Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On 29-9-2012 09:25, Johan Sandblom wrote: It is indeed somewhat complicated. Changes are needed in first-setup.sh as well as in mtx-update.lua. To complicate matters, one of the first things that happens in first-setup.sh is to retrieve a fresh and unaltered mtx-update.lua. My naïve recipe follow

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

It is indeed somewhat complicated. Changes are needed in first-setup.sh as well as in mtx-update.lua. To complicate matters, one of the first things that happens in first-setup.sh is to retrieve a fresh and unaltered mtx-update.lua. My naïve recipe follows: 1. change contextgarden.net to metat

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

I may be dumb... but I can't figure out how to change the mirror. minimals.contextgarden.net seems to be hard-coded in a number of places. Help please? Best, Mica On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Mojca Miklavec < mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Hans Hag

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > Is minimals.contextgarden.net offline? Until we figure out what exactly is wrong one can use the mirror: rsync://metatex.org/minimals/ http://minimals.metatex.org/ Mojca

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals on an arm-processor

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 21:48, Gerhard Kugler wrote: > Hi, > > on my new netbook (Hercules eCafe) I have an ubuntu. It would be > possible to install the official packages of texlive and/or context. > But I would prefer a new minimal installation for a single user. If I > call "first-setup.sh" I ge

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals on an arm-processor

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 23:12, Gerhard Kugler wrote: > On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:01:24PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> If we want to support the architecture, we need somebody to build the >> binaries on regular basis. And since you seem to be the first and >> possibly the only one using thing

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals on an arm-processor

On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 11:01:24PM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > If we want to support the architecture, we need somebody to build the > binaries on regular basis. And since you seem to be the first and > possibly the only one using thing platform, that would probably mean > you. So the main que

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals on an arm-processor

Hello, On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 21:48, Gerhard Kugler wrote: > Hi, > > on my new netbook (Hercules eCafe) I have an ubuntu. It would be > possible to install the official packages of texlive and/or context. > But I would prefer a new minimal installation for a single user. If I > call "first-setup.

Re: [NTG-context] minimals: How to prevent that core and modules become incompatible?

That is a bug, not a version mismatch. Mojca ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/ntg-context webp

Re: [NTG-context] minimals: How to prevent that core and modules become incompatible?

At Monday, 25.07.2011 on 12:31 Paul Menzel wrote: > > Thanks, but I think this was not the problem at my end. > `~/.first-setup.sh` is still the one from January, so `extras` worked > for me. The parameters (and the actual update process) are handled by bin/mtx-update.lua which is one of the fir

Re: [NTG-context] minimals: How to prevent that core and modules become incompatible?

Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 12:14 +0200 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster: > Am 25.07.2011 um 12:10 schrieb Paul Menzel: > > >> the updater/installer remembers what you've installed so the next time > >> the extras will be synchronized along with the core (all or the > >> selection you've chosen) > > >

Re: [NTG-context] minimals: How to prevent that core and modules become incompatible?

Am 25.07.2011 um 12:10 schrieb Paul Menzel: >> the updater/installer remembers what you've installed so the next time >> the extras will be synchronized along with the core (all or the >> selection you've chosen) > > Well, then this somehow failed for me. The TikZ module was still from > May 2

Re: [NTG-context] minimals: How to prevent that core and modules become incompatible?

Am Montag, den 25.07.2011, 09:06 +0200 schrieb Hans Hagen: > On 25-7-2011 12:26, Paul Menzel wrote: > > I just experienced a situation that I wanted to try a module, in this > > case TikZ [1][2], and I only had run `./first-setup.sh`, so the module > > and “core” were diverted and I got an error m

Re: [NTG-context] minimals: How to prevent that core and modules become incompatible?

On 25-7-2011 12:26, Paul Menzel wrote: Dear ConTeXt folks, I just experienced a situation that I wanted to try a module, in this case TikZ [1][2], and I only had run `./first-setup.sh`, so the module and “core” were diverted and I got an error message. ! Undefined control sequence.

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals tree on Wiki?

Hans van der Meer wrote: Searching information in the Wiki on the minimals tree the following page: http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Minimals/Tree did not render as expected, the thumnails are not showing; example: Error creating thumbnail: convert: unable to open image `/var/www/contex

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals ignores structureblockenvironment for frontmatter etc.

