Hi guys,
I'm getting this output:
errorinvalid xml file - parsed text/error
My test.tex file is following:
\setupbackend[export=yes,xhtml=yes]
\definehighlight[strong][style=bold]
\definehighlight[emph] [style=italic]
\starttext
Hello world!
text \strong{text} text \emph{text} text
\stoptext
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 19:47, Hans Hagen pra...@wxs.nl wrote:
I uploaded a new beta. This time a couple of fixes + some reorganization of
font related code. More to follow.
There's something fishy somewhere in the fonts or the simplefonts
module, because a file that worked last week now gets
Hi Hans,
The following used to show all the commands for various math characters. It
still works in mkii, but I wonder what would be the analogous for mkiv: is
there still a way to see math characters in mkiv?
%%% begin showmath.tex
%\doifmode{mkiv}{\usemodule[fnt-25]}
On 17-1-2012 09:08, Mari Voipio wrote:
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 19:47, Hans Hagenpra...@wxs.nl wrote:
I uploaded a new beta. This time a couple of fixes + some reorganization of
font related code. More to follow.
There's something fishy somewhere in the fonts or the simplefonts
module,
On 17-1-2012 09:14, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
The following used to show all the commands for various math characters. It
still works in mkii, but I wonder what would be the analogous for mkiv: is
there still a way to see math characters in mkiv?
s-mat-*
On 17-1-2012 09:01, Martin Bruchanov wrote:
\setupbackend[export=yes,xhtml=yes]
\definehighlight[strong][style=bold]
\definehighlight[emph] [style=italic]
\starttext
Hello world!
text \strong{text} text \emph{text} text
\stoptext
a conflict in some macro names ... will be sorted out
Am 16.01.2012 um 17:18 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 16-1-2012 15:39, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Send a example where we can see how the list entries are formatted.
Wolfgang
Sorry, no example now: I am just about to leave the desk.
Back again ...
Here is the corresponding minimal example:
Hi Wolfgang,
thanks for enlighten me! - This works.
Willi
On 16 Jan 2012, at 23:04, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 16.01.2012 um 22:44 schrieb Willi Egger:
Dear all,
I tried to recompile a booklet. Then I realized that whatever I give for
arguments the standardmakeup environment gives
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.dewrote:
Am 16.01.2012 um 17:18 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 16-1-2012 15:39, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Send a example where we can see how the list entries are formatted.
Wolfgang
Sorry, no example now: I am just
Hello.
I want to use in formulas for letters and numerals my usual text font (Linux
Libertine for example) and math font for all other symbols (saying Cambria Math
or Computer Modern). It is possible? If so, I would like to see example
typescript for MkIV.
Hello,
I want to have 10mm space between rim of the paper and beginig of the text.
This is my layout:
\definelayout[normal][
bottompace=0mm,
footerheight=6mm,
footerdistance=0mm,
bottomdistance=0mm,
bottomspace=0mm,
topdistance=0mm,
topspace=0mm,
headerheight=60mm,
headerdistance=0mm,
Am 17.01.2012 um 12:19 schrieb luigi scarso:
Probably a bug, but this is ok
\definelistplacement[MyListItemIT][none]#1#2#3%
{\hfill\kern-1em\it#1%
\hfill\strut\crlf\strut\hfill\hphantom{\tf#3}%
\framedtext[frame=off,offset=overlay,align=middle,style=bold]%
{#2}%
\hfill\tf#3
}
Not
Hi Wolfgang,
thanks for this. Indeed it works ok! (Stupid me had edited the trypescriptfile
of the wrong tree before writing yesterdays mail).
Willi
On 16 Jan 2012, at 23:11, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 16.01.2012 um 23:00 schrieb Willi Egger:
Hi font gurus,
With context from begin of
On 17-1-2012 12:23, Nikita Volchenkov wrote:
Hello.
I want to use in formulas for letters and numerals my usual text font (Linux
Libertine for example) and math font for all other symbols (saying Cambria Math
or Computer Modern). It is possible? If so, I would like to see example
typescript for
Hello,
** Pavel Dohnal [2012-01-17 12:38:11 +0100]:
Hello,
I want to have 10mm space between rim of the paper and beginig of the text.
This is my layout:
\definelayout[normal][
bottompace=0mm,
footerheight=6mm,
footerdistance=0mm,
bottomdistance=0mm,
bottomspace=0mm,
topdistance=0mm,
Hello all,
I'm now trying to use counters that will tally some values. The value
of these could be zero, which the wiki states will be the default
value. The following shows that nothing is displayed when the counter
is 0.
\definenumber[examplecounter]
\setnumber[examplecounter]{1}
\starttext
I've just updated to the latest beta and the following will cause an error:
\usemodule[tikz]
\starttext
Hello World
\stoptext
The error is:
system tex error on line 129 in file example.tex:
Undefined control sequence ...
l.129 \catcode`\;=\active
Obviously there is no line 129.
On 17-1-2012 16:00, Felix Ingram wrote:
I've just updated to the latest beta and the following will cause an error:
\usemodule[tikz]
\starttext
Hello World
\stoptext
The error is:
system tex error on line 129 in file example.tex:
Undefined control sequence ...
l.129 \catcode`\;=\active
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 16:00, Felix Ingram wrote:
I've just updated to the latest beta and the following will cause an error:
\usemodule[tikz]
\starttext
Hello World
\stoptext
The error is:
system tex error on line 129 in file example.tex:
Undefined control sequence ...
