opment/testing-paxexam.html
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-testing-paxexam
>
>
>
> From: Robert Munteanu
> Date: Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 17:44
> To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Oak-it-osgi module
> On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 16:38 +,
//github.com/apache/sling-org-apache-sling-testing-paxexam
From: Robert Munteanu
Date: Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 17:44
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Oak-it-osgi module
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 16:38 +, Carlo Jelmini wrote:
> Up until now, I have used AEM Quickstart to ma
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 16:38 +, Carlo Jelmini wrote:
> Up until now, I have used AEM Quickstart to manually test Oak
> changes, but the roundtrip is very slow, cumbersome, and
> frustrating...
Well, it's probably much quicker if you use the Sling Starter.
On that note, maybe Oak itself can be
3:54 PM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Oak-it-osgi module
Hi Angela,
I agree with the idea. However, what is then the best approach to add OSGi
integration tests in other modules, without duplicating the Pax-Exam setup?
Does it make sense to use oak-it-osgi as a test dependenc
Hi,
On Tue, 2022-01-18 at 15:04 +, Angela Schreiber wrote:
> Hi Carlo
>
> In the various security related modules I used
> org.apache.sling.testing.osgi-mock to test the OSGi setup.
> I never used oak-it-osgi as a base for tests.
>
In my understanding these are slightly different.
The
@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Oak-it-osgi module
Hi Angela,
I agree with the idea. However, what is then the best approach to add OSGi
integration tests in other modules, without duplicating the Pax-Exam setup?
Does it make sense to use oak-it-osgi as a test dependency (using the “tests
Date: Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 08:43
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Oak-it-osgi module
Hi Carlo
The oak-it-osgi module is IMHO not particularly well maintained and I would
rather add the tests to the very modules the belong to.
Kind regards
Angela
Hi Carlo
The oak-it-osgi module is IMHO not particularly well maintained and I would
rather add the tests to the very modules the belong to.
Kind regards
Angela
From: Carlo Jelmini
Sent: Monday, January 17, 2022 4:15 PM
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Am 17.01.2022 um 19:13 schrieb Carlo Jelmini:
Ah ok. I had checked the maven-failsafe-plugin configuration in the parent, but
I didn’t notice the reconfiguration in the profile. The tests are indeed
executed when activating that profile. Thanks.
What about the tests failing to start/connect
Date: Monday, 17 January 2022 at 17:04
To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org
Subject: Re: Oak-it-osgi module
Am 17.01.2022 um 16:15 schrieb Carlo Jelmini:
> Hi,
>
> I’m looking for a good place to add integration tests for the issue “Enable
> configuration of more than one rea
Am 17.01.2022 um 16:15 schrieb Carlo Jelmini:
Hi,
I’m looking for a good place to add integration tests for the issue “Enable
configuration of more than one read-only mount in the composite node store“[0]
and I think the module “oak-it-osgi” is the best candidate.
However, I’m surprised
Hi,
I’m looking for a good place to add integration tests for the issue “Enable
configuration of more than one read-only mount in the composite node store“[0]
and I think the module “oak-it-osgi” is the best candidate.
However, I’m surprised to see that, with the current maven-failsafe-plugin
12 matches
Mail list logo