Am 20.03.2011 um 16:46 schrieb Tom: > Thank you, Wolfgang. Your table is most helpful. This can probably be found > in the documentation but not where I looked. This probably relates to the > recent discussion regarding manuals for novices. > > My observation is that \completecontent and \comple

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals ignores structureblockenvironment for frontmatter etc.

On Sun, 20 Mar 2011, Tom wrote: Thank you, Wolfgang. Your table is most helpful. This can probably be found in the documentation but not where I looked. This probably relates to the recent discussion regarding manuals for novices. You could help by adding this information to the wiki, at a pla

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals ignores structureblockenvironment for frontmatter etc.

nt: Sunday, March 20, 2011 9:49 AM To: mailing list for ConTeXt users Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Minimals ignores structureblockenvironment for frontmatter etc. Am 20.03.2011 um 14:37 schrieb Tom: > Minimals MKIV ignores the structureenvironment blocks when the suffix is > 'matter' but

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals ignores structureblockenvironment for frontmatter etc.

Am 20.03.2011 um 14:37 schrieb Tom: > Minimals MKIV ignores the structureenvironment blocks when the suffix is > 'matter' but applies them if the suffix is 'part.' Furthermore, they are > applied in \starttext if between \startfrontmatter -- \stopfrontmatter, etc. > blocks and error if between \s

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals only a third from texlive

On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 21:10, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > I removed my distributions texlive from my system. This gave back 660 MB. > Installing minimals took 223 MB. But I understood that minimals is more then > texlive. So why is it a lot smaller? Minimals don't contain *any* latex-related stuff (

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals (was: Ideas for restructuring the ConTeXt garden?)

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 22:35, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: > > even if simply because setuptex is too slow for every > new Terminal window You can just as well use export PATH=/path/to/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin:$PATH which should be much faster. Setuptex doesn't do anything else. Mojca ___

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals (was: Ideas for restructuring the ConTeXt garden?)

Am 2011-03-13 um 06:03 schrieb Pontus Lurcock: I have the minimals installed but with no automatic setup in .bashrc or similar. So when I need to run ConTeXt, I fire up a new terminal and explicitly ‘source /path/to/minimals/context/tex/setuptex’ before doing anything else. Anything I run in a d

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > On 03/13/2011 08:42 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: >> >> On Sunday 13 March 2011 07:25:03 luigi scarso wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Pontus Lurcock  wrote: On Sat 12 Mar 2011, mathew wrote: > > My experience on U

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals

On 03/13/2011 08:42 AM, Alan BRASLAU wrote: On Sunday 13 March 2011 07:25:03 luigi scarso wrote: On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Pontus Lurcock wrote: On Sat 12 Mar 2011, mathew wrote: My experience on Ubuntu is that if you install the ConTeXt minimals in your path, they break a bunch of stu

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals (was: Ideas for restructuring the ConTeXt garden?)

On Sunday 13 March 2011 07:25:03 luigi scarso wrote: > On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Pontus Lurcock wrote: > > On Sat 12 Mar 2011, mathew wrote: > >> My experience on Ubuntu is that if you install the ConTeXt minimals > >> in your path, they break a bunch of stuff from TeXLive, such as > >> pdf

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals/MTXrun: 32-bit system with 64-bit kernel: `MTXrun | no 'texmf-linux-64'`

On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 02:13, Paul Menzel wrote: > Dear ConTeXt folks, > > I am running a 32-bit system with a 64-bit kernel. So relying on > >        uname -m > > to determine the architecture leads to problems [1]. I am aware of that. At the moment it is a bit nasty since --platform is not favo

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals/MTXrun: 32-bit system with 64-bit kernel: `MTXrun | no 'texmf-linux-64'`

On 25-1-2011 2:00, Paul Menzel wrote: 1. Could there be some corrupted caches which need to be deleted? I reinstalled everything by deleting `/opt/context`. But maybe something was left over from the broken installation beforehand? 2. How can I update ConTeXt Minimals without getting `setuptex`

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals/MTXrun: 32-bit system with 64-bit kernel: `MTXrun | no 'texmf-linux-64'`

