2010/8/10 Hans Hagen :
> \setupbackend
> [format=valid pdf/x name,
> profile=name.icc,
> intent=name.icc,
> level=compresslevel, % default 3
Does it correctly handle x-4? That's a lot harder then x-3.
Best
Martin
__
2010/7/22 Vedran Miletić :
>
> Same here. Perhaps Mojca is busy and minimals didn't get updated.
I was away and offline for a great deal of time in the last two weeks
(and I will probably keep being offline during the next days), but the
minimals should usually update automatically. (I need to cat
2010/7/23 Vedran Miletić :
> 2010/7/22 Steffen Wolfrum :
>>
>> Am 22.07.2010 um 17:39 schrieb Hans Hagen:
>>
>>> On 22-7-2010 5:34, Vnpenguin wrote:
>>>
Since one week, I update my minimal ConTeXt almost everyday (Win32
version), but the version is alway the same:
>>>
>>> sure, as i didn'
2010/7/22 Steffen Wolfrum :
>
> Am 22.07.2010 um 17:39 schrieb Hans Hagen:
>
>> On 22-7-2010 5:34, Vnpenguin wrote:
>>
>>> Since one week, I update my minimal ConTeXt almost everyday (Win32
>>> version), but the version is alway the same:
>>
>> sure, as i didn't update context for a week
>
>
> this
Am 22.07.2010 um 17:39 schrieb Hans Hagen:
> On 22-7-2010 5:34, Vnpenguin wrote:
>
>> Since one week, I update my minimal ConTeXt almost everyday (Win32
>> version), but the version is alway the same:
>
> sure, as i didn't update context for a week
this exchange you should be archieved in con
On 22-7-2010 9:47, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
Hans Hagen wrote:
the error is probably related to the fact that formats
are no longer dealt with in the same way
Actually, this particular warning is a glitch in itself, it seems
a (quite harmless) case of forgetting to clear the condition state.
Hi,
Hans Hagen wrote:
> the error is probably related to the fact that formats
> are no longer dealt with in the same way
Actually, this particular warning is a glitch in itself, it seems
a (quite harmless) case of forgetting to clear the condition state.
Nevertheless, there are numerous other
Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> you shouldn't run mp 1.5 as it's a quite experimental version, the
> prelude to 2.0; the error is probably related to the fact that formats
> are no longer dealt with in the same way
I don't think minimal (beta) users have a choice in the matter
at the moment.
Best wishes
On 22-7-2010 8:59, Vedran Miletić wrote:
2010/7/22 Vnpenguin:
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:51, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Hi,
Otared Kavian wrote:
So this means that something has changed in first-setup.sh, and for some reason
context.tex (and maybe a few other files…) are not thoroughly synched
2010/7/22 Vnpenguin :
> On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:51, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Otared Kavian wrote:
>>>
>>> So this means that something has changed in first-setup.sh, and for some
>>> reason context.tex (and maybe a few other files…) are not thoroughly
>>> synched with the zip file o
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:51, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Otared Kavian wrote:
>>
>> So this means that something has changed in first-setup.sh, and for some
>> reason context.tex (and maybe a few other files…) are not thoroughly synched
>> with the zip file on the Pragma's website.
>
> The
On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:43 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 22-7-2010 5:33, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Hans,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your attention.
>>> I looked in context.tex after updating and I do have
>>> \edef\contextversion{2010.06.23 1
Hi,
Otared Kavian wrote:
>
> So this means that something has changed in first-setup.sh, and for some
> reason context.tex (and maybe a few other files…) are not thoroughly synched
> with the zip file on the Pragma's website.
The minimals do not sync from the public website but from an interna
On 22-7-2010 5:33, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your attention.
I looked in context.tex after updating and I do have
\edef\contextversion{2010.06.23 12:45}
Does this mean that somehow context.tex is not updated? The file on th
On 22 juil. 2010, at 17:14, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> \edef\contextversion{2010.07.22 15:19}
>
> zip on the website, synced each hour on the garden
>
> Hans
Hi,
After downloading the zipped files and making the formats « manually », I do
get the new version:
ConTeXt version 2010.07.22 15:19
So t
On 22-7-2010 5:34, Vnpenguin wrote:
Since one week, I update my minimal ConTeXt almost everyday (Win32
version), but the version is alway the same:
sure, as i didn't update context for a week
-
On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 17:23, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Thanks for your attention.
