeremy the replay showed he had a clear view all the way from the players boot. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 2:03 AM, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: He didn’t see it till it hit him L We’re MUCH better second half but still crap. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:59 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies But how can a keeper who has pulled off some world class saves already in the match, fail to catch a ball fired straight at his body? Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:54 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote: And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I seriously look at this guy sometimes and think that he's crap on purpose. From: to...@hotkey.net.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:47:22 +1100 Is anyone suggesting otherwise Marcus? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:43 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies The fact that we scored doesn't change the fact we are crap. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:19 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote: I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took us 45 mins. At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off. From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:08 + Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
SEB has mo brains. Offsides and shooting from out there instead of trying to set it up closer and feedi g others. Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies From: chant...@iinet.net.au Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:06:04 +1100 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com I beg to differ Jeremy the replay showed he had a clear view all the way from the players boot. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 2:03 AM, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: He didn’t see it till it hit him L We’re MUCH better second half but still crap. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:59 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies But how can a keeper who has pulled off some world class saves already in the match, fail to catch a ball fired straight at his body? Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:54 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote:And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I seriously look at this guy sometimes and think that he's crap on purpose. From: to...@hotkey.net.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:47:22 +1100Is anyone suggesting otherwise Marcus? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:43 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies The fact that we scored doesn't change the fact we are crap. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:19 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote:I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took us 45 mins. At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off. From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:08 +Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
anyone who reckons that O'Hara is a better player than Milijas only needs to watch this match to demonstrate how bad O'Hara is. On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
At least Henry will be back next week to relegate Milijas back to the bench. I think Mick will be gone after today. Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies From: chant...@iinet.net.au Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:08:12 +1100 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Why the fuck did mick just ask O'Hara whether he's ok? Can't he see from the touch line that he is dead on his feet and a liability to the team. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 2:06 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: I beg to differ Jeremy the replay showed he had a clear view all the way from the players boot. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 2:03 AM, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: He didn’t see it till it hit him L We’re MUCH better second half but still crap. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:59 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies But how can a keeper who has pulled off some world class saves already in the match, fail to catch a ball fired straight at his body? Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:54 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote:And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I seriously look at this guy sometimes and think that he's crap on purpose. From: to...@hotkey.net.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:47:22 +1100Is anyone suggesting otherwise Marcus? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:43 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies The fact that we scored doesn't change the fact we are crap. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:19 AM, Paul Taylor taylorpau...@hotmail.com wrote:I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took us 45 mins. At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off. From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:08 +Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out.-- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
5 now. I hope they make it 6 and send Mick on his way. This is the result we've deserved all season. It's been on the cards for so long. For and against screwed. From: chant...@iinet.net.au Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:13:06 +1100 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
only 8 points gap between us and them now. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
I think clipboard just shook hands goodbye with Mick. From: chant...@iinet.net.au Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:20:38 +1100 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com only 8 points gap between us and them now. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote:Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
It could easily have been 10 or more. lets not forget Hennessy pulled off about 7 top draw saves. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
47% possession at home Hennesey faced 29 shots, with 16 of them on target (versus our 5 shots on target) we got what we deserved. what's West Brom's wage bill Steve? On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really don't give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn't be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED We have to take the risk and replace him now, no use worrying about who can get us back up if we go down. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 07:10 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really don't give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn't be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
We'll be told how devastated they all are but that they're a great bunch of lads who will keep working for each other, for him and for the fans. It'll be the worst performance of his tenure at Wolves (we've had a few of these now, each one setting a new low - how bad does it have to get before it becomes unacceptable?) and not what is normally associated with a Mick McCarthy team (despite the fact that this sort of shite is exactly what is now associated with a Mick McCarthy team) but he's sure there will be a positive reaction to it (the most positive reaction we could see to this would be for Morgan to replace him). Poor team selection again last night - in trying to find places for his favourite players we end up with a striker playing at right midfield despite the fact he's signed a number of players specifically for this position. Ward and Edwards were classic examples of one of my biggest gripes with McCarthy now - picking players based on their lung capacity and willingness to put in a shift ahead of footballing ability (people have been somewhat blinded this year by Ward's 'energy' going forwards but as pointed out a number of times by David Pleat last night, he's a shithouse left back).. There's a need for grafters in the team but there has to be a mix. I don't understand McCarthy's insistence on buying players that he then tries to mould in his 'graft' ethos - you know when you buy a payer what their game's about. If he manages it it invariably makes them worse players (Milijas is a prime example), if he doesn't manage it he doesn't play them. We have enough talent and variation in the squad to be able to put out a team that includes graft with a bit of guile but he insists on a completely 1 dimensional game plan based around his idea of everybody 'putting in a shift'. It was effective in the Championship, its not enough in the Premiership. