Am 02.07.2011 um 15:05 schrieb Andreas Harder:
> I tried this allready
>
> \setupnote [footnote] [numbercommand=,]
> \setupnotedefinition [footnote] [right={.}]
>
> \starttext
> \dorecurse{12}{test\footnote{test}}
> \stoptext
>
> The output is the same.
Use this:
\setupnote [footno
Am 02.07.2011 um 14:42 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
>
> Am 02.07.2011 um 14:20 schrieb Andreas Harder:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I'm pretty sure the following example worked a white ago
>>
>> \setupnote [footnote] [numbercommand=,right={.}]
>
> Use \setupnotedefinition.
Hi Woflgang,
I tried this al
Am 02.07.2011 um 14:20 schrieb Andreas Harder:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm pretty sure the following example worked a white ago
>
> \setupnote [footnote] [numbercommand=,right={.}]
Use \setupnotedefinition.
Wolfgang
___
If
Hi all,
I'm pretty sure the following example worked a white ago
\setupnote [footnote] [numbercommand=,right={.}]
\starttext
\dorecurse{12}{test\footnote{test}}
\stoptext
Can someone help? I would like to have:
1. First footnote
2. Second footnote etc.
Greeting
Andreas
___
72pt,
backspace=17mm,topspace=17mm,
header=12pt,headerdistance=6pt,
footer=36pt,footerdistance=0pt,
location=middle,marking=off]
\starttext
{\em Case 1: line wrap before dot}
\noindent dieses ist dabei typisch für den Bereich der Architekten- oder
Ingenieurleis
m,height=572pt,
> backspace=17mm,topspace=17mm,
> header=12pt,headerdistance=6pt,
> footer=36pt,footerdistance=0pt,
> location=middle,marking=off]
>
>
> \starttext
>
> {\em Case 1: line wrap before dot}
>
> \noindent dieses ist dabei typisch fü
Am 24.06.2011 01:20, schrieb Aditya Mahajan:
> On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, yoraxe wrote:
>
>> Hey.
>>
>> Trying to use the interpunct · as a dot operator (normally \cdot), I
>> noticed, that it is not shown correctly in math mode. Since the
>> interpunct has different
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, yoraxe wrote:
Hey.
Trying to use the interpunct · as a dot operator (normally \cdot), I
noticed, that it is not shown correctly in math mode. Since the
interpunct has different applications in different languages, in text
mode its appearance seems to be okay.
But isn'
Hey.
Trying to use the interpunct · as a dot operator (normally \cdot), I
noticed, that it is not shown correctly in math mode. Since the
interpunct has different applications in different languages, in text
mode its appearance seems to be okay.
But isn't it possible to change its function
dot}
\noindent dieses ist dabei typisch für den Bereich der Architekten- oder
Ingenieurleistungen\index{Ingenieurleistungen}. Warum?
\blank
{\em Case 2: line wrap after visible space}
Bei den Grünen werden neben den beiden Fraktionsvorsitzenden, Renate
\index{Künast}Künast und Jürgen Trittin
ted by using:
export TEXINPUTS=.:${TEXROOT}:${HOME}/ConTeXt-inc
The dot makes that first is looked in the current directory. But the module
fancybreak is not found. So there is still a problem.
--
Cecil Westerhof
__
#x27;s thesis, City, Country:
University of Something.
I think this would be better as:
Smith, A. B. (2000). A Thesis Title. Master's thesis. City, Country:
University of Something.
(This also changes the comma to a dot.) I have implemented this with
the following modifications to bib
ine. At the moment I do not have a problem with this. But I do
>> not know if this will be always the case.
>>
>
> \setupinteraction[state=start]
> \useURL
> [email]
> [mailto:quitealongusernametowriteanema...@dummy.nl]
> []
> [\goodbreak\hbox{quitealongusernametowriteanemai...@dummy.nl}]
>
Muc
Dear Hans,
there is a block of code that is commented out in math-lbr:
\startmathcollection[lbr]
\definemathcharacter [:] [punct] [tf] ["3A] % unbelievable
\definemathcharacter [;] [punct] [tf] ["3B] % unbelievable
\stopmathcollection
As a consequence I get a dot instead of colon
Hello,
With the following example I get a dot instead of colon:
\usetypescript[lucida][ec]
\setupbodyfont[lucida]
\starttext
\startformula
a := b
\stopformula
\stoptext
The particular example in MKIV works fine ...
... except when it doesn't (\sqrt enters ifinite loop, but many other
com
On 15-2-2011 12:07, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
I am using the Neo keyboard layout [1], which enables me to directly
enter several UTF-8 characters.