Am Montag, den 24.01.2011, 19:18 -0500 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Paul Menzel wrote: > > >MTXrun | run: rsync -rpztlv --delete > > contextgarden.net::'minimals/current/base/tex/ > > minimals/current/base/metapost/ minimals/current/fonts/common/ > > minimals/current/f

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals/MTXrun: 32-bit system with 64-bit kernel: `MTXrun | no 'texmf-linux-64'`

On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Paul Menzel wrote: MTXrun | run: rsync -rpztlv --delete contextgarden.net::'minimals/current/base/tex/ minimals/current/base/metapost/ minimals/current/fonts/common/ minimals/current/fonts/other/ minimals/current/misc/web2c minimals/current/base/xetex/ minimals/cur

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals/MTXrun: 32-bit system with 64-bit kernel: `MTXrun | no 'texmf-linux-64'`

Am Sonntag, den 23.01.2011, 20:50 -0500 schrieb Aditya Mahajan: > On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Paul Menzel wrote: > > I am running a 32-bit system with a 64-bit kernel. So relying on > > > > uname -m > > > > to determine the architecture leads to problems [1]. > > > > So I do `cpu = "i686` manually in

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals/MTXrun: 32-bit system with 64-bit kernel: `MTXrun | no 'texmf-linux-64'`

On Mon, 24 Jan 2011, Paul Menzel wrote: Dear ConTeXt folks, I am running a 32-bit system with a 64-bit kernel. So relying on uname -m to determine the architecture leads to problems [1]. So I do `cpu = "i686` manually in `first-setup.sh` but I still do get the the following error me

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals fail to install on SunOS x86

Dear Marco, (I'm CC-ing Apostolos who compile Solaris binaries for TeX Live.) On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 15:59, Marco wrote: > On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:54:26 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> For Solaris Sparc we have nobody to compile the binaries at the moment. > I also have a Sparc server but I ca

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals fail to install on SunOS x86

On Fri, 17 Sep 2010 10:54:26 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > For Solaris Sparc we have nobody to compile the binaries at the moment. I also have a Sparc server but I cannot remote access it from my location now. But I feel no need to run context on the Sparc. > The person who asked us for adding

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals fail to install on SunOS x86

On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 04:09, Marco wrote: > Hi, > > I was trying to install the minimals on my SunOS remote server (to have access > to MkIV everywhere). > Is SunOS x86 not supported? On the luatex home page I see there are binaries > available. For Solaris Sparc we have nobody to compile the b

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals & Windows PowerShell

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:44, Hans Hagen wrote: > > i've been using this for a quite some time now: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/console/ > > it is much faster in scrolling the log; it captures the output and flushes > periodically contrary to the normal console which flushes each char and

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals & Windows PowerShell

On 19-8-2010 6:20, Vnpenguin wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 16:33, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 15:17, luigi scarso wrote: With cmd.exe call C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex\setuptex.bat C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex does it's job correctly. You should not even ne

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals & Windows PowerShell

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 16:33, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 15:17, luigi scarso wrote: >> With cmd.exe >> call C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex\setuptex.bat >> C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex >> does it's job correctly. > > You should not even need the second argument. >

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals & Windows PowerShell

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Peter Rolf wrote: > maybe > > & "C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex\setuptex.bat" > > http://technet.microsoft.com/de-de/library/ee176949%28en-us%29.aspx no and even dot source fails -- luigi __

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals & Windows PowerShell

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Peter Rolf wrote: > maybe > > & "C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex\setuptex.bat" > > http://technet.microsoft.com/de-de/library/ee176949%28en-us%29.aspx no and even dot source -- luigi

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals & Windows PowerShell

Am 19.08.2010 15:17, schrieb luigi scarso: > With cmd.exe > call C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex\setuptex.bat > C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex > does it's job correctly. > > I would like to know the same for Windows PowerShell: > . C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex\setuptex.bat > C:\lu

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals & Windows PowerShell

On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 15:17, luigi scarso wrote: > With cmd.exe > call C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex\setuptex.bat > C:\luatex\minimals-beta\context\tex > does it's job correctly. You should not even need the second argument. > I would like to know the same for Windows PowerShell: > .  C:

Re: [NTG-context] minimals update issues

> > No way that i'm going back to messy encodings for > patterns. > > Hans I not worried and not pushing for a quick-fix (I went back to a previous edition (my fav zip-of-minimals-method)) and am happy to hold off with updates until there is a proper solution... cheerful Martin _

