I finally was able to spend time and dig up error 1355 which is a SID error.
Whenever you remove a trust relationship you have to bounce the netlogon
service to reset permissions on the sysvol. After we did that all was well.
We came across the errors put out by netdom reset command to reset
Gparted live cd, free, works with about anything. Only downfall is to have the
drivers available for linux. Seems to work with most major drive controllers
out of the box.
Also check Bart PE and you may be able to resize the disk with the built in
windows app. The name escapes me at the
Hmm, in the toolbar it justs says Message (Plain Text) however the guy next
to him will say Message - HTML
I didn't see a 'converted' message anywhere. I think this is a BES issue
with v 4.1 and his BB doesn't support html so it converts it right in his
mailbox.
I don't have any proof just a
diskpart.exe on Vista and later can both shrink and extend. Get a WinPE iso
from the Windows Automated Installation Kit and boot from it. I use UltraISO
to write said iso to a flash drive and boot from it.
-Anders
On 2/24/09, Benjamin Zachary - Lists li...@levelfive.us wrote:
Gparted live
Hi All,
We need to extend a wireless LAN to the guest houses in a campus
environment. The last wired point is fiber to one side of the hostels.
From the switch where the fiber is terminated, an ethernet cable has
been extended to an Access point which covers a only a limited number of
rooms
Consumer or enterprise-grade linksys? The WRT54G series routers from linksys
have a widely available custom firmware that's excellent for using WDS-type
bridging.
Jack Kramer
Computer Systems Specialist
University Relations, Michigan State University
517-884-1231
I don't believe wireless is going to work through Stone well.
Especially if there is a significant distance to go. It will of course
depend on the type of stone, thickness, distance between AP and laptops.
All of the AP's I have used drastically reduce their distance when going
through solid
Not to mention the probable existence of steel reinforcement bars or mesh in
the wall which will kill most wireless signals. My server room falls into this
category - no cell phone reception, no wireless. Checking cell phone reception
in the target area will give you some idea as to how bad
there's always the possibility of having APs on opposite sides of
obsticles like this, hard-wired to eachother.
--
ME2
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:10 AM, John Cook john.c...@pfsf.org wrote:
Not to mention the probable existence of steel reinforcement bars or mesh in
the wall which will kill
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr [mailto:michealespin...@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Extending Wireless Network
there's always the possibility of having APs on opposite sides of
obsticles like this, hard-wired to eachother.
Like Shook and TVK?
Webster
~ Finally,
In the OP case no wiring is feasible, in my case my Datacenter is an 8 X 8
dungeon with a landline phone.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS,
Dude...you're sooo jealous :)
Shook
-Original Message-
From: Webster [mailto:carlwebs...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 9:20 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Extending Wireless Network
-Original Message-
From: Micheal Espinola Jr
Probably more like soft wired in Shooks case but I'll defer to TVK for the
definitive answer.
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS,
Well...at least I don't feel inadequate when I hold a RJ-45 connector.
Shook
-Original Message-
From: John Cook [mailto:john.c...@pfsf.org]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 9:24 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Extending Wireless Network
Probably more like soft wired in
Because your cable fits right in the hole
John W. Cook
Systems Administrator
Partnership For Strong Families
315 SE 2nd Ave
Gainesville, Fl 32601
Office (352) 393-2741 x320
Cell (352) 215-6944
Fax (352) 393-2746
MCSE, MCTS, MCP+I,CompTIA A+, N+
-Original Message-
From:
With all the obstacles, you may want to consider powerline networking with
multiple APs.
It's not cheap at $50 per adapter plus the cost of an AP, but it will let
you avoid the issues of running cables since there is already powerlines.
Works great for me.
HTH!
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 8:39 AM,
I did this with a Tropical Smoothie Café that wanted to offer free WiFi to
their customers, and wanted a secured wireless for the owner's use.
Sean Rector, MCSE
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2009 7:21 PM
To: NT System Admin
+1
Sean Rector, MCSE
-Original Message-
From: John Hornbuckle [mailto:john.hornbuc...@taylor.k12.fl.us]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 8:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Supporting former employer
Those who would expect me to come back and do work for them for
free--and
wonder if ROUTE PRINT still shows the wireless interface even though it's
not connected
Erik Goldoff
IT Consultant
Systems, Networks, Security
_
From: René de Haas [mailto:rene.deh...@woodward.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 9:38 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
I don't think thats exactly clear. The OP said some hard-wiring was
not feasible because of distance, and while there was a mention of
solid walls, there was no remark about not being able to drill
through.
