Re: [NTG-context] [Dev-luatex] State of OpenType support

2008-05-09 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: Khaled Hosny wrote: (Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow) char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we need a mark and a basemark match an donly anchor-11 qualifies as basemark but ...

Re: [NTG-context] [Dev-luatex] State of OpenType support

2008-05-09 Thread Hans Hagen
Khaled Hosny wrote: On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: Khaled Hosny wrote: (Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow) char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we need a mark and a basemark match an donly anchor-11 qualifies as

Re: [NTG-context] [Dev-luatex] State of OpenType support

2008-05-09 Thread Hans Hagen
Khaled Hosny wrote: On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: Khaled Hosny wrote: On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: Khaled Hosny wrote: (Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow) char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so

Re: [NTG-context] [Dev-luatex] State of OpenType support

2008-05-09 Thread Khaled Hosny
On Fri, May 09, 2008 at 06:34:22PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: Khaled Hosny wrote: On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:02:10PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: Khaled Hosny wrote: (Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow) char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we need a mark

Re: [NTG-context] [Dev-luatex] State of OpenType support

2008-05-08 Thread Hans Hagen
Khaled Hosny wrote: (Moved from lautex mailing list, more bellow) char 1614 and 1617 are to be relatively positioned using mkmk, so we need a mark and a basemark match an donly anchor-11 qualifies as basemark but ... { [anchors]={ [basemark]={[Anchor-11]={[x]=0,[y]=250,},},