On 2/19/2014 7:41 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
Forgot to tell why I need the glyph paths...
I implemented multi path support in drops yesterday and now I want to
test it with some glyphs. Currently I use Inkscape (export the glyph
path as PDF) and pdftoedit to finally get a MP path. Time consuming and
Hi,
Just a question about blocks... I consulted the manual, but I'm in trouble:
I have this definitions:
% the exercise
\defineenumeration
[exercici]
Hi,
Maybe this is what you looking for:
begin question-hint-answer.tex
\defineblock[question]
\defineblock[hint]
\defineblock[answer]
\defineenumeration[question][alternative=hanging,width=2.5cm,text={Question},stopper={.}]
\defineenumeration[hint]
Am 20.02.2014 09:58, schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 2/19/2014 7:41 PM, Peter Rolf wrote:
Forgot to tell why I need the glyph paths...
I implemented multi path support in drops yesterday and now I want to
test it with some glyphs. Currently I use Inkscape (export the glyph
path as PDF) and pdftoedit
Not exactly. If you don't have the same number of answers that the number of
questions, so your counter is not properly set. See that:
\defineblock[question]
\defineblock[hint]
\defineblock[answer]
\defineenumeration[question][alternative=hanging,width=2.5cm,text={Question},stopper={.}]
On 02/20/2014 01:22 PM, Xan wrote:
If you comment one solution, then, you get Answer to question 1, instead of
Answer of question 2, which is really. No always a question has an answer provided by
me;-)
Thanks,
Obviously you will have to give every question|answer|hint some sort of
unique
Am 20.02.2014 um 13:22 schrieb Xan dxpubl...@telefonica.net:
Not exactly. If you don't have the same number of answers that the number of
questions, so your counter is not properly set. See that:
\defineblock[question]
\defineblock[hint]
\defineblock[answer]
A general question. I use setupenumerations to define theorem-,
lemma-, and definition-environments for my document. I realised that
setupenumerations is overwriting keys that are set in setupitemize
(and groups defined by defineitemgroup).
~~~snip~~~
\setupenumerations
Am 20.02.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Thomas Möbius kont...@thomasmoebius.de:
A general question. I use setupenumerations to define theorem-,
lemma-, and definition-environments for my document. I realised that
setupenumerations is overwriting keys that are set in setupitemize
(and groups defined
2014-02-20 14:52 GMT+01:00 Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com:
Am 20.02.2014 um 14:45 schrieb Thomas Möbius kont...@thomasmoebius.de:
A general question. I use setupenumerations to define theorem-,
lemma-, and definition-environments for my document. I realised that
Thanx Thomas
very much for link to PDF file Using ConTEXt with Databases. I'm sure
I will use it in the future.
Jaroslav Hajtmar
Dne 20.2.2014 13:57, Thomas A. Schmitz napsal(a):
On 02/20/2014 01:22 PM, Xan wrote:
If you comment one solution, then, you get Answer to question 1,
instead of
Thanx Wolfgang.
For me this is valuable information
Jaroslav Hajtmar
Dne 20.2.2014 14:13, Wolfgang Schuster napsal(a):
Am 20.02.2014 um 13:22 schrieb Xan dxpubl...@telefonica.net:
Not exactly. If you don't have the same number of answers that the number of
questions, so your counter is not
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\starttext
\chapter{Chapter}
.\doifemptyelse{\getmarking[section][current]}
{\getmarking[chapter][current]}
{\getmarking[section][current]}.
\section{Section}
.\doifemptyelse{\getmarking[section][current]}
{\getmarking[chapter][current]}
Am 20.02.2014 um 21:12 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es:
Dear list,
I have the following sample:
\starttext
\chapter{Chapter}
.\doifemptyelse{\getmarking[section][current]}
{\getmarking[chapter][current]}
{\getmarking[section][current]}.
\section{Section}
On 02/20/2014 09:39 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 20.02.2014 um 21:12 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez:
[...]
How can I make the first conditional work?
You can’t, markings are only reliable when you use them in the
header of footer of the page.
To access the values of a heading you can use the
Am 20.02.2014 um 23:09 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es:
On 02/20/2014 09:39 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 20.02.2014 um 21:12 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez:
[...]
How can I make the first conditional work?
You can’t, markings are only reliable when you use them in the
header of footer
Have you looked at:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Headers_and_Footers#Marginal_headings_and_centered_headings
?
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the
Wiki!
maillist :
Hi,
Been struggling with this issue:
1. Source test.tex: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=hPVmkATT
2. Chivo: https://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Chivo
3. Gentium Basic: http://www.google.com/fonts/specimen/Gentium+Basic
4. Install fonts.
5. Run: context test.tex
Looks fine.
1. Uncomment:
I have identified the problem. I have ConTeXt minimals installed
simultaneously with ConTeXt from TeXLive 2013. Unsetting the environmental
variable TEXMFMAIN (which was set to my TeXLive 2013 TEXMF directory) fixes
the problem. Perhaps the minimals installation should unset (or ignore)
this
anyhow, i'll add this:
\setupuserpagenumber[viewerprefix=titlepage]
\startstandardmakeup
The first page
\stopstandardmakeup
\setupuserpagenumber[viewerprefix=p ]
Thanks Hans. That works great. Is it possible to have ONLY the prefix
(not followed by the
20 matches
Mail list logo
