Oliver voted +1 for oak-segment-tar. :)
On 4/28/2016 1:43 PM, Francesco Mari wrote:
Hi Oliver,
If I understand your mail correctly, you gave a -1 to every proposed
option. Can you be a little bit more constructive about your approach, or
explain the message that is evidently hidden in your email?
Regards,
Francesco
2016-04-28 11:43 GMT+02:00 Oliver Lietz <[email protected]>:
On Monday 25 April 2016 16:46:45 Michael Dürig wrote:
Hi,
There is a couple of names that came up in the discussion [1]:
oak-local-store
oak-segment-file
oak-embedded-store
oak-segment-store
oak-segment-tar
oak-segment-next
Please vote which of the above six options you would like to see as the
final name for oak-segment-next [2]:
Put +1 next to those names that you favour, put -1 to veto names and
remove the remaining names. Please justify any veto as otherwise it is
non binding.
The name with the most +1 votes and without any -1 vote will be chosen.
oak-local-store -1
oak-segment-file -1
oak-embedded-store -1
oak-segment-store -1
oak-segment-tar +1
oak-segment-next -1
Regards,
O.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours.
Michael
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/ktk7szjxtucpqd2o
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4245
