Hi
I've been looking at some core codes and the PDF reference, still have no
idea.
Somehow, I was told that LaTeX can do such things using hyperref package
and \pdfstringdef\temp{???}, then \pdfannot{... /Contents(\temp) ...} should
be OK.
On 4/11/07, Zhichu Chen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
Le 12 avr. 07 à 07:37, Thomas A. Schmitz a écrit :
... There are fast approaching competitors that
will eventually overtake LaTeX if we continue to stagnate. (Not to
mention ConTeXt, which has surpassed LaTeX in essentially every
area. Maybe the solution is just for everyone to switch to
Hello everyone, good morning europe, I want to generate an API-
documentation. For this I use a table (bTABLE) for every function
definition. That's a lot of code, which is in part dynamic (number of
rows for example depends on number of arguments). Here is a simple
example, but I will need
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Maurice Diamantini wrote:
Le 12 avr. 07 à 07:37, Thomas A. Schmitz a écrit :
... There are fast approaching competitors that
will eventually overtake LaTeX if we continue to stagnate. (Not to
mention ConTeXt, which has surpassed LaTeX in essentially every
area. Maybe
2007/4/13, Janko Hauser [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello everyone, good morning europe, I want to generate an API-
documentation. For this I use a table (bTABLE) for every function
definition. That's a lot of code, which is in part dynamic (number of
rows for example depends on number of arguments).
luigi scarso wrote:
On 4/12/07, John R. Culleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have the file set up with no parindent and one blank line between
paragraphs. but I want to kill the extra space after \section
headers. The current definition is:
Op 13-apr-2007, om 9:20 heeft Aditya Mahajan het volgende geschreven:
While starting ConTeXt, I found ConTeXt an excrusion and ConTeXt
manual to be extremely well written, much better than what I had read
for LaTeX (but then, I never bought a LaTeX book). What do you find
missing in the
Except for reference documentation or book (no need for a s here!).
This is exactly why I'm doing modules
That's why I come back to LaTeX
Very sad about that.
I would like www.ensta.fr/~diam/latex/pst-uml/
in context some day.
luigi
___
ntg-context
ok, it's a joke
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.pdftex/3404
(but the best is
http://www.google.com/tisp/
)
But my question is:
Will be easy in luatex to implement a new output format
(dvi,pdf,xps,my-xml,my-bin-format)
driven by command line ?
Actually
$texmfstart texexec --pdf a.tex ==
Dear Luigi,
luigi scarso wrote:
hmm maibe i have not understand, but
\zeichen{0002}{b}{second letter \vrule width 0.1pt height 1em depth2em }{}%
%% or this
%% \zeichen{0002}{b}{second letter \blank Mlg() }{}%
breaks the rule.
Or not ?
Yes, it does, definitely. So it's my (or any
I still have to see how to deal with large symbols (bigops and
integrals). Maybe with \blank[medium] in between (and some \smash),
so that every second line will be on the grid again.
Maybe a strategy is to use a vbox with ht+dp multiple of a grid space
...but the first line of every page has
Among others, see and criticize
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/User:Luigi.scarso/modules.pdf#modules.pdf
Of course, the main starting point is
http://wiki.contextgarden.net
exp.Search wiki
luigi
___
ntg-context mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jelle Huisman schrieb:
Op 13-apr-2007, om 9:20 heeft Aditya Mahajan het volgende geschreven:
While starting ConTeXt, I found ConTeXt an excrusion and ConTeXt
manual to be extremely well written, much better than what I had read
for LaTeX (but then, I never bought a LaTeX book). What do you
luigi scarso wrote:
ok, it's a joke
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.tex.pdftex/3404
(but the best is
http://www.google.com/tisp/
)
But my question is:
Will be easy in luatex to implement a new output format
(dvi,pdf,xps,my-xml,my-bin-format)
driven by command line ?
in
Johannes Kuester wrote:
Dear Luigi,
luigi scarso wrote:
hmm maibe i have not understand, but
\zeichen{0002}{b}{second letter \vrule width 0.1pt height 1em depth2em }{}%
%% or this
%% \zeichen{0002}{b}{second letter \blank Mlg() }{}%
breaks the rule.
Or not ?
Yes, it does,
Hello Paul,
Thanks a lot for help with Xetex+Context on Windows.
And by the way, what is the uc encoding? It is not mentioned on
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Encodings_and_Regimes
--
With best regards
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
___
ntg-context
On 4/13/07, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello Paul,
Thanks a lot for help with Xetex+Context on Windows.