Re: [NTG-context] minimals update issues

Hi all, I can confirm the same issue here: actually after the update, mkiv works fine and reports the following versions: LuaTeX version 61, LuaTeX revision 0, (LuaTeX date stamp 2010072817), ConTeXt version 2010.08.02 18:58. However mkii is broken: the command texexec --make --all stop

Re: [NTG-context] minimals update issues

On 3-8-2010 10:38, Mojca Miklavec wrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 06:29, Martin Althoff wrote: Just ran ./first-setup.sh (yesterday it ran fine, now=5:20AM GMT 3.Aug) and it ends very ungracefully: A section from some the first (of more) failure. Am I doing something wrong? (/Users/martin/conte

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals on windows 32 bit fails ?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:49, Martin Althoff wrote: > Luigi, > > check out Mojca's reply to my : "minimals update issues" The fastest quick-and-dirty fix is to replace the contents of lang-agr.pat with an empty set of patterns (as long as you don't need ancient Greek patterns) or simply do somethi

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals on windows 32 bit fails ?

Luigi, check out Mojca's reply to my : "minimals update issues" Martin --- On Tue, 3/8/10, luigi scarso wrote: > From: luigi scarso > Subject: Re: [NTG-context] Minimals on windows 32 bit fails ? > To: "mailing list for ConTeXt users" > Date: Tuesday, 3

Re: [NTG-context] minimals update issues

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 06:29, Martin Althoff wrote: > Just ran ./first-setup.sh (yesterday it ran fine, now=5:20AM GMT 3.Aug) and > it ends very ungracefully: > > A section from some the first (of more) failure. Am I doing something wrong? > > (/Users/martin/contextMini/tex/texmf-context/tex/conte

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals on windows 32 bit fails ?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Vnpenguin wrote: > Hi, > Just install minimal on Windows-XP 32bit (VM). It works without error here :) Still same error as before -- luigi ___ If your question is of interest to other

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals on windows 32 bit fails ?

Hi, Just install minimal on Windows-XP 32bit (VM). It works without error here :) C:\>context --version MTXrun | main context file: C:/context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2010.08.02 18:58 C:\>luatex --version This is LuaTeX, Version beta-0.61.0-201007

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals on windows 32 bit fails ?

On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Peter Rolf wrote: > Am 03.08.2010 08:36, schrieb luigi scarso: >> It seems that there is an error with >> patterns while building formats -- can someone check it ? >> > yep, same error here. > > /context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context > /patterns/lang-agr.pat > ! Dup

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals on windows 32 bit fails ?

Am 03.08.2010 08:36, schrieb luigi scarso: > It seems that there is an error with > patterns while building formats -- can someone check it ? > yep, same error here. /context/tex/texmf-context/tex/context /patterns/lang-agr.pat ! Duplicate pattern. l.137 ΐ1 Peter __

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals Beta on Windows 64bit

On Mon, 26 Jul 2010 18:07:24 +0200, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > The problem is that I'm not able to reproduce the problem you are > reporting. Did anyone else experience the same problem? > > Mojca It seems to have been fixed in the meantime. I just tried it again and rsync worked fine. The crash s

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals without rsync - again?

As I am working in China at the moment, rsync only works sporadically (super slow, possibly not at all for a couple of days, then at high speed for a day or two), kind of soft blocked. Having clobbered my installation of minimals (and other things) because of it, Not a solution, but a crutch:

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals without rsync - again?

On 28-7-2010 3:42, Richard Stephens wrote: What would be really nice is a .zip file containing EVERYTHING needed to install ConTeXt for the latest stable release AND another .zip (produced, say, once a month) with the changes since the stable release! Or failing that, just a big .zip file with e

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals without rsync - again?

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 15:42, Richard Stephens wrote: > > At the above address, there is a .zip file called mswin.zip which > appears to contain binaries etc (dated 28-May-2010). Plus another one > called mswincontext.zip which presumably contains everything else > (dated 17-April-2008). How woul

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals without rsync - again?