> I looked in context.tex after updating and I do have
> \edef\contextversion{2010.06.23 12:45}
>
> Does this mean that somehow context.tex is not updated? The file on the
> minimal is indeed created on
On Jul 22, 2010, at 5:23 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
> Hi Hans,
>
> Thanks for your attention.
> I looked in context.tex after updating and I do have
> \edef\contextversion{2010.06.23 12:45}
>
> Does this mean that somehow context.tex is not updated? The file on the
> minimal is indeed created on
On 22-7-2010 5:23, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your attention.
I looked in context.tex after updating and I do have
\edef\contextversion{2010.06.23 12:45}
Does this mean that somehow context.tex is not updated? The file on the minimal
is indeed created on
Wednsday June 23, 2010, a
Hi Hans,
Thanks for your attention.
I looked in context.tex after updating and I do have
\edef\contextversion{2010.06.23 12:45}
Does this mean that somehow context.tex is not updated? The file on the minimal
is indeed created on
Wednsday June 23, 2010, at 12:45
Best regards: OK
On 22 juil. 201
On 22-7-2010 5:07, Vedran Miletić wrote:
2010/7/22 Otared Kavian:
Dear Hans,
I updated my minimal installation, but noticed that since the end of last June
I get the same version: after any updating, upon doing
context --version
I get:
MTXrun | main context file:
/context-minimal/tex/texmf-c
On 22-7-2010 5:03, Otared Kavian wrote:
Dear Hans,
I updated my minimal installation, but noticed that since the end of last June
I get the same version: after any updating, upon doing
context --version
I get:
MTXrun | main context file:
/context-minimal/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/con
2010/7/22 Otared Kavian :
> Dear Hans,
>
> I updated my minimal installation, but noticed that since the end of last
> June I get the same version: after any updating, upon doing
> context --version
> I get:
>
> MTXrun | main context file:
> /context-minimal/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/con
Dear Hans,
I updated my minimal installation, but noticed that since the end of last June
I get the same version: after any updating, upon doing
context --version
I get:
MTXrun | main context file:
/context-minimal/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex
MTXrun | current version: 2010.06
On 7-4-2010 4:34, Peter Rolf wrote:
\nopdfcompression
\starttext\null\stoptext
i'll send you a patch
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Nether
On Mar 30, 2010, at 7:26 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 30-3-2010 19:15, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>>>
>>>
>> Hans, sorry, the 19.00 beta doesn't fix it yet, I get the same errors.
>
> will take till 20.00 before the garden is in sync
>
You're right, of course, the warnings have disappeared now! T
fixed in latest beta. Thanks Hans!
MTXrun | current version: 2010.03.30 18:56
This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.53.0-2010032921 (rev 3561)
Am 30.03.2010 14:07, schrieb Peter Rolf:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried the latest beta and run into this error...
>
> [..]
> (C:/tmp/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/con
On 30-3-2010 19:15, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Mar 30, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
i see, some files are missing in the zip (and as i have them in my dev path it
goes unnoticed when i do a run)
i'll make a newer beta
Hans, sorry, the 19.00 beta doesn't fix it yet, I get the same
On Mar 30, 2010, at 6:22 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>>
>
> i see, some files are missing in the zip (and as i have them in my dev path
> it goes unnoticed when i do a run)
>
> i'll make a newer beta
>
Hans, sorry, the 19.00 beta doesn't fix it yet, I get the same errors.
Thomas
__
On 30-3-2010 19:06, Otared Kavian wrote:
As Thomas Schmitz points out it may be a matter of math fonts.
i just uploaded a new version
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat
On 30 mars 2010, at 17:41, Peter Rolf wrote:
> […]Hi Otared,
>
> it's just an undefined definition (\Umathquad)
>
> \let\Umathquad\quad
>
> works here (donno if this 'messes' up spacing in math)
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Peter
> __
Thanks Peter,
I tried your suggestion, but here I did not g
On 30 mars 2010, at 17:41, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
> Am 30.03.10 16:48, schrieb Otared Kavian:
>> Hi Hans,
>>
>> Thanks for fixing so quickly the issue with the release 2010.03.29.
>> Now with the latest release, that is
>> ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.30 12:47 MKIV fmt: 2010.3.30 int: english/engli
On 30-3-2010 18:06, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
did you run luatools --generate before making a format?
i moved some math font related issues to other files so that can be a reason
Well, something is fishy in the math font department with the late
On Mar 30, 2010, at 5:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> did you run luatools --generate before making a format?