And by the way, what is the uc encoding? It is not mentioned on
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Encodings_and_Regimes
That page should be improved. uc stands for Unicode. It might be
Hello
Unfortunately, I get dummy boxes instead of .pdf figures in the
XeteXed document. I know, it has been discussed already in the list. However, I
downloaded and installed the fresh
version of TexLive2007 today, and no problems from updating shouldn't arise.
The log says:
figures :
Hello Mojca,
Thanks a lot. In other words, XeTeX handles Unicode-coded fonts and the author
creates UTF-coded documents. Then those encodings are merged somewhere inside.
Do I think right?
On 4/13/07, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello Paul,
Thanks a lot for help with Xetex+Context on
Hans Hagen wrote:
there is some some gridmath support available; see details.pdf
Hans
Yes, I know, I use that already.
Very helpful for my display formulas.
I didn't try it yet on my symbols list, here the module from Wolfgang
and blanks will do, I think.
Johannes
--
Johannes Kuester
Maybe a strategy is to use a vbox with ht+dp multiple of a grid space
...but the first line of every page has another height
Each first line will be some heading, so that's not a problem in my case.
My grid-keeping list problem is solved, the module by Wolfgang serves my
purpose very well.
Hello,
To get rid of dummy boxes instead of figures in XeTeX output, I've decided to
update the stuff (I already has installed fresh latest TeXLive).
I typed
ctxtools --update
then
texexec --xtx --make en
and even recreated format files from TeXLive GUI. After all, I get
I admit it. I admit everything. I'm the guily one for the whole mess
about XeTeX!
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Encodings_and_Regimes_in_XeTeX
Some time ago Hans has decided to ignore \enableregime in XeTeX. I
could have written more (and cite things), but I'm in a hurry right
now and I will
Hi,
For those who like beautiful books and are not a Dante member ...
http://www.linotype.com/26/merchandise.html
you can order Hermann Zapfs latest book here, apart from being an
interesting and well designed book, it's also also a nice palatino
showcase (nova and sans), perfect paper,
Hi Vyatcheslav,
I encountered the same problem a couple of weeks ago ... and it will
probably not be fixed until luaTeX is out.
The reason is that Hans is currently reworking bits and pieces of
ConTeXt in order to prepare for the transition to luaTeX ... and font
handling is apparently one
Hi,
again, I've been through this a couple of days ago so I'm happy to
share my experience with you ;-)
For me the problem was not having installed ImageMagick in the first
place. But judging from your log this doesn't seem to be the problem.
Let me think ... perhaps your glitch might be
Sorry, just found a strange thing.
A month old distribution of TeXLive contains bib-mod.doc file dated November 4,
2006. And current cont-tmf.zip contains the same file but dated... September 7,
2006.
Strange, isn't it?
Best,
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky
Hello Oliver,
I reinstalled TeXLive2007 from scratch -- fonts work fine, but .pdf images are
replaced by dummy rectangles. (ImageMagik makes no difference.)
After manually updating ConTeXt files to the current release -- font handling
is broken.
So, there is no way to use XeTeX for me.
:(((
On Fri, 13 Apr 2007, Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello
Unfortunately, I get dummy boxes instead of .pdf figures in the
XeteXed document. I know, it has been discussed already in the list. However,
I downloaded and installed the fresh
version of TexLive2007 today, and no problems from
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Hello Oliver,
I reinstalled TeXLive2007 from scratch -- fonts work fine, but .pdf
images are replaced by dummy rectangles. (ImageMagik makes no
difference.)
This sounds like the command execution extension is turned off.
Whether or not ConTeXt is allowed to
Vyatcheslav Yatskovsky wrote:
Sorry, just found a strange thing.
A month old distribution of TeXLive contains bib-mod.doc file dated
November 4, 2006. And current cont-tmf.zip contains the same file but
dated... September 7, 2006.
I'll check. The differences can't be big. It looks like I
Oliver Buerschaper wrote:
Hi Vyatcheslav,
I encountered the same problem a couple of weeks ago ... and it will
probably not be fixed until luaTeX is out.
It appears to me that reverting back to the situation from three months
ago would already be a step forward from what we have now, yes?
I encountered the same problem a couple of weeks ago ... and it will
probably not be fixed until luaTeX is out.
It appears to me that reverting back to the situation from three
months
ago would already be a step forward from what we have now, yes?
As far as fonts are concerned ...
Hello,
Taco and Anita, you are geniuses! shell_escape was set to false, indeed.
However, it fails further. My ch6.pdf output file isn't created at all whenever
I insert \externalfigure[f01.pdf].
The log says
...
systems : begin file ch6 at line 10
[EMAIL
34 matches
Mail list logo