The dot »·« is one of those characters [2] and I like to use it in math
mode instead of
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011, Paul Menzel wrote:
Dear ConTeXt folks,
I am using the Neo keyboard layout [1], which enables me to directly
enter several UTF-8 characters.
The dot »·« is one of those characters [2] and I like to use it in math
mode instead of `\cdot`.
But in math mode it is some kind
Dear ConTeXt folks,
I am using the Neo keyboard layout [1], which enables me to directly
enter several UTF-8 characters.
The dot »·« is one of those characters [2] and I like to use it in math
mode instead of `\cdot`.
But in math mode it is some kind of bold lower dot (see attachment) and
not
space instead (a word space), since I've put a dot stopper after the
>> numbers (\setupheads[stopper=.]). Example:
>>
>> 1. Title (what I get)
>> 1. Title (what I want)
>
> % if you know how to get the width of 1 space:
> \setuphead[section][stoppe
maggy...@gmail.com writes:
> How to control the space between the number and the title in heads? By default
> it seems there is a space of about 1 em. I want to change that space and set a
> normal space instead (a word space), since I've put a dot stopper after the
> numbers (\s
Hi,
How to control the space between the number and the title in heads? By
default it seems there is a space of about 1 em. I want to change that
space and set a normal space instead (a word space), since I've put a
dot stopper after the numbers (\setupheads[stopper=.]). Example
o add missing glyphs to a font,
>> a discussion about kerning flaws, discussions about bad accent
>> placement, in another group someone missed the "m with dot" in a
>> font, in the luatex.user list you can find a message about a problem
>> with fea-files and kerning
en
in the xetex list a discussion how to add missing glyphs to a font,
a discussion about kerning flaws, discussions about bad accent
placement, in another group someone missed the "m with dot" in a
font, in the luatex.user list you can find a message about a problem
with fea-files and kerni
e.
(I must say I'm wondering a bit why problems with fonts are so
seldom discussed in the context list. In the last weeks I have seen
in the xetex list a discussion how to add missing glyphs to a font,
a discussion about kerning flaws, discussions about bad accent
placement, in another grou
On 2011-02-01 pmli...@free.fr (Peter Münster) wrote:
> Vedran Miletić writes:
>
> > Yes, there is a bug when using dots,
>
> Or a feature...?! ;)
>
> See also:
> - http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2010/052339.html
> ("and such" can mean a dot
Vedran Miletić writes:
> Yes, there is a bug when using dots,
Or a feature...?! ;)
See also:
- http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2010/052339.html
("and such" can mean a dot)
- http://pmrb.free.fr/contextref.pdf section 1.7
;-)
--
ontext-new/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.mkiv
^^^
this dot looks suspect... can you try without it, ie
/Users/bonasia/context-new...
and then
$>. setuptex
$>mtxrun --generate
?
Ok - Thank you! I keep (kept) my contexts in hidden dirs (my current one
from 3 mont
re. mkII is working.
>>
>> and
>> $> kpsewhich context.mkiv
>> ?
>
> /Users/bonasia/.context-new/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.mkiv
^^^
this dot looks suspect... can you try without it, ie
/Users/bonasia/context-new...
and then
$>. setuptex
$>mt
of the pdf bookmark
entries have gone as well. Partitioned numbers of sections, subsections etc.,
have only the dot left.
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\placebookmarks[chapter,section,subsection]
\starttext
\chapter{A Chapter}
\section{A Section}
\subsection{The Subsection}
\stoptext
line 5
l numbers in front of the pdf bookmark
entries have gone as well. Partitioned numbers of sections, subsections etc.,
have only the dot left.
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\placebookmarks[chapter,section,subsection]
\starttext
\chapter{A Chapter}
\section{A Sec
In fact you should say \NR[+] at the end of each line in \startalign in
order to get numbers.
This works for me:
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign
\NC \dot{x}(t) \NC=f(x(t), u(t)) \NR[+]
\NC y(t) \NC=h(x(t), u(t)), \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stoptext
Wow, that's
Hi Vyatcheslav,
In fact you should say \NR[+] at the end of each line in \startalign in order
to get numbers.
This works for me:
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
\startalign
\NC \dot{x}(t) \NC=f(x(t), u(t)) \NR[+]
\NC y(t) \NC=h(x(t), u(t)), \NR[+]
\stopalign
\stopformula
\stoptext
Hi,
I cannot understand why, but multiline formulas are not numbered.