>
> i moved some math font related issues to other files so that can be a reason
Well, something is fishy in the math font department with the latest beta. With
one of my own typescripts, I
Am 30.03.10 16:48, schrieb Otared Kavian:
Hi Hans,
Thanks for fixing so quickly the issue with the release 2010.03.29.
Now with the latest release, that is
ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.30 12:47 MKIV fmt: 2010.3.30 int: english/english
there is an issue with \dots: mkiv considers that this should be i
Am 30.03.2010 17:15, schrieb Otared Kavian:
>
> On 30 mars 2010, at 14:07, Peter Rolf wrote:
>
>> […]
>> ! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set.
>> l.3 $\downarrow$
>> […]
>> test is simply
>>
>> \starttext
>> $\downarrow$
>> \stoptext
>>
>>
>> Peter
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I just
On 30-3-2010 16:48, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
Thanks for fixing so quickly the issue with the release 2010.03.29.
Now with the latest release, that is
ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.30 12:47 MKIV fmt: 2010.3.30 int: english/english
there is an issue with \dots: mkiv considers that this should be in
On 30 mars 2010, at 14:07, Peter Rolf wrote:
> […]
> ! Math error: parameter \Umathquad\displaystyle is not set.
> l.3 $\downarrow$
> […]
> test is simply
>
> \starttext
> $\downarrow$
> \stoptext
>
>
> Peter
Hi Peter,
I just ran into the same issue but with $\to$: I was going to report the
Am 23.03.2010 11:02, schrieb Taco Hoekwater:
>
>
> Hans Hagen wrote:
>> On 22-3-2010 21:06, Peter Rolf wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> the underbar line is drawn vertically here.
>>>
>>> \starttext
>>> sonder\underbar{bar}
>>> \stoptext
>>>
>>> MTXrun | current version: 2010.03.20 22:59
>>> This is LuaTeX
Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 22-3-2010 21:06, Peter Rolf wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> the underbar line is drawn vertically here.
>>
>> \starttext
>> sonder\underbar{bar}
>> \stoptext
>>
>> MTXrun | current version: 2010.03.20 22:59
>> This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.53.0-2010032213 (rev 3535)
>
> looks like a
On 22-3-2010 21:06, Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
the underbar line is drawn vertically here.
\starttext
sonder\underbar{bar}
\stoptext
MTXrun | current version: 2010.03.20 22:59
This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.53.0-2010032213 (rev 3535)
looks like a but in luatex ... when i use a long word we get a
Just checked here in
ConTeXt ver: 2010.03.20 22:59 MKIV fmt: 2010.3.21 int: english/
english
Can confirm that:
\starttext
sonder\underbar{bar}
gives vertical bar, but the following (note the blank line after
starttext) does not.
\starttext
sonder\underbar{bar}
met vriendelijke groet
H
Hi
Thanks!!!
The fantastic thing about is that text created with this new macro is
editable inside Acrobat! (While other options, e.g. font specs do not
lead to this)
You used the same font (e.g. Arial) in both tests?
Arial too, but first of all Times New Roman.
Vyatcheslav
___
Am 26.01.10 19:56, schrieb Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky:
Thanks!!!
The fantastic thing about is that text created with this new macro is
editable inside Acrobat! (While other options, e.g. font specs do not
lead to this)
You used the same font (e.g. Arial) in both tests?
Wolfgang
Thanks!!!
The fantastic thing about is that text created with this new macro is
editable inside Acrobat! (While other options, e.g. font specs do not
lead to this)
The latest beta has a few more fonts defined in type-otf.mkiv. YOu can
do things like
\setupbodyfont[mscore,ss,10pt]
Happy
Vy
bedankt :)
Taco Hoekwater schrieb:
Hans Hagen wrote:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
underbar slides to the left, if the underbar area is restricted to
only one char of a word. Example attached.
I need this for showing the keyboard shortcuts in my graphics. :)
ok, i need to discuss thi
Hans Hagen wrote:
> Peter Rolf wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> underbar slides to the left, if the underbar area is restricted to
>> only one char of a word. Example attached.
>> I need this for showing the keyboard shortcuts in my graphics. :)
>
> ok, i need to discuss this with taco
There was a luatex bu
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
underbar slides to the left, if the underbar area is restricted to only
one char of a word. Example attached.
