Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Paul Dreik wrote: > On 2012-07-03 11:04, Michael Goffioul wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Paul Dreik > > wrote: > > > > On 2012-06-25 10:58, c. wrote: > > > P.S. I think there might be a typo in tis line of sockets.cc

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On 2012-07-03 11:04, Michael Goffioul wrote: > On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Paul Dreik > wrote: > > On 2012-06-25 10:58, c. wrote: > > P.S. I think there might be a typo in tis line of sockets.cc: > > > > DEFUNX_DLD ( "AF_LOCAL", FAFL_OCAL, FSAF_LOCAL

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Paul Dreik wrote: > On 2012-06-25 10:58, c. wrote: > > P.S. I think there might be a typo in tis line of sockets.cc: > > > > DEFUNX_DLD ( "AF_LOCAL", FAFL_OCAL, FSAF_LOCAL, args, nargout, "socket > constant" ) > > { error( "AF_LOCAL address family not supported on

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On 2012-06-25 10:58, c. wrote: > P.S. I think there might be a typo in tis line of sockets.cc: > > DEFUNX_DLD ( "AF_LOCAL", FAFL_OCAL, FSAF_LOCAL, args, nargout, "socket > constant" ) > { error( "AF_LOCAL address family not supported on this platform" ); return > octave_value(); }; > > > shoul

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On 25 Jun 2012, at 10:11, Paul Dreik wrote: > The discussion I referred to is here: > http://gnu-octave-repository.2306053.n4.nabble.com/Sockets-error-td3981398.html#a3981400 > > Paul Thanks for the pointer, I'll have a look this evening to see whether there is another way to keep backward com

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On 2012-06-24 23:52, c. wrote: > > On 24 Jun 2012, at 23:05, Paul Dreik wrote: > >> #if MAJORVERSION==3 && MINORVERSION<2 >> # define DEFUN_DLD_SOCKET_CONSTANT(name, help )\ >> DEFUNX_DLD ( #name, F ## name, FS ## name, args, nargout, help)\ >> {return octave_value( name

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On 24 Jun 2012, at 23:05, Paul Dreik wrote: > #if MAJORVERSION==3 && MINORVERSION<2 > # define DEFUN_DLD_SOCKET_CONSTANT(name, help )\ > DEFUNX_DLD ( #name, F ## name, FS ## name, args, nargout, help)\ > {return octave_value( name ); }; > #else > # def

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

2012-06-24 21:02, Mike Miller skrev: > On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Rafael Laboissiere > wrote: >> * Paul Dreik [2012-06-24 11:44]: >> >>> However, I am glad to simplify the existing solution while at the same >>> time avoiding dependencies on awk or gsed. Is "word" GNU make specific? >>> I d

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

2012-06-24 14:31, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso skrev: > On 24 June 2012 05:44, Paul Dreik wrote: > >> A good example on how to handle version comparisons is how boost does >> it, see the BOOST_VERSION macro description on >> http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_0/libs/config/doc/html/boost_config/boost_m

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Paul Dreik [2012-06-24 11:44]: > >> However, I am glad to simplify the existing solution while at the same >> time avoiding dependencies on awk or gsed. Is "word" GNU make specific? >> I did not see any note about it in the manual, bu

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

* Paul Dreik [2012-06-24 11:44]: > However, I am glad to simplify the existing solution while at the same > time avoiding dependencies on awk or gsed. Is "word" GNU make specific? > I did not see any note about it in the manual, but I did not check > thoroughly. > In the meanwhile, I have changed

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On 06/24/2012 04:44 AM, Paul Dreik wrote: > However, I am glad to simplify the existing solution while at the same > time avoiding dependencies on awk or gsed. Is "word" GNU make specific? > I did not see any note about it in the manual, but I did not check > thoroughly. Yes, I think "word" is GN

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On 24 June 2012 05:44, Paul Dreik wrote: > A good example on how to handle version comparisons is how boost does > it, see the BOOST_VERSION macro description on > http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_46_0/libs/config/doc/html/boost_config/boost_macro_reference.html#boost_config.boost_macro_reference.

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

2012-06-23 21:23, Stephen Montgomery-Smith skrev: > On 06/23/2012 02:38 AM, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: >> * Stephen Montgomery-Smith [2012-06-21 19:59]: >> >>> I was looking at the Makefile, and it had some comments asking for >>> suggestions for how to extract the version numbers of octave. >>> >>

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On 06/23/2012 02:38 AM, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: > * Stephen Montgomery-Smith [2012-06-21 19:59]: > >> I was looking at the Makefile, and it had some comments asking for >> suggestions for how to extract the version numbers of octave. >> >> How about: >> >> majorversion := $(shell mkoctfile --ver

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

* Stephen Montgomery-Smith [2012-06-21 19:59]: > I was looking at the Makefile, and it had some comments asking for > suggestions for how to extract the version numbers of octave. > > How about: > > majorversion := $(shell mkoctfile --version 2>&1 \ > | awk -F '[. ]' '{print $$3}') > minorvers

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

I was looking at the Makefile, and it had some comments asking for suggestions for how to extract the version numbers of octave. How about: majorversion := $(shell mkoctfile --version 2>&1 \ | awk -F '[. ]' '{print $$3}') minorversion := $(shell mkoctfile --version 2>&1 \ | awk -F '[. ]' '{print

Re: [OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

On 21 June 2012 10:48, Paul Dreik wrote: > I have now released 1.0.8, please upload! Done. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has chang

[OctDev] sockets 1.0.8 released

>>> I took the freedom to update the documentation strings and bump the >>> version to 1.0.8 at the same time. >> >> Please go ahead as this package has no package maintainer. I can see >> that you have been contributing to this package. Would you be be >> interested on taking up its maintenance?