On 11/23/2013 8:25 PM, Renaud Aubin wrote:
Le 23/11/2013 19:08, Wolfgang Schuster a écrit :
Am 23.11.2013 um 18:51 schrieb Renaud Aubin :
Hi folks,
I'm working on a Roboto typescript and starting from the work done by
Zen Lima back in last July, I would like to push things further.
Since I wo
Am 22.11.2013 um 18:08 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster :
>
> Am 22.11.2013 um 05:00 schrieb Rik :
>
>> Fallbacks (at least the range I tested) do not work with the roman face of
>> Linux Libertine O in the new (core) simplefonts implementation. I first
>> thought that this might be a Libertine issu
Hello together,
I have an arabic font, which is quite perfect, but only a little bit too
thin, so that it seems to "vanish" into the white of the paper.
Unfortunately this font does not come with an bold-variant.
Now I tried to manipulate it with CorelDraw, just converted into curves
and add
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 2:01 PM, "H. Özoguz" wrote:
>
> Now the question: I obviously cant set the entire book (more than 600 pages)
> with Corel-Draw, and want too use ConText, of course. So is there a way to
> produce this boldness out of this too thin font within ConText, too?
>
May be ConTeXt
May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
Thanks for your advice.
Unfortunately I did not manish to work with this font by simplefonts. I us
Hi Hans,
Thank you for the review and your suggestions!
Le 24/11/2013 12:53, Hans Hagen a écrit :
>
> normally typescripts like that end up in tex/context/third (maybe at
> some point we can collect extra typescripts in one package)
https://github.com/nibua-r/roboto-context/issues/1
Extra types
Am 24.11.2013 um 12:53 schrieb Hans Hagen :
>> Any chance that this typescript could find a way to the main ConTeXt distro?
>
> normally typescripts like that end up in tex/context/third (maybe at some
> point we can collect extra typescripts in one package)
I can add it to my typescript colle
Am 24.11.2013 um 15:32 schrieb H. Özoguz :
>> May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
>> may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
>> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
>
> Thanks for your advice.
> Unfortunately I
Hello there,
I wonder why working with fonts is soo hard in ConText (much easier in
Word or CorelDraw).
See this following font (free, opensource):
http://fonts.qurancomplex.gov.sa/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/UthmanTN1-Ver10.zip
And try now this Context-Code:
\definefont[arabic][file:Uthman
To be more concrete, I added an jpeg from CorelDraw, which shows, what I
mean with these "little signs" above the letters. They are vanished in
ConText, but are correctly set in CorelDraw with the very same font.
Huseyin
<>
On 11/24/2013 4:41 PM, "H. Özoguz" wrote:
Hello there,
I wonder why working with fonts is soo hard in ConText (much easier in
Word or CorelDraw).
See this following font (free, opensource):
http://fonts.qurancomplex.gov.sa/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/UthmanTN1-Ver10.zip
And try now this Contex
>
>
> >> May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
> >> may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
> >>
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
> >
> > Thanks for your advice.
> > Unfortunately I did not manish to work with
Am 24.11.2013 um 18:12 schrieb H. Özoguz :
> >
> >
> > >> May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
> > >> may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
> > >> http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
> > >
> > > Thanks for your
On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
shows me a "little sign" above the word
the only issue i see is that this otf font has 2048 units and gets
scaled wrong (in luatex's backend probably)
definefont[arabica][file:uthmantn1-ver10.otf*arabic at 45pt]
\definefont[arabicb][file:arabtype.ttf
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
>
> >shows me a "little sign" above the word
>
> the only issue i see is that this otf font has 2048 units and gets scaled
> wrong (in luatex's backend probably)
It is actually a TTF font but t
On 11/24/2013 6:38 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
shows me a "little sign" above the word
the only issue i see is that this otf font has 2048 units and gets scaled
wrong (in luatex's backend probabl
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:48:05PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 11/24/2013 6:38 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
> >On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >>On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> >>
> >>>shows me a "little sign" above the word
> >>
> >>the only issue i see is tha
The extend feature stretches the glyphs to get narrow or wide font but it
doesn’t embolden it.