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:33 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.commailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said: I always feel I'm the right person to do it. I've not got a message for the fans. I've apologised. That is all I can do. He's said sorry , so that's all right then. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 9:01 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies We'll be told how devastated they all are but that they're a great bunch of lads who will keep working for each other, for him and for the fans. It'll be the worst performance of his tenure at Wolves (we've had a few of these now, each one setting a new low - how bad does it have to get before it becomes unacceptable?) and not what is normally associated with a Mick McCarthy team (despite the fact that this sort of shite is exactly what is now associated with a Mick McCarthy team) but he's sure there will be a positive reaction to it (the most positive reaction we could see to this would be for Morgan to replace him). Poor team selection again last night - in trying to find places for his favourite players we end up with a striker playing at right midfield despite the fact he's signed a number of players specifically for this position. Ward and Edwards were classic examples of one of my biggest gripes with McCarthy now - picking players based on their lung capacity and willingness to put in a shift ahead of footballing ability (people have been somewhat blinded this year by Ward's 'energy' going forwards but as pointed out a number of times by David Pleat last night, he's a shithouse left back).. There's a need for grafters in the team but there has to be a mix. I don't understand McCarthy's insistence on buying players that he then tries to mould in his 'graft' ethos - you know when you buy a payer what their game's about. If he manages it it invariably makes them worse players (Milijas is a prime example), if he doesn't manage it he doesn't play them. We have enough talent and variation in the squad to be able to put out a team that includes graft with a bit of guile but he insists on a completely 1 dimensional game plan based around his idea of everybody 'putting in a shift'. It was effective in the Championship, its not enough in the Premiership. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:33 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. Logo http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/images/permanent/RMS_Email_Logo.png Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
UNCLASSIFIED I am becoming frustrated with many things at Wolves, but one thing plainly obvious to me is that Ebanks Blake is totally out of his depth in the Premier League, he takes far too long on the ball..again it was obvious and pointed out by David Pleat last night. For me the spark has gone out of this team, Fletcher is the standout and does very well with the limited opportunities he gets.Frimpong was looking good but there is very little else to excite meits all so bloody predictable...Jarvis's runs, the wayward passes, etc etcit really is rubbsh. I had a feeling Mad Mick would put out an attacking side because of the QPR result ...for gods sake, that was against ten men...the commentators focussed on our very attacking lineup right from the start last night, and we were lucky to get away with conceding five in all honesty. Its probably too late for a replacement to make much difference now, the damege is done...but what can we do? IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 09:22 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said: I always feel I'm the right person to do it. I've not got a message for the fans. I've apologised. That is all I can do. He's said sorry , so that's all right then. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of LEESE Matthew Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 9:01 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies We'll be told how devastated they all are but that they're a great bunch of lads who will keep working for each other, for him and for the fans. It'll be the worst performance of his tenure at Wolves (we've had a few of these now, each one setting a new low - how bad does it have to get before it becomes unacceptable?) and not what is normally associated with a Mick McCarthy team (despite the fact that this sort of shite is exactly what is now associated with a Mick McCarthy team) but he's sure there will be a positive reaction to it (the most positive reaction we could see to this would be for Morgan to replace him). Poor team selection again last night - in trying to find places for his favourite players we end up with a striker playing at right midfield despite the fact he's signed a number of players specifically for this position. Ward and Edwards were classic examples of one of my biggest gripes with McCarthy now - picking players based on their lung capacity and willingness to put in a shift ahead of footballing ability (people have been somewhat blinded this year by Ward's 'energy' going forwards but as pointed out a number of times by David Pleat last night, he's a shithouse left back).. There's a need for grafters in the team but there has to be a mix. I don't understand McCarthy's insistence on buying players that he then tries to mould in his 'graft' ethos - you know when you buy a payer what their game's about. If he manages it it invariably makes them worse players (Milijas is a prime example), if he doesn't manage it he doesn't play them. We have enough talent and variation in the squad to be able to put out a team that includes graft with a bit of guile but he insists on a completely 1 dimensional game plan based around his idea of everybody 'putting in a shift'. It was effective in the Championship, its not enough in the Premiership. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Rog Reet Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:33 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this year. So what? It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA jpar...@munichre.comwrote: I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. ** ** ** ** -- ** ** *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] ** ** *UNCLASSIFIED* A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men ** ** *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. ** ** On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. ** ** On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ** ** -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ** ** ** ** -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ** ** -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Paul Crowe really enjoyed the game. He only watched the 1 minute of injury time in the first half. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 3:09 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were fighting amongst themselves. After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so people should be entitled to criticize. However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this year. So what? It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA jpar...@munichre.com wrote: I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really don't give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn't be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. _ From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. _ CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies
