[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.62.0
with
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.6.3
[INFO] OS name: "linux", version: "6.1.0-1035-oem", arch: "amd64", family:
"unix"
[INFO] Java version: 11.0.22, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64
[INFO] MAVEN_OPTS:
[INFO]
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.19
with
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.6.3
[INFO] OS name: "linux", version: "6.1.0-1035-oem", arch: "amd64", family:
"unix"
[INFO] Java version: 11.0.22, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64
[INFO] MAVEN_OPTS:
[INFO]
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.60.0
with
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.6.3
[INFO] OS name: "linux", version: "6.1.0-1025-oem", arch: "amd64", family:
"unix"
[INFO] Java version: 11.0.21, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64
[INFO] MAVEN_OPTS:
[INFO]
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.18
with
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.6.3
[INFO] OS name: "linux", version: "6.1.0-1025-oem", arch: "amd64", family:
"unix"
[INFO] Java version: 11.0.20.1, vendor: Ubuntu, runtime:
/usr/lib/jvm/java-11-openjdk-amd64
[INFO] MAVEN_OPTS:
[INFO]
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.58.0
with
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.9.2 (c9616018c7a021c1c39be70fb2843d6f5f9b8a1c)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 11", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family:
"windows"
[INFO] Java version: 11.0.18, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
D:\java\jdk-11
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.17
with
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.9.2 (c9616018c7a021c1c39be70fb2843d6f5f9b8a1c)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 11", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family:
"windows"
[INFO] Java version: 11.0.18, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
D:\java\jdk-11
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.56.0
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.9.2 (c9616018c7a021c1c39be70fb2843d6f5f9b8a1c)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 11", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family:
"windows"
[INFO] Java version: 11.0.18, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
D:\java\jdk-11
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.54.0
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.9.2 (c9616018c7a021c1c39be70fb2843d6f5f9b8a1c)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 11", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family:
"windows"
[INFO] Java version: 11.0.18, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
D:\java\jdk-11
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.16
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.9.2 (c9616018c7a021c1c39be70fb2843d6f5f9b8a1c)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 11", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family:
"windows"
[INFO] Java version: 11.0.18, vendor: Oracle Corporation, runtime:
Hi Balamir,
That's https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-10166.
It's actually not quite clear if that's a bug on the server side. I think
it is, but as you can see in the comments, Julian seems to think that
rewriting lock tokens is not allowed for clients. I do not see that from
looking
Hi Balamir,
that should be possible. Maybe this is helpful:
https://lists.apache.org/thread/crcnrz2xhzvbtxxczxb4d5tnw1j309n4.
Regards,
Manfred
Am Mo., 3. Juli 2023 um 13:50 Uhr schrieb Balamir Kodak <
balamir.ko...@gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> There is a web application named oak-webapp in
Hi Thomas, Hi list,
We have a problem with a standalone Oak repository using Solr indexing
where the async reindexing did not run for a long time while huge
imports have been made. Now an indexing run would require days and the
instance always crashes before it can finish. Now the idea is to
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.26.0
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
[INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_221, vendor: Oracle Corporation
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.26
with
[INFO]
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch:
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.22.1
...where...
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
[INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_221, vendor: Oracle
+1
On 12/6/2019 2:07 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
That is, 1.10.* (and earlier) would contain the old
API (and not deprecate it), 1.26.0 (and later) would only contain the
new API.
I don't believe that's acceptable.
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.10.2
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family:
"dos"
[INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_162, vendor: Oracle
Hi,
This fix allows external identifiers for LDAP principals to be created
from custom attributes, not just from the LDAP DN. Since the DN may
change and rep:externalId is a protected property, this is necessary.
Best regards,
Manfred
+1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.9.7
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
[INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_162, vendor: Oracle Corporation
the component and metatype descriptors. I will
run more tests tomorrow.