> Does http://www.pragma-ade.com/download-2.htm help? > > -- > Vedran Miletić I used to update to the latest beta using download-2, but it doesn't contain new binaries and dll's etc. > There is also >    http://minimals.contextgarden.net/pragma/ > > Maybe it doesn't contain the latest ConTeXt, bu

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals without rsync - again?

On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 12:49, Richard Stephens wrote: > Hi all, > > On the wiki at http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Minimals/FAQ is says: > > "Blocked Firewall port > You are most probably behind a firewall. Make sure that port 873 is > open. If you cannot make any changes yourself and if you

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals without rsync - again?

2010/7/28 Richard Stephens : > Hi all, > > On the wiki at http://wiki.contextgarden.net/ConTeXt_Minimals/FAQ is says: > > "Blocked Firewall port > You are most probably behind a firewall. Make sure that port 873 is > open. If you cannot make any changes yourself and if your admin > objects, you pro

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals Beta on Windows 64bit

On Fri, Jul 23, 2010 at 14:04, Andreas Schneider wrote: > > Since one of the last Betas mtxrun seems to be aware of 64bit windows, but > all the stubs and scripts seem to be missing support for that resulting in > the whole setup to not work at all. > > First-setup fails with stuff like that: > MTX

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On 16-6-2010 1:17, Otared Kavian wrote: On 15 juin 2010, at 23:43, Hans Hagen wrote: do others on the mac observe the same? Hans Hi Hans, I just updated to the latest minimal, and everything works perfectly on my MacBook Pro running Mac OS X 10.6.3. I get: LuaTeX version 60, LuaTeX revis

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On 15 juin 2010, at 23:43, Hans Hagen wrote: > > do others on the mac observe the same? > > Hans > Hi Hans, I just updated to the latest minimal, and everything works perfectly on my MacBook Pro running Mac OS X 10.6.3. I get: LuaTeX version 60, LuaTeX revision 1, (LuaTeX date stamp 2010042

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On 15-6-2010 7:48, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Jun 15, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: you can give it a try What about the cannot open tree:Users/tas/texmf/: No such file or directory do others on the mac observe the same? Hans --

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On 15-6-2010 8:03, Bernhard Rosensteiner wrote: Am 15.06.2010 um 19:41 schrieb luigi scarso: On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: you can give it a try It looks ok on my linux 32bit box -- luigi on mac snow leopard it works again. Kerning on Adobe Fonts is also ok now, howe

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On Jun 15, 2010, at 8:11 PM, Michael Murphy wrote: > Does the directory exist? If there is nothing important there, just delete it. It's my HOMETEXMF tree... ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, ple

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On 15/06/2010 19:48, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote: On Jun 15, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: you can give it a try What about the cannot open tree:Users/tas/texmf/: No such file or directory error? I'm still getting it... Does the directory exist? If there is nothing important there,

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

Am 15.06.2010 um 19:41 schrieb luigi scarso: > On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: >> you can give it a try > It looks ok on my linux 32bit box > -- > luigi on mac snow leopard it works again. Kerning on Adobe Fonts is also ok now, however it is not exactly the same as before.

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On Jun 15, 2010, at 7:25 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > you can give it a try What about the cannot open tree:Users/tas/texmf/: No such file or directory error? I'm still getting it... Thomas ___ If your question is

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 7:25 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > you can give it a try It looks ok on my linux 32bit box -- luigi ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On 15-6-2010 10:05, Martin 'golodhrim' Scholz wrote: On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:18:05 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, i'm experimenting with the minimals so best not update now (i need to do tests that i cannot do locally) Hans Hi Hans, can you let us know when it is save again to start an updat

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On 15-6-2010 10:05, Martin 'golodhrim' Scholz wrote: On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:18:05 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: Hi, i'm experimenting with the minimals so best not update now (i need to do tests that i cannot do locally) Hans Hi Hans, can you let us know when it is save again to start an updat

Re: [NTG-context] minimals

On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 15:18:05 +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > i'm experimenting with the minimals so best not update now > > (i need to do tests that i cannot do locally) > > Hans Hi Hans, can you let us know when it is save again to start an update? Greetings -- --- Martin 'golodhrim'

Re: [NTG-context] minimals: kfreebsd-i686 (debian)