That's better. Forgive and forget Rog. Let's move on an put this match behind us. On 13 February 2012 10:21, Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote: When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said: I always feel I'm the right person to do it. I've not got a message for the fans. I've apologised. That is all I can do.” He’s said sorry , so that’s all right then. ** ** ** ** *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *LEESE Matthew *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 9:01 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies ** ** We'll be told how devastated they all are but that they're a great bunch of lads who will keep working for each other, for him and for the fans. It'll be the worst performance of his tenure at Wolves (we've had a few of these now, each one setting a new low - how bad does it have to get before it becomes unacceptable?) and not what is normally associated with a Mick McCarthy team (despite the fact that this sort of shite is exactly what is now associated with a Mick McCarthy team) but he's sure there will be a positive reaction to it (the most positive reaction we could see to this would be for Morgan to replace him). Poor team selection again last night - in trying to find places for his favourite players we end up with a striker playing at right midfield despite the fact he's signed a number of players specifically for this position. Ward and Edwards were classic examples of one of my biggest gripes with McCarthy now - picking players based on their lung capacity and willingness to put in a shift ahead of footballing ability (people have been somewhat blinded this year by Ward's 'energy' going forwards but as pointed out a number of times by David Pleat last night, he's a shithouse left back).. There's a need for grafters in the team but there has to be a mix. I don't understand McCarthy's insistence on buying players that he then tries to mould in his 'graft' ethos - you know when you buy a payer what their game's about. If he manages it it invariably makes them worse players (Milijas is a prime example), if he doesn't manage it he doesn't play them. We have enough talent and variation in the squad to be able to put out a team that includes graft with a bit of guile but he insists on a completely 1 dimensional game plan based around his idea of everybody 'putting in a shift'. It was effective in the Championship, its not enough in the Premiership. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Rog Reet *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:33 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews. ** ** ** ** *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies ** ** I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. ** ** On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: ** ** Should have been 6 *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: ** ** so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: ** ** Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ** ** -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ** ** -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. [image: Logo] Before printing, please consider the environment IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or lost by any mistaken transmission to you. Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) is not responsible for any unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily the views of RMS. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately delete it from your system and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. -- Boo! Thick Mick
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Bring in Stuart Pearce Psycho will fix us ! Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this year. So what? It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA jpar...@munichre.com wrote: I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Morris, Lee SGT Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] UNCLASSIFIED A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re Group. The Munich Re Group will not be liable for any action taken, or omitted to be taken, in reliance upon the contents of this message. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone can say we lack pace. I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the night has anything to do with it. Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and Morgan said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was unrealistic to think we'd improve much. On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were fighting amongst themselves. After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so people should be entitled to criticize. However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this year. So what? It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA jpar...@munichre.comwrote: I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. ** ** ** ** -- ** ** *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] ** ** *UNCLASSIFIED* A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men ** ** *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. ** ** On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. ** ** On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ** ** -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ** ** ** ** -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ** ** -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- CAUTION: This message is intended only for the named addressee. It is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, or distribution is prohibited and may be unlawful. By opening any attachment, you agree that the Munich Re Group will not be liable for any loss resulting from viruses or other defects. Any views in this message are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly and with authority states them to be the views of the Munich Re
Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
I really can't see how Morgan has any other option. MM must go. He has been amazingly loyal to him but he just can't cut it. Time for some new ideas, even if we go down, MM has had more than enough chances. Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra -Original Message- From: Steven Millward millward@gmail.com Sender: nswolves@googlegroups.com Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 18:50:41 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Reply-To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone can say we lack pace. I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the night has anything to do with it. Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing isn't it? I can't get worked up about it anymore. I know that Mick and Morgan said that we would progress but we only bought Johnson so it was unrealistic to think we'd improve much. On 13 February 2012 15:08, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: I suppose that's quite easy to say when you don't bother staying up to watch the games live. Watching the highlights or in 'fast forward' means you don't suffer the same pain or get a full appreciation of our ineptitude. There were many thousands of fans in the ground yesterday who felt the same level of dissatisfaction, to the extent that many were fighting amongst themselves. After scraping through last season Mick and Morgan promised that there would be no repeat of the great escape and that we would make progress this season. They have clearly failed to deliver on that promise of progress so people should be entitled to criticize. However, at the end of the day if we finish in 17th position, in line with our wage bill, then we will have had a small victory in survival, even if progress clearly hasn't been delivered on the pitch. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this year. So what? It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the bottom of the Premier league or losing to local rivals. You all might as well go and support one of the teams at the top of the division. Or perhaps the Harlem Globe Trotters. They're having a great run at the moment On 13 February 2012 08:10, Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA jpar...@munichre.comwrote: I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really don’t give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn’t be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. ** ** ** ** -- ** ** *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Morris, Lee SGT *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 8:03 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED] ** ** *UNCLASSIFIED* A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men ** ** *IMPORTANT*: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested to contact the sender and delete the email. -- *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 01:34 *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. ** ** On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. ** ** On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 *From:* nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] *On Behalf Of *Marcus Chantry *Sent:* Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM *To:* nswolves@googlegroups.com *Subject:* Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ** ** -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ** ** ** ** -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. ** ** -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- CAUTION: This message