I need this for showing the keyboard shortcuts in my graphics. :)
ok, i need to discuss this with taco
quick hack:
\let\normalunderbar\underbar
\def\underbar#
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
the macro \dopresetsymbol is used in \dohandlefitfield
(scrn-fld.mkiv), but no longer defined.
can you make a small example
yep! seems to be used with tooltips, as the attached example breaks with
the same error.
there were a c
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
the macro \dopresetsymbol is used in \dohandlefitfield
(scrn-fld.mkiv), but no longer defined.
can you make a small example
yep! seems to be used with tooltips, as the attached example breaks with
the same error.
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
the macro \dopresetsymbol is used in \dohandlefitfield (scrn-fld.mkiv),
but no longer defined.
can you make a small example
-
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
On 27 mai 09, at 23:25, Hans Hagen wrote:
[…]
ok, solved in next beta
Thanks for your attention: I will test that beta.
Best regards: OK
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an e
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On May 27, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Would be nice to hear about these bugs; some of the have been posted
several times, but we never heard back about them.
weren't you going to make me a zip?
Will do during the weekend. (I'm at
On May 27, 2009, at 7:04 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Would be nice to hear about these bugs; some of the have been
posted several times, but we never heard back about them.
weren't you going to make me a zip?
Will do during the weekend. (I'm at a conference in Belgium
Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Hans,
The issue I reported some time ago regarding \scetion and \footnote with
mkiv, is still there:
mkiv, LuaTeX version 40, LuaTeX revision 1, (LuaTeX date stamp 2009050813),
ConTeXt version 2009.05.27 16:26.
ok, solved in next beta
---
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Would be nice to hear about these bugs; some of the have been posted
several times, but we never heard back about them.
weren't you going to make me a zip?
-
Han
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
the attached example shows some horizontal shift of the clipped
object. Mkii works as expected.
meta-ini.mkiv, add percent sign ...
\else
\xdef\MPclippath{#5}%
\fi
that was fast! thank you Hans!
-
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
the attached example shows some horizontal shift of the clipped object.
Mkii works as expected.
meta-ini.mkiv, add percent sign ...
\else
\xdef\MPclippath{#5}%
\fi
-
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
2. Section numbers in markings are duplicated
fixed in next beta (marks got a prefix)
3. trep and tlig features don't work in node mode
hm, i gave it another try ... also in next beta ... is bit tricky as
this is a feature that does not fall in some script/lang c
Mohamed Bana wrote:
Taco, hi,
could you please include a feature that allows listing the set of pages that
an item was cited on, I'm sure this is present in LaTeX.
As I can't even get the core functionality working, this is a very
bad moment for feature requests, but I'll keep this in mind whil
2009/5/20 Dohyun Kim :
> Lastly, current beta does not support subfonts contained in
> TTC (truetype collection). TTC fonts are becoming more and more
> difficult to find, but we still can find them especially in CJK world.
> It's quite simple to support them:
> just commenting out three lines fro
On Thursday 21 May 2009 12:17:50 Taco Hoekwater wrote:
> Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> > 1. bib-module
> >
> > Taco's bib module does not work with the current beta. For me, this is a
> > showstopper, I will have to give up on mkiv as long as this does not
> > work.
>
> I feel sorry for you, but I do
Taco, hi,
could you please include a feature that allows listing the set of pages that
an item was cited on, I'm sure this is present in LaTeX.
Mohamed
2009/5/21 Taco Hoekwater
> Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
>
>>
>> 1. bib-module
>>
>> Taco's bib module does not work with the current beta. For me,
Hi Taco,
On May 21, 2009, at 12:17 PM, Taco Hoekwater wrote:
1. bib-module
Taco's bib module does not work with the current beta. For me, this
is a showstopper, I will have to give up on mkiv as long as this
does not work.
I feel sorry for you, but I do not know what to do about it anymor
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
1. bib-module
Taco's bib module does not work with the current beta. For me, this is a
showstopper, I will have to give up on mkiv as long as this does not work.
I feel sorry for you, but I do not know what to do about it anymore.
On Thursday 21 May 2009 11:57:37 Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
> OK, here is a collection of some assorted bugs. Most of them have been
> posted several times. Of course, everybody will have their own feeling
> of what is more and what is less urgent, but I will just add a few
> words about my own situa
On May 20, 2009, at 12:13 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Hi,
I uploaded a beta. Not that many fixes (if someone can collect
structure related bugs ...), only a few.
For those who keep an eye on the source ... i'm rewriting ppchtex
and it will be integral part of the core of mkiv (so that we have
Dohyun Kim wrote:
2009/5/20 Hans Hagen :
Hi,
I uploaded a beta. Not that many fixes (if someone can collect structure
related bugs ...), only a few.