Even if not able o drill, the distance may be short enough to
hard-wire around the
Have you tried setting the metric on the wireless higher (e.g. 10) than the
cable (e.g. 1)? This will mean the two connections can co-exist but the PC will
use the cable in preference.
Warmest regards
Howard Coates - Director
[cid:image001.png@01C99694.B3D95220]
IT, Internet Networking
No, not yet. However after disabling the Offline folders the drives are
behaving fine.
Looks like there's a problem with his Offline folders.
Reÿé
From: Howard Coates [mailto:h...@coatesconsulting.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 4:30 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE:
Catching up on emails, but for Unified communications aren't you
looking at OCS 2007r2?
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 9:23 AM, Cameron Cooper ccoo...@aurico.com wrote:
We would like to setup a unified communications solution in our environment,
Windows Server 2003 and currently only have one Exchange
W2K3 AD domain:
Got an odd DHCP issue. We have a DHCP scope that is used just for
automated server builds. Getting a bunch of BAD_ADDRESS conflicts in the
DHCP console. The Unique ID field shows an 8 digit string not the 12 of a
MAC address. I can not ping any of the IP addresses that are
We had this fun and excitement once we finally cut-over to our VoIP
system. ALL our phones were doing this.
I believe we selected all the 8-character entries and yanked their leases.
This part might not have been necessary, but we also reset the DHCP
Server service. Once the DHCP Server
There are occasions we do it. It's a pain for them so it's rare.
Generally it is when an employee had an emergency (medical, family,
leave of absence, they had to leave the office now type of thing)
and it is at the request of their director or above and in order to
'validate' they are in the
Trying to get a feel for what's out there and what others have deployed.
___
Cameron Cooper
IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified
Aurico Reports, Inc
Phone: 847-890-4021Fax: 847-255-1896
ccoo...@aurico.com
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource
We looked at OCS 2007 and have not done anything on it. OCS is just too
pricey for something that is not really necessary.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Cameron Cooper ccoo...@aurico.com wrote:
Trying to get a feel for what's out there and what others have deployed.
What part of it is 'not really necessary'? We had a lot of people
that thought IM was silly but it truly has helped communications here
in the past few years.
Steven
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:02 AM, Sherry Abercrombie saber...@gmail.com wrote:
We looked at OCS 2007 and have not done anything
Agree with the price aspect of OCS 07. I know that something like this
can be done with VoIP, but with what we do for a business, we aren't
ready to go that route.
---___
Cameron Cooper
IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified
Aurico Reports, Inc
Phone: 847-890-4021
With the Nortel system, is that using Norstar?
___
Cameron Cooper
IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified
Aurico Reports, Inc
Phone: 847-890-4021Fax: 847-255-1896
ccoo...@aurico.com
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
IM can be done for free using any number of clients. The cost of OCS vs
business functionality gained doesn't make sense for my organization so
therefore, not really necessary to keep business functioning.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:11 AM, Steven Peck sep...@gmail.com wrote:
What part of it is
We would love to add IM to our communications strategy, however we would
like to be able to control who our users can add. We don't want them to
start adding 20+ friends, then chat and not work. Hard enough finding
work for some users with business being slow.
Is IM your only goal? If so, OCS is likely too expensive as others
have pointed out.
If IM is your only goal, then there are all kinds of free options out
there. You'd likely have to host your own if you don't want an
external interface.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Cameron Cooper
We would probably start out with IM and then add addition features as
time went... conferencing, etc...
___
Cameron Cooper
IT Director - CompTIA A+ Certified
Aurico Reports, Inc
Phone: 847-890-4021Fax: 847-255-1896
ccoo...@aurico.com
~ Finally, powerful
You don't need additional servers for conferencing in R2; you can have a
single-server installation - although with a thousand concurrent users you'd
definitely be pushing hardware to the limit...
