I don't seem to have write access to the wiki but I'll be there :-)
Regards,
Tommaso
On 17/set/2012, at 11:23, Ate Douma wrote:
Hi OAK hackers again,
As indicated earlier we (Hippo developers) would love to come to the OAK
Hackathon next week.
Looking at the wiki page [1] not many others
Hi all,
On 19/set/2012, at 22:47, Lukas Kahwe Smith wrote:
Hi,
Just wanted to bring up how this all relates to custom index solutions (like
Solr/ES). Isnt there a risk that by making it possible to attach such
configuration to nodes, that it would encourage applications that make it
,
Tommaso
Regards,
Thomas
On 1/24/13 10:46 AM, Tommaso Teofili teof...@adobe.com wrote:
Hi all,
maybe that's a silly question but I wonder what is currently considered
the best practice for where to create index nodes.
Do they all have to (or _should_) be under a same (e.g. query:index
Hi all,
I'm trying to access an Oak repository over HTTP as explained at [1] so I
assumed I had to use oak-run as explained at [2].
If I try with curl:
curl -d foo=bar http://localhost:8080/test
I get:
html
head
meta http-equiv=Content-Type content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1/
titleError 500
this helps,
Tommaso
On 25/gen/2013, at 12:51, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Hi all,
I'm trying to access an Oak repository over HTTP as explained at [1] so I
assumed I had to use oak-run as explained at [2].
If I try with curl:
curl -d foo=bar http://localhost:8080/test
I get:
html
head
meta http
On 15/feb/2013, at 08:11, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
However, there is a difference depending on whether the index is stored in
content or external. For the former case using commit hooks is the right
thing to do. In
thanks Jukka, you beat me on this :-)
Tommaso
2013/2/21 ju...@apache.org
Author: jukka
Date: Thu Feb 21 09:18:00 2013
New Revision: 1448559
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1448559
Log:
OAK-646: Commit Oak Solr modules to Oak trunk
Exclude the jms dependency not found on the central Maven
Hi Jukka,
On 22/feb/2013, at 08:44, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
We currently have half a dozen different commit hooks looking at each
commit. This means that each content diff is traversed at least half a
dozen times before the commit can be completed. As Thomas noted, this
causes a lot of
On 26/feb/2013, at 11:12, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote:
Large transactions: I think we didn't define this as a strict requirement.
It's probably not the most important thing for Oak to achieve, but we
did list it as a
On 27/feb/2013, at 10:25, Michael Dürig wrote:
On 15.2.13 9:27, Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Tommaso Teofili teof...@adobe.com wrote:
maybe it would be nice to explicitly design the synchronous / asynchronous
execution of an hook
An Observer
On 08/lug/2013, at 12:54, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
Hi,
I tried to integrate Apache DirectMemory as Second level cache (L2).
It uses Kryo [2] for serializing/derserializing objects from the off
heap memory managed by DirectMemory. Initial test based on this show
quite a bit of saving in
+1
Tommaso
On 16/set/2013, at 11:44, Alex Parvulescu wrote:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 0.9 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/0.9/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
Yes, definitely an accident, sorry (IDEs are evil)!
Regards,
Tommaso
On 20/set/2013, at 11:00, Alex Parvulescu wrote:
hmm, this looks like an accident commit :)
alex
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 9:55 AM, tomm...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tommaso
Date: Fri Sep 20 07:55:41 2013
New
it's fixed now, sorry for the noise.
Tommaso
2013/9/20 Tommaso Teofili teof...@adobe.com
Yes, definitely an accident, sorry (IDEs are evil)!
Regards,
Tommaso
On 20/set/2013, at 11:00, Alex Parvulescu wrote:
hmm, this looks like an accident commit :)
alex
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013
Hi Chetan,
I think that currently the complete binary is sent and the on the Solr side
you have the ability to choose which field to use for indexing and
searching properties of Binary type via the
OakSolrConfiguration#getFieldNameFor(Type? propertyType) [1] method.
Currently the default
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.10
Tommaso
2013/10/3 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 0.10 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/0.10/
The release candidate is a zip archive of
It should be fine now.