Let me raise several issues about luatex-plain.
thanks for the detailed report .. i'm at the ntg meeting today so will
look into it tommorro
2009/5/20 Hans Hagen :
> Hi,
>
> I uploaded a beta. Not that many fixes (if someone can collect structure
> related bugs ...), only a few.
>
Let me raise several issues about luatex-plain.
First, newly released beta breaks luatex-plain,
because "luat-sto.lua" is not included in luatex-fonts.lua.
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
just in case this slipped someone's mind :)
I still get an error about an undefined control sequence
(\PDFobjectreferenceB) and the footnote marker (star) is not moved
with the footnote (\moveright).
The attached example code (with overprinting) br
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
just in case this slipped someone's mind :)
I still get an error about an undefined control sequence
(\PDFobjectreferenceB) and the footnote marker (star) is not moved with
the footnote (\moveright).
The attached example code (with overprinting) breaks with the mention
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in
the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures.
While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use
[-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in a
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in
the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures.
While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use
[-1 -1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in all directions.
Is
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
while comparing the PDF of mkii and mkiv I noticed a slight differ in
the boundingboxes (bb) of MP figures.
While all mkii bb have the form [0 0 w h], the mkiv counterparts use [-1
-1 w+1 h+1]. So the bb of mkiv is enlarged 1bp in all directions. Is
this intended?
harm
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
some problems with js interaction stuff. I get
! Undefined control sequence.
\dopresetfieldsymbol #1->\checkobjectreferences
for nearly all interaction fields in mkiv. Mkii compiles, but the pop-up
tooltip is only a black box (not the text 'tooltip').
I also had some p
On Mon, 11 May 2009, Hans Hagen wrote:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
hex colors don't work anymore in mkii (no problems in mkiv). All I get is
black (reminds me of a song by the Rolling Stones)...
I see a red door and I want it painted black
No colors anymore I want them to turn black
...
Mini
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
hex colors don't work anymore in mkii (no problems in mkiv). All I
get is black (reminds me of a song by the Rolling Stones)...
I see a red door and I want it painted black
No colors anymore I want them to turn black
...
Minimal example:
---
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
hex colors don't work anymore in mkii (no problems in mkiv). All I get
is black (reminds me of a song by the Rolling Stones)...
I see a red door and I want it painted black
No colors anymore I want them to turn black
...
Minimal example:
\setupcolo
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
there are still some problems with footnotes and overprinting. I have
reactivated the old (sorry, non minimal) example for that. But for three
problems it is pretty short :)
1. the footnote uses '1' instead of the chosen '*' (set 1)
in mkiv conversion has become numbe
Hi Hans,
Indeed there is something going wrong with footnotes, and maybe the
following remark may help fix the issue.
It works (for me…) in the following example (note the \sction command
commented out):
%%% begin basic-test.tex
\starttext
This file has been typeset
on \currentdate{}
at \c
Am 2009-05-11 um 13:05 schrieb Peter Rolf:
there are still some problems with footnotes and overprinting. I
have reactivated the old (sorry, non minimal) example for that. But
for three problems it is pretty short :)
1. the footnote uses '1' instead of the chosen '*' (set 1)
That's only a
Hans Hagen 写道:
i uploaded a beta with some fixes
The following bug is still there.
! Argument of \dotripletestemptyx has an extra }.
\par
}
\doif #1#2->\edef \!!stringa {#1}
\edef \!!stringb {#2}\ifx \!!stringa \!!str...
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
there are still some problems with footnotes and overprinting. I have
reactivated the old (sorry, non minimal) example for that. But for
three problems it is pretty short :)
1. the footnote uses '1' instead of the chosen '*' (set 1)
2. the footnote
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
there are still some problems with footnotes and overprinting. I have
reactivated the old (sorry, non minimal) example for that. But for three
problems it is pretty short :)
1. the footnote uses '1' instead of the chosen '*' (set 1)
2. the footnote marker is not bound t
Am 2009-05-11 um 11:14 schrieb Hans Hagen:
i uploaded a beta with some fixes
Minimals have version 2009.05.11 10:51, is that the one?
The footnote bugs still remain in that (no marks, no "bypage").
Greetlings from Lake Constance!
Hraban
---
http://www.fiee.net/texnique/
http://wiki.contextg
Peter Rolf wrote:
Peter Rolf schrieb:
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
finally found some time to test the latest beta. I get a couple of
undefined control sequences here (mkiv).