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24,
We've had LCS2005sp1 for a few years now. We are using only the IM
portion for a variety of reasons but my initial 'proof of concept'
test install for 50 users (100 in three weeks) now supports 1,500
users with 1,000 logged on at any given time. For the most part our
users are happy with it.
Well, if you are going to use some of those features, OCS can come in
at a compelling price. But you are going to pay for them all up
front.
Sounds like you need to do a requirements analysis.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:35 PM, Cameron Cooper ccoo...@aurico.com wrote:
We would probably start
We get these all the time when building large groups of machines. One of
our nearby support people wrote a script that queries the dhcp server for
BAD_ADDRESS, deletes the offending reservation, and recreates the
reservation. It runs pretty slow and I've found that just keeping 2 cmd
files with
For those of you who are backing up over the WAN:
Wwhat types of hardware and software are required for this to work
efficiently?
Does it only work well with deduplication?
Would I have to rethink my nightly/weekly/monthly backup strategies?
I'm currently working with BE 12 soon
virtual _cough_ 'cause you can virtualize anything, it's a magic 'no
cost' solution. Sigh.
Also, archiving is part of the new environment and the requirement
time limits are a little outside the 'normal' scope. I will be
implementing based on the requirements and available resources but
really,
So, there are a lot of options, but those options are expensive, just
not expensive in terms of licensing costs.
Jabber for in house only (block to the Internet)
You could set up your own IRC server in house ( I am not sure if
Jabber will do persistent 'group' chat like IRC does with channel bots
Roger,
I have had a few processes in place for some time, and I have slowly
been adding more and more backups to my WAN replication process.
I have about 2TB of data, and also use BE 12.5. (However, BE doesn't
offer much help to me in this arena).
- Currently, I ship 2 critical SQL
This is more of a collaboration tool than a conferencing tool, but this
combined with Live Messenger has gotten some good traction with me.
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/2008.07.utilityspotlight.aspx
-Original Message-
From: Steven Peck [mailto:sep...@gmail.com]
Sent:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Cameron Cooper ccoo...@aurico.com wrote:
With the Nortel system, is that using Norstar?
Norstar can mean many things. Technically, it's just a premises
phone system (i.e., KSU), not even voice mail. A Norstar phone system
will have some kind of voice mail
At the moment, we have some sites that we are backing up over the WAN by
using DFS R2 to replicate the data (one way) to a central server and
then backing up that server. It works well and take very minimal
bandwidth to keep the remote site synced to the central server. The
initial replication
How much data is traversing the WAN for the continuous replication?
Roger Wright
Network Administrator
Evatone, Inc.
727.572.7076 x388
_
From: Webb, Brian (Corp) [mailto:brian.w...@teldta.com]
Sent: Tuesday, February 24, 2009 3:03 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject:
I don't have the numbers in front of me, but it is almost nothing. The
sites we are doing this with don't have a huge amount of data and it
isn't changing a ton. You need to look at how much your data changes.
How big is a daily incremental backup? The incremental will give you an
upper bound
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron)
tom.alver...@ngc.com wrote:
... mirror ... performance was fine ...
The RAID5 part was still horribly slow.
Short version: Your RAID controller stinks. Buy a better one.
Explanation: Mirroring requires no computation; the controller
We have a number of low volume printers and recently have installed some
high speed/volume printers on our network. We would like to put a limit
on the maximum number of copies of a document that can be printed on the
low volume printers to force staff to use the high speed/volume
printers. We
I already figured out the stinking part. The P800 (which might be the
same hardware with more memory and included battery is the highest
performing controller in the SAS portfolio and supports over 100 hard
drives (i.e. this one controller can control 108 drives at once).
-Original
Hi all,
Anyone have any recommendations for compact managed switches?
Something in the 5 to 10 port range. Ideally, PoE as an option would
be nice. 10/100 is all we need for the station ports; it would be
nice if the uplink was gig.
Management features I'm interested in include: Port
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 3:52 PM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron)
tom.alver...@ngc.com wrote:
The P800 ... is the highest performing controller
in the SAS portfolio
Does it have dedicated silicon for XOR? That's what matters. This
might be called an XOR engine or XOR co-processor or RAID-5
... mirror ... performance was fine ...
