[NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Paul Taylor
Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out.

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Paul Taylor
I can't believe we scored as I was typing that. First shot on goal ad it took us 45 mins. At least that saved the team from a round of boos going off. From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:15:08 +

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Jeremy Tonks
Is anyone suggesting otherwise Marcus? From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:43 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies The fact that we scored doesn't change the

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Paul Taylor
And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I seriously look at this guy sometimes and think that he's crap on purpose. From: to...@hotkey.net.au To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 01:47:22 +1100 Is anyone

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Paul Taylor
We must train this bad too. Joy. Oh look, Nenad is on. From: taylorpau...@hotmail.com To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:54:18 + And so the crap continues. Great up and under clearance from Johnston. I seriously look at this

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Jeremy Tonks
He didn't see it till it hit him L We're MUCH better second half but still crap. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 1:59 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Marcus Chantry
I beg to differ Jeremy the replay showed he had a clear view all the way from the players boot. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 2:03 AM, Jeremy Tonks to...@hotkey.net.au wrote: He didn’t see it till it hit him L We’re MUCH better second half but still crap. From:

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Marcus Chantry
Why the fuck did mick just ask O'Hara whether he's ok? Can't he see from the touch line that he is dead on his feet and a liability to the team. Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 2:06 AM, Marcus Chantry chant...@iinet.net.au wrote: I beg to differ Jeremy the replay showed he had a clear

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Paul Taylor
SEB has mo brains. Offsides and shooting from out there instead of trying to set it up closer and feedi g others. Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies From: chant...@iinet.net.au Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:06:04 +1100 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com I beg to differ Jeremy the replay showed

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Marcus Chantry
anyone who reckons that O'Hara is a better player than Milijas only needs to watch this match to demonstrate how bad O'Hara is. On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Paul Taylor
At least Henry will be back next week to relegate Milijas back to the bench. I think Mick will be gone after today. Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies From: chant...@iinet.net.au Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:08:12 +1100 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Why the fuck did mick just ask O'Hara

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Marcus Chantry
so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up. Being shown up badly. -- Boo! Thick Mick Out. -- Boo! Thick Mick

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Marcus Chantry
sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to midfield, then a hoof up.

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Paul Taylor
5 now. I hope they make it 6 and send Mick on his way. This is the result we've deserved all season. It's been on the cards for so long. For and against screwed. From: chant...@iinet.net.au Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:13:06 +1100 To:

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Marcus Chantry
only 8 points gap between us and them now. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: so will Mick say that we played well and were unlucky to concede 4 at home? On 13/02/2012, at 1:15 AM, Paul Taylor wrote: Anyone watching this tripe at the moment? No linkage at all from defence to

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Jeremy Tonks
Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies sorry, 5 at home. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Paul Taylor
I think clipboard just shook hands goodbye with Mick. From: chant...@iinet.net.au Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 02:20:38 +1100 To: nswolves@googlegroups.com only 8 points gap between us and them now. On 13/02/2012, at 2:13 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote:so will

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Marcus Chantry
It could easily have been 10 or more. lets not forget Hennessy pulled off about 7 top draw saves. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Marcus Chantry
I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:16 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Marcus Chantry
47% possession at home Hennesey faced 29 shots, with 16 of them on target (versus our 5 shots on target) we got what we deserved. what's West Brom's wage bill Steve? On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Rog Reet
Be the usual tripe he serves up in post match interviews. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 2:25 AM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies I wish we could see Mick's

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Marcus Chantry
apparently it's kicking off outside the Steve Bull stand. some sort of protest demanding Mick's head. On 13/02/2012, at 2:25 AM, Marcus Chantry wrote: I wish we could see Mick's post match interview. On 13/02/2012, at 2:22 AM, Jeremy Tonks wrote: Should have been 6 From:

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED A bit late. Funny thing is, QPR would have done the same to us with 11 men IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email in error, you are requested

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread Parkes Jim - Sydney-MHA
I am now fully committed to the cause of getting Mick out now. Really don't give a sh*t who replaces him: couldn't be any worse. Think of those poor sods back home who work with WBA fans. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED We have to take the risk and replace him now, no use worrying about who can get us back up if we go down. IMPORTANT: This email remains the property of the Department of Defence and is subject to the jurisdiction of section 70 of the Crimes Act 1914. If you have received this email

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread LEESE Matthew
We'll be told how devastated they all are but that they're a great bunch of lads who will keep working for each other, for him and for the fans. It'll be the worst performance of his tenure at Wolves (we've had a few of these now, each one setting a new low - how bad does it have to get before

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Rog Reet
When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said: I always feel I'm the right person to do it. I've not got a message for the fans. I've apologised. That is all I can do. He's said sorry , so that's all right then. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [sec=unclassified] [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread Morris, Lee SGT
UNCLASSIFIED I am becoming frustrated with many things at Wolves, but one thing plainly obvious to me is that Ebanks Blake is totally out of his depth in the Premier League, he takes far too long on the ball..again it was obvious and pointed out by David Pleat last night. For me the spark has

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread Steven Millward
Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed them in the same fixture last year and they thrashed us this year. So what? It seems no one has any stomach for being perpetually at the

RE: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread Rog Reet
Paul Crowe really enjoyed the game. He only watched the 1 minute of injury time in the first half. From: nswolves@googlegroups.com [mailto:nswolves@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Marcus Chantry Sent: Monday, 13 February 2012 3:09 PM To: nswolves@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [NSWolves] Wolves

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies

2012-02-12 Thread Steven Millward
That's better. Forgive and forget Rog. Let's move on an put this match behind us. On 13 February 2012 10:21, Rog Reet rognr...@exemail.com.au wrote: When asked if he was still the right man to lead Wolves, McCarthy said: I always feel I'm the right person to do it. I've not got a

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread Paul Hart
Bring in Stuart Pearce Psycho will fix us ! Sent from my iPhone On 13/02/2012, at 1:59 PM, Steven Millward millward@gmail.com wrote: Dear oh dear, it's a good job this generation wasn't being relied upon during the war. We'd have surrendered as soon as Poland was invaded. We thrashed

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread Steven Millward
I like watching the games on fast forward. I really don't know how anyone can say we lack pace. I don't think the 'hair shirt' of watching the games in the middle of the night has anything to do with it. Imagine fighting amongst yourselves at a football game. Embarassing isn't it? I can't get

Re: [NSWolves] Wolves v Baggies [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]

2012-02-12 Thread paul
I really can't see how Morgan has any other option. MM must go. He has been amazingly loyal to him but he just can't cut it. Time for some new ideas, even if we go down, MM has had more than enough chances. Sent via BlackBerry® from Telstra -Original Message- From: Steven Millward