On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
(Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow)
char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we
need a mark and a basemark match an donly anchor-11 qualifies as
basemark but ...
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
(Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow)
char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we
need a mark and a basemark match an donly anchor-11 qualifies as
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
(Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow)
char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
Khaled Hosny wrote:
(Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow)
char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we
need a mark
Khaled Hosny wrote:
(Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow)
char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we
need a mark and a basemark match an donly anchor-11 qualifies as
basemark but ...
{
[anchors]={
[basemark]={[Anchor-11]={[x]=0,[y]=250,},},