Hi Holger,
thanks for your reply.
I completely forgot to say that we are using CentOS (5.4) and Firefox (10)...
You are using Shotgun at your company, or?
Can you open Nuke from within Shotgun? Is it possible to see how they managed
this to work?
Actually i m not sure for what terms i have to
Yes you can open Nuke from Shotgun.
Basically in two ways. Either by simply using a local file field on the
desired entity with the link to a nk file in your mapped file system or by
creating a custom menu item in Shotgun that triggers a python script that
does the job for you.
The only few
What happens if you write this in your browser?
file:///Servername/Projects/Project/.../nukescript.nk
Ofcourse with the correct path and all.
If the mimetypes/filetypes are setup correctly firefox should ask which
application it should open it with. Also what deskop environment are you
using
That will probably trigger a download for the file trough the browser. But
I can test this, so it's just a guess.
-diogo
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:52 AM, Jimmy Christensen ji...@ghost.dk wrote:
What happens if you write this in your browser?
You probably need some Java or Javascript blackmagic to bypass the
browser's own file handling. Normally browsers check if a file is
supported/readable and try to open it, if they can't, they trigger a
download operation.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Ron Ganbar ron...@gmail.com wrote:
It shouldn't. Here it opens it directly and doesn't first download to
temp and open it.
Best Regards
Jimmy Christensen
Developer
Ghost A/S
On 17/08/12 14:55, Diogo Girondi wrote:
That will probably trigger a download for the file trough the browser.
But I can test this, so it's just a guess.
I believe it works that way for security reasons. Otherwise people with bad
intentions could simply post links pointing to the shell exec with some
nasty commands and create havok on ones machine.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Diogo Girondi diogogiro...@gmail.comwrote:
You probably need
Well, to be honest I didn't test with a nuke file :)
When I tried with a nuke file it opened up as clear text.
Anyway found this :
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/30931/register-file-extensions-mime-types-in-linux
Which made firefox open it directly in Nuke.
Made a xml file called
Nice!
Will this work on the Mac do you think?
Ron Ganbar
email: ron...@gmail.com
tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
+972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
On 17 August 2012 16:08, Jimmy Christensen ji...@ghost.dk wrote:
Well, to be honest I didn't test with a nuke
Update:
It doesn't seem work if it's linked from eg. a html page. Most likely
for security reasons (and good reason).
Another thing which can be done it to use a custom protocol and write a
small wrapper for it. Much like how rv does it with shotgun.
More info here :
Here Chrome opens the file as text in a tab and Safari opens the containing
folder. None of them triggers Nuke's exec with the path as an argument.
If it worked differently I would get worried.
file:///Applications/Utilities/Terminal.app/Contents/MacOS/Terminal rm -rf
* -- click me
Kaboom! :)
http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/protocolhandlers/
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web-based_protocol_handlers
http://docstore.mik.ua/orelly/java/exp/ch09_06.htm
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Diogo Girondi diogogiro...@gmail.comwrote:
Here Chrome opens the file as text
No, it's linux only.
However I found this :
http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/
Best Regards
Jimmy Christensen
Developer
Ghost A/S
On 17/08/12 15:14, Ron Ganbar wrote:
Nice!
Will this work on the Mac do you think?
Ron Ganbar
email: ron...@gmail.com mailto:ron...@gmail.com
tel:
That looks sweet!
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Jimmy Christensen ji...@ghost.dk wrote:
No, it's linux only.
However I found this :
http://www.rubicode.com/**Software/RCDefaultApp/http://www.rubicode.com/Software/RCDefaultApp/
Best Regards
Jimmy Christensen
Developer
Ghost A/S
On
Nice!
Thanks for this.
Ron Ganbar
email: ron...@gmail.com
tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
+972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
On 17 August 2012 16:36, Diogo Girondi diogogiro...@gmail.com wrote:
That looks sweet!
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Jimmy
Thanks those expressions Frank and Jose, they both seem to work well (if you
don't need Motion Blur)...
As a long term goal, I was wondering if it wouldn't be possible somehow to
access the Vertex information directly from the alembic file, I mean the data
must be already there as it's a baked
Aloha e na po`e...
SO question:
I have a simple sprite based particle system emitting particlesa along the
ground. I have a separate premulted image projected on a card that is also in
the scene. I am using the projected image to render with the particles, so
that through the camera some
That looks good Jack, thanks!
On 17 August 2012 19:34, Jack Binks jackbi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey Gents,
Will have to investigate further, but I think what you're seeing is
related to the auto calculated center of mass. Does the below
amendment make it more what you expect (body has CoM
Seperate the particles and projected image into two renders using two
scanline render nodes. Then zmerge/deep them after you grade them.
On 18 August 2012 08:48, poiboy nuke-users-re...@thefoundry.co.uk wrote:
**
Aloha e na po`e...
SO question:
I have a simple sprite based particle system
Marten,
I actually thought of that, but the depth channel for the partciles are pretty
fubar as well as the card for the projected image.
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
I'm not sure how you can have a bad depth channel. can you post an image?
On 18 August 2012 10:33, poiboy nuke-users-re...@thefoundry.co.uk wrote:
**
Marten,
I actually thought of that, but the depth channel for the partciles are
pretty fubar as well as the card for the projected image.
Yes Howard, thats exactly the problem I am pondering about.
___
Nuke-users mailing list
Nuke-users@support.thefoundry.co.uk, http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
Seems like the motion vectors are set by the geometry and uninfluenced by
the image on them.
On 18 August 2012 11:07, kafkaz nuke-users-re...@thefoundry.co.uk wrote:
**
Yes Howard, thats exactly the problem I am pondering about.
___
Nuke-users
The only suggestions are then:
1) to separate to multiple scanline renders and add vector blur separately,
then comp.
Even if you could get motion blur to work as per the transparency, it would
affect the background in an undesirable way.
2) to split these into separate layers/channels and
24 matches
Mail list logo