Tommaso
2013/10/10 build...@apache.org
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/3405
Buildbot URL: http://ci.apache.org/
Buildslave for
Hi all,
I'm a bit lost about how validation / editing of content to-be-persisted is
done.
What's exactly the difference and the intended usage scenarios for
CommitHooks and Editors ?
I see for example EditorHook is a CommitHook but uses an EditorProvider
which returns an Editor when the
of documentation.
regards
angela
On 10/15/13 3:48 PM, Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org wrote:
Nice summary Jukka! How about adding this to oak-doc?
Michael
On 15.10.13 3:35 , Jukka Zitting wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:33 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote
From the user point of view I think this makes sense and it'd be worth the
effort, also it looks like the global space approach would allow to do that
without loosing too much in terms of performance.
My 2 cents,
Tommaso
2013/10/17 Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org
Hi,
Currently we can't
Hi all,
out of curiosity, I was wondering if there's any guideline other than
following the API on writing a new MK implementation.
What one should start with, design concepts, experience on known dos,
donts, caveats, etc.
In the past I wanted to play with it a bit but never had time to do
implementation [2]
cheers
stefan
[1] http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/RepositoryMicroKernel
[2]
http://wiki.apache.org/jackrabbit/RepositoryMicroKernel?action=AttachFiledo=viewtarget=MicroKernel+Revision+Model.pdf
On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com
Hi all,
2013/12/6 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Will the search index contain access control information or will the
search results be filtered as each result is retrieved ?
The results will be filtered after
2013/12/6 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
In Oak when a index is stored in the repository, how is it updated
when the
Hi,
2013/12/6 Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk
Hi,
On 6 December 2013 16:12, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
2013/12/6 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 9:36 PM, Ian Boston i...@tfd.co.uk wrote:
Will the search index contain
+1
Tommaso
2014/1/22 Alex Parvulescu alexparvule...@apache.org
Hi,
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 0.15 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/0.15/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
Hi all,
I'm a bit lost about how the plugin registration is (or should be) done.
I assume the goal here is to be able to register whatever Oak plugin
(Editor, IndexEditor, etc.) regardless of how Oak is initialized or at
least having that possible by default and I understood the idea was to
+1 I think it makes sense, see also [1].
Regards,
Tommaso
[1] : http://markmail.org/message/4youjqpyjvajcttr
2014-02-08 Tobias Bocanegra tri...@apache.org:
Hi,
currently there is not way to access the whiteboard from within the
content repository - only if it's added from the outside to
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 0.16
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-02-06 10:25 GMT+01:00 Alex Parvulescu alexparvule...@apache.org:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 0.16 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/0.16/
The release
oak-blob/pom.xml was referencing the wrong parent, fixed in r1570487.
Tommaso
2014-02-20 19:04 GMT+01:00 build...@apache.org:
The Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder oak-trunk while
building ASF Buildbot.
Full details are available at:
right, sorry my bad, I'll fix that.
Tommaso
2014-02-24 11:08 GMT+01:00 Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org:
On 24.2.14 11:02 , Alex Parvulescu wrote:
This doesn't look like something I did:
Failed tests:
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.index.solr.configuration.
awesome commit message Alex :)
Tommaso
2014-02-28 11:20 GMT+01:00 alexparvule...@apache.org:
Author: alexparvulescu
Date: Fri Feb 28 10:20:03 2014
New Revision: 1572903
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1572903
Log:
OAK-1472 ConcurrentAddReferenceTest#addReferences still fails
- enabling
involved this time ;-)
regards
angela
On 05/03/14 08:19, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
also as far as I could see just yesterday, rep:AccessControllable is
searched when logging in (I was logging into Felix WebConsole on a system
running Sling and Oak and the query
Hi all,
for my Solr (indexing) resiliency use case [1] I've implemented an
extension of Solr client which is able to cache requests if Solr goes down
and execute them back once the Solr instance comes back.
