On 11/24/2013 6:03 PM, H. Özoguz wrote:
/ May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
// may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
// http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
//
// Thanks for your advice.
//
On 11/25/2013 12:34 AM, H. Özoguz wrote:
Thanks, that works fine:
\definefont[arabicamiri][file:amiri-regular.ttf*arabic at 15pt]
\definefont[arabicuth][file:UthmanicHafs1Ver09.ttf*arabic at 17pt]
\def\eoa#1{#1\char06DD}
\starttext
\setupalign[r2l]
\arabicuth لأَفَبِهَـٰذَا ٱلْحَدِيثِ أَنتُم
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:18:47PM +0100, H. Özoguz wrote:
It is my believe that Unicode has the wrong properties for Arabic
standalone Hamza; in short you should just type a regular Hamza in the
middle of the word and it will get positioned correctly. Placing a
combining Hamza over a Tatweel
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 2:01 PM, H. Özoguz h.oezo...@mmnetz.de wrote:
Now the question: I obviously cant set the entire book (more than 600 pages)
with Corel-Draw, and want too use ConText, of course. So is there a way to
produce this boldness out of this too thin font within ConText, too?
May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
Thanks for your advice.
Unfortunately I did not manish to work with this font by simplefonts. I
Am 24.11.2013 um 15:32 schrieb H. Özoguz h.oezo...@mmnetz.de:
May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
Thanks for your advice.
May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
Thanks for your advice.
Unfortunately I did not manish to work with this font by
Am 24.11.2013 um 18:12 schrieb H. Özoguz h.oezo...@mmnetz.de:
May be ConTeXt experts would have better suggestions, till then you
may want to look at the fake bold option in simplefonts -
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/Simplefonts#Faking_italics_and_bold_fonts
Thanks for your
The extend feature stretches the glyphs to get narrow or wide font but it
doesn’t embolden it.
The best solution is to get a font with a real bold style, money shouldn’t be a
problem because fonts are cheap nowadays.
Wolfgang
Thanks, I hoped the it could really embold ist (like I did it in
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 06:52:31PM +0100, H. Özoguz wrote:
The extend feature stretches the glyphs to get narrow or wide font but it
doesn’t embolden it.
The best solution is to get a font with a real bold style, money shouldn’t
be a problem because fonts are cheap nowadays.
Wolfgang
Again, because arabic seems to be vanished in my first posting, I dont know why.
Thanks Khaled,
the Naskh-Style is not an absolute requirement, but it is very well
known and very common (at least for muslims in germany) - and it is very
nice, of course, this is an question of flavor.
I know
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 08:53:00PM +0100, H. Özoguz wrote:
Again, because arabic seems to be vanished in my first posting, I dont know
why.
Thanks Khaled,
the Naskh-Style is not an absolute requirement, but it is very well
known and very common (at least for muslims in germany) - and
It is my believe that Unicode has the wrong properties for Arabic
standalone Hamza; in short you should just type a regular Hamza in the
middle of the word and it will get positioned correctly. Placing a
combining Hamza over a Tatweel to “fake” it is wrong IMO. So in Amiri
you just type
Hi Huseyin,
On Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 10:18 PM, H. Özoguz h.oezo...@mmnetz.de wrote:
If I put the same arabic into CorelDraw, it prints a nice Unicode-Symbol for
the number - see the JPG I have attached here, screenshot from CorelDraw,
but ConTeXt ignores the brackets and prints just a verys
Hi Ondra,
thanks for your help.
Apparently, replacing a number enclosed in ornate parentheses (U+FD3E
and U+FD3F) with a number in the end of ayah ornament is a specialty
of the UthmanicHafs font. If I input the digit (e.g. U+0662) and then
the special non-printable end of ayah character
Thanks, that works fine:
\definefont[arabicamiri][file:amiri-regular.ttf*arabic at 15pt]
\definefont[arabicuth][file:UthmanicHafs1Ver09.ttf*arabic at 17pt]
\def\eoa#1{#1\char06DD}
\starttext
\setupalign[r2l]
\arabicuth لأَفَبِهَـٰذَا ٱلْحَدِيثِ أَنتُم مُّدْهِنُونَ ﴿٨١﴾\eoa
\stoptext
Now I
16 matches
Mail list logo
