Comment In line:
>>>KP
Thanks!
-kenny
From: on behalf of Jason Hunt
Date: Monday, July 2, 2018 at 7:04 AM
To: Lingli Deng
Cc: "'GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)'" ,
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Attendance requirements - discussion
Thanks for everyone
ZIN E)' ;
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Attendance requirements - discussion
Thanks for everyone's feedback. It's nice to have a healthy discussion on
this. A couple questions/comments:
- Mazin, can you please clarify which option you were in favor of?
- In
Regards,
Jason Hunt
Distinguished Engineer, IBM
Phone: 314-749-7422
Email: djh...@us.ibm.com
Twitter: @DJHunt
From: "Lingli Deng"
To: , "'GILBERT, MAZIN E \(MAZIN E\)'"
Cc:
Date: 07/01/2018 10:42 PM
Subject:Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Attendance requir
Hi Mazin and all,
See my inline comments below.
Lingli
From: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Jason
Ryberg via Lists.Onap.Org
Sent: 2018年7月2日 10:30
To: GILBERT, MAZIN E (MAZIN E)
Cc: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] TSC Attendance requirements - discussion
ne 28, 2018 6:31 PM
To: onap-tsc mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-tsc] TSC Attendance requirements - discussion
Hi Everyone,
To follow-up on today's discussion around TSC requirements, I wanted to share
the survey results, examples from other communities, other conside
gards,
Steve.
From: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>
mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Jason
Hunt
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 6:31 PM
To: onap-tsc mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [onap-tsc] TSC Attendance requirements - discu
quot;
Best Regards,
Steve.
From: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
On Behalf Of Jason Hunt
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 6:31 PM
To: onap-tsc
Subject: [onap-tsc] TSC Attendance requirements - discussion
Hi Everyone,
To follow-up on today's discussion around TSC requirements, I wanted to share the
ting."
Best Regards,
Steve.
From: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org On Behalf Of Jason Hunt
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 6:31 PM
To: onap-tsc
Subject: [onap-tsc] TSC Attendance requirements - discussion
Hi Everyone,
To follow-up on today's discussion around TSC requirements, I wanted to share
Hello
I agree with the proposal
If we want to include the email vote, I would propose to replace" two (2)
consecutive meetings" by 2 consecutive events (TSC meetings and email vote)."
We can get an observation period for the next 3 months to detect is there is a
problem for the quorum and sol
Hi Everyone,
To follow-up on today's discussion around TSC requirements, I wanted to
share the survey results, examples from other communities, other
considerations, and a strawman proposal.
Survey Results
The survey results on this topic can be found on slides 3-7 of this
presentation:
http
10 matches
Mail list logo