The RAID5 part was still horribly slow.
Short version: Your RAID controller stinks. Buy a better one.
Well, R5 performance is not ever going to be as good as R1 (at least in that
scenario).
Is the P400 really no good? I use some P800's here for R10's
I enjoyed reading the earlier thread with all the different screen
sharing tools that you guys (and gals) have been using that I have never
heard of. Today I discovered that Microsoft has a free one too:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_SharedView
You can download it from here (posted
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:04 PM, Joseph L. Casale
jcas...@activenetwerx.com wrote:
... mirror ... performance was fine ...
The RAID5 part was still horribly slow.
Short version: Your RAID controller stinks. Buy a better one.
Well, R5 performance is not ever going to be as good as R1 (at
Not sure if the product ever took off but a few years ago i worked
with a xerox product called print exchange. It was basicly a print
server that allowed you to setup all kinds of rules for printing. An
example would be if you tried to send a 500 page doc to a little ink
jet it would reroute the
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron)
tom.alver...@ngc.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_SharedView
Sounds like NetMeeting all over again.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~
It has a monster 600+ PIN BGA (ball grid array) LSI chip on it
(LSISAS1078). I'm sure there are a few XOR's in there somewhere.
http://www.lsilogic.com/news/product_news/2005_03_23.html
LSI Logic First to Validate Serial Attached SCSI (SAS) RAID-On-Chip/RAID
Stack Solution
LSISAS1078 SAS
Oh, ah, Nortel NC1000 series switched. Beyond that I'd have to ask
more info from the telecom side.
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Cameron Cooper ccoo...@aurico.com wrote:
With the Nortel system, is that using Norstar?
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron)
tom.alver...@ngc.com wrote:
It has a monster 600+ PIN BGA (ball grid array) LSI chip on it
(LSISAS1078). I'm sure there are a few XOR's in there somewhere.
You're looking for dedicated silicon that can do all the XOR
calculations on a
The LSISAS1078 is a custom chip designed for high performance RAID controllers.
It is used on the HP P400 and P800 (their best raid card) as well as an Intel
RAID card and LSI logics own Mega-Raid brand of RAID card.
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott [mailto:mailvor...@gmail.com]
Similar but different. Netmeeting is point to point. SharedView
appears to communicate through Microsoft servers on ports 80 and 443 so
firewalls should not be a problem. In netmeeting you have an optional
ILS server which is basically just a list of names and IP addresses.
Sharedview requires
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron)
tom.alver...@ngc.com wrote:
The LSISAS1078 is a custom chip designed for high performance RAID
controllers.
It is used on the HP P400 and P800 (their best raid card) as well as an Intel
RAID card and LSI logics own Mega-Raid brand of
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Ben Scott mailvor...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:46 PM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron)
tom.alver...@ngc.com wrote:
The LSISAS1078 is a custom chip designed for high performance RAID
controllers.
It is used on the HP P400 and P800 (their best raid card)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:49 PM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron)
tom.alver...@ngc.com wrote:
Similar but different. Netmeeting is point to point. SharedView
appears to communicate through Microsoft servers
Ahhh, I see. Thanks for the clarification.
-- Ben
~ Finally, powerful endpoint
What's your price point?
Here's some more options:
HP ProCurve 1800-8G (J9029A) - 8 10/100/1000 ports for US$140 with the
HP lifetime warranty, web-managed but no CLI
HP ProCurve 1700-8 (J9079A) - 7 10/100 and 1 10/100/100 for US$80 with
the HP lifetime warranty, web-managed but no CLI
Watch
Of course I get it. If the chip did not have the guts to perform the RAID
calculations fast enough, I doubt that both Intel and HP would have chosen this
chip for their RAID controllers. I think the problem is somewhere else (i.e.
the raid chip is fast enough). I suspect the problem is
More info from the WIKI:
Overview
Microsoft SharedView allows connecting with up to 15 people in different
locations. Users can be invited to join a session by email or IM. They are able
to communicate with each other by being able to view each other's screens and
control them. Also, handouts,
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:29 PM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron)
tom.alver...@ngc.com wrote:
If the chip did not have the guts to perform the RAID calculations fast
enough,
I doubt that both Intel and HP would have chosen this chip for their RAID
controllers.