Now if the repository goes down during the Solr downtime we loose the
cached requests as
Hi,
2014-03-06 15:46 GMT+01:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
for my Solr (indexing) resiliency use case [1] I've implemented an
extension of Solr client which is able to cache requests if Solr
Hi Davide,
2014-03-06 15:43 GMT+01:00 Davide Giannella giannella.dav...@gmail.com:
Hello Tommaso,
On 06/03/2014 14:32, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Hi all,
for my Solr (indexing) resiliency use case [1] I've implemented an
extension of Solr client which is able to cache requests if Solr
Hi all,
The main issue we currently have with our full text indexers is that Lucene
and Solr are not OSGi ready, missing proper MANIFEST entries so that they
cannot directly be installed in e.g. Apache Felix, don't have semantic
version information, etc.
Currently oak-lucene embeds the Lucene
) would
not be usable in non OSGi env a user would have to add such jars in
addition to the one embedded thus adding to size
would inlining the jars solve the problem and / or are there any drawbacks
in inlining?
Thanks,
Tommaso
Chetan Mehrotra
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Tommaso Teofili
2014-03-10 17:15 GMT+01:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 5:40 AM, Chetan Mehrotra
chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote:
Reason for not embedding the Lucene and Solr related dependencies in
Oak bundles is to enable usage of same bundle jars in non OSGi env
ah ok, thanks for clarifying.
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-03-10 18:10 GMT+01:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, so (in OSGi env) we would have oak-solr and oak-fulltext as fragments
of oak-lucene
+01:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com:
ah ok, thanks for clarifying.
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-03-10 18:10 GMT+01:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
ok, so (in OSGi env) we would have oak
In
https://github.com/tteofili/jackrabbit-oak/blob/oak-1475c/oak-solr-osgi/pom.xmlI've
specialized the above approach only for Solr.
Tommaso
2014-03-12 16:40 GMT+01:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com:
2014-03-12 12:29 GMT+01:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com:
2014
://github.com/tteofili/jackrabbit-oak/tree/oak-1475c and then we can
switch to the full OSGi way once Lucene and Solr properly support it.
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-03-12 17:15 GMT+01:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com:
In
https://github.com/tteofili/jackrabbit-oak/blob/oak-1475c/oak-solr-osgi
that's a Solr error, of course not related to Julian's commit, I'll have a
look however it seems related to a test deleting index data while another
test is not finished yet, I'll look into it.
Tommaso
2014-03-28 14:37 GMT+01:00 Travis CI ju...@apache.org:
Build Update for
Hi Davide,
I'm looking into the Solr one.
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-03-31 10:55 GMT+02:00 Davide Giannella giannella.dav...@gmail.com:
Hello everyone,
I think all of us is aware of those but I have a fairly consistent
failing test (first one at the end) and a more randomly failing one.
Did
it should be fine now (as of r1583322).
Tommaso
2014-03-31 13:37 GMT+02:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com:
disabling it for now while investigating.
Tommaso
2014-03-31 12:36 GMT+02:00 Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de:
On 2014-03-28 16:13, Julian Reschke wrote:
On 2014
ignored the test for now (r1584015)
Tommaso
2014-04-02 14:48 GMT+02:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
Test case failure on oak-solr
Failed tests:
testOffsetAndLimit(org.apache.jackrabbit.core.query.LimitAndOffsetTest):
expected:1 but was:0
no idea, but I guess it may be related to yesterday's SVN outage, which was
caused by LDAP issues [1] ... maybe worth asking to infra@a.o
Tommaso
[1] : https://twitter.com/infrabot/status/451726976794263552
2014-04-04 9:48 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I'm having
2014-04-09 13:44 GMT+02:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Chetan Mehrotra
chetan.mehro...@gmail.com wrote:
... the testcase only fetches the first result.
Is that a common use case? To better simulate a normal usage scenario
I'd make the
I'm looking into the Lucene codecs right now.
Tommaso
2014-04-09 15:20 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com:
Profiling the result shows that quite a bit of time goes in
org.apache.lucene.codecs.compressing.LZ4.decompress() (40%). This I
think is part of Lucene 4.x and not
Hi Chetan,
oak-solr-osgi should export the same packages exported by oak-solr-core, to
me the list looks good.