On 17-1-2012 16:28, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I didn't follow development of ConTeXt too closely, but I'm lead to
believe that \active has disappeared from ConTeXt MKIV. Others will
have to correct me if I'm wrong - I didn't check ConTeXt sources. And
others will have to make suggestion about what
Am 17.01.2012 um 15:55 schrieb Felix Ingram:
Hello all,
I'm now trying to use counters that will tally some values. The value
of these could be zero, which the wiki states will be the default
value. The following shows that nothing is displayed when the counter
is 0.
Am 17.01.2012 um 12:38 schrieb Pavel Dohnal:
Hello,
I want to have 10mm space between rim of the paper and beginig of the text.
This is my layout:
\definelayout[normal][
bottompace=0mm,
footerheight=6mm,
footerdistance=0mm,
bottomdistance=0mm,
Hi everyone,
With MKIV, the names of formulas don't get written in the List Of Formulas
anymore.The following example works fine for me in MKII, but not in MKIV.The
only bug is that the names of formulas don't appear in the LOF.Anyone knows a
way around ?
Thank you very much !
Oh, and also,
On 17-1-2012 19:39, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
When you want to set all values to zero and only a few to certain value you
first clone the “page” layout (where everything is zero) and set then the rest
to desired value.
The horizontal dimensions are determined by the three values
- backspace
Am 17.01.2012 um 13:14 schrieb Steffen Wolfrum:
Am 17.01.2012 um 12:19 schrieb luigi scarso:
Probably a bug, but this is ok
\definelistplacement[MyListItemIT][none]#1#2#3%
{\hfill\kern-1em\it#1%
\hfill\strut\crlf\strut\hfill\hphantom{\tf#3}%
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 13:38 +0900, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
Hey Vlad.
(not an expert, just read command reference)
(1) What is the difference between \definedescription and
\setupdescriptions?
the first should define new description, the second change style of
already defined description.
Hey list,
When I wish to reference some section, I can inline typeset with
\in{section}[Some Reference]. In the case of a definition defined with a
\startdefinition{Some Definition}, how can I reference it inline?
--
Kip Warner -- Software Engineer
OpenPGP encrypted/signed mail preferred
Hello,
** Kip Warner [2012-01-17 17:47:21 -0800]:
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 13:38 +0900, Vladimir Lomov wrote:
Hey Vlad.
Actually Vladimir, Vlad is usually used as short for Vladislav.
(not an expert, just read command reference)
(1) What is the difference between \definedescription and
Hello,
** Kip Warner [2012-01-17 18:07:18 -0800]:
Hey list,
When I wish to reference some section, I can inline typeset with
\in{section}[Some Reference]. In the case of a definition defined with a
\startdefinition{Some Definition}, how can I reference it inline?
I could be wrong but from
Hi, sorry to dredge up such an old thread, but I recently updated from a Feb
2010 vintage minimals to current (first to 1/12/2012, then to today 1/17). I
ran into problems splitting a table within a splitfloat. I search the list
archives and came up with this example, which is failing for me.
Hello,
** Brian Landy [2012-01-17 23:19:41 -0500]:
Hi, sorry to dredge up such an old thread, but I recently updated from
a Feb 2010 vintage minimals to current (first to 1/12/2012, then to
today 1/17). I ran into problems splitting a table within a
splitfloat. I search the list archives
Am 17.01.2012 um 23:41 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
You should try to make your code more readable.
\definelistplacement[MyListItemIT][none]#1#2#3%
{\maxaligned\bgroup
\rlap{\it#1}%
\framed[frame=off,align=middle,location=bottom,width=broad,foregroundstyle=\TOCstyleBF]{#2}%
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.dewrote:
Am 17.01.2012 um 23:41 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
You should try to make your code more readable.
\definelistplacement[MyListItemIT][none]#1#2#3%
{\maxaligned\bgroup
\rlap{\it#1}%
Am 18.01.2012 um 03:07 schrieb Kip Warner:
Hey list,
When I wish to reference some section, I can inline typeset with
\in{section}[Some Reference]. In the case of a definition defined with a
\startdefinition{Some Definition}, how can I reference it inline?
\startdefinition[des:some]{Some
Am 18.01.2012 um 04:06 schrieb Vladimir Lomov:
Hello,
** Kip Warner [2012-01-17 18:07:18 -0800]:
Hey list,
When I wish to reference some section, I can inline typeset with
\in{section}[Some Reference]. In the case of a definition defined with a
\startdefinition{Some Definition}, how
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 8:30 AM, luigi scarso luigi.sca...@gmail.comwrote:
Wolfgang often uses internal macro, gaining speed but loosing
compatibility.
Uh uh it sounds offensive (there is the fog here outside, but maybe
something is still in my head).
Just to be clear: I read *all* the
Am 18.01.2012 um 08:30 schrieb luigi scarso:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Steffen Wolfrum cont...@st.estfiles.de
wrote:
Am 17.01.2012 um 23:41 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
You should try to make your code more readable.
\definelistplacement[MyListItemIT][none]#1#2#3%
37 matches
Mail list logo
