On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Ben Scott wrote:
>
> Don't make the mistake of putting the RFID tag in the hand or wrist,
> because then they'll just lop off your arm. Go for a major organ,
> like the skull.
::Thinks of the end of Mad Max::
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 5:32 PM, Angus Scott-Fleming
wrote:
> I hope they're subcutaneous RFID tags, otherwise someone could use your card.
Don't make the mistake of putting the RFID tag in the hand or wrist,
because then they'll just lop off your arm. Go for a major organ,
like the skull.
--
On 27 Oct 2010 at 14:30, Ames Matthew B wrote:
> We do this, but use RFID tags to save us having to log in. The rfid tag
> also provides the ability to do secure printing, where the job is only
> released once you get to the printer.
I hope they're subcutaneous RFID tags, otherwise someone cou
System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Office Printers
We have our Xerox WorkCentre machines fixed to only scan to email, not
file shares. Users have to log in to the Xerox via their AD account and
the machine automatically addresses the email to their mailbox. It is a
bit of a pain to log in with the
it is a lot easier to manage than scan to shared folders and it meets our
security needs better.
-Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: John Aldrich [mailto:jaldr...@blueridgecarpet.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 08:15
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Office Printers
Kyocera can
rtment for
that folder and to the scanner user.
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 10:28 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Office Printers
> I don't get it. What's the issue?
Because they
7;re good to go. :-)
-Original Message-
From: Joseph L. Casale [mailto:jcas...@activenetwerx.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 12:40 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: RE: Office Printers
> Ah, I see. Some ideas:
/snip
Yeah, that's why I was intending on using procmail and scan-to-ema
> Ah, I see. Some ideas:
/snip
Yeah, that's why I was intending on using procmail and scan-to-email so
attachments would never
see my exchange server. Pretty sure I could whip something up based on who they
email it to (Themselves).
A better solution so they don't even have to leave the doc on
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 10:28 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> Because they scan sensitive/private stuff and unless
> it works like it used it to with the old office scan app
> where they save it to their desktop, they won't want
> it in a publicly accessible folder.
Ah, I see. Some ideas:
Sca
> I don't get it. What's the issue?
Because they scan sensitive/private stuff and unless it works like it used it
to with
the old office scan app where they save it to their desktop, they won't want it
in a
publicly accessible folder.
As per my other thread about perms, I haven't crafted a w
it".
I don't know if that's applicable here, but I'd be reluctant to suggest scan to
folder to an awful lot of my current clients, were it to come up.
G
-Original Message-
From: Ben Scott
Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 21:02:06
To: NT System Admin Issues
Reply-To: &quo
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 8:42 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
>> Wouldn't it make more sense to scan-to-FTP/SMB/whatever,
>> and just have the copier drop the file there, rather than futz
>> around with email filters? That's what we do; works great.
>
> With a generic account that it will likely use
> Wouldn't it make more sense to scan-to-FTP/SMB/whatever, and just have the
> copier drop the file there, rather than futz around with email filters?
> That's what we do; works great.
Sure, if I can get it to go where I need:)
With a generic account that it will likely use to access the resou
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 5:31 PM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> One question about the email capabilities, is it very configurable in so
> far as the email format? Rather than have everyone send a zillion attachments
> to my exchange server, I hoped to send the mail to a Postfix server with
> some proc
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 11:58 AM, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> We have some Canon iR’s that are showing their teeth and the proposed
> replacements by a couple reps are either Ricoh Ficio MP 5000SP or a Xerox
> WorkCenter 5790.
We took delivery of a Xerox WorkCenter 5755 in May of this year.
Our v
lable, permissions for color, etc.
--
Mike Gill
-Original Message-
From: Graeme Carstairs [mailto:loonyto...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 25, 2010 1:26 AM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Office Printers
We've had no probes with xerox drivers.
Scan to e-mail just works
Scan
We actually went the other way from Ricoh's to Canon's (mostly IR-3225's)
Here is what I found.
Ricoh's - reliable and fast printing (both from Windows and Unix). They
finally came out with a hardware device (@remote) which will scan multiple
subnets and automatically report back to Ricoh for any p
We just made the change from Canon to Ricoh 2 months ago and our users much
prefer the Ricohs as do I.
I have had a much easier time with the Ricoh drivers than I did with the Canon
drivers. We use the universal drivers for both PS and PCL for the Ricohs and
have no issues at all.
Tim
From: Jos
On Mon October 25 2010, you wrote:
> We have scan to email, but more interesting is the scan to folder - we
> have a special folder set up on our file server, and the machine
> integrates with AD via LDAP very easily, so setting up permissions was
> easy as pie.
>
Same thing with the Kyoceras we u
>> folder.
>>
>> Thanks!
>> jlc
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:50 PM
>> To: NT System Admin Issues
>> Subject: Re: Office Printers
>>
>> Show
tract and drop the attachments in a private
> folder.
>
> Thanks!
> jlc
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:50 PM
> To: NT System Admin Issues
> Subject: Re: Office Printers
>
> Showin
On 24 Oct 2010 at 20:16, Graeme Carstairs wrote:
> Canon or xerox all the way for me
We've had issues getting Xerox drivers to work natively for Win7 for our two
older Xerox Workcenter units, a 240 and a color 265.
--
Angus Scott-Fleming
GeoApps, Tucson, Arizona
1-520-290-5038
Security Blog: h
private
folder.
Thanks!
jlc
-Original Message-
From: Kurt Buff [mailto:kurt.b...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 24, 2010 2:50 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Office Printers
Showing their teeth? Have they attacked yet, or are they just growling? Heh.
I think you meant
Showing their teeth? Have they attacked yet, or are they just growling? Heh.
I think you meant either showing their age or long in the tooth.
But, we use Aficio's, and they seem just fine.
Kurt
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 08:58, Joseph L. Casale
wrote:
> We have some Canon iR’s that are showing th
1:16 PM
To: NT System Admin Issues
Subject: Re: Office Printers
Canon or xerox all the way for me
Would never get anything else
Cheers
~ Finally, powerful endpoint security that ISN'T a resource hog! ~
~ <http://www.sunbeltsoftware.com/Business/VIPRE-Enterprise/> ~
---
To manage subsc
Canon or xerox all the way for me
Would never get anything else
Cheers
On Sunday, October 24, 2010, John Aldrich wrote:
> On Sun October 24 2010, you wrote:
>> We have some Canon iR's that are showing their teeth and the proposed
>> replacements by a couple reps are either Ricoh Ficio MP 5000SP
On Sun October 24 2010, you wrote:
> We have some Canon iR's that are showing their teeth and the proposed
> replacements by a couple reps are either Ricoh Ficio MP 5000SP or a
> Xerox WorkCenter 5790.
>
> I always hated the Canons software as it wasn't msi based and needed
> write perms to the %P
27 matches
Mail list logo
