Re: [onap-discuss] Importance of common auth service in this release

2017-09-08 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
Kanagaraj, we started collecting none functional requirements for the next release here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/R2+proposals+for+Non-functional+requirements so they can be prioritized. Could you document your suggestion there? I do agree that our authentication/authorization setup

Re: [onap-discuss] M2 Functionality Frezee feedback request

2017-08-10 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
Can we discuss below? I agree with Catherine if we want to have the code stubs in place by M2 we will have a DETAILED functional design freeze milestone before M2. Having both on the same day makes little sense to me too. To late to worry about this for r1 (will just push trough and adjust as

[onap-discuss] Versioning for Amsterdam

2017-07-19 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
On the OOM call the question of versioning came up and as this is a larger issue across projects David and I decided to bring it up with the larger community. I know we have discussed this before but I am not sure we made a final decision for Amsterdam (sorry if there was a decision I missed

[onap-discuss] Use Case Subcommittee Flow

2017-06-19 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
Based on the discussion in the subcommittee meeting my understanding on how use cases get worked from the beginning to the end is like follow: 1. Use case subcommittee discuses new use cases 2. Use case subcommittee gets feedback from community including integration team on feasibility 3.

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: Re: Updated Invitation: ONAP Project Tech LeadTraining @ Wed Jun 14, 2017 5pm - 6pm (PDT) (onap-discuss@lists.onap.org)

2017-06-15 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
Recording is here: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Presentations Oliver On Jun 15, 2017, at 9:19 PM, fu.guangr...@zte.com.cn wrote: Hi Kenny, It seems that the meeting time has been modified for many times which led me to miss the meeting eventually (the

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Tentative July ONAP Developers Face-to-Face Meeting

2017-06-12 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
That’s not how I took the poll. I thought the question was “if it was decided that there was a meeting these would be possible days that work”. I am wondering if we could make this a regional/virtual meeting. E.g. AT and a good number of the other ONAP members have quite elaborate

Re: [onap-discuss] 答复: Question on VID

2017-06-05 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
Just to highlight the current architecture in the seed code. There is the portal (which has a project). It’s the framework for all GUI’s in the seed code. All GUI’s in the seed code are applications which plug into the portal. This allows for a common authorization/authentication, looks and

Re: [onap-discuss] [onap-tsc] Call for vCPE VNFs proposals

2017-06-01 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
Could we also start listing who is supporting the open source VNFs? E.g. even the simple open source based VNFs we are using for the current ONAP demo based on the seed code took a couple of people 2 months or so to get to work properly in the integration environment. I would assume that for

Re: [onap-discuss] Staging repo in settings.xml

2017-05-26 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
Would have to talk to all the teams to get the details but I think most artifacts need to be locked down. Please remember that since we created the 1.0.0 branch we have been contributing code based on two additional internal releases into the seed repos. This new code base has not been fully

Re: [onap-discuss] Staging repo in settings.xml

2017-05-24 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
> On May 24, 2017, at 10:54 AM EDT, Gary Wu wrote: > > 3) I understand that all the staging process was meant to be temporary, and > to add on Gary’s last question, what is the plan moving forward and how could > we contribute to that effort ? I think that’s a TSC

Re: [onap-discuss] ONAP Algorithms Integration

2017-05-11 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
You could. At one point we even managed to wrap R into CDAP but I am not sure writing the shim layer didn’t take 10 times more work then it would have taken to rewrite the analytics…. . Just my personal opinion. So if you think it’s worth it go for it. Oliver On May 11, 2017, at 11:03 AM,

[onap-discuss] May F2F Calendar

2017-04-24 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
May 4th we will still have a regular agenda going on. So you will be competing with the main program which means the key players might be missing. May 5th is the free for all day. Oliver On Apr 24, 2017, at 5:14 PM, ROSE, DANIEL V mailto:dr695h at att.com>> wrote: ***Security Advisory: This

[onap-discuss] ONAP Intro Webinar

2017-04-21 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
As requested we will have a 2 hour webinar next week. It will provide an introduction into ONAP roughly at the same level as in Brian?s tutorial or the Hackathon at ONS. So if you saw those or if you look at the code or already onboarded a VNF this is probably not for you. It is intended to

[onap-discuss] F2F in May: Tutorial or Deep Dive On Tue am.

2017-04-20 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
, > > Thanks, > > On 2017-04-19, 9:08 AM, "onap-discuss-bounces at lists.onap.org on behalf of > SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)" behalf of spatsch at research.att.com> wrote: > > >If there is sufficient interest we can offer a Tutorial and/or a Dee

[onap-discuss] Support ONAP on multiple OS/Openstacks?

2017-04-20 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
Dhananjay, I think there are two dimensions ONAP can be improved in this regard. 1. Multi cloud support: To support multiple cloud technologies we not only have to modify the startup automation (heat template) but also adjust the components which work directly with the cloud orchestrator

[onap-discuss] F2F in May: Tutorial or Deep Dive On Tue am.

2017-04-19 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
If there is sufficient interest we can offer a Tutorial and/or a Deep Dive session on Tue morning (5/2) before the F2F meeting officially begins. To decided if there is sufficient interest I created a doodle poll: https://doodle.com/poll/h8q9uipum694hcw6 please only select one of the two

[onap-discuss] Request for new repos for child projects under AAI

2017-04-19 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
I think those are two separate questions (also not sure if you are both using the term micro service with the same meaning. There are many definitions ?. ) Huabing, I think you are racing the good question if we should agree on a homogenous approach to micro services in ONAP. I think that?s a

[onap-discuss] Upgrade from ODL Beryllium to Boron

2017-04-06 Thread SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER)
only patches with well defined scope will be pushed? Thanks, Alexis On Apr 6, 2017, at 4:45 PM, SPATSCHECK, OLIVER (OLIVER) mailto:spatsch at research.att.com>> wrote: I think there are two phases to this. We have explained this before but I am not sure if everybody has heard this. The curre