Hello,
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
obviously there was not too much knowledge about the former
role of Team OpenOffice.org and the relationship among Team
OOo and Apache is not really defined right now. I hope the
header of this message does not mean that no further
communication between
Am 20.10.2011 09:41, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
I wrote an email (on 13.10.2011) tovorst...@teamopenoffice.de (your
emai...@openoffice.org in CC) and got no answer. Why? No interest in
communication?
sorry, for not answering yet, our bandwidth is bit overloaded in the
moment, we come back to
Hello Ariel Constenla-Haile
With your help, I solved the Extensions Integration into Installation Set
problem, I would like to ask some questions about build.lst file
build.lst file
myext myextensions: solenv NULL
myext myextensions usr1 - all myextensions_mkout NULL
myext myextensions \
Hi,
Wether to stay with OpenOffice or LibreOffice or to migrate to
LibreOffice or to OpenOffce is a question in the recent past often
occurred, by users, by people doing business with OpenOffice, by the
press. The answer I would like to give is that this question is not
really that relevant
On 10/17/11 6:54 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
New article out by Brian Profitt on IT World:
http://www.itworld.com/it-managementstrategy/213997/apache-disavows-team-openofficeorg-ev
He has a good catch here that this page is still calling for donations
to Team OpenOffice:
On 20 October 2011 10:02, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
Wether to stay with OpenOffice or LibreOffice or to migrate to LibreOffice
or to OpenOffce is a question in the recent past often occurred, by users,
by people doing business with OpenOffice, by the
Has someone already thought about the license for the included JRE?
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/terms/license/index.html
With releases from Sun/Oracle we put the JRE into (many) installation
sets to make it easier for the user with the installation. But it's also
required
Am 20.10.2011 11:02, schrieb Martin Hollmichel:
A call to LibreOffice contributors also to contribute their changes to
Apache as the ASF is the long desired independent foundation for
OpenOffice.org.
of course this should read as a call for all people providing patches,
to do a dual licensing
Hello Martin;
First of all a hats off for the work you#39;ve done in the past for OOo,
it#39;s difficult not to have seen your name around in some documents, and my
best wishes that you can get some agreement to complement the ASF funding.
Given that there has already been a 3.4-RC, I do
On 20 October 2011 12:10, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hello Martin;
First of all a hats off for the work you#39;ve done in the past for OOo,
it#39;s difficult not to have seen your name around in some documents, and
my best wishes that you can get some agreement to complement the
Thanks for joining the ooo-dev@ list!
On 10/20/2011 5:02 AM, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
Hi,
Wether to stay with OpenOffice or LibreOffice or to migrate to
LibreOffice or to OpenOffce is a question in the recent past often
occurred, by users, by people doing business with OpenOffice, by the
Hello,
Martin Hollmichel wrote:
sorry, for not answering yet, our bandwidth is bit overloaded
in the moment, we come back to your email soon,
In the moment? Oh no, this is shortened.
I have written numerous emails to Team OOo e.V. and members of Team OOo e.V.
(and one Fax to), _since
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 1:20 AM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hello;
This header has license issues:
main/agg/inc/agg_conv_gpc.h
It is part of the General Poligon Clipper and unlike the rest of AGG its
free only for non commercial use.
I would delete it myself but my desktop
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
Wether to stay with OpenOffice or LibreOffice or to migrate to LibreOffice
or to OpenOffce is a question in the recent past often occurred, by users,
by people doing business with OpenOffice, by
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Another question that has come up based on review of OpenOffice code.
If a 3rd party module is used as part of the build or test automation,
but is not part of our release, do we care about whether it is
copyleft? Or do we
Forgot my footnote: [1]
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/what_is_a_podling
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
Wether to stay with OpenOffice or
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
One observation, before it slips through. Depending on gpl#39;d compilers
and tools that we don#39;t carry in the release is fine AFAICT.
In our bootstrap procedure we use Dmake (gplv1), which we must remove in
favor of
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi Everyone,
Following up to my earlier note[1] to discuss and gauge interest in a
meetup for the project at ApacheCon.
If you will be attending, and wish to participate, what topics do your
propose we cover? I
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti
pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
snip
I would turn the post you describe into a warning that the mailing list
address will change, including all information about Apache but not
requiring users to take action. I volunteer to consolidate the 12
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:41 PM, Donald Harbison dpharbi...@gmail.comwrote:
You could open the discussion
here on ooo-dev, since there are TDF folks here already.