On Tue, 7 Aug 2018 at 19:56, Manfred Baedke <mailto:manfred.bae...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Francesco,
I think that you don't want to make this a factory component but
instead
you want to use
Hi Francesco,
I think that you don't want to make this a factory component but instead
you want to use a factory configuration (the difference being a
component lifecycle control thing, if I got that right - ask a real OSGi
expert :)). Just try dropping the factory attribute from the
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.6. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:Release
Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hi,
The vote passes as follows:
+1 Manfred Baedke
+1 Matt Ryan
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Vikas Saurabh
+1 Alex Deparvu
+1 Robert Munteanu
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
Best regards,
Manfred
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.6
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
[INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_162, vendor: Oracle
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.6 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.8.6/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.8.6/
The SHA1 checksum of the
.
--Vikas
(sent from mobile)
On Fri 27 Jul, 2018, 01:22 Manfred Baedke, wrote:
Hi all,
Oak 1.8.6 is scheduled for release on next Monday. If there are no
reported issues, it's planned to skip that release, so if you have any
issues, please report them by Monday.
Best regards,
Manfred
Hi all,
Oak 1.8.6 is scheduled for release on next Monday. If there are no
reported issues, it's planned to skip that release, so if you have any
issues, please report them by Monday.
Best regards,
Manfred
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.5
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
[INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_162, vendor: Oracle
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.9.5
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
[INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_162, vendor: Oracle
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.22. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.22
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
[INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_45, vendor: Oracle
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.22 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.4.22/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.4.22/
The SHA1 checksum of the
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.9.4
...where...
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
[INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_45, vendor: Oracle
[x] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.12
...where...
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family:
"windows"
[INFO] Java version: 1.7.0_79, vendor:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.12 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.6.12/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.6.12/
The SHA1 checksum of the
Hello team,
I'm planning to cut Oak 1.6.12 on Monday 2018-05-28.
If there are any objections please let me know. Otherwise I will
re-schedule any non-resolved issue for the next iteration.
Best regards,
Manfred
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.9.0
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM warning: ignoring option
MaxPermSize=1024m; support was removed in 8.0
[INFO] OS name: "windows
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hi,
The vote passes as follows:
+1 Manfred Baedke
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Alex Deparvu
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
Best regards,
Manfred
On 3/27/2018 4:21 PM, Manfred Baedke wrote:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.21 release is available at:
https
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.21
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family:
"windows"
[INFO] Java version: 1.7.0_79, vendor: Oracle
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.21 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.4.21/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.4.21/
The SHA1 checksum of the
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hi,
The vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Manfred Baedke
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Amit Jain
+1 Davide Giannella
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
Best regards,
Manfred
On 3/20/2018 6:07 PM, Manfred Baedke wrote:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.42 release
Hi,
The vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Manfred Baedke
+1 Marcel Reutegger
+1 Amit Jain
+1 Davide Giannella
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
Best regards,
Manfred
On 3/20/2018 6:07 PM, Manfred Baedke wrote:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.42 release
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.42
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family:
"windows"
[INFO] Java version: 1.7.0_79, vendor: Oracle
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.42 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.42/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.42/
The SHA1 checksum of the
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak --
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Manfred Baedke
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Alex Deparvu
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Andrei Ducleanu
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
Regards,
Manfred
Hello Team,
the vote passes as follows:
+1 Manfred Baedke
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Alex Deparvu
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Andrei Ducleanu
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
Regards,
Manfred
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.20
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 8.1", version: "6.3", arch: "amd64", family:
"windows"
[INFO] Java version: 1.7.0_79, vendor: Oracle
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.4.20 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.4.20/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.4.20/
The SHA1 checksum of the
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.6.9
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
[INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_162, vendor: Oracle
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.8.2
where
[INFO] Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5;
2015-11-10T17:41:47+01:00)
[INFO] OS name: "windows 10", version: "10.0", arch: "amd64", family: "dos"
[INFO] Java version: 1.8.0_144, vendor: Oracle
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.41. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this released:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak
Hi,
The vote passes as follows:
+1 Alex Deparvu
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Andrei Dulceanu
+1 Davide Giannella
+1 Manfred Baedke
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
Regards,
Manfred
[X] +1 Release this package as Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.41
Best regards,
Manfred
On 1/19/2018 2:15 PM, Manfred Baedke wrote:
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.41 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.41/
The release candidate is a zip
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.41 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.41/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.41/
The SHA1 checksum of the
+1
On 1/18/2018 11:08 AM, Davide Giannella wrote:
On 18/01/2018 05:56, Julian Reschke wrote:
So I believe this is fixed now - should we attempt a new release?