\starttext
% has number
\placeformula \startformula
f(x_0, u_0)=0.
\stopformula
% has no number
\placeformula \startformula \startalign
\NC \dot{x}(t) \NC=f(x(t), u(t)) \NR
\NC y(t) \NC=h(x(t), u(t)), \NR
\stopalign
On 23-1-2011 9:34, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 22-1-2011 1:20, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
A simple algorithm with assume that everything following the dot is the
extension, while that is certainly not the case here. We can definitely
restrict the search of
On Sun, 23 Jan 2011, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 22-1-2011 1:20, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
A simple algorithm with assume that everything following the dot is the
extension, while that is certainly not the case here. We can definitely
restrict the search of extension to the last 10 or so characters of
On 22-1-2011 1:20, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
A simple algorithm with assume that everything following the dot is the
extension, while that is certainly not the case here. We can definitely
restrict the search of extension to the last 10 or so characters of the
url, but there will be cases when such
Hi all,
I want to have my headings numbered via ownnumber, and they sometimes
should include a dot.
Everything works fine except when the ownnumber is numeric. In that case
the dot is omitted, can anyone show my my fault?
\definehead [chapter] [section=section-2, sectionsegments=2:100
+ extension). I am not sure how if
extensions can be calculated reliably in urls. In particular imaging
something like
http://www.bing.com/search?q=check+.extension+long+url+so+that+os+filename+limit+exceeds+
A simple algorithm with assume that everything following the dot is the
extension, while
Except that I used . And not *
"Hans Hagen" a écrit :
>On 18-1-2011 10:04, Peter Münster wrote:
>> Renaud AUBIN writes:
>>
>>> It would be nice to think of those like me who use dot into their
>naming
>>> scheme… ;)
>>
>> See als
On 18-1-2011 9:32, Renaud AUBIN wrote:
Ok, using /usr/local/ConTeXt_version_2010.11.26 will not please the
resolver or something else because of the dot…
mv do the job
It would be nice to think of those like me who use dot into their naming
scheme… ;)
hm, i wonder what goes wrong, as catc-ini
On 18-1-2011 10:04, Peter Münster wrote:
Renaud AUBIN writes:
It would be nice to think of those like me who use dot into their naming
scheme… ;)
See also http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2010/052339.html ;)
well, having a * in a filename is a bad idea anyway
Hans
Renaud AUBIN writes:
> It would be nice to think of those like me who use dot into their naming
> scheme… ;)
See also http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2010/052339.html ;)
--
Peter Münster
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/c
Ok, using /usr/local/ConTeXt_version_2010.11.26 will not please the
resolver or something else because of the dot…
mv do the job
It would be nice to think of those like me who use dot into their naming
scheme… ;)
Renaud
Le 18/01/2011 20:13, Renaud AUBIN a écrit :
> Hi Hans,
>
> On L
x27;'.
> Here is, briefly, what is wanted:
>
> * short TeX, METAFONT or METAPOST macro(s), not necessarily useful,
>
> * the solution not obvious at the first glance,
>
> * easy to explain: necessarily 10 minutes at most.
>
> If you have something that fits the bi
10, Horacio Suarez wrote:
>
> >
> > hello all:
> > I'm shure this is a silly question, but in this code, the second item
> > [Fiesta] disappears -but the dot remains- and in the first item the text
> > inside the brackets is ok. What is wrog?
> > \sta
Am 10.11.2010 21:51, schrieb Horacio Suarez:
>
> hello all:
> I'm shure this is a silly question, but in this code, the second item
> [Fiesta] disappears -but the dot remains- and in the first item the text
> inside the brackets is ok. What is wrog?
> \starttext
> \st
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010, Horacio Suarez wrote:
hello all:
I'm shure this is a silly question, but in this code, the second item [Fiesta]
disappears -but the dot remains- and in the first item the text inside the
brackets is ok. What is wrog?
\starttext
\startitemize[packed]
\item Ac
, the second item [Fiesta]
disappears -but the dot remains- and in the first item the text inside the
brackets is ok. What is wrog?
\starttext
\startitemize[packed]
\item Acto de Apertura [y muestra de emprendimientos].
\item [Fiesta].
\item Acto de cierre.
\stopitemize
\stoptext
Thankyou in ad
hello all:
I'm shure this is a silly question, but in this code, the second item [Fiesta]
disappears -but the dot remains- and in the first item the text inside the
brackets is ok. What is wrog?