So, in other words, you have
http://www.baremetalsoft.com/baretail/index.php
Awesome little free tool, standalone (no install), can run from network etc
Simultaneously monitor multiple files for changes using tabs, multi color
highlighting for different strings and so on
From: cs [mailto:chr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday,
This just floated across the patch management list
During our analysis, Secunia managed to create a reliable, fully working
exploit (available for Secunia Binary Analysis customers), which does not use
JavaScript and can therefore successfully compromise users, who may think they
are safe
Well I am hoping that someone else on this list may have solved this
problem already. No such luck yet. My guess is that adding
memory/battery or changing to a P800 card will help, and I am testing
that guess buy purchasing both (on order, not here yet).
If someone tells me that card XXX will
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Phil Brutsche p...@optimumdata.com wrote:
What's your price point?
I dunno, I haven't bought a managed switch in this size category before.
When it comes to networking, I try to avoid buying cheap crap. At
the same time, I don't spend money just for the
What stripe and cluster sizes are being used?
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Alverson, Tom (Xetron)
tom.alver...@ngc.com wrote:
Well I am hoping that someone else on this list may have solved this
problem already. No such luck yet. My guess is that adding
memory/battery or changing to a
Also what are the sizes of the files you are reading/write from the
drive.
HP Has tools to measure the performance of the reading and writing from
disk. Although I have heard the P400 controller rant before about the
slowness. Is it any better if you use RAID 10? I am also looking to do a
dsquery * domainroot -filter
((objectCategory=Person)(objectClass=User)(homeDirectory=\\directorypath))
-attr sAMAccountName homeDirectory c:\temp\hdir.csv
This simple query is suppose to write all domain users who homeDirectory
path resides on a particular server. The file gets created and
Tom.
I am very interested in the outcome of this as I have 5 servers on order
and 4 of them will have this same controller.
I forwarded the first email from this thread to our rep to see if he had
heard anything and asked if we should be concerned.
He said he would do some checking and let me know
The \ character is a special character in LDAP query strings and must be
escaped. The basic escape character in LDAP is, you guessed it, the \
character. (There is another way to escape UTF-8 characters in LDAP, but we
won't go there right now. For details, see:
try (homedirectory=\5c\5cdirectorypath)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 PM, MarvinC marv...@gmail.com wrote:
dsquery * domainroot -filter
((objectCategory=Person)(objectClass=User)(homeDirectory=\\directorypath))
-attr sAMAccountName homeDirectory c:\temp\hdir.csv
This simple query is
I'll give this a try.
Thanks
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Michael B. Smith
mich...@theessentialexchange.com wrote:
The “\” character is a special character in LDAP query strings and must
be escaped. The basic escape character in LDAP is, you guessed it, the “\”
character. (There is
Same here. Thanks
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 10:10 PM, KenM kenmli...@gmail.com wrote:
try (homedirectory=\5c\5cdirectorypath)
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 9:48 PM, MarvinC marv...@gmail.com wrote:
dsquery * domainroot -filter
Hellos..
We are currently in research and eval mode for a software tool that will allow
us to gather all configuration data from a server (i.e. AD structure, policies,
folder security information, etc.).
Anyone using anything like this?
CAR
This e-Mail and
On 24 Feb 2009 at 14:55, David Lum wrote:
This just floated across the patch management list
During our analysis, Secunia managed to create a reliable, fully working
exploit (available for Secunia Binary Analysis customers), which does not use
JavaScript and can therefore successfully
Is it a default that MS system patches may be released out of band ?
(Today MS KB 967715 and 961118)
GuidoElia
HELPPC
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/ ~
It's more like 2nd Tuesday for security updates, 2nd or 4th Tuesday for
non-security updates, and signature updates all the time.
Carl
From: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 1:46 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Out of band patches ?
Yes I am signed up, that is the reason I posted
GuidoElia
HELPPC
_
Da: Ken Schaefer [mailto:k...@adopenstatic.com]
Inviato: mercoledì 25 febbraio 2009 7.46
A: NT System Admin Issues
Oggetto: RE: Out of band patches ?
Security patches are released once a month.
Other stuff is
87 matches
Mail list logo