+1 as 1.0.40 won't be usable in OSGi environment.
D.
The Apache Jackrabbit community is pleased to announce the release of
Apache Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.39. The release is available for download at:
http://jackrabbit.apache.org/downloads.html
See the full release notes below for details about this release:
Release Notes -- Apache Jackrabbit Oak
Hi,
While working through the Jackrabbit release cookbook, I got stuck here:
* close all the issues included in the release: Jira Project Home ->
Change Log -> Choose the released version. From the issue list you
have the option to bulk update all of the included issues. Just
Hi,
The vote passes as follows:
+1 Julian Reschke
+1 Andrei Dulceanu
+1 Amit Jain
+1 Robert Munteanu
Thanks for voting. I'll push the release out.
Best regards,
Manfred
A candidate for the Jackrabbit Oak 1.0.39 release is available at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jackrabbit/oak/1.0.39/
The release candidate is a zip archive of the sources in:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jackrabbit/oak/tags/jackrabbit-oak-1.0.39/
The SHA1 checksum of the
Hi,
I'd like to cut Oak 1.0.39 tomorrow.
The list of open issues scheduled for 1.0.39 is empty (after moving some
old Hudson test failure issues to 1.0.40):
hi
and what do we gain with that? except for the fact that api consumers have
to create an Principal instance from a name?
not sure if that makes sense... i'd rather just clarify the API contract
in the javadoc.
angela
You're right. I didn't realize that the intended overload would have the
On 4/4/2017 2:32 PM, Davide Giannella wrote:
On 04/04/2017 11:05, Manfred Baedke wrote:
Yes, but now we'd break all existing implementations.
True. We could though, create an overload that receives the principal
and deprecate the other method for the 1.8 timeframe. By 1.10 we delete
Yes, but now we'd break all existing implementations.
On 4/4/2017 11:09 AM, Davide Giannella wrote:
On 03/04/2017 15:49, Michael Dürig wrote:
Confirmed, this is principle name. At least this is what it was built
for in Jackrabbit 2. The string passed is escaped vis
principals
I would expect it to be a principal name, which in the default
implementation just can be any string value.
Kind regards
Angela
On 03/04/17 16:14, "Manfred Baedke" <manfred.bae...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi all,
Can anyone clarify the contra
Hi all,
Can anyone clarify the contract of the method
org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.QueryBuilder.impersonate(String
name)?
According to the JavaDoc, the parameter is the "name of an
authorizable". But the interface
org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Authorizable doesn't have a
Hi all,
Can anyone clarify the contract of the method
org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.QueryBuilder.impersonate(String
name)?
According to the JavaDoc, the parameter is the "name of an
authorizable". But the interface
org.apache.jackrabbit.api.security.user.Authorizable doesn't have a
Hi,
We need to get rid of the RC dependency to
org.apache.directory.api.api-all anyway. Note that this is not a test
dependency and we've been shipping with milestone dependencies since day
one.
Best regards,
Manfred
On 12/21/2016 5:19 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi
Re transient
Hi Davide, Angela,
Note that this is not an issue with oak-auth-ldap, but rather with
oak-auth-external.
