Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-09-04 Thread Sebastian Elsner
No to both. Am 04.09.2013 00:24, schrieb Larry Gritz: Two more questions: Is anybody still using Python = 2.5? Does anybody legitimately care about Python 3.x? On Aug 27, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Larry Gritz wrote: I won't hold you to this. And I'm not planning any immediate changes. But

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-09-04 Thread Jonathan Gibbs
A rough guess at the minimums. These are generally determined by what old version of third party tools we're still building for: Compiler - icc 11.1+, gcc 4.5+ Boost: 1.46.1+ OpenEXR: 1.7.1+ Python 2.x: 2.6+ Python 3.x: nope --jono On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Larry Gritz

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-09-04 Thread Chris Foster
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:06 AM, Larry Gritz l...@larrygritz.com wrote: I should have clarified that I'm talking strictly about OIIO internals -- for link compatibility with apps that must use older compilers, I was not really considering using any newfangled things in the public APIs. Note

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-09-03 Thread Larry Gritz
Two more questions: Is anybody still using Python = 2.5? Does anybody legitimately care about Python 3.x? On Aug 27, 2013, at 5:40 PM, Larry Gritz wrote: I won't hold you to this. And I'm not planning any immediate changes. But thinking about where we are going with toolchain

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-09-03 Thread Larry Gritz
Don't panic. From these responses, it's clear that we can't really make much use of C++11 features for a while, too many people are stuck on old compilers. I should have clarified that I'm talking strictly about OIIO internals -- for link compatibility with apps that must use older compilers, I

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-09-03 Thread Daniel Wexler
XCode 4.5+ (for iOS+ARMv7) Boost: Whatever compiles on iOS is fine, currently 1.44 On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Larry Gritz l...@larrygritz.com wrote: Don't panic. From these responses, it's clear that we can't really make much use of C++11 features for a while, too many people are stuck

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-09-02 Thread Kevin Wheatley
For some plugin work we're at the choice of vendors, which means gcc 4.1.x (Nuke/Maya/etc) on Linux :-( Luckily we're only using OIIO standalone so for that we're 4.6.1 currently, OSX is 4.2.1. Windows is VS2010. Boost wise we're 1.47 - probably because nobody tried building a newer one in some

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-08-28 Thread Sebastian Elsner
Am 28.08.2013 02:40, schrieb Larry Gritz: I won't hold you to this. And I'm not planning any immediate changes. But thinking about where we are going with toolchain dependencies, coding standards, and how conservative we need to be about newer C++ features... Think ahead to where you or

[Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-08-27 Thread Larry Gritz
I won't hold you to this. And I'm not planning any immediate changes. But thinking about where we are going with toolchain dependencies, coding standards, and how conservative we need to be about newer C++ features... Think ahead to where you or your facility will likely be in, say, January

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-08-27 Thread Richard Shaw
Just checked a fully updated EL6 system and it's still at GCC 4.4... Since it has a 7 year support period, I don't expect that to change anytime soon. Richard ___ Oiio-dev mailing list Oiio-dev@lists.openimageio.org

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-08-27 Thread Pete Black
Default compiler on OS X Snow Leopard is gcc 4.2, I compile OIIO on my mac laptop and would ideally like to continue doing so. -Pete On 28/08/2013, at 1:07 PM, Richard Shaw hobbes1...@gmail.com wrote: Just checked a fully updated EL6 system and it's still at GCC 4.4... Since it has a 7

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-08-27 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:11 PM, Pete Black pbl...@parkroad.co.nz wrote: Default compiler on OS X Snow Leopard is gcc 4.2, I compile OIIO on my mac laptop and would ideally like to continue doing so. Interesting... I wouldn't think anything would be behind EL... Richard

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-08-27 Thread Pete Black
Admittedly, I am way behind what the cool kids are running with their Mountain Lions and Mavericks or whatever the new hotness is. On the Linux side the only compiler version particularly relevant to my work would be (from Ubuntu 12.04 LTS) GCC 4.6 -Pete On 28/08/2013, at 1:17 PM, Richard

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-08-27 Thread Richard Shaw
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 8:24 PM, Pete Black pbl...@parkroad.co.nz wrote: Admittedly, I am way behind what the cool kids are running with their Mountain Lions and Mavericks or whatever the new hotness is. On the Linux side the only compiler version particularly relevant to my work would be

Re: [Oiio-dev] Poll -- C++ compilers

2013-08-27 Thread Brecht Van Lommel
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 2:40 AM, Larry Gritz l...@larrygritz.com wrote: I won't hold you to this. And I'm not planning any immediate changes. But thinking about where we are going with toolchain dependencies, coding standards, and how conservative we need to be about newer C++ features...