On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
I admit to a certain curiosity about your own
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:07 AM, Nathaniel Smith n...@pobox.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 4:02 AM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 8:56 PM, Fernando Perez fperez@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 6:12 PM, Charles R Harris
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 06:03:25AM -0600, Charles R Harris wrote:
Well, you have already appealed to the authority of greater experience, so
it's a bit late to declare disinterest in the subject ;) I mean, at this
point I really would like to see how big your FOSS is.
Chuck, I am not sure that
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Charles R Harris
charlesr.har...@gmail.com wrote:
That is one of the reasons that the smaller
scikits attract people, they have more freedom to do what they want and
fewer people to answer to. Scipy also has some of that advantage because
there are a number of
The masked array discussions have brought up all sorts of interesting
topics - too many to usefully list here - but there's one aspect I haven't
spotted yet. Perhaps that's because it's flat out wrong, or crazy, or just
too awkward to be helpful. But ...
Shouldn't masked arrays (MA) be a
Hello,
is there weighted version of linalg.lstsq available?
In my case, b is a (N,K) matrix, so i can't use manual scaling of x and b.
greetings
Till
___
NumPy-Discussion mailing list
NumPy-Discussion@scipy.org
I don't agree here. People work on open source to scratch an itch, so the
process of making a contribution needs to be easy. Widespread veto makes it
more difficult and instead of opening up the process, closes it down. There
is less freedom, not more. That is one of the reasons that the
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Till Stensitzki mail.t...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
is there weighted version of linalg.lstsq available?
In my case, b is a (N,K) matrix, so i can't use manual scaling of x and b.
What shape are the weights in this case? I'm not that familiar with
problems with an
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I don't agree here. People work on open source to scratch an itch, so the
process of making a contribution needs to be easy. Widespread veto makes it
more difficult and instead of opening up the process, closes it
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
Compared to - say - Sympy?
Why do you think this is?
I don't know about SymPy. But in my view (and I'm just a typical user of
NumPy), numpy seems to be at the
On 4/25/2012 4:51 PM, Andreas H. wrote:
I would assume that most users see numpy
as infrastructure, they write their own code on top of it. As a normal
user of numpy, I wouldn't know where it would need improvement to suit
my needs because it already does all I need. (Okay, masked arrays are
I too have to agree with Andreas. I have been using Numpy for years in my
work, but am not versed in C so I don't even understand what numpy is doing
under the hood. I too would only be able to contribute to the code at the
python level, or as Andreas said, at improving SciPy packages and other
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
Compared to - say - Sympy?
Why do you think this is?
I think it's mostly because it's infrastructure that is a means to an end. I
certainly wasn't
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
Compared to - say - Sympy?
Why do you think this is?
I think it's mostly
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012, Matthew Brett wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant
tra...@continuum.iojavascript:;
wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large user-base?
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
I don't agree here. People work on open source to scratch an itch, so the
process of making a contribution needs to be easy.
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 10:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io
wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in recruiting and
maintaining new developers compared to its large
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
Do you agree that Numpy has not been very successful in
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 7:08 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:24 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 5:54 PM, Matthew Brett matthew.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Travis Oliphant
On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Except for the big changes like NA and datetime, I think the debate is
pretty boring.
The main problem that I see for discussing technical issues is whether
there are many
developers really interested in commenting on code and
On Wednesday, April 25, 2012, Travis Oliphant wrote:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com javascript:; wrote:
Except for the big changes like NA and datetime, I think the debate is
pretty boring.
The main problem that I see for discussing technical issues is whether
On 4/25/12 8:11 PM, Travis Oliphant wrote:
On Apr 25, 2012, at 7:18 PM, josef.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Except for the big changes like NA and datetime, I think the debate is
pretty boring.
The main problem that I see for discussing technical issues is whether
there are many
developers really
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
[snip]
It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list. Is
that even possible?
That is definitely possible and shouldn't be too hard to do, like
Jason said. But that can potentially cause
On 4/25/12 11:08 PM, Puneeth Chaganti wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Travis Oliphanttra...@continuum.io wrote:
[snip]
It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list.Is
that even possible?
That is definitely possible and shouldn't be too hard to do, like
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Puneeth Chaganti puncha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 6:41 AM, Travis Oliphant tra...@continuum.io wrote:
[snip]
It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list. Is
that even possible?
That is definitely possible and
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 6:28 PM, Benjamin Root ben.r...@ou.edu wrote:
It would be nice if every pull request created a message to this list.
Is that even possible?
-Travis
This ha been a concern of mine for matplotlib as well. The closest I can
come is to set up an RSS feed, but all the
27 matches
Mail list logo