\doPDFpageattribute
\doPDFaddtocatalog
\PDFobjectreferenceB (overprinting)
i have been fizing some i
Peter Rolf schrieb:
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
finally found some time to test the latest beta. I get a couple of
undefined control sequences here (mkiv).
\doPDFpageattribute
\doPDFaddtocatalog
\PDFobjectreferenceB (overprinting)
i have been fizing some issues so maybe a ne
Yanrui Li 写道:
Hi,
The numbering of footnotes are abnormal. Simple example:
\starttext
\chapter{T}
This is a test\footnote{t}.
\chapter{E}
This is a test\footnote{e}.
\chapter{S}
This is a test\footnote{s}.
\chapter{T}
This is a test\footnote{t}.
\stoptext
The numbering of four footnotes is
Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Yanrui Li wrote:
2009/4/29 Otared Kavian :
Hi Yanrui,
I tested your file and everything is correct here both with mkii and
mkiv
(ConTeXt ver: 2009.04.21 16:11 MKIV fmt: 2009.4.25 int:
english/english).
Hi Otared,
When you would update to "M
2009/4/30 Aditya Mahajan :
> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Yanrui Li wrote:
>
>> 2009/4/29 Otared Kavian :
>>>
>>> Hi Yanrui,
>>>
>>> I tested your file and everything is correct here both with mkii and mkiv
>>> (ConTeXt ver: 2009.04.21 16:11 MKIV fmt: 2009.4.25 int:
>>> english/english).
>>>
>>
>> Hi Ot
On Thu, 30 Apr 2009, Yanrui Li wrote:
2009/4/29 Otared Kavian :
Hi Yanrui,
I tested your file and everything is correct here both with mkii and mkiv
(ConTeXt ver: 2009.04.21 16:11 MKIV fmt: 2009.4.25 int: english/english).
Hi Otared,
When you would update to "Minimals 2009.04.28 08:46",
On 29 avr. 09, at 18:37, Yanrui Li wrote:
2009/4/29 Otared Kavian :
Hi Yanrui,
I tested your file and everything is correct here both with mkii
and mkiv
(ConTeXt ver: 2009.04.21 16:11 MKIV fmt: 2009.4.25 int: english/
english).
Hi Otared,
When you would update to "Minimals 2009.04.
2009/4/29 Otared Kavian :
> Hi Yanrui,
>
> I tested your file and everything is correct here both with mkii and mkiv
> (ConTeXt ver: 2009.04.21 16:11 MKIV fmt: 2009.4.25 int: english/english).
>
Hi Otared,
When you would update to "Minimals 2009.04.28 08:46", maybe you can
get the abnormal res
Hi Yanrui,
I tested your file and everything is correct here both with mkii and
mkiv (ConTeXt ver: 2009.04.21 16:11 MKIV fmt: 2009.4.25 int:
english/english).
Best regards: OK
On 29 avr. 09, at 16:00, Yanrui Li wrote:
2009/4/28 Hans Hagen :
As I'm redoing the backend as well as cross
2009/4/28 Hans Hagen :
> As I'm redoing the backend as well as cross referencing some interaction
> features might be broken but normally they are easy to fix (once i know what
> fails). So, best collect all bugs while i'm away so that i can deal with
> then at once.
>
The numbering of footnotes a
Hans Hagen 写道:
I uploaded a beta just before leaving for bachotek. Quite some structure
(lua) code has been overhauled and i need to finish some bits.
Have fun!
As I'm redoing the backend as well as cross referencing some interaction
features might be broken but normally they are easy t
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Apr 27, 2009, at 11:06 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
OK, trying to compile the test file I sent last week:
no crash any more in beta
Well, it'll have to wait till you come back from Bachotek. I still get
this:
! Undefined control sequence.
\preparebibrefprefix ...llt
On Apr 27, 2009, at 11:06 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
OK, trying to compile the test file I sent last week:
no crash any more in beta
Well, it'll have to wait till you come back from Bachotek. I still get
this:
! Undefined control sequence.
\preparebibrefprefix ...lltoclevels \alltoclevels
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
On Apr 27, 2009, at 10:14 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
small test set needed then
OK, trying to compile the test file I sent last week:
no crash any more in beta
-
Hans Hagen schrieb:
Peter Rolf wrote:
Hi,
finally found some time to test the latest beta. I get a couple of
undefined control sequences here (mkiv).
\doPDFpageattribute
\doPDFaddtocatalog
\PDFobjectreferenceB (overprinting)
i have been fizing some issues so maybe a new beta later today
401 - 500 of 718 matches
Mail list logo