\starttext
\startitemize[packed]
\item Acto de Apertura [y muestra de emprendimientos].
lower
greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
does the font that you use have greek symbols?
It seems to be a bug in code, not the lack of symbols. It fails in
Gentium as well. The code (\greeknumerals{3}) doesn't return anything,
but it works in MKII.
Can you make a example be
ome additional settings to get lower
> >>> greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
> >>>
> >> does the font that you use have greek symbols?
> >
> > It seems to be a bug in code, not the lack of symbols. It fails in
> > Gentium as well.
2010/10/31 Herbert Voss :
> Do I need some additional settings to get lower
> greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
\setupbodyfont[dejavu]
\starttext
\startitemize[g]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\item baz
\stopitemize
\startitemize[G]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\it
Am 31.10.2010 um 18:18 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
> On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 16:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 31-10-2010 12:11, Herbert Voss wrote:
>>>
>>> Do I need some additional settings to get lower
>>> greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
>
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 16:57, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 31-10-2010 12:11, Herbert Voss wrote:
>>
>> Do I need some additional settings to get lower
>> greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
>>
> does the font that you use have greek symbols?
It seems to
On 31-10-2010 12:11, Herbert Voss wrote:
Do I need some additional settings to get lower
greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
\starttext
\startitemize[g]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\item baz
\stopitemize
\startitemize[G]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\item baz
\stopitemize
Do I need some additional settings to get lower
greek letters in the example? I get only a dot for g
\starttext
\startitemize[g]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\item baz
\stopitemize
\startitemize[G]
\item foo
\item bar
\item baz
\item baz
\stopitemize
\stoptext
MTXrun | current version
Hi Jano,
Am 26.10.2010 um 18:03 schrieb Jano Kula:
> On 10/26/2010 03:01 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
>
>> I am working on a book right now where the author set 4906 index marks ...
>> sometimes right-in-the-middle of a word, but most often behind (and before
>> dot
Hi Steffen,
On 10/26/2010 03:01 PM, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
I am working on a book right now where the author set 4906 index marks ...
sometimes right-in-the-middle of a word, but most often behind (and before dot
or comma).
and what about to clean up the file with regular expression
...
sometimes right-in-the-middle of a word, but most often behind (and before dot
or comma).
Steffen
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl
:3]
> \section{two}
> \placeformula[eq:3]
> \startformula
> f(x)=x^3
> \stopformula
> \stoptext
>
> 1. missing a dot in the number of formula.
>
> I must add "\defineenumeration[definition][text=Definition]"
> change"\setupenumerations[definition,form
\stopformula
\stoptext
1. missing a dot in the number of formula.
I must add "\defineenumeration[definition][text=Definition]"
change"\setupenumerations[definition,formula][...]"
and use once
\startdefinition
some text
\stopdefinition
before the "\placeformula"
Am 19.10.2010 um 16:55 schrieb Cedric Mauclair:
>>> Would it be possible to add an options to the captions with name
>>> textcommand to typeset the caption text only. In French, we use a
>>> point at the end of the captions, but if I want to use \about...
>>>
use a
>> point at the end of the captions, but if I want to use \about...
>> somewhere, I end up with the dot too, which I don't want.
>>
>> Currently I have changed, rather crudely, the definition of
>> \putcompletecaption... to take that into account. Here is wh
omewhere, I end up with the dot too, which I don't want.
>
> Currently I have changed, rather crudely, the definition of
> \putcompletecaption... to take that into account. Here is what I came
> up with.
Make a complete example to show us what do you want to achieve before you
at 14:24, Cedric Mauclair
wrote:
> Hi Hans and all,
>
> Would it be possible to add an options to the captions with name
> textcommand to typeset the caption text only. In French, we use a
> point at the end of the captions, but if I want to use \about...
> somewhere, I end u
Hi Hans and all,
Would it be possible to add an options to the captions with name
textcommand to typeset the caption text only. In French, we use a
point at the end of the captions, but if I want to use \about...
somewhere, I end up with the dot too, which I don't want.
Currently I have ch
Am 10.10.2010 um 20:39 schrieb Marius:
> Hello,
>
> a stopper option resets item to default value. I expect a) and b)
> instead of big dot in the first itemize.
>
> mkiv current version: 2010.10.06 10:20
>
> \starttext
> \startitemize[a,stopper=)]
You can’t mix
Hello,
a stopper option resets item to default value. I expect a) and b)
instead of big dot in the first itemize.
mkiv current version: 2010.10.06 10:20
\starttext
\startitemize[a,stopper=)]
\item one.
\item two.