I don't think this is a good assumption, any more than it would be to note
that there are Apache members on the tdf-discuss
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:02 AM, Martin Hollmichel
martin.hollmic...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi,
Wether to stay with OpenOffice or LibreOffice or to migrate to LibreOffice
or to OpenOffce is a question in the recent past often occurred, by users,
by people doing business with OpenOffice, by the
Hi jianlizhao
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:38:55PM +0800, jianlizhao wrote:
Hello Ariel Constenla-Haile
With your help, I solved the Extensions Integration into Installation Set
problem, I would like to ask some questions about build.lst file
build.lst file
myext myextensions: solenv
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Has someone already thought about the license for the included JRE?
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/terms/license/index.html
With releases from Sun/Oracle we put the JRE into (many) installation sets
to
Am 20.10.2011 14:35, schrieb Shane Curcuru:
This is an interesting idea. The three key questions are:
-- Are there sufficient volunteers in the Apache OpenOffice podling to
actually complete this work in a reasonable time, without impacting
(what I think is) the progress to a new Apache
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
A moderator can do the above, but this still will generate a
confirmation email, to f...@bar.com, in English:
This would seem to be better than simply subscribing everyone
silently...making it effectively an opt-in cross
Wonder what is the future of the UNO scripting framework since there are
many languages with different languages like Python, Beanshell and other
scriptings that OOo ships. OOo builds have a full Python 2.6 version and
also IDE like Rhino and other applications that are stringly attached to the
Hi Rob,
This is excellent.
On Oct 20, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti
pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
snip
I would turn the post you describe into a warning that the mailing list
address will change, including all information about Apache
Actually, upon closer examination this is a non issue, it can be removed but
it is not urgent. I will do it when I am back.
Pedro.
Am 10/20/2011 05:38 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Has someone already thought about the license for the included JRE?
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/terms/license/index.html
With releases from Sun/Oracle we put
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 10/20/2011 05:38 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Has someone already thought about the license for the included JRE?
Hmm ...
We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have not
drawn a roadmap about it beyond the initial migration list. I think we will
have to open BZ issues for those.
The gtk/qt issue is rather critcal: I do not think there is previous history
among Apache projects
Shane Curcuru wrote on Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 08:35:57 -0400:
However, there is a somewhat related precedent in the Apache
Subversion project, which shipped code as a podling under it's
previous license before creating a fully ASF blessed release. As
a widely used and mature project before it
Am 10/20/2011 06:02 PM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 10/20/2011 05:38 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Has someone already thought about the
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Rob,
This is excellent.
On Oct 20, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti
pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
snip
I would turn the post you describe into a warning that
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Marcus (OOo) marcus.m...@wtnet.de wrote:
Am 10/20/2011 06:02 PM, schrieb Alexandro Colorado:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Marcus (OOo)marcus.m...@wtnet.de
wrote:
Am 10/20/2011 05:38 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Marcus
The Sun/Oracle OO.o distributions satisfy the requirements for installation on
Microsoft Windows. The LO distributions do as well. Of course, including JVM
in Sun/Oracle distributions was a no-brainer.
Since these are distributed in binary form only and the appropriate NOTICE
information
The moderator-issued subscription e-mail seems useful, especially because it
is done as an opt-in (requiring confirmation from the recipient). If the list
to be retired was informed of this process, its near-automatic operation could
be considered.
- Dennis
THINKING OUT LOUD
With regard to
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
The moderator-issued subscription e-mail seems useful, especially because it
is done as an opt-in (requiring confirmation from the recipient). If the list
to be retired was informed of this process, its
Hi all,
is here someone who can unsubscribe an user from us...@de.openoffice.org?
Please look at
http://openoffice.org/projects/de/lists/users/archive/2011-10/message/208
User FAX Praxis praxis.kun...@gmx.de tries to unsubscribe without
success and all hints couldn't solve the problem.
Op 19-10-2011 14:00, Rob Weir schreef:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I'm not going to dig into all the details of how a vote is called in the ASF.
In posting this I am not asking for the current vote to be recalled,
there is no need.
I am
On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Rob,
This is excellent.
On Oct 20, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti
pesce...@openoffice.org wrote:
snip
I
Rob,
As were you, I was looking at the value of the ezmlm confirmation e-mail and
its opt-in requirement for moderator-initiated subscriptions. It seemed to me
that would provide a clean opt-in point for users of lists about to be
retired.