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-04-17 13:01 GMT+02:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
Hi Team,
As part of OAK-1741 [1] I have captured details about current exported
packages
I'll fix it, thanks.
Tommaso
2014-04-30 16:02 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com:
this can be seen in the oak-solr-core project, probably introduced by
OAK-1783
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 3:28 PM, Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de
wrote:
ignored the test for now (as far as I can see it seems to only fail on
windows)
Tommaso
2014-04-30 16:05 GMT+02:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com:
I'll fix it, thanks.
Tommaso
2014-04-30 16:02 GMT+02:00 Alex Parvulescu alex.parvule...@gmail.com:
this can be seen in the oak
the changes on
that issue have been already merged.
It doesn't fail for me locally, but I can't tell about Windows machines.
on 1.0 that test suite is not enabled therefore it should not fail :)
Tommaso
alex
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.comwrote
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
Tommaso
2014-05-11 21:39 GMT+02:00 Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org:
On 9.5.14 4:07 , Jukka Zitting wrote:
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.0
Michael
the
index via cost / index plans (but maybe that's only me), implementations
can be then adjusted accordingly if needed.
Regards,
Tommaso
[1] : http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/query.html#Native_Queries
Regards,
Thomas
On 26/05/14 10:25, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote
ok, thanks Davide for the pointers.
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-06-18 13:36 GMT+02:00 Davide Giannella giannella.dav...@gmail.com:
On 18/06/2014 10:26, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
it would be ok for me to either deprecate it or improve the semantics
of the cost calculation (e.g. explicitly introduce
Hi,
2014-06-18 13:44 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com:
Hi,
QueryIndex.getCost
my doubt is what
this heuristic function to estimate the traversed entries should look
like in general
Relational databases typically know the number of entries in the index
(total indexed entries),
Hi,
2014-06-18 16:02 GMT+02:00 Jukka Zitting jukka.zitt...@gmail.com:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:26 AM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
should we just return the number of estimated entries for the cost?
Yes, that's what I think the contract should be.
ok, that's
Hi all,
While going through some logs of a repository using Oak I did found a bunch
of warns like this:
11.07.2014 15:10:58.788 *WARN* [qtp1450933858-233]
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.jcr.session.ItemImpl Item#refresh invokes
Session#refresh!
My question is: does this pose any possible performance
I don't yet have a proper proposal, but maybe what could be done may be
something similar to what Davide has done with regards to the ordered index
(using a skiplist), that is defining a specific structure of the nodes,
together with a specific implementation, that avoids having to use sortable
+1
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-08-01 11:45 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.4 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.4/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
Hi all,
since this has been asked every now and then [1] and since I think it's a
pretty useful and common feature for search engine nowadays I'd like to
discuss introduction of facets [2] for the Oak query engine.
Pros: having facets in search results usually helps filtering (drill down)
the
think so :)
Any suggestions and / or feedback would be highly welcome, especially from
potential users of this feature so that we properly tackle your
requirements (if any).
Thanks and regards,
Tommaso
Thanks!
Laurie
On 8/25/14 7:08 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote
+1
Tommaso
2014-08-26 8:42 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.5 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.5/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
!
Laurie
On 8/25/14 7:08 AM, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi all,
since this has been asked every now and then [1] and since I think it's
a
pretty useful and common feature for search engine nowadays I'd like to
discuss introduction of facets [2] for the Oak
2014-09-23 13:31 GMT+02:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
Hi Thomas,
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Thomas Mueller muel...@adobe.com wrote:
Index plans need to be wrapped as well. If there is only one sub-index,
then it's easy: just wrap the plans from the sub-index. If there
Hi all,
in the context of Sling [1][2] I am evaluating the possibility of using the
ObservationManager#setUserData [3] as a way to signal which Sessions
generated certain events in order to filter some having specific userData.
