Raphael,
Very cool! We should do this in the other parts. I'll check tonight unless
someone else does it.
I like the look of the DE site.
Regards,
Dave
On Aug 22, 2011, at 7:57 AM, rbirc...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rbircher
Date: Mon Aug 22 14:57:21 2011
New Revision: 1160285
URL:
Do we need this for every subpage (like de, download, www) or can it be
implemented more centralized?
Marcus
Am 08/22/2011 04:57 PM, schrieb rbirc...@apache.org:
Author: rbircher
Date: Mon Aug 22 14:57:21 2011
New Revision: 1160285
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1160285view=rev
Log:
More centralized it's maybe a better Idea
Am 22.08.11 17:06, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Do we need this for every subpage (like de, download, www) or can it
be implemented more centralized?
Marcus
Am 08/22/2011 04:57 PM, schrieb rbirc...@apache.org:
Author: rbircher
Date: Mon Aug 22 14:57:21
On Aug 22, 2011, at 8:06 AM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Do we need this for every subpage (like de, download, www) or can it be
implemented more centralized?
Yes, we do because we want the project part to be spidered, but not the
openoffice.org parts until they are sanitized. Mostly we need to get
Am 22.08.11 17:05, schrieb Dave Fisher:
Raphael,
Very cool! We should do this in the other parts. I'll check tonight unless
someone else does it.
We have to clean up the page ;-)
I like the look of the DE site.
The Design is not from me, it was from SimonAW
Regards,
Dave
On Aug 22,
On 21.08.2011 19:32, Andy Brown wrote:
Watching the discussions here I have a question.
How hard would it be to find out which forwarding addresses are in
active use, last six months, last year?
Seems to me if an address is active' then it should be maintained for
that user as that is
Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 21.08.2011 19:32, Andy Brown wrote:
Watching the discussions here I have a question.
How hard would it be to find out which forwarding addresses are in
active use, last six months, last year?
Seems to me if an address is active' then it should be maintained for
that
On Aug 22, 2011, at 10:11 AM, Andy Brown wrote:
Mathias Bauer wrote:
On 21.08.2011 19:32, Andy Brown wrote:
Watching the discussions here I have a question.
How hard would it be to find out which forwarding addresses are in
active use, last six months, last year?
Seems to me if an
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
On 21.08.2011 19:32, Andy Brown wrote:
Watching the discussions here I have a question.
How hard would it be to find out which forwarding addresses are in
active use, last six months, last year?
Seems to me if an
On 22.08.2011 19:22, Rob Weir wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:00 PM, Mathias Bauer mathias_ba...@gmx.net wrote:
On 21.08.2011 19:32, Andy Brown wrote:
Watching the discussions here I have a question.
How hard would it be to find out which forwarding addresses are in
active use, last six
Mathias, thank you for pointing out this significant case.
Concerning id@openoffice.org in issue-tracking forms:
If the bugtracker is bugzilla, there is both the CC information and the
submitter (as well as anyone who is listed as having some role in handling the
issue). I know that where I
+1
I volunteer to help with the long-range problems (karma and fu assumed).
--/tj/
On 8/22/2011 14:38, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Mathias, thank you for pointing out this significant case.
Concerningid@openoffice.org in issue-tracking forms:
If the bugtracker is bugzilla, there is both the
TJ Frazier wrote:
+1
I volunteer to help with the long-range problems (karma and fu assumed).
--/tj/
I am willing to help as well. The only question is how do we get access
to the OOo bugzilla to clean it up before moving it to the ASF?
Andy
On 8/22/2011 15:31, Andy Brown wrote:
TJ Frazier wrote:
+1
I volunteer to help with the long-range problems (karma and fu assumed).
--/tj/
I am willing to help as well. The only question is how do we get access
to the OOo bugzilla to clean it up before moving it to the ASF?
Andy
Strongly
TJ Frazier wrote:
On 8/22/2011 15:31, Andy Brown wrote:
TJ Frazier wrote:
+1
I volunteer to help with the long-range problems (karma and fu assumed).
--/tj/
I am willing to help as well. The only question is how do we get access
to the OOo bugzilla to clean it up before moving it to the ASF?
On 08/21/2011 03:28 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I've updated the text on http://www.openoffice.org/mail_list.html;
(with borrowed text from Mathias).
Marcus
That should help a bit I think! :)
Am 08/19/2011 07:57 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 08/19/2011 07:29 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Fri,
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've
write access) please let me know.
Marcus
Am 08/22/2011 11:10 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 08/21/2011 03:28 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
I've updated the text on http://www.openoffice.org/mail_list.html;
(with borrowed
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've
write access) please let me know.
Marcus
If you have access, maybe on the mailing list page on the OOo site [1]
or [2]. If not then post a message to the list that your on.
[1]
Am 08/22/2011 11:45 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've
write access) please let me know.
Marcus
If you have access, maybe on the mailing list page on the OOo site [1]
or [2]. If not then post a message to the
Hi Dennis,
On Sunday, 2011-08-21 09:37:50 -0700, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I note that there is a similar post on the list, with the same date stamp (I
am in utc-0700).
The differences between the one on ooo-dev@i.a.o and the separate one
to my inbox are Bjoern's From address is different
Hi TJ,
On Monday, 2011-08-22 15:36:54 -0400, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 8/22/2011 15:31, Andy Brown wrote:
I am willing to help as well. The only question is how do we get access
to the OOo bugzilla to clean it up before moving it to the ASF?