The process for the moderator-initiated subscription
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
On Oct 20, 2011, at 9:20 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:48 AM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Rob,
This is excellent.
On Oct 20, 2011, at 7:57 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:14 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
Rob,
As were you, I was looking at the value of the ezmlm confirmation e-mail and
its opt-in requirement for moderator-initiated subscriptions. It seemed to me
that would provide a clean opt-in point for users
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:41 PM, floris v floris...@gmail.com wrote:
Op 19-10-2011 14:00, Rob Weir schreef:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Ross Gardler
rgard...@opendirective.com wrote:
I'm not going to dig into all the details of how a vote is called in the
ASF.
In posting this I am
I did not assert anything about how the auto-subscription offer is done. I did
note that the lists may already be in the custody of a US-hosted system, so
transnational border crossing is not involved in any movement of subscribers.
Since this is an opt-in, not an opt-out procedure, it might
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
I did not assert anything about how the auto-subscription offer is done. I
did note that the lists may already be in the custody of a US-hosted system,
so transnational border crossing is not involved in any
Do any of these lists have publicly accessible archives? It would be a
shame to lose those, when the lists shut down. I suspect messages about OOo
1.x are pretty much dead, or at least the software is pretty much
obsoleted. Those archives might be less useful.
Just wondering..
--
This Apt
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
Do any of these lists have publicly accessible archives? It would be a
shame to lose those, when the lists shut down. I suspect messages about OOo
1.x are pretty much dead, or at least the software is pretty much
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:14 PM, TJ Frazier tjfraz...@cfl.rr.com wrote:
On 10/18/2011 18:53, Kay Schenk wrote:
On 10/18/2011 02:58 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
massive snippery
snip-ectomy
Why not have both Apache Open Office
and OpenOffice.org?
1) We already have both and people are
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do any of these lists have publicly accessible archives? It would be a
shame to lose those, when the lists shut down. I suspect messages about
OOo
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:31 PM, Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:28 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com
wrote:
Do any of these lists have publicly accessible archives? It would be a
Hi Rob,
Your technical item was an interesting distraction. It may have a use. I think
below you give a good explanation of your plan.
Let me express a recommendation that ought to alleviate my concerns about the
full MX issues.
I am still concerned that we may be abandoning a database of
This question came up a few months ago, when we initially started the
podling. The legacy OOo project had many mailing lists which were for
non-English list traffic. This included user lists as well as project
lists (marketing and translation mainly). Many of these lists are
showing up in my
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Dave Fisher dave2w...@comcast.net wrote:
Hi Rob,
Your technical item was an interesting distraction. It may have a use. I
think below you give a good explanation of your plan.
Let me express a recommendation that ought to alleviate my concerns about the
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:04 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
This question came up a few months ago, when we initially started the
podling. The legacy OOo project had many mailing lists which were for
non-English list traffic.
snip
So that's my proposal. I have my asbestos underwear
I believe the next-action on administration of the ooo-bz is ours. It looks
like there need to be some @apache.org administrators, and the hierarchy of
administration with respect to the various categories also needs to be dealt
with.
From the list that Mark Thomas provided, I only see 2
A strong +1 - this is consistent with my memory of what was discussed three
months ago.
On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
This question came up a few months ago, when we initially started the
podling. The legacy OOo project had many mailing lists which were for
non-English list
On Oct 20, 2011, at 12:20 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I believe the next-action on administration of the ooo-bz is ours. It looks
like there need to be some @apache.org administrators, and the hierarchy of
administration with respect to the various categories also needs to be dealt
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
snip
It is not clear to me that either of those bundlings in binary releases is
explicitly tolerated by the information that is provided at
http://apache.org/legal/resolved.html. There seems to be no help in
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hmm ...
We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have not
drawn a roadmap about it beyond the initial migration list. I think we will
have to open BZ issues for those.
The gtk/qt issue is rather
I don't understand what this means:
I think we need a languages properties file with items like BZ, Forum, ML,
Language Pack, etc.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 12:29
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hmm ...
We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have not
drawn a roadmap about it beyond the initial migration list. I think
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:01 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 9:06 AM, Robert Burrell Donkin
snip
At Apache, a source release is (just) what's in version control when
the release is cut, is canonical and mandatory. Other artifacts follow
the binary release
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 4:07 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pedro Giffuni p...@apache.org wrote:
Hmm ...