2010/2/21 Vedran Miletić : > 2010/2/19 Mojca Miklavec : >> Eem ... while trying to add the architecture, I noticed that we >> don't have the basic TeX Live binaries (which has never been the case >> before). >> >> Alan - you'll need to compile TeX Live tree as well, sorry for that >> ... (and p

Re: [NTG-context] minimals: kfreebsd-i686 (debian)

2010/2/19 Mojca Miklavec : > Eem ... while trying to add the architecture, I noticed that we > don't have the basic TeX Live binaries (which has never been the case > before). > > Alan - you'll need to compile TeX Live tree as well, sorry for that > ... (and put it somewhere online where I can

Re: [NTG-context] minimals: kfreebsd-i686 (debian)

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 20:31, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed kfreebsd-i686 Debian/GNU. It is now officially supported as > core architecture by Debian as an alternative to the linux kernel, but is not > yet supported by the ConTeXt minimals. Eem ... while trying to add the

Re: [NTG-context] minimals: kfreebsd-i686 (debian)

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 20:31, Alan BRASLAU wrote: > Hello, > > I just installed kfreebsd-i686 Debian/GNU. It is now officially supported as > core architecture by Debian as an alternative to the linux kernel, but is not > yet supported by the ConTeXt minimals. > > luatex 0.50.0-1 is available as

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals installation problem OS X 10.6.2

On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, paul morgan wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Khaled Hosny >> wrote: >> >> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 04:06:47PM -0500, paul morgan wrote: >>> You may also try > > luatools --generate > > before runn

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals installation problem OS X 10.6.2

On Sat, 16 Jan 2010, paul morgan wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote: On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 04:06:47PM -0500, paul morgan wrote: Hi, On a new Snow Leopard machine, I ran ./first-setup.sh in ~/context. As instructed at the end of the ./first-setup.sh run, I then ad

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals installation problem OS X 10.6.2

On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Khaled Hosny wrote: > On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 04:06:47PM -0500, paul morgan wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On a new Snow Leopard machine, I ran ./first-setup.sh in ~/context. > > > > As instructed at the end of the ./first-setup.sh run, I then > added /Users/pm/ > > conte

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals installation problem OS X 10.6.2

On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 04:06:47PM -0500, paul morgan wrote: > Hi, > > On a new Snow Leopard machine, I ran ./first-setup.sh in ~/context.  > > As instructed at the end of the ./first-setup.sh run, I then added /Users/pm/ > context/tex/texmf-osx-64/bin to my .zshenv, and % echo $PATH shows correc

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals and XeTeX

2010/1/11 Vedran Miletić: > Hi, > > I'm a new user of ConTeXt and minimals distribution and first I would > like to say to thank everyone involved in it. Like most LaTeX users, I > found something that was very hard to do in LaTeX to be fairly trivial > in ConTeXt, and gave it a shot. > > Neverthel

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals Setup witout rsync?

On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:49, Johannes Graumann wrote: > Timestamp: >        2009-05-11 13:30 > Ouch. > > Can that be synchronized with the rsync-able repository? You got some extra instructions (maybe I need to mention them in some installation notes), but another mirror should be http://mini

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals Setup witout rsync?

Geee, that was easy! $context --version MTXrun | main context file: /opt/ConTeXt/tex/texmf- context/tex/context/base/context.tex MTXrun | current version: 2009.12.03 00:41 Thanks a lot! Joh Alan BRASLAU wrote: > On Monday 07 December 2009 10:49:45 Johannes Graumann wrote: >> Timesta

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals Setup witout rsync?

On Monday 07 December 2009 10:49:45 Johannes Graumann wrote: > Timestamp: > 2009-05-11 13:30 > Ouch. > > Can that be synchronized with the rsync-able repository? > > Thanks, Joh > > Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > > Am 04.12.2009 um 14:27 schrieb Johannes Graumann: > >> Hi, > >> > >> How would

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals Setup witout rsync?

Johannes Graumann wrote: Timestamp: 2009-05-11 13:30 Ouch. Can that be synchronized with the rsync-able repository? my upload is not that fast ... they will be synced with luatex 0.50 Hans -

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals Setup witout rsync?

Timestamp: 2009-05-11 13:30 Ouch. Can that be synchronized with the rsync-able repository? Thanks, Joh Wolfgang Schuster wrote: > > Am 04.12.2009 um 14:27 schrieb Johannes Graumann: > >> Hi, >> >> How would one install the minimals when sitting behind a restrictive >> firewall not a

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals Setup witout rsync?