The best solution is to get a font with a real bold style, money shouldn’t be a
problem because fonts are cheap nowadays.
Wolfgang
Thanks, I hoped the it could really embold ist (like I did it in
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:52:31PM +0100, "H. Özoguz" wrote:
> >The extend feature stretches the glyphs to get narrow or wide font but it
> >doesn’t embolden it.
> >
> >The best solution is to get a font with a real bold style, money shouldn’t
> >be a problem because fonts are cheap nowadays.
> >
On 11/24/2013 6:50 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:48:05PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:38 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:31:27PM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 11/24/2013 6:09 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
shows me a "little sign" above the word
the
not at all, as you show way more input here as in the jpeg ... so first
make a minimal example
I did gave a min-example, didn't I? The JPG was only to make clear, what
I mean with "little signs". Is that clear now? Dont know how to say it
better way (sorry my english) :),
also "another font
Dear All,
is it possible to get the complete representation of the layout that is
processed in the luatex PDF generator?
I mean coordinations of individual text boxes, their dimensions etc.
In e.g. XSL-FO processors it is provided in the XML based formats:
http://www.renderx.com/reference.html
http://amirifont.org/
>/ - and more hard to find such a find in this style (Uthmanic).
/
There is no such a style, it is just a simplified (dumbed down) Naskh
style used only in one single Mushaf. Why is that a requirement?
Thanks Khaled,
the Naskh-Style is not an absolute requirement, but it
Again, because arabic seems to be vanished in my first posting, I dont know why.
Thanks Khaled,
the Naskh-Style is not an absolute requirement, but it is very well
known and very common (at least for muslims in germany) - and it is very
nice, of course, this is an question of flavor.
I know yo
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 08:49:40PM +0100, "H. Özoguz" wrote:
> >http://amirifont.org/
> >
> >>/ - and more hard to find such a find in this style (Uthmanic).
> >/
> >There is no such a style, it is just a simplified (dumbed down) Naskh
> >style used only in one single Mushaf. Why is that a require
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 08:53:00PM +0100, "H. Özoguz" wrote:
> Again, because arabic seems to be vanished in my first posting, I dont know
> why.
>
>
> Thanks Khaled,
>
> the Naskh-Style is not an absolute requirement, but it is very well
> known and very common (at least for muslims in germany
It is my believe that Unicode has the wrong properties for Arabic
standalone Hamza; in short you should just type a regular Hamza in the
middle of the word and it will get positioned correctly. Placing a
combining Hamza over a Tatweel to “fake” it is wrong IMO. So in Amiri
you just type “بِءَايَٰت
On 2013-11-18 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> > On 2013–06–03 Jan Tosovsky wrote:
> > in fresh MkIV I use the following commands for building ToC, but I
> > have no idea how to align the label (roman numeral) to the right.
>
> I am almost there, but things get complicated when chapters are
> combined with p
Hi Huseyin,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:18 PM, "H. Özoguz" wrote:
> If I put the same arabic into CorelDraw, it prints a nice Unicode-Symbol for
> the number - see the JPG I have attached here, screenshot from CorelDraw,
> but ConTeXt ignores the brackets and prints just a verys small number. Ther
Hi Ondra,
thanks for your help.
Apparently, replacing a number enclosed in ornate parentheses (U+FD3E
and U+FD3F) with a number in the "end of ayah" ornament is a specialty
of the UthmanicHafs font. If I input the digit (e.g. U+0662) and then
the special non-printable "end of ayah" character (U
Thanks, that works fine:
\definefont[arabicamiri][file:amiri-regular.ttf*arabic at 15pt]
\definefont[arabicuth][file:UthmanicHafs1Ver09.ttf*arabic at 17pt]
\def\eoa#1{#1\char"06DD}
\starttext
\setupalign[r2l]
\arabicuth لأَفَبِهَـٰذَا ٱلْحَدِيثِ أَنتُم مُّدْهِنُونَ ﴿٨١﴾\eoa
\stoptext
Now I coul
31 matches
Mail list logo
