Re: Oak-it-osgi module

2022-01-17 Thread Angela Schreiber
Hi Carlo The oak-it-osgi module is IMHO not particularly well maintained and I would rather add the tests to the very modules the belong to. Kind regards Angela From: Carlo Jelmini Sent: Monday, January 17, 2022 4:15 PM To: oak-dev@jackrabbit.apache.org

Re: Oak-it-osgi module

2022-01-17 Thread Julian Reschke
Am 17.01.2022 um 19:13 schrieb Carlo Jelmini: Ah ok. I had checked the maven-failsafe-plugin configuration in the parent, but I didn’t notice the reconfiguration in the profile. The tests are indeed executed when activating that profile. Thanks. What about the tests failing to start/connect

Re: Oak-it-osgi module

2022-01-17 Thread Carlo Jelmini
Ah ok. I had checked the maven-failsafe-plugin configuration in the parent, but I didn’t notice the reconfiguration in the profile. The tests are indeed executed when activating that profile. Thanks. What about the tests failing to start/connect to the forked container? Is my setup incorrect?

Re: Oak-it-osgi module

2022-01-17 Thread Julian Reschke
Am 17.01.2022 um 16:15 schrieb Carlo Jelmini: Hi, I’m looking for a good place to add integration tests for the issue “Enable configuration of more than one read-only mount in the composite node store“[0] and I think the module “oak-it-osgi” is the best candidate. However, I’m surprised to

Oak-it-osgi module

2022-01-17 Thread Carlo Jelmini
Hi, I’m looking for a good place to add integration tests for the issue “Enable configuration of more than one read-only mount in the composite node store“[0] and I think the module “oak-it-osgi” is the best candidate. However, I’m surprised to see that, with the current maven-failsafe-plugin