Strongly suggest we just move it as-is. We *know* how
On Aug 22, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/22/2011 11:45 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've
write access) please let me know.
Marcus
If you have access, maybe on the mailing list page on the
On Aug 22, 2011, at 3:44 PM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi TJ,
On Monday, 2011-08-22 15:36:54 -0400, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 8/22/2011 15:31, Andy Brown wrote:
I am willing to help as well. The only question is how do we get access
to the OOo bugzilla to clean it up before moving it to the ASF?
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 3:36 PM, TJ Frazier tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
On 8/22/2011 15:31, Andy Brown wrote:
TJ Frazier wrote:
+1
I volunteer to help with the long-range problems (karma and fu assumed).
--/tj/
I am willing to help as well. The only question is how do we get access
to
Am 08/23/2011 12:50 AM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Aug 22, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/22/2011 11:45 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've
write access) please let me know.
Marcus
If you have
The changes are good at showing where we are as developers.
The unfortunate point is that us...@openoffice.org is still a functional list
with several posts in a day and the change is hiding that list.
Until there is ooo-users@i.a.o we shouldn't hide users@ooo.
Does anyone think we should wait
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
The changes are good at showing where we are as developers.
The unfortunate point is that us...@openoffice.org is still a functional list
with several posts in a day and the change is hiding that list.
Until there is
Dave Fisher wrote:
On Aug 22, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/22/2011 11:45 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've
write access) please let me know.
Marcus
If you have access, maybe on the mailing
Dave Fisher wrote:
The changes are good at showing where we are as developers.
The unfortunate point is that us...@openoffice.org is still a functional list
with several posts in a day and the change is hiding that list.
Until there is ooo-users@i.a.o we shouldn't hide users@ooo.
Does anyone
On 2011-08-22 5:09 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/23/2011 12:50 AM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Aug 22, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/22/2011 11:45 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and I've
write access)
Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-08-22 5:09 PM Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/23/2011 12:50 AM, schrieb Dave Fisher:
On Aug 22, 2011, at 3:38 PM, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 08/22/2011 11:45 PM, schrieb Andy Brown:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
@all:
If there is somewhere else a place that should be updated (and
So we get two copies any time someone uses that news reader to make a reply?
Can we block the ones that come from the news group and only accept the direct
ones?
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Eike Rathke [mailto:o...@erack.de]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 15:42
To:
On 2011-08-22 7:29 PM Andy Brown wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
There is no link to it anymore on the OOo support or mailing list pages.
How are current users of OOo supposed to find support if the support
lists are no longer listed. Certainly not by posting to this list!
Larry, the link is
And why should we accept newsgroup posts the same as posts from subscribers to
this list? This list is not a newsgroup, but the gmane newsgroup creates the
effect of subscribers without they're being subscribed here.
Why should we be interested in that? Especially with those mangled subject
On Aug 22, 2011, at 6:45 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote:
On 2011-08-22 7:29 PM Andy Brown wrote:
Larry Gusaas wrote:
There is no link to it anymore on the OOo support or mailing list pages.
How are current users of OOo supposed to find support if the support
lists are no longer listed. Certainly
Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
And why should we accept newsgroup posts the same as posts from subscribers to
this list? This list is not a newsgroup, but the gmane newsgroup creates the
effect of subscribers without they're being subscribed here.
Why should we be interested in that? Especially
On 2011-08-22 8:25 PM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
And why should we accept newsgroup posts the same as posts from subscribers to
this list? This list is not a newsgroup, but the gmane newsgroup creates the
effect of subscribers without they're being subscribed here.
Do some research. Read
Reply all doesn't do what you think on this list.
I added you to the CC so you would know this was intended for you as well as
the list.
Nice change of subject though.
My question was meant seriously.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gusaas [mailto:larry.gus...@gmail.com]
I guess any questions about who is subscribed here need no longer be asked,
because we have no idea who is subscribed via one of these aggregations.
Interesting.
-Original Message-
From: Andy Brown [mailto:a...@the-martin-byrd.net]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 19:43
To:
Are you saying that the newsgroup, whatever it is, is designed to send
everything posted on it to ooo-dev ? And it subscribes to ooo-dev so it is
like an aggregator?
I guess if it aggregated and allowed posting, it would end up being a
disconnected conversation if it didn't post here also.
Larry, I meant subject lines like the first one from you earlier today. That's
how it showed up on the ooo-dev@i.a.o list. It didn't come from this list that
way.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Gusaas [mailto:larry.gus...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 22, 2011 18:09
To:
On 2011-08-22 9:44 PM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Reply all doesn't do what you think on this list.
Yes it does. Actions of reply-all also depend on the email client you are using.
If I had used reply-all for this post, a copy would have been posted through gmane, another
would have gone
On Aug 22, 2011, at 8:44 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Are you saying that the newsgroup, whatever it is, is designed to send
everything posted on it to ooo-dev ? And it subscribes to ooo-dev so it is
like an aggregator?
Yes. And it is actually very handy. These services are searchable
On 2011-08-22 10:04 PM Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Larry, I meant subject lines like the first one from you earlier today. That's
how it showed up on the ooo-dev@i.a.o list. It didn't come from this list that
way.
It seems that either gmane or the list-serve for this list was confused by the
44 matches
Mail list logo