The ExternalIdentity implementation used by oak-auth-ldap uses the DN as
both the id and the principal name, so it's working fine. Other
implementations of the external auth mechanism
Oliver voted +1 for oak-segment-tar. :)
On 4/28/2016 1:43 PM, Francesco Mari wrote:
Hi Oliver,
If I understand your mail correctly, you gave a -1 to every proposed
option. Can you be a little bit more constructive about your approach, or
explain the message that is evidently hidden in your
Hi Francesco,
Your tests ran out of the box in my IDE (IntelliJ IDEA 15) using a local
Postgres 9.3.
Best regards,
Manfred
On 3/23/2016 8:27 AM, Ancona Francesco wrote:
Hello,
any news about question ?
Thanks in advance,
best regards
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Ancona Francesco
Hi Francesco,
Or could you point out the unit test in oak source code, can we use ?
A natural starting point is
org.apache.jackrabbit.oak.plugins.document.rbd.RDBDocumentStoreTest in
oak-core.
Best regards,
Manfred
On 3/2/2016 12:45 PM, Ancona Francesco wrote:
I’m not authorized to
e guesses, but I thought it might help.
Regards
Julian
On Monday, February 15, 2016, Davide Giannella <dav...@apache.org> wrote:
On 12/02/2016 18:36, Manfred Baedke wrote:
Hi,
This is due to change 1721196 (associated with JCR-2633), which
changes the persistent data model. Prob
Hi,
This is due to change 1721196 (associated with JCR-2633), which changes
the persistent data model. Probably the test has just to be tweaked
accordingly, I'll look into it during WE.
Best regards,
Manfred
On 2/12/2016 5:50 PM, Davide Giannella wrote:
On 12/02/2016 16:39, Julian Reschke
Whatever the long term solution will be: we need a short term solution
that doesn't kill an entire application server, so +1.
On 09.09.15 14:12, Stefan Egli wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to follow up on the idea to restart DocumentNodeStore as a result
> of a lease failure [0]: I suggest we don't
cba
Am 28. August 2015 02:36:27 GMT-04:00, schrieb Thomas Mueller
muel...@adobe.com:
Hi,
I wonder what does the team think about using final for variables and
parameters. In Oak, so far we didn't use it a lot. This question has
come up with OAK-3148. The patch uses final for variables, but not
:
On 22/08/2015 19:59, Manfred Baedke wrote:
Hi,
OAK-3169 caused inconsistencies that currently have to be repaired
manually, even after a patch has been applied. Since lots of customers
are suffering from this, Andrew Khoury suggested to implement an
optional auto-repair feature, which logs a warning
Hi,
OAK-3169 caused inconsistencies that currently have to be repaired
manually, even after a patch has been applied. Since lots of customers
are suffering from this, Andrew Khoury suggested to implement an
optional auto-repair feature, which logs a warning and removes and
re-adds
Hi Michael, Chetan,
I absolutely agree that this code has to improve. Before the change it read
if (blob instanceof BlobStoreBlob) {
return blob.getBlobId();
}
which is just as broken in IMHO and failed to write blobs in Oak2Oak
migration scenarios.
I would consider to blob stores
To elaborate on that: If the current design is assuming exactly one
BlobStore instance per NodeStore instance, the new code does the right
thing - verifying that the BlobStoreBlob in question comes from this
very instance. It shouldn't use equals(), though.
On 22.07.15 14:33, Manfred Baedke
A test case will come.
Isn't the current design assuming that there is exactly one BlobStore
per NodeStore (rather than a real singleton)?
On 22.07.15 13:54, Chetan Mehrotra wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 4:33 PM, Manfred Baedke
manfred.bae...@gmail.com wrote:
which is just as broken in IMHO
Thanks Michael, I didn't know.
On 17.07.15 10:27, Michael Dürig wrote:
On 15.7.15 11:41 , bae...@apache.org wrote:
Author: baedke
Date: Wed Jul 15 21:41:03 2015
New Revision: 1691280
URL:http://svn.apache.org/r1691280
Log:
OAK-2619: Repeated upgrades
Added support for incremental upgrades.
85 matches
Mail list logo