I don't have the whole background about how userData is supported in
Tommaso,
Unfortunately Oak has only limited support for user data as it cannot
preserve commit boundaries in all cases (e.g. commits from other cluster
nodes). See also http://jackrabbit.apache.org/oak/docs/differences.html#
Observation
Michael
On 3.10.14 5:00 , Tommaso Teofili wrote:
Hi all
missed that piece of information from the linked page, where did
you get that?
Regards,
Tommaso
Can anyone more knowledgeable address that point?
Thanks,
-Rob
-Original Message-
From: Tommaso Teofili [mailto:tommaso.teof...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2014 2:32 AM
Hi Chetan,
I think no. 1 is definitely the best, also Solr doesn't support aggregation
at the moment, so it'd be a good change to do that.
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-10-08 11:17 GMT+02:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
For OAK-2119 I had modified AggregateIndex to implement
Hi Chetan,
first of all thanks for all your great work on this.
I generally agree with you that we need to be on par with JR2 in terms of
capabilities.
Looking in more detail into the index configuration what about the
following format:
indexRules : {
2014-11-05 13:42 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Marcel Reutegger mreut...@adobe.com
wrote:
the your configuration proposal we'd now have three different
places where a property can be specified:
- includePropertyNames
- properties
Hi Chetan,
overall I prefer B, but that would be not a trivial effort and it looks
like reinventing what ES (and Solr) already have in that area. However,
also given that, I think A and C would be very tricky to solve in OSGi, I
have dealt myself with this topic before 1.0 and there was no clean
Hi Chetan,
2014-11-06 10:23 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
Hi Tommaso,
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:31 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
I think A and C would be very tricky to solve in OSGi, I
have dealt myself with this topic before 1.0
Hi Chetan,
thanks for the explanation (which makes sense), I think we should go with
your latest proposal then.
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-11-06 10:29 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
Hi Tommaso,
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:18 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote
2014-11-06 10:49 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:08 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
yes, that's right, sorry I should've expanded this a bit: I personally
think we should expose all/most of Lucene configuration points
2014-11-06 11:01 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
ok for me, I'd also be happy to help as that would probably imply
exposing
Lucene classes in OSGi too, right?
Yes that would be required
2014-11-06 11:23 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
- carefully expose only those packages classes we want people to be able
to
configure: we expose ourselves to issues with semantic
2014-11-06 12:13 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm a bit skeptical not because it wouldn't work but mostly because the
correct behavior would depend on oak-lucene SPI users to read
+1 really nice and clean :)
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-11-21 9:24 GMT+01:00 Michael Dürig mdue...@apache.org:
Hi,
Oliver Walthard and Alexis Tessier donated a new logo for Oak [1]. I think
this is great news as the current one was chosen ad-hoc due to lack of any
logo.
I think we should
Hi all,
I am resurrecting this thread as I've managed to find some time to start
having a look at how to support faceting in Oak query engine.
One important thing is that I agree with Ard (and I've seen it like that
from the beginning) that since we have Lucene and Solr Oak index
implementations
Hi Chetan
sounds a good idea to me, where would you define that?
Maybe in the index definition, right?
Regards,
Tommaso
2014-12-05 10:41 GMT+01:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
Hi Team,
Currently an IndexEditor would traverse the whole repo (or subtree if
configured in non
, Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am resurrecting this thread as I've managed to find some time to start
having a look at how to support faceting in Oak query engine.
One important thing is that I agree with Ard (and I've seen it like that
from the beginning
2014-12-10 10:17 GMT+01:00 Ard Schrijvers a.schrijv...@onehippo.com:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Davide Giannella dav...@apache.org
wrote:
On 09/12/2014 17:10, Michael Marth wrote:
...
The use cases problematic case for counting the facets I have in mind
are when a query returns
Hi Chetan,
I agree index time aggregation will be probably faster but I'd like the
Solr index to be able to do both so that it's on par with the Lucene index
features. On a side note the mentioned commit would only work pre-OAK-2119
so the next step will be (I'm currently working on it) to
with my commit.