We have discussed some of the things that must be replaced but we have not
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
One last question, based on OpenOffice 3rd party dependencies.
We have a good number of MPL dependencies. I'm trying, with some
difficulty, to interpret what we can do based on the description here:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:27 PM, Sam Ruby ru...@intertwingly.net wrote:
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
One last question, based on OpenOffice 3rd party dependencies.
We have a good number of MPL dependencies. I'm trying, with some
difficulty, to
On 10/20/2011 10:14 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Rob,
As were you, I was looking at the value of the ezmlm confirmation e-mail and
its opt-in requirement for moderator-initiated subscriptions. It seemed to me
that would provide a clean opt-in point for users of lists about to be
retired.
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
There is no intent to hoard. From talking to developers on this
project I get the sense that they want to upstream patches more than
was done previously. But contributing a patch is no guarantee that it
will be integrated by
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:48 PM, Donald Whytock dwhyt...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
There is no intent to hoard. From talking to developers on this
project I get the sense that they want to upstream patches more than
was done
On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
On 10/20/2011 10:14 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
Rob,
As were you, I was looking at the value of the ezmlm confirmation e-mail and
its opt-in requirement for moderator-initiated subscriptions. It seemed to
me
that would provide a
On 10/20/2011 03:22 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
-- snipped --
My guess here is that it is highly unlikely that lists of users or
the forwarding map will be made available. The best approach for
contacting these users is to send messages to
-- snipped --
My guess here is that it is highly unlikely that lists of users or
the forwarding map will be made available. The best approach for
contacting these users is to send messages to the various ML.
Also, there is no imminent shutdown of the ML infrastructure or any
of the other
Am 10/21/2011 12:27 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On 10/20/2011 03:22 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
On Oct 20, 2011, at 2:44 PM, Andrew Rist wrote:
-- snipped --
My guess here is that it is highly unlikely that lists of users or
the forwarding map will be made available. The best approach for
I want to point out another case that I have seen in practice, including in the
construction and deployment of binary releases for OpenOffice.org. This
discussion may impinge on that practice in terms of how it can be retained in
Apache OpenOffice.org binary releases and their deployment.
-
I think that you and I aren't using properties the same way in this context.
I was using it by analogy to the way a real-estate agent or a rental property
manager would use it. I thought I cleared that up.
Can you explain what you mean without using property and being specific to
the
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton orc...@apache.org wrote:
I want to point out another case that I have seen in practice, including in
the construction and deployment of binary releases for OpenOffice.org. This
discussion may impinge on that practice in terms of how it can
Well, that will teach me to read the wrong list first. Rob already identified
the quasi case, etc., on ooo-dev at least. I hereby cease cross-list posting.
-Original Message-
From: Dennis E. Hamilton [mailto:orc...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 16:54
To:
It doesn't matter Rob.. You already covered this case over here and I hadn't
seen that when I replied over there.
- Dennis
-Original Message-
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, October 20, 2011 17:11
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Clarification
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 8:20 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
dennis.hamil...@acm.org wrote:
It doesn't matter Rob.. You already covered this case over here and I hadn't
seen that when I replied over there.
OK. That may explain it. I was vainly searching for what you were
saying new. I assumed you
openoffice installation program has hundreds of megabytes, which includes
Writer, Calc and Draw, and other modules.
Due to hardware resource constraints, combined with the actual demand,
packaged to meet the requirements write, how packaged write it?How to modify
the SCP2 project?
On 10/20/2011 11:28 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Wolf Halton wolf.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
Do any of these lists have publicly accessible archives? It would be a
shame to lose those, when the lists shut down. I suspect messages about OOo
1.x are pretty much dead, or at
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 7:47 PM, jianlizhao jianlizh...@hotmail.com wrote:
openoffice installation program has hundreds of megabytes, which includes
Writer, Calc and Draw, and other modules.
Due to hardware resource constraints, combined with the actual demand,
packaged to meet the
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:56 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/17/2011 07:32 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Shane Curcurua...@shanecurcuru.org
wrote:
On 10/14/2011 7:56 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I've been pondering what it takes to
Hi;
In case you are not aware, Google has a code-in program where teenagers get
involved in open-source projects.
http://www.google-melange.com/gci/homepage/google/gci2011
Compared to a GSoC, this usually involves tasks that are more related to
documentation or alternative task rather than
85 matches
Mail list logo