\stopitemize
\startitemize[a]
\item one.
\item two.
\stopitemize
\stoptext
On 11-9-2010 12:00, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
On 09/11/2010 11:50 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
I thought that you were a specialist in LaTeX apparel?
well, you know what happened with yandy when they deciced no longer to
focus on tex backends and fonts ... (yandy dot com) ... a more
profitable kind of
On 09/11/2010 11:50 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
I thought that you were a specialist in LaTeX apparel?
well, you know what happened with yandy when they deciced no longer to
focus on tex backends and fonts ... (yandy dot com) ... a more
profitable kind of latex I guess
Creating beautiful latex
clothes in the luggage then? How "warm" is the
water?
Mojca
I thought that you were a specialist in LaTeX apparel?
well, you know what happened with yandy when they deciced no longer to
focus on tex backends and fonts ... (yandy dot com) ... a more
profitable kind of latex I gu
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> maybe
>
> & "C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex\setuptex.bat"
>
> http://technet.microsoft.com/de-de/library/ee176949%28en-us%29.aspx
no
and eve
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
> maybe
>
> & "C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex\setuptex.bat"
>
> http://technet.microsoft.com/de-de/library/ee176949%28en-us%29.aspx
no
a
tree makes them found.
Wild guess: could it be related to the dot in ".fonts" ?
Other fonts in that directory are found, font names works for all fonts
there too.
May I chime in here? Hans, a couple of weeks ago, I reported a similar problem:
none of the fonts in my personal texmf-tre
tree makes them found.
Wild guess: could it be related to the dot in ".fonts" ?
Other fonts in that directory are found, font names works for all fonts
there too.
May I chime in here? Hans, a couple of weeks ago, I reported a similar problem:
none of the fonts in my personal texmf-
not. Putting them in TEXMF tree makes them found.
>>
>> Wild guess: could it be related to the dot in ".fonts" ?
>
> Other fonts in that directory are found, font names works for all fonts
> there too.
>
May I chime in here? Hans, a couple of weeks ago, I report
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:01:13PM +0200, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>
>
> Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >
> > Dunno then, it is very confusing, some fonts are found by file name and
> > some are not. Putting them in TEXMF tree makes them found.
>
> Wild guess: could it
Khaled Hosny wrote:
>
> Dunno then, it is very confusing, some fonts are found by file name and
> some are not. Putting them in TEXMF tree makes them found.
Wild guess: could it be related to the dot i
gt;>> \usetypescript[libertine]
>>> \setupbodyfont[libertine,rm,10pt]
>>> \setupinterlinespace[line=2.6ex]
>>>
>>> \starttext
>>> %%echo '\N{LATIN SMALL LETTER A}\N{COMBINING DOT BELOW}\N{COMBINING
>>> CARON BELOW}' |./uconv -t utf-8 -x &quo
; \setupinterlinespace[line=2.6ex]
>>
>> \starttext
>> %%echo '\N{LATIN SMALL LETTER A}\N{COMBINING DOT BELOW}\N{COMBINING
>> CARON BELOW}' |./uconv -t utf-8 -x "name-any
>> ạ̬
>> \stoptext
>
> Tested with Pango, the two marks overlap, very
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 5:57 PM, luigi scarso wrote:
> In this example \N{COMBINING CARON BELOW} looks bad -- a font problem ?
>
> \usetypescript[libertine]
> \setupbodyfont[libertine,rm,10pt]
> \setupinterlinespace[line=2.6ex]
>
> \starttext
> %%echo '\N{LATIN SM
s/setup/first-setup.sh .
>> > Does it mean I don't have to uninstall by Ubuntu packages?
>>
>> You don't need to uninstall anything. Just put the minimals at any
>> location you want.
>>
>> > Is the period at
>> > the end necessary?
>
:
> > rsync -av rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/setup/first-setup.sh .
> > Does it mean I don't have to uninstall by Ubuntu packages?
>
> You don't need to uninstall anything. Just put the minimals at any
> location you want.
>
> > Is the period at
> >
is command:
> rsync -av rsync://contextgarden.net/minimals/setup/first-setup.sh .
> Does it mean I don't have to uninstall by Ubuntu packages?
You don't need to uninstall anything. Just put the minimals at any
location you want.
> Is the period at
> the end necessary?