Tommaso
2014-12-20 17:39 GMT+01:00 Travis CI ju...@apache.org:
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #5068
Status: Errored
Duration: 4539 seconds
Commit: be859641155e10656e06491f921c6b3157d9c585 (trunk)
Author: Tommaso Teofili
really? that is a change in LuceneIndexEditor only for suggest and
spellcheck fields, not on fulltext or any existing one ...
Regards,
Tommaso
2015-02-04 15:26 GMT+01:00 Julian Reschke julian.resc...@greenbytes.de:
On 2015-02-04 14:09, tomm...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tommaso
Date: Wed Feb
I see now, it's a problem in the xpath.txt query template that I forgot to
update when adding OAK-2455 support rep:suggest queries in xpath.
It's fixed as of r1657265.
Regards,
Tommaso
2015-02-04 15:33 GMT+01:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com:
really? that is a change
:00 Travis CI ju...@apache.org:
Build Update for apache/jackrabbit-oak
-
Build: #5106
Status: Errored
Duration: 6192 seconds
Commit: 6b1a872a3d7e4cc011f49f926fc3966da0226694 (trunk)
Author: Tommaso Teofili
Message: OAK-2425 - default solr server provider
thanks guys.
@Chetan right, it's on my todo list to remove such guards soon, as I had
already realized it's not much helpful in most of the cases.
@Julian I'll look for the non ASCII char (no idea how it got into the
commit though...).
Regards,
Tommaso
2015-02-19 11:30 GMT+01:00 Julian Reschke
ahahahah, you got me Julian!
2015-01-30 16:04 GMT+01:00 Julian Reschke julian.resc...@gmx.de:
On 2015-01-30 15:53, tomm...@apache.org wrote:
Author: tommaso
Date: Fri Jan 30 14:53:31 2015
New Revision: 1656033
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1656033
Log:
OAK-2175 - typo in javadoc
Sure, it'd be also good if we could make use of such generic config not
only in Lucene index, as we kind of have the same requirement and need for
Solr index (and possibly other full text ones).
Would it be possible ?
I'm starting to wonder if we may need to create an additional artifact
Hi Chetan,
there are 2 things at play there I think.
First thing is that for testing purposes the suggester was configured to be
updated upon each commit [1], the other thing, which is a bug, is that the
code you mentioned [2] should actually check if the the useInSuggest
property is set before
I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2611 to track the
mentioned issue.
Regards,
Tommaso
2015-03-12 9:36 GMT+01:00 Tommaso Teofili tommaso.teof...@gmail.com:
Hi Chetan,
there are 2 things at play there I think.
First thing is that for testing purposes the suggester
:
Thanks Tommaso!. Let see how the next build runs
http://ci.apache.org/builders/oak-trunk/builds/1144
Chetan Mehrotra
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:36 PM, Tommaso Teofili
tommaso.teof...@gmail.com wrote:
I've created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-2611 to track the
mentioned
Hi all,
as part of OAK-2476 [1] we've setup ASF Jenkins with a matrix of jobs to
better test Oak.
Currently we provide unit, pedantic and integration tests on JDK 1.6, 1.7
and 1.8 running on both Windows and Linux (Ubuntu).
The Windows machines seem to have run out of disk space (or at least
+1
Tommaso
2015-03-31 12:48 GMT+02:00 Chetan Mehrotra chetan.mehro...@gmail.com:
Hi Team,
CopyOnRead feature was provided as part of 1.0.9 release and has been in
used in quite a few customer deployment. Of late we have to recommend to
enable this setting on most of the deployments where
please welcome: Jenkins notifications ;-)
Tommaso
2015-03-27 1:06 GMT+01:00 Apache Jenkins Server jenk...@builds.apache.org:
See
https://builds.apache.org/job/Apache%20Jackrabbit%20Oak%20matrix/jdk=jdk-1.6u45,label=Ubuntu,nsfixtures=SEGMENT_MK,profile=unittesting/61/
Hi Davide, all,
OAK-2175 and OAK-2176 have high priority for me, I think I can close one of
them until monday, but would probably require 1-2 days more to close the
other, so I wonder: is it possible to move the release to Wednesday? (in
case I finish early I will let you know here)
Regards,
1 - 100 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
