Heh...you don't...not automatically I don't think. Unless you have roaming
profiles. Not sure how that works though.
There is something called the User State Migration Tool somewhere. While I
haven't used it, I believe you can run that on a machine, capture their
profile, do your stuff, then rest
Hmmm, just ran across this problem. How do you get the ADMT to mirgrate the
users profile when migrating?
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:42 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: AD Organizational Units
Ya...it really
Ya...it really depends on what you want to do...just because the features
are there doesn't mean they'll help you...they might even make your life
more difficult...especially in a 35user company.
It's a zen thing.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Se
Thanks David, that just took all that information I read and put it into a
nice perspective. Thanks.
-TOny
-Original Message-
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:30 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: AD Organizational Units
It all depends
It all depends on your organisation and what you want to do. Study how GPOs
work as well as delegation of authority.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:26 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: AD Organizational Units
Well...you create OUs really for a few reasons...make it easier to manage,
create GPOs, delegate authority. There are more reasons but you get the
idea.
Just moving a DC to another OU doesn't do a thing if there are no GPOs. But
watch out if you have configured GPOs because as soon as you place a
Is it common place to put user, computer and group accounts into the same
OU, or is it better to create a specific OU for computer Accounts. What are
the Pros & Cons to this? I can think of a few but I am leaning towards
lumping them into their one respective OU.
-TOny
-Original Message
Well that's just it, I am not totally sure what it will have an effect on.
But, the positive side is we are only a 35 user company and I am rebuilding
the domain from scratch, so their shouldn't be any hangups. Our new AD
domain has nobody in it yet, I am getting the OU structure in place before
t
Do whatever you like, as long as you understand what effect the moves will
have on resources and objects. Don't move something somewhere just for the
sake of moving something.
David.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 2:
I have created our companies OU structure, but I am wondering if
it's a good idea to move the global groups like domain users, domain
controllers, domain admins and domain computers into my OU structure from
the Builtin OU, "USERS", that was created by the system.
Thanks for any input.
Here are 2 VB scripts that will list all diabled accounts. Hope this helps.
---
Script 1
---
Dim Domain
Dim DomainName
Dim UserAccount
Dim Counter
Counter = 0
DomainNa
Hi everyone!
I've read the following in Technet about using LDAP queries in advanced
filters to display only users matching certain criteria. What I want to do
is display all accounts that are currently disabled.
Technet : "In advanced filters, you can use matching rules to implement
search flag
Only Win2K systems and above can map to deep directories.
http://www.ultratech-llc.com/KB/?File=MapDrive.TXT
- ASB
-Original Message-
From: WinNT/2000 Discussion
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:40 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: Win2K Home Folders
thanks...
I wasn't sure...
regards,
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 9:14 PM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: 2 mail servers primary and secondary using the DNS Manager
You set a value on it. From 1-100.. The s
what software is needed to use the win98 machines?? What if DFS is not being
used??
Rob Jones, Developer
Lightspeed Systems
www.lightspeedsystems.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 11:10 AM
To: NT 2000 Discu
Sorry guys, sent that one out by accident. Yes I got your message David,
thank you for the input.
I just finished rolling through a complete test migration of a client and
server with full success. Now I am ready to document the whole process then
test my roll back recovery.
Back to the Grind
I am trying to find more information about the IIS lock Down tool; I want
to know if there is any problems or any reason why not to use this tool.
Thank you.
--
You are subscribed as archive@jab.org
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EM
Are you asking this again or is this just the list being glitchy? This was
already answered in detail yesterday.
-Original Message-
From: Anthony L. Sollars [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 10:35 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: AD Migration BestPractices
Yep, just install the connector on the server in the DMZ. Yeah, you would
have to be crazy to have anything besides a firewall sitting on a valid IP.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Saunders [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2001 11:57 AM
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject:
I have one Question along this same subject. I setup a fresh win2k
AD domain, and am testing the migration process right now using the AD
Migration tool. Is their a process I should follow as far as moving client
user & computer accounts over first, or should I move our member resource
Look at group policy. Computer configuration, System, Logon, and enable
"Add the Administrator security group to the roaming user profile share".
Jeffrey Kessler MCSE MCP+I
Technology Coordinator
Newport (NH) School District
603-863-2414 ext 1116
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message
the host on the DMZ may or may not have public IP and therefore nat is not
required on the DMZ. Using NAT on the DMZ will however (arguably) add a
level a security. I've done it both ways.
The internal exchange host forwards all e-mail to the public ip address of
the relay on the DMZ who then u
The DMZ holds valid internet IP addresses and the firewall does use NAT
between our internal Exchange server and our SMTP server. For example our
DMZ has our external web servers. By being in the DMZ we can have the
firewall block everything except for HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, and another other
ports w
Apparently I caused some agitation with my reply to Eric.
I want to be clear so that everyone knows.
I apologies for my reply and I will not be sending anymore OOAR to the list.
Once again, I apologize.
Phil Labonte
--
You are subscribed as archive@jab.org
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/s
Hi all, I've got an easy one:
In NT 4.0 when I copied user accounts, the following fields were also
copied:
Decription
Terminal Server Profile
Terminal Services Timeouts
Now in Active Directory, none of these are copied. Is there a way to do it,
automatically?
I dont know I have my exchange connector on my dmz and my email servers on
my internal LAN. I never had a problem in 2 years. But what ever makes you
guys all warm and fuzzy inside. How could you have your SMTP server in a DMZ
and not use NAT? Isn't the idea of a DMZ to not have a valid IP address
Exactly because of these security issue... Using this no NAT is
needed and there is no exposure of LAN resources...
Thanks again... you are the greatest !
Laercio Santos Jr
- Original Message -
From: "Greg Saunders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "NT 2000
It is working before this process was complete
From Technet:
How to Disable 8BITMIME in Windows 2000 SMTP Service [Q262168]
Thanks !
Laercio Santos Jr
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Blackstone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
You can find this by going to control panel=>administrative tools=> local
security policy (you wanna do this on the computer that has the MSI file)
Expand Local Policies=>User Rights Assignment
I believe access this computer from the network is the first or second
entry. Double click on this an
I'm curious now, what disadvantage is there if they login with the netbios
name rather than the ad name?
Robert
> Now, log in, but when at the username/password/domain box, type in
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] for the username, and the normal password. You'll notice
> the domain box go grey. Click OK and
Read this article.
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/q242/4/32.asp
Article ID: Q242432
I have rolled back from W2K to NT4 in our test lab to try it before we put
it in production. It works fine, only problem is W2K clients stop working
on the domain. Once W2k clients authentic
where do I check that?
Filipe Joel de Almeida
Novabase Saúde
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lich, Brian M.
Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Agosto de 2001 16:14
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: app. management gpo
Does
manual msi instalations runs perfectly
Filipe Joel de Almeida
Novabase Saúde
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ed Esgro
Sent: quinta-feira, 30 de Agosto de 2001 16:21
To: NT 2000 Discussions
Subject: RE: app. management g
33 matches
Mail list logo