You don&
; \setupinterlinespace[line=2.6ex]
>>
>> \starttext
>> %%echo '\N{LATIN SMALL LETTER A}\N{COMBINING DOT BELOW}\N{COMBINING
>> CARON BELOW}' |./uconv -t utf-8 -x "name-any
>> ạ̬
>> \stoptext
>
> Tested with Pango, the two marks overlap, very
27;\N{LATIN SMALL LETTER A}\N{COMBINING DOT BELOW}\N{COMBINING
> CARON BELOW}' |./uconv -t utf-8 -x "name-any
> ạ̬
> \stoptext
Tested with Pango, the two marks overlap, very likely to be a font issue
(no mark to mark anchor attachment). Looks good in DejaVu Sans (but not
Serif) BTW.
In this example \N{COMBINING CARON BELOW} looks bad -- a font problem ?
\usetypescript[libertine]
\setupbodyfont[libertine,rm,10pt]
\setupinterlinespace[line=2.6ex]
\starttext
%%echo '\N{LATIN SMALL LETTER A}\N{COMBINING DOT BELOW}\N{COMBINING
CARON BELOW}' |./uconv -t utf-8 -x &qu
o Linotype font
shipped with XP (version 1.40; significantly different from the Windows
7 one) under MKIV. Everything works fine (oldstyle figures, sups for
instance), except that the small cap "i" character has a dot whereas it
shouldn't.
I borrowed one of the fonts from my wife&
different from the Windows
>> 7 one) under MKIV. Everything works fine (oldstyle figures, sups for
>> instance), except that the small cap "i" character has a dot whereas it
>> shouldn't.
>
> I borrowed one of the fonts from my wife's XP install (pala.ttf).
&g
t the small cap "i" character has a dot whereas it
shouldn't.
I borrowed one of the fonts from my wife's XP install (pala.ttf).
The short answer: the font is borked, complain to Microsoft.
The long answer: lookups are name-based, and if there are two glyphs
with the same name, yo
Hi,
I'm trying to use the full glyph range of the Palatino Linotype font shipped
with XP (version 1.40; significantly different from the Windows 7 one) under
MKIV. Everything works fine (oldstyle figures, sups for instance), except
that the small cap "i" character has a
On 22-6-2010 9:48, Martin Schröder wrote:
2010/6/22 Mojca Miklavec:
First off-topic question: Do you know a good place to buy latex
clothing [products]?
http://www.getdigital.de/products/Latex :-)
well, you can go to yandy (dot com) .. once famous for their dvipsone
backend and fonts but
ode
numeric r, g, b ;
def ran=
r := uniformdeviate 1 ;
g := uniformdeviate 1 ;
b := uniformdeviate 1 ;
enddef;
% Works as expected
for i=0 downto -3:
ran;
label(textext("\bold\colored[r=" & decimal(r) & ",g=" & decimal(g) &
",b=" & d
what happens at your end?
5.) Weird formula number placement when long equations are used in MKIV
\def\oklepaj#1{\left(#1\right)}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
{\dot N}(t)=
A\oklepaj{\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{eksp.-\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{fast}+
B\okl
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
5.) Weird formula number placement when long equations are used in MKIV
\def\oklepaj#1{\left(#1\right)}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
{\dot N}(t)=
A\oklepaj{\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{eksp.-\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{fast}+
B
tMPcode
draw \sometxt{čšž};
\stopMPcode
\stopbuffer
čšž
\getbuffer[gnu]
\stoptext
5.) Weird formula number placement when long equations are used in MKIV
\def\oklepaj#1{\left(#1\right)}
\starttext
\placeformula
\startformula
{\dot N}(t)=
A\oklepaj{\exp\oklepaj{-\frac{t-t_0}{τ_{\text{eksp.}
Otared Kavian gmail.com> writes:
> On 5 mai 2010, at 09:25, Marius wrote:
> > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:12 AM, googlemail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> 1. How does one add a dot after the numerals in headings, so that
> >> "\section{First}"
On 5 mai 2010, at 09:25, Marius wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:12 AM, wrote:
>> G'Day,
>>
>> I'm trying out ConTeXt and have come up with 2 questions.
>>
>> 1. How does one add a dot after the numerals in headings, so that
>>
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 5:12 AM, wrote:
> G'Day,
>
> I'm trying out ConTeXt and have come up with 2 questions.
>
> 1. How does one add a dot after the numerals in headings, so that
> "\section{First}"
> becomes
> "1. First&q
G'Day,
I'm trying out ConTeXt and have come up with 2 questions.
1. How does one add a dot after the numerals in headings, so that
"\section{First}"
becomes
"1. First"
instead of
"1 First"
?
2. I would like to use somet
201 - 300 of 566 matches
Mail list logo