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 14:27, Johannes Graumann wrote: > Hi, > > How would one install the minimals when sitting behind a restrictive > firewall not allowing rsyncing with the outside world? I forgot the details, but could probably find it out again. It should be possible to use ssh tunnelling. T

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals Setup witout rsync?

Am 04.12.2009 um 14:27 schrieb Johannes Graumann: > Hi, > > How would one install the minimals when sitting behind a restrictive > firewall not allowing rsyncing with the outside world? http://pragma-ade.com/download-4.htm Wolfgang

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals and FreeBSD [almost-panic]

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:40 PM, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > Hello guys, esp Yue and Diego, > > while trying to update binaries from TeX Live repository ... I have > discovered that FreeBSD has disappeared completely There was before? > http://www.tug.org/pipermail/tex-live/2009-October/023003.html >

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals (solved)

On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 12:58, Hans Hagen wrote: > Mojca Miklavec wrote: > >> The reason for this weird behavior is that we removed almost all the >> variables from setuptex back in May 2009. >> >> This is just the contrary of what Hans tried to achieve several years >> ago to overwrite the tetex's

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals (solved)

Mojca Miklavec wrote: The reason for this weird behavior is that we removed almost all the variables from setuptex back in May 2009. This is just the contrary of what Hans tried to achieve several years ago to overwrite the tetex's pollution with variables. Now that hardly anyone uses tetex ...

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals (solved)

On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 16:54, Jörg Hagmann wrote: > Mojca has sorted out my problems with minimal installations.  Since our > correspondence was private, I would like to share the conclusions: > > I had old and new installations and "source /path/oldtex/tex/setuptex > /path/oldtex/tex" in the bash

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals (solved)

Mojca has sorted out my problems with minimal installations. Since our correspondence was private, I would like to share the conclusions: I had old and new installations and "source /path/oldtex/tex/setuptex /path/oldtex/tex" in the bash startup file (.profile or .bashrc). When I switched to

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals

Hans Hagen wrote: can you search your disk (path) for other occurences of mtxrun and luatools? I have, in addition to the new attempt (context), the working installation I'm presently using (/Applications/newtex) and an older version (Applications/mytex). Both have their mtxrun and luatools:

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals

luigi scarso wrote: On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Jörg Hagmann > wrote: mtx-context.lua:1358: attempt to call field 'extendbanner' (a nil value) hmm , never see this. I believe that if you make a fresh minimals instal

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:46 PM, Mojca Miklavec < mojca.miklavec.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Just a remark. I didn't touch the Mac binaries for a long while (and > my mac is already resting in peace, so I cannot test). > Have any new binaries been released in the meantime? > > I usually remove the "-

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals

Just a remark. I didn't touch the Mac binaries for a long while (and my mac is already resting in peace, so I cannot test). Have any new binaries been released in the meantime? I usually remove the "--make" switch (or it may be enough to call --keep switch once?) to prevent remaking formats at any

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:01 PM, luigi scarso wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Jörg Hagmann wrote: > >> >> >>> >>>mtx-context.lua:1358: attempt to call field 'extendbanner' (a nil >>>value) >>> >>> hmm , never see this. >>> I believe that if you make a fresh minimals install an

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Jörg Hagmann wrote: > > >> >>mtx-context.lua:1358: attempt to call field 'extendbanner' (a nil >>value) >> >> hmm , never see this. >> I believe that if you make a fresh minimals install and you have the same >> error, >> it's a minimals problem. >> > That's

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals

mtx-context.lua:1358: attempt to call field 'extendbanner' (a nil value) hmm , never see this. I believe that if you make a fresh minimals install and you have the same error, it's a minimals problem. That's what I thought (I freshly installed twice). But I'll try again on Friday .

Re: [NTG-context] Minimals

On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Jörg Hagmann wrote: > > > luigi scarso wrote: > >> >>ok put this in test.tex >> \starttext \input tufte \stoptext >>Then delete luatex-cache; >>$> cd ./tex/texmf-context/scripts/context/lua >> >> why? > Just to be sure; sometimes can be a path pro

  1   2   3   >